User talk:Zastavafan76

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Zastavafan76, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --HolyRomanEmperor 15:04, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Well, everyone deserves to be welcomed - everyone is. You haven't been - and that's just not fair! :P --HolyRomanEmperor 20:14, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

New forum[edit]

Hey. You probably noticed that Airwise is offline if you want to continue aviation discussions you can join em and Aca at avijacija.eu.tt LukaP —Preceding comment was added at 01:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Peace Barnstar Hires.png The Barnstar of Diplomacy
Nice work. Gradanin (talk) 12:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Foreign relations of Serbia[edit]

Thanks for your fine addition! I wanted to add more of those articles, so your help is very much needed! I wanted to expand this template even more, so i just wanted to tell you that i will be happy if you create something for i there! :) --WhiteWriterspeaks 18:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Editors Barnstar Hires.png The Editor's Barnstar
For fine additions in articles about foreign relations of Serbia. WhiteWriterspeaks 18:21, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Karadjordje Stadium[edit]

Zdravo!Imam dva sourca de pise kapacitet stadiona. Jedan oko 12, 000 i drugi oko 15,000. Oba su sa Vosine strane. Koji je sad tacan?Sta cemo sad? Sigruno je da Vosa ima veci kapacitet od 12.000 ali...???--Nado158 (talk) 21:06, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Cao Zastavafan76, evo bas je dobro sto smo svi u vezi jer sam ja vec prodiskutovao ovo sa Nadom. Ovaj problem sa kapacitetima nasih stadiona traje vec neko vreme, i stalno razni editori i cesto ne prijavljeni IP menjaju te brojeve. Ako imate obojica interesovanje trebali bi da nadjemo neko resenje za sve njih. Ako hocete mozemo ovde ovih dana da vidimo jedan po jedan stadion sta koji source kaze za njihov kapacitet i koji su naj kredibilniji. Ne znam da li znate za jos neke editore koji su aktivno ucestvovali u editovanju oko ove teme, pa mozete onda da im javite da i oni ucestvuju. Ako ne, onda ovde da nadjemo neko resenje. Meni licno nije puno bitno je li, recimo, 12 ili 15 hiljada, ali malo je vec dosadno da se svaki dan menjaju te cifre u nasim clancima. Sta mislite, je li zvuci dobro? Imate mozda neke bolje ideje? FkpCascais (talk) 21:39, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Meni zvuci dobro. Ja mislim da je bitno naci tacan podatak, ili prilicno tacan. Karadjordje moze 100% da primi vise nego 12.000. Na Vosinoj strani pise 12,000, a na drugoj vise od 15.000. Na oprostajnoj utakmici Mihajlovica je bilo mislim cak i 20.000.--Nado158 (talk) 21:51, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

To zvuci dobro, nemam nista protiv. Ajde prvo da se slazemo da ne dozvolimo previse nepotrebne promene od ovih profila sa IP brojevima, mislim da oni najcesce menja clanke bez najave ili izvora, ali kad ste vi u pitanju pokusacu prvo da vam pisem nesto na talk-stranici unapred pre nego sto ista ucinim. Zastavafan76 (talk) 23:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Zastavafan76, samo jedna stvar. Kas pises na necijoj talk page pisi uvek na dnu te strane, jer diskusije idu hronoloski. Pomerio sam tvoje komentare i na mojoj i na Nadinoj talk page na dno. Inace, kad ih stavis na pocetak ili sredinu kao sto si uradio tesko se mogu naci. Ja recimo kada si mi napisao na mojoj strani, nisam znao gde si napisao dok ga nisam nasao. A ovako znas da svaki novi komentar ide na dno, pa ne moras da trazis :)
Druga stvar je da posle svakog komentara se doda po jedan : na pocetku da bi komentar bio pomeren na unutra. Evo pogledajte kako izgleda recimo ovde: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football. Na taj nacin se lakse prepozna gde komentar jednog editora pocinje a gde od sledeceg. Svaki editor na sledecem komentaru doda jedan : vise i tako mu se komentar pomeri jedno polje na desno. FkpCascais (talk) 02:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Sta mislite o ovome? Ja mislim da bi najbolje bilo da pise jednom seating capicity i ispod total capacity --Nado158 (talk) 07:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
To je dobra ideja. Obe cifre, znaci seating capacity i total capacity bi trebalo imati u tekstu u Sekciji "Stadium" kod svakog kluba, ali ne znam koliko je to izvodljivo imati obe u infoboxu. U infoboxu se obicno ubacuje samo seating capacity jer je to ona koja se vazi za medjunarodne utakmice, a sve vise i vise i za domace. FkpCascais (talk) 20:08, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Pozdrav i od mene! Evo i ja se slazem sa predlogom koji je naveo Nado. Dakle, samo za one stadione koji imaju i sedeca i stojeca mesta postaviti broj sedecih i broj stojecih mesta zajedno. Oni stadioni koji imaju samo sedenje samo sedeci kapacitet. Za pojedine stadione koji imaju iskljucivo mesta za sedenje kruze razlicite informacije o kapacitetu. Npr stadion Cika Daca je po nekima 15 000,a po drugima 22 000 itd. Problem je velika razlika u brojkama koji nije zanemarljiv. (Nightwolf87 (talk) 15:01, 1 May 2012 (UTC))

