Viral vectors are tools commonly used by molecular biologists to deliver genetic material into cells. This process can be performed inside a living organism (in vivo) or in cell culture (in vitro). Viruses have evolved specialized molecular mechanisms to efficiently transport their genomes inside the cells they infect. Delivery of genes by a virus is termed transduction and the infected cells are described as transduced. Molecular biologists first harnessed this machinery in the 1970s. Paul Berg used a modified SV40 virus containing DNA from the bacteriophage lambda to infect monkey kidney cells maintained in culture.
Viral vectors are tailored to their specific applications but generally share a few key properties.
- Safety: Although viral vectors are occasionally created from pathogenic viruses, they are modified in such a way as to minimize the risk of handling them. This usually involves the deletion of a part of the viral genome critical for viral replication. Such a virus can efficiently infect cells but, once the infection has taken place, requires a helper virus to provide the missing proteins for production of new virions.
- Low toxicity: The viral vector should have a minimal effect on the physiology of the cell it infects.
- Stability: Some viruses are genetically unstable and can rapidly rearrange their genomes. This is detrimental to predictability and reproducibility of the work conducted using a viral vector and is avoided in their design.
- Cell type specificity: Most viral vectors are engineered to infect as wide a range of cell types as possible. However, sometimes the opposite is preferred. The viral receptor can be modified to target the virus to a specific kind of cell. Viruses modified in this manner are said to be pseudotyped.
- Identification: Viral vectors are often given certain genes that help identify which cells took up the viral genes. These genes are called Markers. A common marker is antibiotic resistance to a certain antibiotic. The cells can then be isolated easily as those that have not taken up the viral vector genes do not have antibiotic resistance and so cannot grow in a culture with antibiotics present.
Viral vectors were originally developed as an alternative to transfection of naked DNA for molecular genetics experiments. Compared to traditional methods such as calcium phosphate precipitation, transduction can ensure that nearly 100% of cells are infected without severely affecting cell viability. Furthermore, some viruses integrate into the cell genome facilitating stable expression.
However, transfection is still the method of choice for many applications as construction of a viral vector is a much more laborious process.
Protein coding genes can be expressed using viral vectors, commonly to study the function of the particular protein. Viral vectors, especially retroviruses, stably expressing marker genes such as GFP are widely used to permanently label cells to track them and their progeny, for example in xenotransplantation experiments, when cells infected in vitro are implanted into a host animal.
Gene insertion is cheaper to carry out than gene knockout. But as the silencing is sometimes non-specific and has off-target effects on other genes, it provides less reliable results. Animal host vectors also play an important role.
Gene therapy is a technique for correcting defective genes responsible for disease development. In the future, gene therapy may provide a way to cure genetic disorders, such as severe combined immunodeficiency, cystic fibrosis or even Haemophilia A. Because these diseases result from mutations in the DNA sequence for specific genes, gene therapy trials have used viruses to deliver unmutated copies of these genes to the cells of the patient's body. There have been a huge number of laboratory successes with gene therapy. However, several problems of viral gene therapy must be overcome before it gains widespread use. Immune response to viruses not only impedes the delivery of genes to target cells but can cause severe complications for the patient. In one of the early gene therapy trials in 1999 this led to the death of Jesse Gelsinger, who was treated using an adenoviral vector.
Some viral vectors, for instance lentiviruses, insert their genomes at a seemingly random location on one of the host chromosomes, which can disturb the function of cellular genes and lead to cancer. In a severe combined immunodeficiency retroviral gene therapy trial conducted in 2002, four of the patients developed leukemia as a consequence of the treatment; three of the patients recovered after chemotherapy. Adeno-associated virus-based vectors are much safer in this respect as they always integrate at the same site in the human genome. Altogether non-viral vectors are most preferred in the current scheme of events for transfection studies. Vectors are also called vehicles.
Viruses expressing pathogen proteins are currently being developed as vaccines against these pathogens, based on the same rationale as DNA vaccines. T-lymphocytes recognize cells infected with intracellular parasites based on the foreign proteins produced within the cell. T cell immunity is crucial for protection against viral infections and such diseases as malaria. A viral vaccine induces expression of pathogen proteins within host cells similarly to the Sabin Polio vaccine and other attenuated vaccines. However, since viral vaccines contain only a small fraction of pathogen genes, they are much safer and sporadic infection by the pathogen is impossible. Adenoviruses are being actively developed as vaccines.
