Watts v. Indiana

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Watts v. Indiana
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Argued April 25, 1949
Decided June 27, 1949
Full case name Watts v. Indiana
Citations 338 U.S. 49 (more)
69 S. Ct. 1347; 93 L. Ed. 1801; 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2080
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Frankfurter, joined by Murphy, Rutledge
Concurrence Black
Concurrence Douglas
Concur/dissent Jackson
Dissent Vinson, Reed, Burton

Watts v. Indiana, 338 U.S. 49 (1949), was a United States Supreme Court case in which Robert H. Jackson famously opined, "To bring in a lawyer means a real peril to solution of the crime because, under our adversary system, he deems that his sole duty is to protect his client--guilty or innocent--and that, in such a capacity, he owes no duty whatever to help society solve its crime problem. Under this conception of criminal procedure, any lawyer worth his salt will tell the suspect in no uncertain terms to make no statement to police under any circumstances."

In this case, a defendant was subjected to rigorous interrogation methods, including being forced to sleep on the floor, resulting in a confession to having committed murder. The Supreme Court ruled that the confession was involuntary and reversed his conviction.