Drago mi je da se zlazete sa mojim predlogom :). Ja se slazem takodje sa predlogom koji je naveo Nightwolf87.--Nado158 (talk) 17:06, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Filip Kostić[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Filip Kostić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this player meets WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTBALL; Transfermarkt is not a WP:RS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 20:04, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

But he played in the Serbian SuperLiga this season, thus passes notability. He played 26 matches and has scored 3 goals. Its indocated by Transfermarkt, but I can add Soccerway if you prefer it. I have been active in this talk page so that is why I noteced this notice. FkpCascais (talk) 21:00, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

After this season, Filip Kostić moves to FC Groningen (Netherlands) for 1,25 Mio. euros. --Nado158 (talk) 19:20, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Zastavafan76, you are invited![edit]

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Zastavafan76. You have new messages at Jetstreamer's talk page.
Message added 14:49, 2 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Jetstreamer Talk 14:49, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Zastavafan76. You have new messages at Jetstreamer's talk page.
Message added 00:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jetstreamer Talk 00:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Sreten Ninković[edit]

Izvini, ali stvarno se ne razumem puno u clanke o atletici. Pogledao sam malo kriterijume i malo je cupavo, ali mozda ce upseti da opstane... Ako ona "Balkanijada" znace Balkan Games mozda postoji veca sansa jer su to ipak neko mejdunarodno takmicenje, a one maratone sto spominjes ne znam da li ulaze u okvir onih spomenutih u kriterijumima. Ajde, videcemo sta ce biti... I mani su izbrisali neke clanke u proslosti, pa jos od tada uvek kad pravim neki clanak proverim da li je u redu, ali kako radim skoro iskljucivo fudbalske vec ih znam napamet. A o atletici nisam nijedan pravio. Srdacan pozdrav! Javi uvek sta god da treba. :) FkpCascais (talk) 02:01, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Ma pusti ih molim te, i neka su izgubili... Inace, ovo je poraz celog modela (Toletovog modela) protiv modernog fudbala (kiparskog). Problem je sto kod nas ni ovi direktni udarci glavom u zid nam ne sluze da se nauce lekcije, mada je ljudima zaisa prekipelo vise, jer moze svasta da nam bude lose u zemlji, ali aman, fudbal bas ne mora... :( FkpCascais (talk) 00:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kanis Leskovac[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kanis Leskovac requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:00, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Vosa[edit]

Bolje da si ubacio novu lepsu sliku Vosinog stadiona itd. Stara je slika. Nije aktuelna i ne prikazuje ceo stadion samo deo stadiona.pozz --Nado158 (talk) 18:19, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Razumem brate, ipak hvala na trudu. Ja isto pokusavam sve sto mogu. Ja dosta radim oko clanaka, ali bavi cu se i sa slikama, da nabavim itd. pozz brate.4C--Nado158 (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Ivan Ivanov[edit]

Pozdrav, samo da ti kazem da Soccerway u nekim slucajevima nije najpouzdaniji, odnosno, jeste pouzdan, ali ne mora da znaci da je kompletan. Recimo, National-Football-Teams.com koji je specifican za reprezentacije ima ovu vecu cifru, a posto Soccerway prati bugarsku, nasu i neke ostale lige i igrace tek od samo pre par sezona, lakse je moguce da njima fale 2 utakmice nego da je NFT izmislio 2... Recimo, ako je Soccerway tek poceo da pravi match reports pre 3 godine, oni ce pisati igracima podatke samo za one match report koje imaju, ali to ne znaci da je to tacan broj, jer njima mogu da fale reports od pre nego sto su oni poceli da prave bazu podataka za tog igraca. Bilo bi dobro da postoji neki bugarski sajt ali nesto ne mogu da nadjem nijednog...

