User talk:Zfish118

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to Zfish118's Talk Page!
Hello! --Zfish118 talk 03:56, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia as of July 2016 having completed graduate school, and begun new career in civil engineering.

Catholic Church article[edit]

Hi! I saw that you had posted a peer review for the Catholic Church article, but have already nominated the article for a GA status. Would you like for the peer review link to be closed? I had the same issue for a while with the Alexander Hamilton article when I had nominated for a GA status. LeftAire (talk) 21:04, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

@LeftAire: Yeah, thanks! I couldn't figure out how to withdraw it myself when I noticed it was still open. I will try to be around if you have any questions about the article. --Zfish118 (talk) 21:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Catholic Church[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Catholic Church you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LeftAire -- LeftAire (talk) 21:20, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Catholic Church[edit]

The article Catholic Church you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Catholic Church for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LeftAire -- LeftAire (talk) 22:21, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Million Award[edit]

Million award logo.svg The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Catholic Church (estimated annual readership: 1,000,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! LeftAire (talk) 22:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

The actual amount estimated was 1075684 views was based of a 4-mo. estimate (as of 4/4/2015 had 268,966 views in a 90 day period this year). Congrats! LeftAire (talk) 22:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

@LeftAire: Thank you - I am quite honored! --Zfish118 (talk) 18:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

CCC template[edit]

I would like to craft a template for Code of Canon Law based on your {{CCC}} but do not see where your lookup table for {{CCC}} is to use as an example. Can you point me in the right direction? –BoBoMisiu (talk) 21:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Very cool! The table can be found here: Template:CCC/TOC logical selection Template:CCC/TOC lookup (I had to dig for it myself). I also added a link to the documentation. Good luck! --Zfish118 (talk) 21:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
TYVM –BoBoMisiu (talk) 19:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your edit on White Anglo-Saxon Protestant[edit]

Indeed, all these dictionary sources are dubious. I removed a quotation from the Hippie dictionary. Needless to say, that isn't reliable at all and the definitions are too biased. Cheers. Outedexits (talk) 14:56, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Reference cleanup on CC article[edit]

Just as an FYI, I think (though I could be wrong), some of the references you removed were defined with ref name, so their removal now has a few undefined references in the article. One of them about liturgy and the Christian life, another about the perpetual virginity. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:57, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up! --Zfish118talk 19:58, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Not a problem, if there is anything I can help with on the article as a whole, please let me know. I would love to try to get it to FA status at some point, and I think the consolidating a lot of the excess verbiage and references that you have been doing is a good first step. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:01, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your work on Our Lady of Fátima and Miracle of the Sun[edit]

Those articles badly needed to be analyzed critically by someone competent on the religious aspects of these topics. Some sections of Our Lady of Fátima are still poorly sourced and dodgy, so I hope that you'll continue your work in these areas. See you around! KarlPoppery (talk) 17:11, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! –Zfish118talk 17:13, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:Roman Catholic bishops of Worcester has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Roman Catholic bishops of Worcester, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) 14:47, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


Hi. Because indentation, I don't really know if this message was intended to be a response to my last message or Chicbyaccident's first one. --Grabado (talk) 14:42, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Neuro-Immune Dysfunction Syndrome for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neuro-Immune Dysfunction Syndrome is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuro-Immune Dysfunction Syndrome until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:00, 9 September 2017 (UTC)