Video game censorship
Video game censorship are efforts by an authority to limit access, censor content, or regulate video games or specific video games due to the nature of their content.
Support for video game regulation has at times been linked to moral panic. Even so, governments have enacted, or have tried to enact, legislation that regulates distribution of video games through censorship based on content rating systems or banning. In 2005, David Gauntlett claimed that grant funding, news headlines, and professional prestige more commonly go to authors who, in good faith, promote anti-media beliefs. Tom Grimes, James A. Anderson, and Lori Bergen reiterated these claims in a 2008 book examining sociological effects on the production of media effects research.
Voluntary rating systems adopted by the video game industry, such as the ESRB rating system in the United States and Canada (established in 1994), and the Pan European Game Information (PEGI) rating system in Europe (established in 2003), are aimed at informing parents about the types of games their children are playing (or are asking to play). Some ratings of controversial games indicate they are not targeted at young children ("Mature" (M) or "Adults Only" (AO) in the US, or 15 or 18 in the UK). The packaging warns such games should not be sold to children. In the US, ESRB ratings are not legally binding, but many retailers take it upon themselves to refuse the sale of these games to minors. In the United Kingdom (UK), the BBFC ratings are legally binding. UK retailers also enforce the PEGI ratings, which are not legally binding.
All of the provinces and territories in Canada voluntarily adopt the ESRB rating system for rating video games. Saint Pierre and Miquelon don't have a formal video game rating system, but receive games from Canada, which uses the ESRB.
Video game consoles were banned in Mainland China in June 2000. This ban was finally lifted in January 2014. However, the Chinese would still police video games which would be "hostile to China or not in conformity with the outlook of China's government". Reported by Bloomberg, metaphorically speaking, Cai Wu, head of China's Ministry of Culture, said "We want to open the window a crack to get some fresh air, but we still need a screen to block the flies and mosquitoes.".
The German Strafgesetzbuch (Criminal Code) in § 86a outlaws the use of symbols of unconstitutional organisations, § 130 Volksverhetzung (agitation of the people), and § 131 instructions for crimes. In the official lists, these three sections are always bundled, so any game that contains swastika flags and/or any depiction of Adolf Hitler is listed alongside racist propaganda pieces.
§ 131 outlaws representation of excessive violence in media "which describe cruel or otherwise inhuman acts of violence against human or humanoid beings in a manner which expresses a glorification or rendering harmless of such acts of violence or which represents the cruel or inhuman aspects of the event in a manner which injures human dignity."
On August 9, 2018, USK announced that the German government will relax this Section § 86a restriction on video games, as long as the imagery included falls within the "social adequacy" allowance. USK will still evaluate how this imagery is used and reject games they believe fail to meet the social adequacy allowance.
The Japanese versions are known for removing or heavily modifying anything and all related to sex and nudity in the game out of fear and concern for the "morality" of its citizens. In general, censorship in Japan aims to reduce gore and extreme violence in the localized versions of games.
"Indecent" websites, such as those offering unrated games, any kind of pornography (not only child pornography), and gambling, are also blocked. Attempts to access these sites are automatically redirected to the warning page showing "This site is legally blocked by the government regulations." Search engines are required to verify age for some keywords deemed "inappropriate" for minors.
Mexico voluntarily adopt the ESRB rating system for rating video games.
United States and territories
The United States, Puerto Rico, Samoa, Guam, Virgin Islands, and Northern Mariana Islands all voluntarily comply with the ESRB rating system.
The first major controversy over video games in the United States was in the early 1990s, when games such as Mortal Kombat and Night Trap released, which were known for scenes that would be considered too violent or too sexual for kids. The issue regarding video games eventually made it into the United States Congress. After a proposal to have a government commission to establish video game ratings, the Interactive Digital Software Association was established by major video game corporations and presented the Entertainment Software Ratings Board (ESRB) to the Congress, which was approved and would become the standard of video game ratings.
Jack Thompson has criticized "violent video games", claiming that playing violent video games leads to teenagers replicating those behaviors in the real world. He often represented victims or parents of victims in cases regarding shootings, usually blaming the actions on the perpetrator having played violent video games. Thompson also supported a campaign that tried to stop the release of Bully.
