User talk:Yerevantsi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hello and welcome to my talk page!

Archive
Archives
Archive 1 (Sep 2012 – Jul 2013)
Archive 2 (Jul 2013 – Jan 2014)
Archive 3 (Jan – Jul 2014)
Archive 4 (Jul 2014 – Nov 2014)

How come?[edit]

Hey Yerevantsi,

I wonder, how come all these links and references, which were numerous, are nonsensical, while specifically the two you added are not? Some specific reason that labels them all as unusable? Most are indeed not good at all, but could be supportive. That being said, the links you added are between 5 and 8 years old; maybe something more up-to-date is better? I will ask an user who lives in Iran as well and thus can read and write in Farsi to provide some proper up to date stuff. Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 18:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

In the modern times, there have never been half a million Armenians in Iran. It's a ridiculous figure. Plus, it comes from an atlas. There haven't been much demographic changes in 5-8 years in Iran. Citing a 2012 that is clearly false is no better than citing a 2007 scholastic article on the subject specifically. christianexaminer.com article cites "Compass Direct News of Santa Ana, Calif., which provides reports on Christians worldwide who are persecuted for their faith." it doesn't seem to be a reliable source. Neither is Ajam Media Collective (ajammc.com). After revewing the rest of the sources, two do seem to be appropriate (Semerdjian, The Hill and Mirzoyan 2010). Both of these two books are about Armenians, with the first one being specifically on Iranian Armenians. --Երևանցի talk 08:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
True, the number of 500,000 is clear nonsense. The problem is however that Iran hasn't had any reliable census for decades, which makes us have to search for multiple reliable sources to get a rough indication of their numbers. Its like with the Azeris in Iran. Most sources in the world state a number that comprises 24-30% of Iran's population, but for years (until some days ago, actually) the only somewhat recognized institutional sourcing provided by the CIA world factbook stated a number of 16% (even though until some years ago they held the number stabily on 25%). Thanks for re-adding the other two sources. Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 21:31, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Çınar and Arıkan article pdf[edit]

Hi, I can send you a full text pdf of:

to fulfill your request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request/Archive16#Nationalist Action Party. Please use Special:EmailUser to email me so that I can reply with the pdf as an attachment. Regards, Worldbruce (talk) 03:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

@Worldbruce: please send it to YerevantsiWiki@yandex.com --Երևանցի talk 08:23, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mount Aragats, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shirak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

About WT:VA/E[edit]

There are still many proposals in that talk page lacking other Wikipedians' concern, e.g. knee, and if there will be no other votes in the near future they would be removed, so if you have time please vote in these proposals, especially Mount Ararat and Armenian Apostolic Church, which are proposed by me.--RekishiEJ (talk) 12:32, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grey Wolves (organization), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zaman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

POTD notification[edit]

Hi Yerevantsi,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Roman East 50-en.svg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on December 23, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-12-23. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:31, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Տուշպա[edit]

Բարև՛ Ձեզ դուք հեռացնել Տուշպա քաղաք անունը ստացել պատմական Հայաստանի մայրաքաղաք ցուցակում, սակայն Կաղապար այս անունով դեռ այնտեղ. Ես ուզում եմ իմանալ, թե հեռացնելու այս անունը ճիշտ է կամ սխալ է տեղի ունեցել, շնորհակալ եմModern Sciences (talk) 01:03, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Regarding this line[edit]

Hello Yerevantsi,

Regarding the first line of the body of the Armenian Genocide page;

"Armenia had come largely under Ottoman rule during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries."

Is Greater Armenia meant here in general? (Which would be incorrect) Or just Western Armenia? Just thought of hopping by for a sec to get your opinion.

