User talk:Zfish118

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Zfish118's Talk Page!
Hello! --Zfish118 talk 03:56, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

RETIRED
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia as of October 2017.

Catholic Church article[edit]

Hi! I saw that you had posted a peer review for the Catholic Church article, but have already nominated the article for a GA status. Would you like for the peer review link to be closed? I had the same issue for a while with the Alexander Hamilton article when I had nominated for a GA status. LeftAire (talk) 21:04, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

@LeftAire: Yeah, thanks! I couldn't figure out how to withdraw it myself when I noticed it was still open. I will try to be around if you have any questions about the article. --Zfish118 (talk) 21:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Catholic Church[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Catholic Church you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LeftAire -- LeftAire (talk) 21:20, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Catholic Church[edit]

The article Catholic Church you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Catholic Church for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LeftAire -- LeftAire (talk) 22:21, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Million Award[edit]

Million award logo.svg The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Catholic Church (estimated annual readership: 1,000,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! LeftAire (talk) 22:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)


The actual amount estimated was 1075684 views was based of a 4-mo. estimate (as of 4/4/2015 had 268,966 views in a 90 day period this year). Congrats! LeftAire (talk) 22:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

@LeftAire: Thank you - I am quite honored! --Zfish118 (talk) 18:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

CCC template[edit]

I would like to craft a template for Code of Canon Law based on your {{CCC}} but do not see where your lookup table for {{CCC}} is to use as an example. Can you point me in the right direction? –BoBoMisiu (talk) 21:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Very cool! The table can be found here: Template:CCC/TOC logical selection Template:CCC/TOC lookup (I had to dig for it myself). I also added a link to the documentation. Good luck! --Zfish118 (talk) 21:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
TYVM –BoBoMisiu (talk) 19:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your edit on White Anglo-Saxon Protestant[edit]

Indeed, all these dictionary sources are dubious. I removed a quotation from the Hippie dictionary. Needless to say, that isn't reliable at all and the definitions are too biased. Cheers. Outedexits (talk) 14:56, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Reference cleanup on CC article[edit]

Just as an FYI, I think (though I could be wrong), some of the references you removed were defined with ref name, so their removal now has a few undefined references in the article. One of them about liturgy and the Christian life, another about the perpetual virginity. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:57, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up! --Zfish118talk 19:58, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Not a problem, if there is anything I can help with on the article as a whole, please let me know. I would love to try to get it to FA status at some point, and I think the consolidating a lot of the excess verbiage and references that you have been doing is a good first step. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:01, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your work on Our Lady of Fátima and Miracle of the Sun[edit]

Those articles badly needed to be analyzed critically by someone competent on the religious aspects of these topics. Some sections of Our Lady of Fátima are still poorly sourced and dodgy, so I hope that you'll continue your work in these areas. See you around! KarlPoppery (talk) 17:11, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! –Zfish118talk 17:13, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:Roman Catholic bishops of Worcester has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Roman Catholic bishops of Worcester, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) 14:47, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Indentation[edit]

Hi. Because indentation, I don't really know if this message was intended to be a response to my last message or Chicbyaccident's first one. --Grabado (talk) 14:42, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Neuro-Immune Dysfunction Syndrome for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neuro-Immune Dysfunction Syndrome is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuro-Immune Dysfunction Syndrome until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:00, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Quick note[edit]

Just a quick note saying thanks for always weighing in on the longest running naming dispute on Wikipedia. You always have very reasonable points, which add a lot of value to every conversation. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Garelick Farms Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Garelick Farms Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Zfish118. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Meriden Transit Center move[edit]

Hello Zfish! Just wondering why you moved Meriden Transit Center to Meriden station. The official name is Meriden Transit Center, and the page was moved many months ago to reflect this, so I'm not sure why you moved it. Thanks! –Daybeers (talk) 20:55, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Alert[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svgThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:32, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Barnstar(s) question[edit]

It seems to me that you conferred me barnstars on two different occations - two times the Christianity barnstar. Not sure if this was the intention? Anyway, thanks! Chicbyaccident (talk) 22:38, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Both were intentional. Congrats! –Zfish118talk 16:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Much appreciated. Chicbyaccident (talk) 16:43, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Violation of 1RR[edit]

You violated 1RR on Bruce Ohr.[1] Self-revert immediately. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 01:08, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

@Snooganssnoogans: I am confused, I haven't reverted any edits today. I added a tag for a missing citation, and then added a citation. What do you mean? –Zfish118talk 01:48, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Apparently you had removed my tag while I was researching sources. My apologies for not noticing. The link you provided only states that Trump falsely claimed that the Dossier started the investigation, not that the conspiracy theories are based on it. I did add it as an additional source for the alternative phrasing, however. –Zfish118talk 02:06, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Zfish118. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)