Retroviruses are one of the mainstays of current gene therapy approaches. The recombinant retroviruses such as the Moloney murine leukemia virus have the ability to integrate into the host genome in a stable fashion. They contain a reverse transcriptase that allows integration into the host genome. They have been used in a number of FDA-approved clinical trials such as the SCID-X1 trial.
Retroviral vectors can either be replication-competent or replication-defective. Replication-defective vectors are the most common choice in studies because the viruses have had the coding regions for the genes necessary for additional rounds of virion replication and packaging replaced with other genes, or deleted. These virus are capable of infecting their target cells and delivering their viral payload, but then fail to continue the typical lytic pathway that leads to cell lysis and death.
Conversely, replication-competent viral vectors contain all necessary genes for virion synthesis, and continue to propagate themselves once infection occurs. Because the viral genome for these vectors is much lengthier, the length of the actual inserted gene of interest is limited compared to the possible length of the insert for replication-defective vectors. Depending on the viral vector, the typical maximum length of an allowable DNA insert in a replication-defective viral vector is usually about 8–10 kB. While this limits the introduction of many genomic sequences, most cDNA sequences can still be accommodated.
The primary drawback to use of retroviruses such as the Moloney retrovirus involves the requirement for cells to be actively dividing for transduction. As a result, cells such as neurons are very resistant to infection and transduction by retroviruses. There is concern that insertional mutagenesis due to integration into the host genome might lead to cancer or leukemia. This concern remained theoretical until gene therapy for ten SCID-X1 patients using Maloney murine leukemia virus resulted in two cases of leukemia caused by activation of the LMO2 oncogene due to nearby integration of the vector.
Lentiviruses are a subclass of Retroviruses. They have recently been adapted as gene delivery vehicles (vectors) thanks to their ability to integrate into the genome of non-dividing cells, which is the unique feature of Lentiviruses as other Retroviruses can infect only dividing cells. The viral genome in the form of RNA is reverse-transcribed when the virus enters the cell to produce DNA, which is then inserted into the genome at a random position (recent findings actually suggest that the insertion of viral DNA is not random but directed to specific active genes and related to genome organisation) by the viral integrase enzyme. The vector, now called a provirus, remains in the genome and is passed on to the progeny of the cell when it divides. The site of integration is unpredictable, which can pose a problem. The provirus can disturb the function of cellular genes and lead to activation of oncogenes promoting the development of cancer, which raises concerns for possible applications of lentiviruses in gene therapy. However, studies have shown that lentivirus vectors have a lower tendency to integrate in places that potentially cause cancer than gamma-retroviral vectors. More specifically, one study found that lentiviral vectors did not cause either an increase in tumor incidence or an earlier onset of tumors in a mouse strain with a much higher incidence of tumors. Moreover, clinical trials that utilized lentiviral vectors to deliver gene therapy for the treatment of HIV experienced no increase in mutagenic or oncologic events.
For safety reasons lentiviral vectors never carry the genes required for their replication. To produce a lentivirus, several plasmids are transfected into a so-called packaging cell line, commonly HEK 293. One or more plasmids, generally referred to as packaging plasmids, encode the virion proteins, such as the capsid and the reverse transcriptase. Another plasmid contains the genetic material to be delivered by the vector. It is transcribed to produce the single-stranded RNA viral genome and is marked by the presence of the ψ (psi) sequence. This sequence is used to package the genome into the virion.
As opposed to lentiviruses, adenoviral DNA does not integrate into the genome and is not replicated during cell division. This limits their use in basic research, although adenoviral vectors are still used in in vitro and also in vivo experiments. Their primary applications are in gene therapy and vaccination. Since humans commonly come in contact with adenoviruses, which cause respiratory, gastrointestinal and eye infections, majority of patients have already developed neutralizing antibodies which can inactivate the virus before it can reach the target cell. To overcome this problem scientists are currently investigating adenoviruses that infect different species to which humans do not have immunity.
Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a small virus that infects humans and some other primate species. AAV is not currently known to cause disease and consequently the virus causes a very mild immune response. AAV can infect both dividing and non-dividing cells and may incorporate its genome into that of the host cell. Moreover, AAV mostly stays as episomal; performing long and stable expression. These features make AAV a very attractive candidate for creating viral vectors for gene therapy. However, AAV can only bring up to 5kb which is considerably small compare to AAV's original capacity.
