Jump to content

User talk:Yoga Widya Prasetyo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Non-free rationale for File:BKSpecialGen.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BKSpecialGen.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:28, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tags and articles

[edit]
  1. [1] and [2] — The information wasn't mentioned anywhere in the source. The part "setting a new high for the group" wasn't true. Do you understand what the expression "set a new high" means? Please don't copy-paste sentences and sources from other articles if you don't know what they say. (I don't really know if you could read them or not, but it really looked like you didn't, sorry.)
  2. [3], [4] — The tag is not applicable, there were references.
  3. [5] — Why "refimprove", aren't there enough sources already? Are you sure the article is badly written or incoherent? Are you a native speaker of English? (See 1, the articles you created don't seem like something a native speaker would write.)
  4. [6] — The notability is well proven already.
  5. [7] — Why? You are creating articles about other Berryz' singles, but for some reason you don't think this one is notable. How is it possible? Don't you know all the Berryz' singes ranked on Oricon? --Moscow Connection (talk) 00:20, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]