Isto, video sam da si stavio u update datum od same utakmice. Pre par nedelja smo bas na WP:FOOTY diskutvali o pravilnom koriscenju tih datuma, i moze da se koriste ili 5 ~ koji ti ukucaju datum i vreme edita, ili onda napises rucno datum. Postoje mnogi editori, medju kojima i ja, koji koriste taj simplifikovani datum, ali je za nas preporucljivo da pisemo recimo datum posle utakmice da bi se onda znalo da je utakmica ukljucena u statistiku. Poenta je da datum ne predstavlja datum meca, kao sto moze neko da misli, nego datum updejta, i bas zbog toga i postoji varijanta sa satima i minutima, da bi se onda znalo da li je broj apdejtovan pre ili posle meca, ali kad ne pisemo sate i minute, da ne bi bilo zabune, preporucljivo je napisati dan posle. Recimo, ako se utakmica igrala 7 Septembra 2012, bolje napisati datum 8 Septembar jer se tako zna jasno da je utakmica iz 7 Septembra ukljucena, a sigurno se nece igrati utakmica dan posle, tako da nema problema oko toga.

Sto se broja nastupa tice, nekad je najbolje pogledati vise sajtova pa videti sta svi kazu i naci neku logiku, i narocito imati u obzir da neki sajtovi mogu da nisu kompletni zaviseci od toga od kada prate statistiku. FkpCascais (talk) 06:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Pouzdan je Soccerway u smislu da podatke sto imaju su sigurni, narocito za lige, ali kod reprezentacija taj broj koji oni imaju znaci broj meceva koji oni imaju u njihovoj bazi podataka, sto ne mora da znaci da je to ukupan broj nastupa tog igraca jer moze da se desi da im fale izvestaji... Recimo, to im se masovno desava kod mladih reprezentacija, njima recimo pise za Marka Vešovića da ima 5 nastupa i 1 gol za Montenegro U-21 a na zvanicnom sajtu CG saveza pise 14 nastupa i 1 gol tako da je jasno da oni na Soccerway-u samo ubacuju cifre od match reportsa koje imaju, sto znaci da ne ubrajaju te sto im fale, pa realan broj moze da bude uvek veci od njihovog.
Aaaa video si vec da je Omega dao gol za Liberiju, izjednacili su sa Nigerijom, odlicno za njih, ali bice tesko u revansu tamo. Steta sto izgleda da Oumarou nije debitovao za Kamerun... FkpCascais (talk) 00:42, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
A bre vidim da si opet stavio datum meca u update-u u Omeginom infoboxu. Ne znam je li me nisi razumeo ili mi ne verujes... Evo ovde je dosta toga objasnjeno: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Archive_72#PC.26NT_updates_in_infobox.
Apdejti NISU datum zadnjeg meca, nego datum apdejta (moze da bude bilo koji dan, kad god ti znaci padne na pamet da apdejtujes), i upravo treba izbegavati pisati dan meca da ne bi postojala zabluda da li mec od tog dana ukljucen ili nije u apdejt. Molim te kazi mi ako ti nesto nije jasno. FkpCascais (talk) 00:51, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Ma dobro, ne moras nista da mi obecavas, samo da znas da mozes da ukucas datum apdejta kad god apdejtujes. :D Izvini, nisam zeleo da budem naporan oko ovoga a sad kad citam ovo unazad vidim da sam bio.
Sto se slika tice moram da ti priznam da mi je to najslabija tacka ovde na vikiju. Stalno gledam kako je svima to komplikovano i zbog toga se time uopste ne bakcem. Koliko sam shvatio treba da imas tacan izvor slike odakle si je preuzeo i jos na sve to napismenu dozvolu autora slike koju zelis da ubacis (da pise da ti on daje pravo da je koristis ovde na wikipedia.org). Mislim da je druga varijanta da ti sam napravis sliku, ali to je vec komplikovano za nas slucaj stadiona. Videcu ako imam neku ideju kako da ti pomognem, ali ti nista ne obecavam. FkpCascais (talk) 23:10, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Stadium capacity[edit]

Užice nema kapacitet od 5,998, ne znam što stavljaš tu brojku kad je kapacitet oko 12,000, jer na zapadu i istoku imaš 5,998 sedećih mesta, ali imaš još toliko stajaćih na jugu i severu, tako da je kapacitet 12,000.--Obelixus (talk) 11:17, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