Oh, also, in case you also happen to celebrate it these days; a Merry Christmas to you! If not, I will probably re-mention it again to you in some days ;-)

Bests and take care,

- LouisAragon (talk) 05:30, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

The term "Armenia" referred to a large area, which he can conventionally call Greater Armenia here. Yes, it should say Western Armenia, because Eastern Armenia was never entirely conquered by the Turks and remained largely under Persian rule until 1828. --Երևանցի talk 08:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
I disagree, and have returned it to just "Armenia". The term Western Armenia as used in the article refers to the result of the division of Armenia created by the Ottoman conquest of most of historical Armenia. So, it did not exist before that event - there was not a "Western Armenia" entity to be conquered. But better take this to the article's talk page. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 21:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Because you disagree, you decided to just plainly revert it, instead of perhaps placing a comment on the link that I provided in the edit summary, that stated that we had some kind of a discussion. Great approach. I appreciate your concerns, however, I believe there are unfortunately problems and incorrectnesses regarding your argument. The concept of East and Western Armenia has always been roughly synonymous to the concept at the time of the Genocide, be it that Eastern Armenia had by then just come for about a 100 years in Russian hands, from 1828 to be precise. With your edit you're unfortunately erraneaously stating as if a notion of Western Armenia (which has always been comprising roughly the same territory) was only in use from the early 20th century, and differed to that in terms of concept as how it has been used for earlier periods of Armenian history. Scholars have been using the terms "Western and Eastern Armenia" for numerous era's in Armenian history, notably and only for when historical Armenia was split between the Byzantines-Sasanids, the Safavids-Ottomans, and later when Russia conquered Eastern Armenia from Iran, and the territory became thus divided between Russia and the Ottomans. I believe 1915 or the years prior to that makes the concept/the territory it roughly comprise(d) no different (in the very sense of the word) from how it was used earlier. Furthermore, the Ottomans indeed never entirely conquered Eastern Armenia, or held it for any extended period, thus theres a clear distinction. Western Armenia, from the 16th century and on, virtully literally equals to the Ottoman/Turkish dominated parts of historical Armenia. - LouisAragon (talk) 14:42, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
There are serious flaws in your reasoning. However, this page is not the proper forum. Would you please use the article's talk page. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 16:44, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Grant High School (Los Angeles)[edit]

You might be interested in Grant High School (Los Angeles): it has a lot of Armenian students and there had been some incidents of racial tension with the Mexican and Latino students. I wonder if there's more info about the Armenian students and their backgrounds.

On the Armenian Wikipedia I am putting out a request for somebody to start an Armenian stub about the school. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yerevan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erebuni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Former Armenian Cathedral in Anteb[edit]

Do you want to add information to this article? Or rewrite it if it doesn't please you?--Kuschln (talk) 16:44, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Do you speak Turkish? Saint Gregory the Illuminator Church of Kayseri - I created this one, too. It is the only still functioning Armenian church in Central Anatolia. Do you want to create an English article about it? And do you have a photograph of it?--84.142.117.183 (talk) 15:57, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

POTD notification[edit]

Hi Yerevantsi,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Félix Nadar 1820-1910 portraits Jules Verne (restoration).jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on February 8, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-02-08. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Kalustyan's[edit]

Hi Yerevantsi,

Kalustyan's has an interesting history. The area around Kalustyan's is now called "Curry Hill" in New York City. It is a direct result of Mr Kalustyan's shop. Thus Kalustyan's has played a historic role in transformation of an entire neighborhood in New York City.

Kalustyan's was regarded to be an Indian grocery store. Even today, to some extent it is. Kalustyan's was the forerunner of the hundreds of Indian grocery stores in USA today.

Please allow me a few days to complete the article.

Incidentally one of my friends also has the same first name as yours -Yerevan.

Malaiya (talk) 01:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

POTD notification[edit]

Hi Yerevantsi,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Victor Hugo by Étienne Carjat 1876 - full.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on February 26, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-02-26. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Otto von Bismarck[edit]

Bismarck referred to Socialists specifically, among others, as "Enemies of the Reich". He tried to outlaw them and almost succeeded in doing do. Please do not make content edits -- and reversions, no less -- when you have no idea of what you're talking about. BMK (talk) 19:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

It doesn't matter how referred to them. Many, if not most, conservatives consider Obama their enemy and a traitor. Doesn't mean we have to use those terms in Wikipedia. Why not use quote Bismarck instead ? Երևանցի talk 19:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
I've provided the necessary sources, that ends it. BMK (talk) 19:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Armenian[edit]

Yerevantsi,

Eastern and Western are always relevant, regardless of the fact Eastern is primarily spoken in Armenia. To list something in the Eastern spelling then call it Armenian is intellectually dishonest. It makes a non-speaker believe there is only one form of Armenian. I am giving you a kind vandalism warning.

