User talk:Ydier mot

Welcome to User talk:Ydier mot

Stephanoona[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Stephanoona) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. For more information, please read WP:NFT. Thanks, Danski14^(talk) 03:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Tom Reidy[edit]

A tag has been placed on Tom Reidy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Deranged bulbasaur 07:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Tom Reidy. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Deranged bulbasaur 10:27, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Tom Reidy. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Davewild 10:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jock 'One Eye' McPie Speedy Deletion[edit]

A tag has been placed on Jock 'One Eye' McPie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Maurog 11:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UPNPAD[edit]

A tag has been placed on UPNPAD, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:UPNPAD. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. exolon 03:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Ryan Hunter[edit]

A tag has been placed on Ryan Hunter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. exolon 03:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Dilan Pathirana[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dilan Pathirana, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. exolon 03:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of UPNPAD[edit]

A tag has been placed on UPNPAD, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:UPNPAD. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Corvus cornix 01:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read WP:COI. Corvus cornix 01:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as UPNPAD, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. As noted above, please read the guidelines on conflict of interest. Wikipedia is not an instrument for self-promotion. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look a rare endangered species of african caterpillar found only in australia and new zealand[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Look a rare endangered species of african caterpillar found only in australia and new zealand) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. NeoNerd 09:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Look an eagle) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Maurog 11:50, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop with the nonsense[edit]

Most of us are trying to write and improve an encyclopedia here. Please stop creating nonsense pages, which will just be deleted but also waste all our time. DMacks 01:09, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:JohnWest-bear.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:JohnWest-bear.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks 01:19, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating nonsense pages[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Look an eagle, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 01:36, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Eastregion[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Eastregion, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastregion. Thank you. Icestorm815 (talk) 02:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Whiplash the Band[edit]

A tag has been placed on Whiplash the Band requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WebHamster 03:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Whiplash the Band, you will be blocked. WebHamster 10:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 day as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 03:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]