(Talk-page stalker) Problem je sto postoji zvanican dogovor na WP:FOOTY da se na kapacitete stadiona u infoboxu koristi iskljucivo broj sedecih mesta, a u tekstu, u sekciji "Stadion" moze da se objasni to da ima i stojecih mesta (nazalost toga kod nas ima, ali u vecini vecih liga to vise ne postoji i postoje samo sedeca mesta). Uostalom, kako se to racunaju "stajaca mesta"? Mislim, kao sardine, ili kako? :D Izvini za ironiju, ali morate da shvatite poentu. Stajaca mesta je tesko tacno izracunati, i "dozvoljena gustina" moze da bude razlicita od zemlje do zemlje (mislim, u zemljama gde toga jos uvek ima). A na wiki je dogovor da se koristi cifra stolica, tako da nema sta, Zastavafan76 je u pravu. U sustini sve ovo sto ja pricam je nebitno, jedino sto je bitno je da je to zvanicni dogovor fudbalskih editora vikipedije, i ozvanicen na WP:FOOTY da se stvalja cifra iskljucivo sedecih mesta. Pozdrav! FkpCascais (talk) 21:13, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Evo, cisto da proverim dau medjuvremenu nije bilo slucajno nekih promena u vezi ovog dogovora, postavicu konkretno ovo pitanje na WP:FOOTY i videcu odgovor. FkpCascais (talk) 21:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Hvala Fkpcascais sto si objasnio protokol za brojeve kapaciteta stadiona. Zastavafan76 (talk) 21:26, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Joj, izvini, sinoc sam zboravio da to tamo pitam, evo sad sam postavio pitanje ovde, Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Stadium_capacity, pa da samo potvrdimo sta ce vecina da kaze. FkpCascais (talk) 00:10, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

November 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mercury Villager may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ] plant in [[Avon Lake, Ohio]]. It was Mercury's first of only two minivan models it ever featured (before the [[Mercury Monterey (minivan)|2004-07 Mercury Monterey]]. In spite of Mercury's tradition

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:18, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar![edit]

Sport Barnstar Hires.png The Running Man Barnstar
For your great contribution to football related articles FkpCascais (talk) 21:10, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on middle-distance runners – there are many athletes with interesting stories that barely get covered at all! SFB 19:26, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Order of contents[edit]

Hi there ZASTAVAFAN, AL "here",

please keep in mind that, in some cases, personal life of a footballer does not have anything to do with football. So, it should be the very last thing on the list of contents, the football things coming first of course.

Attentively, sorry for any inconvenience (for example any exaggeration on my edit summary). --AL (talk) 22:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

  • No re-reply, seems you did take offense at my reversion/summary, apologize once again but can't be doing it all the time as you may imagine. What i can and will do is propose a discussion at WP:FOOTY, whatever results emerge from there i will abide by.

Cheers --AL (talk) 23:35, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

If you notice the last opinion, it states "Where the subject's personal life goes is dependent on the person. Our suggested layout works best for persons who are famous primarily or exclusively for their football careers. My preference in this case is for an "early life" section before the football stuff, and a "personal life" section before the stats blocks." So, as we stand, Bruma's article is not wrong, and i've complied with the fact that honours should come after statistics.

That said, if you want to continue unresponsive there's nothing i can do about it, i apologized (here i go again!) for anything that might have been viewed as a "wrongdoing in words", and am trying my best. Take care --AL (talk) 16:25, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your message on my talk page suggests that you have completely ignored the advice from User:Always Learning and the suggestions at WT:FOOTY. The order of the sections at Lionel Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo and Zinedine Zidane is pretty irrelevant to the situation at Wayne Rooney, but thank you for informing me of the incorrect order in those articles. – PeeJay 22:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Re:How do I do this on my userpage?[edit]

The code looks fine (of course it does :) ), but the subpage does not exist yet. Once you create it an copy the barnstars, it should work... GregorB (talk) 21:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Should be fine now. I needed to purge the page (WP:PURGE). GregorB (talk) 23:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Miloš Krstić. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GiantSnowman 17:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes, most of your edits were fine, with references supporting what you said - though you did introduce un-encyclopedic material (the section about the free kick), POV (i.e. describing a club as "ambitious"), as well as unreferenced information (i.e. the Thun stats, which I have since corrected). Because it is such a short article, I don't think headers bring anything to it but if you wish to re-introduce them I won't challenge you. We should be able to work together to make this a better article/encyclopedia. GiantSnowman 18:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Yep, go ahead for the headings. As for the free kick, again that is your personal view that it was an important goal, or an important match. It does not appear to have been covered in any reliable, third-party sources. If you are able to find sources which cover the goal in detail then we could consider adding a small section back. GiantSnowman 18:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
I have removed the maintenance tags; many thanks for adding the new references. GiantSnowman 12:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Kolarov Image[edit]

My mistake on the year difference. I still think the headshot/quality are better enough, however, to merit that image being the lede. Out of curiosity, how do you know it is copyrighted? It says "This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license." I don't have too much knowledge of that. User:Gossamers User talk:Gossamers 3 October 17:55 (ET)

A page you started (2015 NCAA Division I Outdoor Track and Field Championships) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating 2015 NCAA Division I Outdoor Track and Field Championships, Zastavafan76!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please complete the article.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.