In 2013, the Entertainment Software Association, the lobbying group for the video games industry, had enlisted over 500,000 members to the "Video Game Voters Network," a "grassroots" lobbying group to mobilize gamers to act against public policy that may negatively impact the gaming industry. The VGV was launched in 2006 by the ESA, and uses social media sites like Facebook and Twitter to inform members of allies and opponents. In 2013, the ESA spent over 3.9 Million USD on lobbying, including but not limited to against VVG legislation. This included opposing a bipartisan federal bill that would direct the National Academy of Sciences to study the effects of all forms of violent media. Such bills themselves had come under criticisms from some scholars for pressuring scientists to find specific outcomes rather than studying the issues neutrally
US government legislation
No video game console manufacturer has allowed any game marked AO to be published in North America; however, the PC gaming service Steam has allowed AO titles such as Hatred to be published on its platform. No major retailers are willing to sell AO-rated games. However, Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas was rated AO after the presence of the Hot Coffee add-on became evident. The add-on was later removed and the game rated M. In the 109th Congress and 110th Congress, the Video Games Enforcement Act was introduced to the US House of Representatives. The act required an identification check for the purchase of M and AO rated games. The bill and others like it did not succeed because of likely First Amendment violations. Although no law mandates identification checking for games with adult content, a 2008 survey by the Federal Trade Commission showed that video game retailers have voluntarily increased ID verification for M- and AO-rated games, and sales of those games to underage potential buyers decreased from 83% in 2000 to 20% in 2008. A further survey in April 2011, found that video game retailers continued to enforce the ratings by allowing only 13% of underage teenage shoppers to buy M-rated video games, a statistically significant decrease from the 20% purchase rate in 2009.
On 7 January 2009, Joe Baca, representative of California's 43rd District, introduced H.R. 231, the Video game health labelling act. This bill called for a label to be placed in a "clear and conspicuous location on the packaging" on all video games with an ESRB rating of T (Teen) or higher stating, "WARNING: Excessive exposure to violent video games and other violent media has been linked to aggressive behavior." The proposed legislation was referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection. On 24 January 2011, Joe Baca reintroduced the Video game health labelling act as H.R. 400 of the 112th Congress. The bill was once again passed onto the subcommittee.
On 27 June 2011, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association. Video games were protected speech under the First Amendment. The case centered on a California law that sought to restrict sales of violent video games to minors. The video game industry, led by the Entertainment Merchants Association and the Entertainment Software Association, successfully obtained an injunction on the bill, believing that the definition of violence as stated in the California law was too vague and would not treat video games as protected speech. This opinion was upheld in lower courts, and supported by the Supreme Court's decision. The majority of the justices did not consider the studies brought to their attention as convincing evidence of harm, and stated that they could not create a new class of restricted speech that was not applied to other forms of media. However, Justice Breyer's minority decision found the evidence more convincing.
Deana Pollard Sacks, Brad Bushman, and Craig A. Anderson objected to the ruling, claiming that the thirteen experts who authored the Statement on Video Game Violence on the Brown side were considerably more academically merited, and had on average authored over 28 times as many peer-reviewed journal articles about aggression/violence based on original empirical research as the signatories supporting the EMA, whereas the over 100 signatories supporting Brown had on average authored over 14 times as many. Richard Hall, Ryan Hall, and Terri Day replied: "It is not surprising that Anderson and Bushman found their own qualifications and the qualifications of those who agree with them to be superior to the qualifications of those who disagree with them", and claimed that they might have used methodology which have undercounted contributions of some scholars. On 3 April 2013, Dianne Feinstein, a Californian senator and Democrat, spoke in San Francisco to a group of 500 constituents about gun violence. She said video games have "a very negative role for young people, and the industry ought to take note of that" and that Congress might have to step in if the video games industry did not cease to glorify guns.
- Byrd P. "It's all fun and games until somebody gets hurt: the effectiveness of proposed video game regulation." Houston Law Review 2007. Accessed 19 March 2007.
- Byrd P. R. "It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt: the effectiveness of proposed video-game legislation on reducing violence in children." Houston Law Review.
- "Technology: Greeks fight computer game ban." BBC News World Edition. 5 September 2002.
- Lee J."South Korea pulls plug on late-night adolescent online gamers." CNN 22 November 2011.
- "Nintendo Censorship". Filibuster cartoons website. Accessed 20 September 2012.
- "Moving Experiences". Iupress.indiana.edu. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
- "SAGE: Media Violence and Aggression: Science and Ideology: Tom Grimes: 9781412914413". SAGE. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
- Colin Campbell (16 February 2012). "How Parents See Games Today". IGN. Retrieved 18 June 2015.
- Seth G. Macy (16 September 2014). "The ESRB Is Turning 20". IGN. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
- "UK Enforce PEGI Video Game Ratings System". BBC News. 30 July 2012. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
- Hook L. "Lenovo's Kinect-clone evades Chinese ban on video-game consoles." The Globe and Mail 18 June 2012. Accessed 18 June 2012.