Western Armenia is irrelevant whether you like it or not. All official and unofficial literature in the Republic of Armenia is in Eastern Armenian. Try to familiarize yourself with basic Wikipedia guidelines before giving me a baseless "warning". --Երևանցի talk 19:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

It does not matter. In this world, Western Armenian is still spoken. "In the Republic of Armenia" doesn't matter. You're not too good with logic, are you? What is officially spoken in Armenia has nothing to do with the Wikipedia page. If that were the case, a page on Western Armenian would not exist. Your opinion does not trump reality. And, you're also quite wrong, as all church documentation is in Krapar or Western Armenian. You familiarize yourself.

So what ? Western Armenia has no relevance in Gyumri and all of modern-day Republic of Armenia. Yes it does, Gyumri is part of the Republic of Armenia and not a country where Western Armenian is an officially recognized spelling. Also, the "Western Armenian" spelling of Yerevan (Երեւան) is in reality the Classical Armenian spelling. Iranian Armenians do not speak Western Armenian, but they still use the classical orthography. I've added that spelling to the note next to its pronunciation in the intro. The church is highly irrelevant here. And even it was, how does that make Western Armenian relevant. Do you know the difference between Grabar and Western Armenian? because you seem to confuse the two. I agree that the classical spelling is somewhat relevant because it was in use for centuries. But why Western Armenian? I was the one who added the classical spelling to the First Republic of Armenia, United Armenia, Aram Manukian and other articles' intros, because the relevance is evident in those cases. Western Armenian (not classical) spelling of Gyumri is not in any way. --Երևանցի talk 06:28, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Again, you fail to have logic. The fact of whether or not it is spoken is Gyumri or Armenia DOES NOT MATTER. It is a language spoken by millions and still has relevance in the world as a whole. I do know the difference between Krapar and Western - they are more closely related than any other dialects of Armenian. Krapar is the purest Armenian spoken, and western is closest to it. So, I don't know what your vendetta is on Western Armenian, but I will keep reverting the changes. I will, also, post a 3rd and final warning if either of the changes are reverted, and then bring admins into the dispute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HyeSK (talkcontribs) 20:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Yerevantsi - It's time to bring a moderator into this. You just have a chip on your shoulder, for some reason, towards Western Armenian. It will be, and has been, always relevant. Have a little respect for the most widely spoken dialect of Armenian. And, use a little logic once in a while. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HyeSK (talkcontribs) 10:46, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

So, I am going to make a formal mediation request. Do you agree to this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HyeSK (talkcontribs) 13:45, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Again, I had to revert back to Western Armenian on the Yerevan article. I am not the only person to tell you your changes are disingenuous. Please refrain from changing the classification which is factual. HyeSK (talk) 22:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC)HyeSK

@HyeSK:, I reverted your edit on the Yerevan page as I have to concur with Yerevantsi that your revision brings in simply obsolete information. The Western Armenian translation has no relevance on the article. Eastern Armenian is the official dialect of the Republic of Armenia (of which Yerevan is the capital), and the utter vast majority of the Armenians in Armenia speak the Eastern variant of the language. Western Armenian is virtually exclusively spoken in the diaspora. If you still think that his revision is incorrect, then please bring your concerns to WP:ANI. Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 01:02, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

@LouisAragon - I will be reverting them back, and it is NOT AT ALL irrelevant and I have made that perfectly clear. And, your information is completely incorrect. Western is more widely spoken. Also I didn't know the number of speakers made a language more or less relevant. HyeSK (talk) 15:06, 7 August 2016 (UTC)HyeSK

