|Marriage and other
equivalent or similar unions and status
|Validity of marriages|
|Dissolution of marriages|
|Private international law|
|Family and criminal code
(or criminal law)
In law, a ward is someone placed under the protection of a legal guardian. The wardship jurisdiction is an ancient jurisdiction derived from the Crown's duty as parens patriae to protect his/her subject, and particularly those unable to look after themselves. In the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth realms, the Queen as parens patriae is mother for all the children in her realms . A court may take responsibility for the legal protection of an individual, usually either a child or incapacitated person, in which case the ward is known as a ward of the court or a ward of the state. However, the House of Lords in the case of Re F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation) held that the Queen has no parens patriae jurisdiction with regard to mentally handicapped adults.
In Australia, New Zealand and the United States, the child is termed a ward of the court. In Ireland and the United Kingdom "the" is not used; the ward is thus termed a ward of court. In Canada the legal term is Crown ward.
Children who are in the custody of government departments, also known as foster care, become wards of the respective government entity, and in the US wards of the states in which they reside. The government or state is in loco parentis to the child, which generally entails assuming all lawful authority to make medical and legal decisions on the child's behalf.
|This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (November 2010)|
In Canada people of Native American status remain wards of the Crown as a result of Indian Act legislation. Some scholars and political organizations, such as the Assembly of First Nations, have argued that this represents an apartheid-like system of governance.
In the Supreme Court case Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, the native peoples were legally made to be wards of the state. One consequence of this was that they were not permitted to sue the US government because of their status as a dependent nation.
The Indian Appropriations Act was passed on 3 March 1871, with an amendment ending tribal recognition and the treaty system. All Indians were made wards of the state; thus the U.S. government no longer needed tribal consent in dealing with the tribes.
- Charge (youth)
- Court of Wards and Liveries
- Government involvement in the Terri Schiavo case
- History of the English fiscal system
- Proof of age inquisition
- Tenant-in-chief - relating to medieval feudal wardships
- Re Y (Minors)  HKLR 204 at 207
- Judicial Office. "Judiciary.Gov.UK". Judiciary.Gov.UK. Retrieved 2014-05-06.
- Ontario.Gov Archived July 1, 2009, at the Wayback Machine.
- "Nolo Law Dictionary". Nolo.com. Retrieved 2014-05-06.
- FAFSA Archived January 10, 2010, at the Wayback Machine.
- "Indian Status". Indigenousfoundations.arts.ubc.ca. 2011-11-01. Retrieved 2014-05-06.
- Wilkinson, C (1998). American Indians, Time, and the Law: Native Societies in a Modern Constitutional Democracy. Yale University Press.
- "Key Events in the Presidency of Ulysses S. Grant". University of Virginia. Retrieved 2012-06-17.
|This legal term article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|