User talk:Zakkman

Image tagging for Image:Trixter Front.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Trixter Front.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:12, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Was Made for Lovin' You[edit]

How is it not a disco song? -GTBacchus^(talk) 14:22, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my reply to you at Talk:I Was Made for Lovin' You. We have sources calling it a disco song. Why are you so adamant that it's not? -GTBacchus^(talk) 22:35, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided a source for it being a disco song, and I have sought dialogue. If you want to convince people that your edit should stand, you've got to explain yourself. When we have a source saying that the song is disco, then why should we say otherwise? Please see Talk:I Was Made for Lovin' You. -GTBacchus^(talk) 22:53, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But its by KISS a Hard Rock/ Heavy Metal band so they cant sing disco its just wrong to lie.

Well, you say they can't sing disco, but sources would say otherwise. How do you know you're right? -GTBacchus^(talk) 08:14, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why[edit]

Why can't a hard rock band sing disco? -GTBacchus^(talk) 02:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because that would be gay.

Are you serious? -GTBacchus^(talk) 08:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no im sarcastic. hard rock/metal are mortal enemies with dsco so jeez let it be.

Do not change the genre for this song again you have been at this for years now ,i will seek a long term block on you if you do, you clearly have an obsession with this genre issue, where time and time again ,it has been explained to you that,there are sources that state it is a Disco song,not to mention the band itself have said it was their attempt to make a disco record,i.e they made themselves a disco record and it was a really big success in 1979,now please end this obsession because as i recall even an administrator stepped in previously to halt your POV actions!--Wikiscribe (talk) 04:13, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 08:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your recent edits are marked as vandalism, do them again and you are going to get blocked.--Jpkmaster (talk) 17:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to I Was Made for Lovin' You, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 18:23, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to I Was Made for Lovin' You, you will be blocked from editing. John Carter (talk) 18:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

its not fucking vandalism its the fucking truth for fuck sakes god no need to block a guy from editingffor some fucking stupid controbversy you win wikipedia ill tell my friends to get their infor mation some other way!!!Zakkman (talk) 18:36, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from obscenity as well, as that can also result in your being blocked. The facts are that the writer of the song himself says it is a disco song. Unless you can produce verifiable sources which indicates otherwise, the content is more than justified, and removal of sourced content to conform an article to a given parties point of view is vandalism. If you can produce evidence which refutes the sourced material, then do so. However, until such time, your comments above also clearly violate WP:CIVILITY. Please engage in reasonable, rational dialogue, rather than the almost incoherent statement above; it will serve you far better than statements such as the above. Thank you. Also, you might benefit from reviewing some of our core policies and guidelines, as are indicated in the statement below:

Welcome!

Hello, Zakkman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! John Carter (talk) 18:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You might also note that the writer of the song says he wrote it to prove how easy it is to write a disco song, indicating that the writer himself thought of it as being a disco song, if a joke disco song. Even given your comments above, that the group may disdain disco, which I personally do as well, it would certainly be possible for him to write a parody song which would still qualify as a song of that genre. John Carter (talk) 20:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

well yea i guess thats a given its making fun of dsco so i guess discos fine then as long as someone puts in it was making fun of disco.Zakkman (talk) 21:42, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article already says that the writer wrote the song to indicate how easy it is to write a disco song. If we could come up with more information than that, we could add it as well. However, we really couldn't use the phrase "making fun of" or anything similar unless we had specific sources to that effect, which I don't think we do yet. But the existing statement is I think itself a rather clear statement that the author of the song disdains disco. John Carter (talk) 21:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008[edit]

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 15:31, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sweet (band). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Libs (talk) 23:29, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IDIOT[edit]

You are such a idiot. You can't spell at all. Why are you even on here??--70.149.134.54 (talk) 02:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC) personal attack man im gonna report you.Zakkman (talk) 08:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to DragonForce, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The Real Libs-speak politely 22:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Black Sabbath Vol. 4[edit]

I wanted to inform you that I've moved Vol. 4 back to its original name, Black Sabbath Vol. 4. The reason is simple: "Black Sabbath" is an official part of the album's name. The ultimate authority here are media references to the album, nearly all of which refer to the album formally as Black Sabbath Vol. 4. Just because a band's name is the cover art does not mean in any way that it can't be a part of the title. Xnux the Echidna 02:38, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The Real Libs-speak politely 15:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at I Was Made for Lovin' You, you may be blocked from editing. This genre change you keep insisting on, it is beginning to get disruptive. Please refrain; there are lots of other articles that need your attention. This one doesn't. Drmies (talk) 04:14, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]