@HyeSK:, the only thing that you made clear is your own POV and personal stance. I'm dearly sorry, but Wikipedia doesn't work like that. It's based on what the reliable sources tell us. Therefore, unfortunately your own opinion accounts for nothing here. Oh, consider yourself reported if you revert it again, for continuously and blatantly violating WP:RS, WP:WAR and WP:BRD. That is, if you continue to revert without presenting any reliable sources that back up the so-called "high significance" of Western Armenian in Yerevan or the Armenian Republic as a whole the way you present it. As well as, most importantly, bringing sources to show that it's an official language of the Republic of Armenia, as those are the main merits to be included. If you're able to present reliable sources that back this up, then we obviously won't have any objections against its inclusion. In fact we would support it. Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 16:25, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
@Louisaragon: - Actually, that is what you have done. Only your personal opinion is what you are using. How does the official language of Armenia change what Western Armenia is and that it is the most widely spoken. Your reasons for changing it are blatantly false, which is why you have ignored it. Report me, go ahead. I will return the favor. HyeSK (talk) 21:21, 7 August 2016 (UTC)HyeSK

Orphaned non-free image File:Paruyr Sevak.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paruyr Sevak.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Armenian Quarter[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Armenian Quarter you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 23:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Permstrump (talk) 10:08, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ivan Aivazovsky[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ivan Aivazovsky you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 04:40, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ivan Aivazovsky[edit]

The article Ivan Aivazovsky you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Ivan Aivazovsky for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 11:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Armenian Quarter[edit]

The article Armenian Quarter you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Armenian Quarter for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 19:01, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations, and thanks for making a great article ;) --Al Ameer (talk) 19:32, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind words. --Երևանցի talk 07:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Suggestion for DYK[edit]

Hi Yerevantsi,

For the Aivazovsky DYK, I'd suggest placing the $$$ amount (i.e. "$5.2 million") on the ALT2 hook. It might be more catchy like that. People like big numbers. What do you think? @The Almightey Drill: as reviewer, your opinion is also welcome. Étienne Dolet (talk) 05:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

I agree. I've added the amount. --Երևանցի talk 07:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Armenian–Azerbaijani clashes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Status quo ante (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Casualties[edit]

Regarding your edit here [1], per the newest source there is here [2] Armenia is claiming 300 dead Azeri and 2,000 wounded. Also, one of the sources you inserted was a twitter post. Per Wikipedia policy, Twitter is generally not allowed to be used as a source because it is not verifiable. And even if it was, both the post and your other source are dated from April 5th. The newer source is from April 6th, which makes the other two sources (including the post) out-of-date and Wiki policy requires us to use newer up-to-date sources. Hope all this clears it up. Cheers! EkoGraf (talk) 10:30, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

EkoGraf I didn't cite just a random Twitter account. It's the official account of the NKR defense ministry. I agree with using the latest one, but how is an article covering an Armenian diaspora protest a good source? If that's really the case (out of the 2,000 casulties only 300 being dead) then why can't you find a better source? I'm not saying it's wrong. --Երևանցի talk 19:22, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Its an Armenian source and as that it goes under the category of Armenian claims. Just as we put cited Azeri sources under Azeri claims. There are several other Armenian sources claiming the 300 dead, but this is the only source (so far) that I could find claiming the number of wounded (2,000). As for the twitter post read here WP:TWITTER. EkoGraf (talk) 20:11, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

news.am[edit]

  • The news website http://news.am is a useful source of information; when did its manager stop letting its readers add comments to its news articles? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:18, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Honestly, I don't follow Armenian news sites closely. In any case, from my experience, most Armenian internet users usually comment under Facebook posts of news articles instead of news websites. --Երևանցի talk 09:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Armenian Quarter[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 17 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Armenian Quarter, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jerusalem's first printing press was established in the Armenian Quarter? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Armenian Quarter. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Armenian Quarter), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:02, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Ivan Aivazovsky[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 17 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ivan Aivazovsky, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the painter Ivan Aivazovsky (work pictured) threw away his Ottoman medals to protest large-scale massacres of Armenians? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ivan Aivazovsky. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ivan Aivazovsky), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 17:46, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

POTD notification[edit]

Hi Yerevantsi,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Antoine-François Callet - Louis XVI, roi de France et de Navarre (1754-1793), revêtu du grand costume royal en 1779 - Google Art Project.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on May 10, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-05-10. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Crimea[edit]

