User talk:YuMaNuMa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Necessary deletion of topics in Saraswatichandra(TV Series)[edit]

R/s user,

The page Saraswatichandra (TV series) contains sub-topics which are not important. The plot of the serial will always be an incomplete matter. The daily upgradation of this topic regarding flow of series is not consistent. Thus, I request not to let any user upgrade this sub-topic.

Kaushalskaloo (talk) 01:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC)


G'day, welcome to AURD, if you need any tips, or have any questions/ideas let us know at WT:AURD. It'd probably pay to check out the various AURD wikiproject pages to see how we operate and why we've come to various decisions in the past. Though it appears you are a pretty seasoned user, so Im sure you'll figure out most things on your own :) - Look forward to working with you on Australian roads (we've got much work to do at this point!), and to hearing ideas you may have to help us improve the quality of our articles. -- Nbound (talk) 10:07, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

This week's articles for improvement - 22 July 2013 to 28 July 2013[edit]

posted by Northamerica1000(talk) 13:52, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

I've added an opt-in section for those interested in receiving TAFI notifications on the project's main page, located here. Those that don't opt-in won't receive this message again. Also, a revised notification template has been created, located at Template:TAFI weekly selections notice. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:02, 24 July 2013 (UTC)


Please dont just undo edits based on your opinion and attack editors. INstead, why not start a constructive discussion on TALK? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmarsden (talkcontribs) 04:50, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Because the onus was on the user who made the changes to create a discussion per WP:BRD. No attack was made on the user, however I admit that the comment was rather blunt. YuMaNuMa Contrib 05:06, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
If you don't like an edit, just reverting it is not ok. You need to let others develop articles. Frankly, the one you reverted to was naive and not to the point. You can always try and contribute and improve rather than just revert other people's work. Rmarsden (talk) 20:57, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
I didn't "just" revert his/her edit. I provided an explanation every time I reverted. What was stopping you or the IP from starting a discussion per WP:BRD instead of making further changes under the false premise of "improving" the article when what s/he was really doing was reverting my edit? This is a collaborative project, an editor making changes doesn't have the right to have his poor quality edits displayed any more than I do. I have every right to revert it, much like you have every right to revert my edits if they were of a poor form, provided you had reason. YuMaNuMa Contrib 03:27, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Million Award[edit]

Million award logo.svg The Million Award
For your contributions to bring iPhone 5 (estimated annual readership: 1,708,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:05, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

Million award logo.svg This user won the Million Award for bringing iPhone 5 to Good Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:05, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Sydney September 2013 edit-a-thon invite[edit]

Hi there! You are cordially invited to an edit-a-thon this Saturday (21 September) in Sydney at the State Library of New South Wales (SLNSW), where you can collaborate with other Wikipedians throughout the day. Andy Carr, a senior librarian at SLNSW will also be helping out. The theme of the edit-a-thon is paralympics sports, but you are free to come along to meet other wiki contributors, and edit other topics.

If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online. Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/September 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:58, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using to all users in Wikipedians in Sydney)

HTC One article copy-edit request[edit]

YuMaNuMa, would you like to copy-edit HTC One and give some suggestions for improvement? It's currently going through an FAC, and any suggestions from non-involved editors would be helpful. Thanks - M0rphzone (talk) 14:54, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I'm not gonna lie, your contribution to Apple-related articles inspires me. Zach Vega (talk to me) 22:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Very much appreciated! And the feeling is mutual. Face-smile.svg YuMaNuMa Contrib 07:41, 19 October 2013 (UTC)


I've mentioned you at AN/I. Bidgee (talk) 11:46, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Half Million Award[edit]

Another editor just astutely pointed out that we owe you at least one more of these. Thanks for your terrific contributions; they're helping a lot of people! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:19, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Million award logo.svg The Half Million Award
For your contributions to bring iPad (4th generation) (estimated annual readership: 764,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:19, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Million award logo.svg This user won the Half Million Award for bringing iPad (4th generation) to Good Article status.
Thanks for the award. As usual, it's much appreciated. Face-smile.svg My final school year is drawing to a close, so that may mean I'll get more time to edit in the future - hopefully. YuMaNuMa Contrib 06:23, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Glad to hear it! Good luck with finals and graduation... -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:22, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter[edit]

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

Eurasian Eagle-Owl Maurice van Bruggen.JPG

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 19:54, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to TPG Telecom may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |key_people = [[David Teoh]] (founder, executive chairman}
  • }}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:51, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement[edit]

Dijkstras progress animation.gif

Illustration of Dijkstra's algorithm search, a search algorithm for finding path from a start node (lower left, red) to a goal node (upper right, green) in a robot motion planning problem.

Hello, YuMaNuMa:

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection.

Posted by: Northamerica1000(talk) 18:38, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey[edit]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 14:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

your edit comment at telstra article[edit]

I believe you need to presume good faith. Accusing someone of conflict of interest without any data or facts is just an unhelpful opinion. You can always contribute to the article and improve it. Throwing stones from the sidelines at other editors is not useful (talk) 00:33, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Perhaps you're the one who needs to assume good faith; accusing others of vandalism is never helpful and instead incites rash reactions, which can be detrimental to the quality of the article. Putting that aside, claiming that a company is performing "well" or their strategy is working based on stock increases is naive at best. Inclusion of ridiculous claims warrants such responses. YuMaNuMa Contrib 01:53, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.[edit]


This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Melbourne". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Scorch (talk | ctrb) 10:50, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of I SQUARE for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I SQUARE is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I SQUARE until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 22:13, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, YuMaNuMa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Apple Inc. WikiProject Reviving[edit]

Hello there, I am trying to revive the Apple WikiProject. Please come back and add your name to the participant list if you'd like to help me. Let's make this awesome. Come by today! Thank you, DJAustin (talk) 15:00, 17 June 2017 (UTC)