Furthermore, because of its potential use as a gene therapy vector, researchers have created an altered AAV called Self-complementary adeno-associated virus (scAAV). Whereas AAV packages a single strand of DNA and requires the process of second-strand synthesis, scAAV packages both strands which anneal together to form double stranded DNA. By skipping second strand synthesis scAAV allows for rapid expression in the cell. Otherwise, scAAV carries many characteristics of its AAV counterpart.
Challenges in application
The choice of a viral vector to deliver genetic material to cells comes with some logistical problems. There are a limited number of viral vectors available for therapeutic use. Any of these few viral vectors can cause the body to develop an immune response if the vector is seen as a foreign invader. Once used, the viral vector cannot be effectively used in the patient again because it will be recognized by the body. If the vaccine or gene therapy fails in clinical trials, the virus can’t be used again in the patient for a different vaccine or gene therapy in the future. Pre-existing immunity against the viral vector could also be present in the patient rendering the therapy ineffective for that patient. It is possible to counteract pre-existing immunity when using a viral vector for vaccination by priming with a non-viral DNA vaccine, but this method presents another expense and obstacle in the vaccine distribution process. Pre-existing immunity may also be challenged by increasing vaccine dose or changing the vaccination route.
- Goff, S.; Berg, P. (1976). "Construction of hybrid viruses containing SV40 and $lambda; phage DNA segments and their propagation in cultured monkey cells". Cell 9 (4): 695–705. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(76)90133-1. PMID 189942.
- Beardsley T (February 2000). "A tragic death clouds the future of an innovative treatment method". Scientific American.
- McDowell N (15 January 2003). "New cancer case halts US gene therapy trials". New Scientist.
- Hacein-Bey-Abina, Salima; Hauer, Julia; Lim, Annick; Picard, Capucine; Wang, Gary P.; Berry, Charles C.; Martinache, Chantal; Rieux-Laucat, Frédéric; Latour, Sylvain; Belohradsky, Bernd H.; Leiva, Lily; Sorensen, Ricardo; Debré, Marianne; Casanova, Jean Laurent; Blanche, Stephane; Durandy, Anne; Bushman, Frederic D.; Fischer, Alain; Cavazzana-Calvo, Marina (22 July 2010). "Efficacy of Gene Therapy for X-Linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency". New England Journal of Medicine 363 (4): 355–364. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1000164. Retrieved 13 April 2013.
- Cavazzana-Calvo, M.; Hacein-Bey, S.; De Saint Basile, G.; Gross, F.; Yvon, E.; Nusbaum, P.; Selz, F.; Hue, C.; Certain, S.; Casanova, J. L.; Bousso, P.; Deist, F. L.; Fischer, A. (2000). "Gene Therapy of Human Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID)-X1 Disease". Science 288 (5466): 669–672. doi:10.1126/science.288.5466.669. PMID 10784449.
- Varmus, Harold; Coffin, John M.; Hughes, Stephen H., ed. (1997). "Principles of Retroviral Vector Design". Retroviruses. Plainview, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. ISBN 0-87969-571-4.
- Hacein-Bey-Abina, S.; Le Deist, F. O.; Carlier, F. D. R.; Bouneaud, C. C.; Hue, C.; De Villartay, J. P.; Thrasher, A. J.; Wulffraat, N.; Sorensen, R.; Dupuis-Girod, S.; Fischer, A.; Davies, E. G.; Kuis, W.; Leiva, L.; Cavazzana-Calvo, M. (2002). "Sustained Correction of X-Linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency by ex Vivo Gene Therapy". New England Journal of Medicine 346 (16): 1185–1193. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa012616. PMID 11961146.
- Hacein-Bey-Abina, S.; Von Kalle, C.; Schmidt, M.; McCormack, M. P.; Wulffraat, N.; Leboulch, P.; Lim, A.; Osborne, C. S.; Pawliuk, R.; Morillon, E.; Sorensen, R.; Forster, A.; Fraser, P.; Cohen, J. I.; De Saint Basile, G.; Alexander, I.; Wintergerst, U.; Frebourg, T.; Aurias, A.; Stoppa-Lyonnet, D.; Romana, S.; Radford-Weiss, I.; Gross, F.; Valensi, F.; Delabesse, E.; MacIntyre, E.; Sigaux, F.; Soulier, J.; Leiva, L. E.; Wissler, M. (2003). "LMO2-Associated Clonal T Cell Proliferation in Two Patients after Gene Therapy for SCID-X1". Science 302 (5644): 415–419. doi:10.1126/science.1088547. PMID 14564000.