According to general consensus on most reliable English sources Crimea is not a "natural part of Russia" but a part of Ukraine annexed by Russia without Ukraine's permission. This should be mentioned on articles dealing with Crimea. Hence your edit here was not up to Wikipedia standards. But I corrected this already. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 01:37, 5 May 2016 (UTC) — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 01:37, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Nobody said Crimea is a "natural part" of Russia. Whether we like it or not, Crimea is controlled by Russia. I wouldn't mind if Crimea was a separate section or under (a new) Ukraine section. Not an issue for me at all. --Երևանցի talk 06:41, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Since the accusation of Grey Wolves activities in Crimea was only in Russian media it makes more logic sense to keep the section on Crimea where it is now. Thanks for your cooperative spirit! — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 15:42, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aram Manukian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Statesman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring and refusal to discuss[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jeppiz (talk) 09:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Any reasons?[edit]

[3] [4] such your edits need explanation and consensus at talk. Deletion of native names is controversial (WP:Idontlikeit). OptimusView (talk) 09:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
For Jamala, see Talk:Jamala#Armenian_transliteration_of_name. Armenian is not her native language. As for Balasanyan, the Armenian spelling of his name is pretty much redundant in the template. It's already placed in the intro. If you really care, you can add it back to the template. It's just a style issue for me. --Երևանցի talk 09:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested[edit]

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Listing spellings of Armenian items in Western and Eastern Armenian.". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 25 May 2016.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 14:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected[edit]

The request for formal mediation concerning Listing spellings of Armenian items in Western and Eastern Armenian., to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Moved Armenians in 1826-1829[edit]

Hey Yerevantsi, I was wondering whether you have more knowledge about this matter. I'm trying to pinpoint down how many Armenians moved/were moved in the aftermath of the 1826-1828 Russo-Persian War and the 1828-1829 Russo-Turkish War, as I want to bring and keep some consistency on these articles. However, the numbers given are kinda inconsistent regarding the matter. F.e, this reference by Herzig & Kurkchiyan (2004), p.66 states that "As many as 45,000 from Persia and 100,000 from the Ottoman Empire left for Russian-controlled territory after the end of the 1826-8 Russo-Persian War and 1828-9 Russo-Ottoman Wars." I've read other estimates given by other reliable authors as well. Any opinion/idea as for what numbers we should keep it at? Have you, by any chance, stored some references/information about this? Thanks in advance. - LouisAragon (talk) 15:35, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Those numbers seem pretty reasonable to me. I do recall reading some other estimates. I'll try to do some research and will let you now my opinion. --Երևանցի talk 18:11, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
@LouisAragon: Another authoritative book, Hacikyan, Agop Jack; Basmajian, Gabriel; Franchuk, Edward S.; Ouzounian, Nourhan (2005). The Heritage of Armenian Literature: From the eighteenth century to modern times. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. p. 10. ISBN 9780814332214. , gives the total number of Armenian migrants at 130,000 in 1828-30 from both Persia and Turkey. I think it's ok to use the numbers given in Herzig & Kurkchiyan. --Երևանցի talk 10:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Aight, thanks for your opinion. I appreciate it. - LouisAragon (talk) 18:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Nice expansion of Grégoire-Pierre Agagianian. Your hard work doesn't go unnoticed. Étienne Dolet (talk) 04:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! --Երևանցի talk 18:29, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Բարև :)[edit]

Բարև, Երևանցի ջան: Ինչպե՞ս ես: Զարմանալի է, որ անգլերեն Վիքիպեդիայում ես խմբագրում: Շնորհակալություն հայկական թեմատիկան զարգացնելու համար: --TonJ (talk) 18:29, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Բարև, հիանալի: Իսկ ինչու՞ է զարմանալի: Անգլերեն Վիքիպեդիայի լսարանը ամենամեծն է և իմ անգլերենի իմացությունը փորձում եմ լավագույնս ծառայեցնել հայերիս՝ անգլախոսներին ավելի լավ ներկայացնելուն: --Երևանցի talk 20:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Շնորհակալություն անգնահատելի գործիդ համար ;-)--TonJ (talk) 12:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Armenian Genocide denial[edit]