- Ume L. "Console revolution." the Escapist. 15 December 2011. Accessed 20 August 2011.
- Tom Phillips (13 January 2014). "As the Console Ban Lifts, China Plan to Block "Hostile" Games". Eurogamer". Retrieved 17 June 2015.
- "German Criminal Code, Section 131 Representation of Violence". Iuscomp.org. Retrieved 2011-10-26.
- Handrahan, Matthew (August 9, 2018). "Germany relaxes stance on Nazi symbols in video games". GamesIndustry.biz. Retrieved August 9, 2018.
- "From Japan, With Changes: The Endless Debate Over Video Game 'Censorship'". kotaku. 14 December 2015. Retrieved 1 January 2018.
- "5 Weird Ways Japan Has Censored Video Games". Dorkly. 10 November 2017. Retrieved 1 January 2018.
- Automatic redirect to KCSC Warning Archived 2011-04-30 at the Wayback Machine.
- "Searching For An Adult Topic? You’ll Have To Prove Your Age To Google Korea", Search Engine Land, 17 May 2007
- "Then there were three: Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo and the evolution of the Electronic Entertainment Expo". Engadget. Retrieved 2017-09-08.
- Kohler, Chris. "July 29, 1994: Videogame Makers Propose Ratings Board to Congress". WIRED. Retrieved 2017-09-08.
- "Excerpt from '20/20' on the Debate Whether Violent Video Games Desensitize Children". World News Now, ABC, 2000-03-23.
- Dobbs, Lou. Lou Dobbs Tonight. CNN, 2005-08-24.
- "Gaming lobby Video Game Voters Network surpasses 500K members". VentureBeat. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
- "Video Game Lobby Steers Gun Violence Debate Away". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
- "Report: ESA Spent $3.9 Million in 2013 Fighting Against State and Federal Anti-Videogame Legislation, Lobbying". Gamepolitics.com. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
- "A Hornet's Nest Over Violent Video Games – The Conversation - Blogs - The Chronicle of Higher Education". Chronicle.com. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
- "Gun violence and media effects: challenges for science and public policy". Bjp.rcpsych.org. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
- "Senators Clinton, Lieberman Announce Federal Legislation to Protect Children from Inappropriate Video Games". Archived from the original on July 31, 2008.
- "Hidden Sex Scenes Hit GTA's Rating". BBC News. 21 July 2005. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
- "Video games ratings enforcement act." FR Web Gate US government website.
- Triplett W. "Bill targets teen gamers." Archived 2008-05-13 at the Wayback Machine. Variety 7 May 2008.
- "Undercover Shoppers Find It Increasingly Difficult for Children to Buy M-Rated Games | Federal Trade Commission". Ftc.gov. 2008-05-08. Retrieved 2015-02-18.
- "Violent Video Games Are The Hardest Media For Minors To Acquire, According To A Study From The FTC". Wayback.archive.org. 2011-04-24. Archived from the original on 2012-04-05. Retrieved 2015-02-18.
- "H.R. 231, Video game health labelling act." Congressional bills, GPO access.
- Baca J. "Video game health." US government. January 2009.
- "Video Game Health Labelling Act." Congressional Bills, GPO Access 24 January 2011.
- "Arnold Schwarzenegger. Edmund G. Brown Jr. v. Entertainment Merchants Association, and Entertainment Software Association"
- O'Sullivan S. "Lawmaker keeps eye on video game case." Delaware News-Journal 1 November 2010. Accessed 11 November 2010.
- Riopell M. "Ban kids from buying violent video games in Illinois?" Daily Herald 10 November 2010. Accessed 11 November 2010.
- "Bloomberg Law - Document - Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn., 131 S. Ct. 2729, 180 L. Ed. 2d 708, 2011 ILRC 2071, 32 ILRD 137 (2011), Court Opinion". Bloomberglaw.com. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
- "Do Violent Video Games Harm Children? Comparing the Scientific Amicus Curiae "Experts" in Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association". Law.northwestern.edu. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
- Ryan Hall; Terri Day & Richard Hall (August 2011). "A Further Plea for Caution Against Medical Professionals Overstating Video Game Violence Effects". Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 86 (8): 821–823. doi:10.4065/mcp.2011.0357. PMC 3146384.
- "Sen. Feinstein blames NRA, gun makers for derailing assault weapons ban." CBS, San Francisco 3 April 2013, Accessed 1 August 2013.