This article's lead section may be too short to adequately summarize the key points. (October 2021)
Voir dire (/ˈvwɑːr dɪər/; often /vɔɪr daɪər/; from an Anglo-Norman phrase meaning "to speak the truth") is a legal phrase for a variety of procedures connected with jury trials. It originally referred to an oath taken by jurors to tell the truth (Latin: verum dicere). This term is also used informally to describe the practice of jury selection in certain jurisdictions.
According to the American Heritage Dictionary, it comes from the Anglo-Norman language.
The word voir (or voire), in this combination, comes from Old French and derives from Latin verum, "[that which is] true". It is related to the modern French word voire, meaning "indeed" (and in an obsolete sense, "truly"), but not to the more common word voir, "to see", which derives from Latin vidēre. William Blackstone referred to it as veritatem dicere, which was translated by John Winter Jones as "To speak the truth". However, the expression is now often interpreted by false etymology to mean "to see [them] say". The term is used (as le voir-dire) in modern Canadian legal French.
In earlier centuries, a challenge to a particular juror would be tried by other members of the jury panel, and the challenged juror would take an oath of voir dire, meaning to tell the truth. This procedure fell into disuse when the function of trying challenges to jurors was transferred to the judge.
Commonwealth countries, Ireland and Hong Kong
In England and Wales, Cyprus, Hong Kong, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea and Canada, it refers to a "trial within a trial". It is a hearing to determine the admissibility of evidence, or the competency of a witness or juror. As the subject matter of the voir dire often relates to evidence, competence or other matters that may lead to bias on behalf of the jury, the jury may be removed from the court for the voir dire.
Under Scots law, jury selection is random, and there are a few well-defined exclusions in criminal trials.
In Canada, the case of Erven v. The Queen holds that testimony on a voir dire cannot influence the trial itself. This remains true even if the judge ruled against the accused in the voir dire. The judge is assumed to ignore what he or she heard during voir dire. The jury is never present during a voir dire. However, since the evidence given at a voir dire may be redundant to evidence at trial, with the consent of the parties a procedure called a "blended voir dire" may be used to save time. In this procedure, evidence given in the voir dire, if then found admissible, is transferred into the main trial without having to be repeated.
In Australia, the rule about voir dire is in section 189 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth): "On a voir dire parties can call witnesses, cross-examine opponent's witnesses and make submissions- as they might in the trial proper." The term has thus been broadened in Australian jurisdictions to include any hearing during a trial where the jury is removed. The High Court of Australia has noted that the voir dire is an appropriate forum for the trial judge to reprimand counsel or for counsel to make submissions as to the running of the court to the trial judge.
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (October 2021)
In the United States, voir dire is the process by which prospective jurors are questioned about their backgrounds and potential biases before being chosen to sit on a jury. "Voir Dire is the process by which attorneys select, or perhaps more appropriately reject, certain jurors to hear a case." It also refers to the process by which expert witnesses are questioned about their backgrounds and qualifications before being allowed to present their opinion testimony in court. As noted above, in the United States (especially in practice under the Federal Rules of Evidence), voir dire can also refer to examination of the background of a witness to assess their qualification or fitness to give testimony on a given subject. Voir dire is often taught to law students in trial advocacy courses.
Colloquially, among attorneys and their staff, the term is used to describe the process of selecting a jury in some jurisdictions. Jury selection differs based on the court and locality where a trial occurs. The process of jury selection and managing voir dire is a key area of study for criminal trial attorneys. The Center for Jury Studies, a project of the National Center for State Courts, has studied voir dire, as has The American Bar Association.
- ^ "Voir Dire: to see them say, or to tell the truth?". Glossophilia. May 5, 2017. Retrieved January 8, 2019.
- ^ "Rule 24: Trial Jurors. | Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts". www.tncourts.gov. Retrieved 2022-04-22.
- ^ "How Courts Work". www.americanbar.org. Retrieved 2022-04-22.
- ^ "voir dire". American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (5th ed.). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 2019. Retrieved January 8, 2019.
Anglo-Norman, to speak the truth
- ^ "Verum, veri [n.] O". Latin is Simple. Retrieved January 8, 2019.
- ^ Blackstone, William. Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England. Vol. Book 3, Ch. 23. p. 394.
A juror may himself be examined on oath of voir dire, veritatem dicere ....
- ^ Jones, J. (1823). A Translation of All the Greek, Latin, Italian, and French Quotations which Occur in Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, And Also in the Notes of the Editions by Christian, Archbold, and Williams. Vol. III. p. 197.
- ^ Blackstone's Commentaries, vol. 3 p. 364.
- ^ Duhaime, Lloyd. "Voir Dire definition". Duhaime's Legal Dictionary. Duhaime.org. Retrieved 4 April 2011.
- ^ "Does US jury system make justice a joke?". The Scotsman. Retrieved 25 May 2015.
- ^ "Erven v The Queen". Supreme Court of Canada. January 2001.
- ^ "Criminal Procedure". freelegalhelp.ca.
- ^ Fugazza, Léo (21 August 2018). "R. v. Cochrane, 2018 ABCA 80 - Summary". CanLII Connects. Retrieved 8 December 2022.
- ^ Jill Hunter et al, The Trial (The Federal Press, 2015) 55
- ^ Moles, Robert N.; Sangha, Bibi (3 May 2007). "Jago v The District Court of NSW and others (1989) HCA 46". Networked Knowledge. Retrieved 4 April 2011.
- ^ Cleary, Gordon P.; Tarantino, John A. (2007). Trial Evidence Foundations. Santa Ana, Calif.: James Publishing. Section 201.
- ^ Mueller, Christopher B.; Kirkpatrick, Laird C. (2009). Evidence. Aspen Treatise Series (4th ed.). New York: Aspen Publishers. §§6.2, 6.59, 7.14. ISBN 978-0-7355-7967-5. OCLC 300280544.
- ^ Lubet, Steven (2004). Modern Trial Advocacy (Law School Edition, 2nd ed.). NITA. pp. 213–214, 276. ISBN 9781556819247.
- ^ "Voir Dire and Jury Selection — Judicial Education Center". jec.unm.edu. Retrieved 2022-04-22.
- ^ "Building a Better Voir Dire Process" (PDF). Center for Jury Studies.
- ^ Bardeen, Michael (May 1, 2015). "Voir Dire Training - ACLU Northern California" (PDF).
- ^ "11 must-dos from a voir dire master".
- Sample Voir Dire to Jury—United States Department of Justice (via Wayback Machine)
- Getting Jurors to Talk