Hello, in my large series of edits over the last three days to Armenian Genocide denial in which I sought to rid the article of its abhorrent genocide apologism and pro-Ottoman bias, I also changed "Cyprus" in its mention of having genocide denial laws to "(southern) Cyprus", as I was convinced no such law could exist in Northern Cyprus. I believe you took offense here, perhaps thinking I advocated the self-declared state's legitimacy, which was not my intention. Could you please clarify? Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 20:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

@Prinsgezinde: Thank you for your edits. I believe you made the contested changes in good faith. But the term "southern Cyprus" is usually used to legitimize Turkey's occupation of Cyprus' north. See here "Turkey, which does not recognise the Republic of Cyprus, and the Turkish Cypriot administration of the northern part of the island, do not accept the Republic's rule over the whole island and refer to it not by its international name, but as the "Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus"." e.g. [5] [6] [7]
The official and, in my opinion acceptable, term is "Republic of Cyprus". --Երևանցի talk 16:39, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Ah, I was unfamiliar with that usage. The original sentence was: "The denial of the Armenian Genocide is officially outlawed in Italy, Switzerland, Greece, Cyprus and Slovakia." The fact that it didn't even mention that, if true, such Armenian Genocide denial would only be illegal in these countries because any form of genocide denial was illegal obviously intended to portray the old "Armenian conspiracy" as being powerful enough to "censor" countries. Anyway, in changing its tone I reasoned with myself that de facto Turkey would never allow person in Turkish-occupied Cyprus to be prosecuted for denying the Armenian Genocide. But I fully understand your point, and agree that we shouldn't promote it. Frankly, the page was filled with so many misleading and blatantly wrong claims that I'm not surprised I missed ones like this. The lead itself previously contained the apologistic line: "The Turkish government acknowledges that during World War I many Armenians died, but counters that Muslim Turks died as well, and claims that the number of Armenian victims has been inflated, and that massacres were committed by both sides as a result of inter-ethnic violence and the wider conflict of World War I." The whole article was a mess and frankly I was surprised it had been in that state for so long. Then I noticed articles like Turkish lobby in the United States and Armenian lobby in the United States (which previously called it one of the three "most effective ethnic lobbies in the United States" along with the Israeli and Greek ones), and POV-forks like Ottoman Armenian casualties and Ottoman Armenian population that carefully say "Western scholars say X"... It's pretty bad. I never know what to do about such large-scale problems but I'm glad people agree with most of the changes. Thanks for the input! Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 18:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rome and Jerusalem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magnum opus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Duduk[edit]

I've seen your edits on the duduk page. You are 100% correct. The true name of the duduk is the ծիրանափող/tsiranapogh. I don't understand the debate over this, outside of Azeris and Turks who want to Turkify everything they can. HyeSK (talk) 20:22, 27 June 2016 (UTC)HyeSK

Image position[edit]

Hello Yerevantsi Why are you changing the position of my father's photograph on this page? You have twice moved it to the right when it looks far better on the left. Please give me an explanation. Philip Stokes Pdstokes (talk) 08:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

It doesn't matter if he was your father or not. The standard Wikipedia way of doing things is putting the default picture on the right side. But I couldn't care less. Do whatever you want. --Երևանցի talk 08:52, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Khojaly Massacre recognition[edit]

Hi Yerevantsi. I have a question concerning the discussion about deleting the article Khojaly Massacre recognition. User Coffee has stated that there was "no consensus". However as far as I see the conclusion was to either delete or merge it (mainly to delete it), but definitely not to keep it, which is the current stage of affairs. How do you suggest to proceed? I have already contacted User Coffee on July 6, but no response yet. Thanks, Markus2685 (talk) 22:43, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Hasmik Karapetyan (Kirmizian)[edit]

Yerevantsi,

Hasmik and I were married a year ago and she took my last name. Stop reverting the page. HyeSK (talk) 09:26, 25 August 2016 (UTC)