User talk:Yopie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

| Archive page

Thanks Yopie[edit]

Hi, I am Guilatshalit, and I wanna say Thank you Yopie for your comments, I hope to improve my articles and keep on editing wikipedia, thanks for your advice , now I will preview my articles before I edit , thank you so much.

czech prime ministers[edit]

I have another source that podivinsky is member of kdu-csl note that candidate number 8 is clearly marked as independent.


Why did you revert my entry on the list of foreign award winners of the Ordre des palm academique?? I have been awarded this year and I have proof! Natacha

Polli Corporation[edit]

Hello Yopie, thanks for your rollback of the edit made by that blocked user. The user has been blocked on many wikis. I just would like to get you noticed that in the meantime I checked some sources and created the article Polli (company) with the text that I had previously wrote in Polli Corporation. Actually, Polli Corporation seems to be a "true" company of the past. But the article was likely written to promote this little company by exploiting the notoriety of another company with the same name (the aforementioned Polli) and the "historical value" of an unrelated and not notable old company (Polli Corporation).

Please see fr:Discussion:Polli_Alimentari/Suppression and it:Wikipedia:Pagine da cancellare/Conserve Fratelli Polli as well. Thanks! --Lucas (talk) 21:57, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the info. The article was confusing and promotional, but now seems clear. --Yopie (talk) 22:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
You're welcome. :) It is probably a multiple-wiki spam. We could speedy delete it on We'll see. Cheers. --Lucas (talk) 23:15, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


@Yopie: thank you for your kind advice earlier. However subsequently I have been ambushed by someone who clearly takes delight in criticising me & doing about as much as one could possibly do to stray off the actual topic whilst denigrating me. I'm fed up with it. If people don't like my contributions why can't they go about their business quietly without spending hours and hours moaning and groaning. Please help! M Mabelina (talk) 02:48, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for butting in and please ignore me if my question is inappropriate or unwanted:
Who is "ambushing" you and can you provide diffs of the kind of behavior you deprecate, please? BushelCandle (talk) 01:00, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

@Yopie and BushelCandle: thank you for your concern and are you in a position to provide me with assistance? M Mabelina (talk) 19:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

I've no idea, Mabelina.
Perhaps if you were to answer my 2 questions I might be in a position to answer yours:
1) who is "ambushing" you?
2) can you provide diffs of the kind of behavior you deprecate, please?
BushelCandle (talk) 21:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
See User talk:Mabelina & Lord Bessborough - the latter is preferable, albeit longwinded. M Mabelina (talk) 02:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
@Yopie and BushelCandle: so to summarise - there is much to be done to improve Wiki's content. However, my name seems to be on a watchlist & unless I spend hours arguing the case I get threatened. Is not possible for people to enhance Wiki without such treatment? M Mabelina (talk) 05:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
PS. let's see what gets reversed without due consideration..
@Yopie and BushelCandle: you asked who is "ambushing" me - so please see User talk:Miesianiacal who yet again doesn't like what I have to say, so wants to remove me from Wiki. I spend all my time trying to set down in the clearest of ways the reason(s) for my edits, yet these are seemingly dismissed out of hand as if I am some sort of trouble maker. How can one make a point about Wiki MOS if one then has to spend hours and hours arguing thereafter? I prefer to get on with improving Wiki's content, not engaging in this truly frustrating behaviour. M Mabelina (talk) 00:12, 28 January 2016 (UTC)