- Marini, B.; Kertesz-Farkas, A.; Ali, H.; Lucic, B.; Lisek, K.; Manganaro, L.; Pongor, S.; Luzzati, R.; Recchia, A.; Mavilio, F.; Giacca, M.; Lusic, M. (2015). "Nuclear architecture dictates HIV-1 integration site selection". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature14226.
- Cattoglio, C.; Facchini, G.; Sartori, D.; Antonelli, A.; Miccio, A.; Cassani, B.; Schmidt, M.; Von Kalle, C.; Howe, S.; Thrasher, A. J.; Aiuti, A.; Ferrari, G.; Recchia, A.; Mavilio, F. (2007). "Hot spots of retroviral integration in human CD34+ hematopoietic cells". Blood 110 (6): 1770–1778. doi:10.1182/blood-2007-01-068759. PMID 17507662.
- Montini, E.; Cesana, D.; Schmidt, M.; Sanvito, F.; Ponzoni, M.; Bartholomae, C.; Sergi Sergi, L. S.; Benedicenti, F.; Ambrosi, A.; Di Serio, C.; Doglioni, C.; Von Kalle, C.; Naldini, L. (2006). "Hematopoietic stem cell gene transfer in a tumor-prone mouse model uncovers low genotoxicity of lentiviral vector integration". Nature Biotechnology 24 (6): 687–696. doi:10.1038/nbt1216. PMID 16732270.
- Nussbaum, Robert L; McInnes, Roderick R; Willard, Huntington F (2015). Thompson & Thompson Genetics in Medicine. Canada: ELSEVIER. p. 278. ISBN 978-1-4377-0696-3.
- McCarty, D M; Monahan, P E; Samulski, R J (2001). "Self-complementary recombinant adeno-associated virus (scAAV) vectors promote efficient transduction independently of DNA synthesis". Gene Therapy 8 (16): 1248–54. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3301514. PMID 11509958.
- Nayak, S.; Herzog, R. W. (2009). "Progress and prospects: Immune responses to viral vectors". Gene Therapy 17 (3): 295–304. doi:10.1038/gt.2009.148. PMC 3044498. PMID 19907498.
- Zhou, H. S.; Liu, D. P.; Liang, C. C. (2004). "Challenges and strategies: The immune responses in gene therapy". Medicinal Research Reviews 24 (6): 748–761. doi:10.1002/med.20009. PMID 15250039.
- Crommelin DJA, Sindelar RD, Meibohm B (2008). Pharmaceutical Biotechnology: Fundamentals and application. London: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 1420044370.
- Yang, Z. -Y.; Wyatt, L. S.; Kong, W. -P.; Moodie, Z.; Moss, B.; Nabel, G. J. (2003). "Overcoming Immunity to a Viral Vaccine by DNA Priming before Vector Boosting". Journal of Virology 77 (1): 799–803. doi:10.1128/JVI.77.1.799-803.2003. PMC 140625. PMID 12477888.
- Pandey, A.; Singh, N.; Vemula, S. V.; Couëtil, L.; Katz, J. M.; Donis, R.; Sambhara, S.; Mittal, S. K. (2012). Subbiah, Elankumaran, ed. "Impact of Preexisting Adenovirus Vector Immunity on Immunogenicity and Protection Conferred with an Adenovirus-Based H5N1 Influenza Vaccine". PLoS ONE 7 (3): e33428. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033428. PMC 3303828. PMID 22432020.
- Torashima, T.; Koyama, C.; Higashida, H.; Hirai, H. (2007). "Production of neuron-preferential lentiviral vectors". Protocol Exchange. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.89.
- Okada, Y.; Ikawa, M. (2007). "Placenta specific gene manipulation by transducing zona-free blastocyst using lentiviral vector". Protocol Exchange. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.62.
- Fry JW, Wood KJ (8 June 1999). "A comparison of vectors in use for clinical gene transfer". Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine.