Newbattle (or Lothianbridge) viaduct
|Status||Disused, scheduled for partial re-opening|
|Locale||Edinburgh, Midlothian, Borders, Carlisle
|Closed||1969 (under re-construction; partial re-opening 2015)|
|Line length||98.25 mi (158.12 km)|
|Track gauge||4 ft 8 1⁄2 in (1,435 mm)|
The Waverley Route was a railway line that ran south from Edinburgh, through Midlothian and the Scottish Borders, to Carlisle. The line was built by the North British Railway; the stretch from Edinburgh to Hawick opened in 1849 and the remainder to Carlisle opened in 1862. The line was named after a series of novels by Sir Walter Scott. The line was closed in 1969, as a result of the Beeching Report. Part of the line, from Edinburgh to Tweedbank, is scheduled to reopen in September 2015. The reopened railway is to be known as the Borders Railway.
- 1 History
- 2 Infrastructure and services
- 3 Post-closure
- 4 References
- 5 External links
Edinburgh and Dalkeith Railway
The North British Railway (NBR) was established on 4 July 1844 when Parliamentary authorisation was given for the construction of a 57-mile-30-chain (92.3 km) line from Edinburgh to Berwick-upon-Tweed with a 4-mile-50-chain (7.4 km) branch to Haddington. The company's chairman and founder was John Learmonth, the chairman of the Edinburgh and Glasgow Railway, whose ambition it was to enclose the triangle of land between Edinburgh, Berwick and Carlisle with NBR rails. Carlisle was a key railway centre where a cross-border link with the Lancaster and Carlisle Railway could be established.
The NBR's Edinburgh-Berwick line was to be the starting point for the route which would run diagonally across the Southern Uplands to the Solway Plain and Carlisle, a distance of some 98 miles (158 km). The first step in establishing the line was the acquisition of the Edinburgh and Dalkeith Railway (E&DR), a local line which ran from an inconveniently-sited station at St Leonards on the southern extremity of Edinburgh to Dalhousie on the Lothian Coalfield. The E&DR, which had been authorised on 26 May 1826 as a tramway to carry coal to the Firth of Forth at Fisherrow and, later, Leith, ran for a distance of 8 1⁄2 miles (13.7 km) with branches eastwards to Leith and Fisherrow from Wanton Walls. The proprietors of the E&DR viewed the NBR's overtures with some alarm as they feared the loss of their valuable coal traffic; thought was given to extending the E&DR to meet the Edinburgh and Glasgow or the projected Caledonian Main Line but the proprietors' concerns were assuaged by the NBR's generous offer of £113,000 for the outright purchase of the line and the sale was completed in October 1845.
In the state in which it was acquired, the E&DR was of little use to the NBR as it had been operated as a horse-drawn tramway for the previous thirteen years, was built to a 4 ft 6 in gauge and was in a dilapidated state in terms of both infrastructure and rolling stock. Nevertheless, the concern brought with it a number of advantages: its proprietors had developed an efficient coal-marketing organisation which would greatly benefit its new owners, it consolidated the NBR's position in Edinburgh while also barring the rival Caledonian Railway from the Lothian Coalfields, and, perhaps most importantly, the E&DR pointed in the direction of Carlisle. Parliamentary authorisation for the line's acquisition was obtained on 21 July 1845 with the passing of the North British Railway (Edinburgh & Dalkeith Purchase) Act, which allowed the NBR to lay a spur from its Edinburgh-Berwick line near Portobello to the E&DR at Niddrie, thereby allowing NBR services to run directly from North Bridge station to Dalhousie.
Edinburgh and Hawick Railway
Even before the NBR had obtained its Act authorising the acquisition of the E&DR, John Learmonth had instructed John Miller to carry out a flying survey of the territory to the south of Dalkeith for a potential line to Kelso which would connect with a branch from Berwick. The scheme, which would see a 52-mile (84 km) line from the E&DR's terminus at Dalhousie Mains to Hawick, was discussed at a shareholders' meeting on 19 December 1844 where it drew criticism for being nearly as long as the NBR's Berwick line. Learmonth described the line as a "protective" one to guard against incursions by the NBR's Glasgow-based rival, the Caledonian Railway, and stated that there was no intention of extending it further to Carlisle.its Glasgow-based rival. The proposal having been carried by a substantial majority, the Act authorising the line was obtained on 21 July 1845 with the incorporation of the Edinburgh and Hawick Railway. Although nominally independent, the company had £400,000 of its capital subscribed by NBR directors and the shares, each bearing a 4% guarantee, were to be transferred to NBR shareholders after incorporation. A special shareholders' meeting on 18 August 1845 authorised a further £400,000 to be raised which would be used to buy out the Edinburgh and Hawick company. At the same time, Learmonth revealed that it was in fact intended to continue to Carlisle.
The line would first be extended to Galashiels by paying £1,200 to buy out the independent Galashiels Railway project. The line to Hawick was to be the greatest and most costly of the NBR's lines. From Dalhousie it climbed up the valleys of the South Esk and the Gore Water for 8 miles (13 km) at 1 in 70 to reach a 900-foot (270 m) summit at Falahill, before dropping down to the Gala Water which it crossed fifteen times to reach Galashiels. The next stage passed through the Tweed Valley, around the Eildons to Melrose and St Boswells, and finally to Hawick over undulating terrain. Construction was already under way in June 1846 when the company obtained authorisation to build seven branch lines - four from its Berwick line and three from the Hawick line. The line opened on 1 November 1849.
Border Union Railway
Despite the manifest lack of traffic potential over the barren moorlands separating Hawick and Carlisle, reaching the Cumbrian county town was to be a hotly disputed affair with the NBR and the Caledonian Railway vying for control. The Caledonian was keen to hinder the progress of the NBR and planned an incursion into NBR territory with the Caledonian Extension Railway - a 104-mile (167 km) line from Ayr to Berwick to complement its main line from Carlisle to Glasgow. In 1847, the Caledonian obtained powers to construct a line eastwards from Gretna on its main line to Canonbie, only 8 miles (13 km) from Hawick, but these powers were allowed to lapse. A second scheme was promoted in 1857: a single-line branch to Langholm whose sole aim was to keep the NBR out of Carlisle. The NBR put forward a rival scheme: the 43-mile (69 km) long double-track Border Union Railway which would run from Hawick down Liddesdale and through Newcastleton to the Solway Plain and Carlisle. The extension being a matter of life and death for the NBR, its chairman, Richard Hodgson, who had replaced Learmonth in 1855, set about appealing to local councils and traders for their support. Through his efforts, the Border Union Railway was backed by the town councils of Edinburgh, Leith, Dunbar, Haddington, Berwick and Hawick, whilst the Leith Dock Commissioners, the Merchant Company of Edinburgh and the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce also supported the scheme. The Border towns saw the Glasgow-based Caledonian Railway as an interloper, whereas the NBR was an Edinburgh company and their chairman was from the Borders region. Such was the support for Hodgson that a public holiday was declared in his honour at Hawick in August 1858.
Notwithstanding this support, Hodgson sought to build bridges with the Caledonian by offering, on 4 September 1858, to construct a joint line between Hawick and Carlisle. The line would be built in two equal parts by the companies which would be responsible for its management; free interchange of traffic would be allowed on the NBR lines north and west of Hawick and on the lines south and west of the Caledonian main line. The proposal gained no traction with the Caledonian, leading the NBR to publish details of its proposed scheme, to be known as the Border Union Railway, on 17 December 1858. The line would cost £450,000, of which £337,500 would be raised by shares and the remainder by a loan. Authorisation was given on 21 July 1859 when the Border Union (North British) Railway Act provided for the construction of a 43-mile (69 km) long line to Carlisle. The main line opened throughout to passengers on 1 July 1862. A celebration was held on 1 August when a special train ran from Edinburgh and a dinner was held in the carriage shed at Carlisle for around 700 guests. The Waverley Route was not however complete until the final section on the branch from Canonbie to Langholm opened on 18 April 1864 after completion of a 12-arch viaduct over Tarras Water.
Comprised within the Border Union Railway Act were powers allowing the NBR to cross the Caledonian Railway's main line and join the Carlisle and Silloth Bay Railway at Rattlingate, as well as the granting of facilities at Carlisle Citadel railway station. The NBR would take a 999-year lease of the Silloth line from 1 August 1862. This brought two advantages: firstly, the NBR had access to Carlisle and Silloth harbour with access to Ireland and Liverpool and, secondly, it allowed freight to be sent by sea without having to work through Carlisle and thus not be subject to the Anglo-Scottish traffic agreement which set the rates for goods workings via Carlisle.
Topography and construction
At 98 1⁄4 miles (158.1 km), the alignment chosen for the Waverley Route was considerably longer than the direct route as the crow flies between Edinburgh and Carlisle. However, the course was chosen navigated a careful path around the formidable natural barriers south of Edinburgh in the form of the Southern Uplands and the summits at Whitrope (1,006 feet or 307 metres) and Falahill (880 feet or 270 metres). Although advantage was taken of the easy conditions offered by the numerous river valleys, these two areas of high ground had to be tackled head-on and gave rise to the line's reputation as the toughest main line in Britain due to its constant curves and continuous steep gradients.
From Edinburgh Waverley, the line proceeded south via Portobello East Junction towards the Moorfoots and the Lammermuirs, following the valleys of the South Esk, Gore Water and the Tyne. From Hardengreen Junction near Galashiels there began a 10-mile (16 km) climb at a gradient of 1 in 70 to reach Falahill before meandering along the course of the Gala Water down to its confluence with the River Tweed which accompanied the line for a few miles eastwards to Melrose and St Boswells, descending at typically 1 in 150. The route swung to the south-west at St Boswells towards the River Teviot and on to Hawick where the valley of Slitrig Water provided easy going before the 10-mile (16 km) climb at 1 in 70 over the massed hills to Whitrope Summit. The gradient subsequently eased to 1 in 96 through Whitrope Tunnel to Whitrope Siding box and descended at an unbroken 1 in 75 for over 8 miles (13 km) through the curves necessitated by the rugged countryside around Arnton Fell towards Riccarton Junction and Steele Road. Thereafter came easier terrain in the form of Liddel Water where the line turned west to follow Liddesdale and the Esk valley to reach the border at Kershope Burn. The final stretch from Riddings struck out across the coastal plain to Longtown and then Carlisle.
The first sod on the Border Union Railway was turned at Hawick on 22 July 1859, a day after the line had received Parliamentary approval. Construction works were to last two years and ten months with the task made all the more difficult by the Caledonian Railway's delaying tactics in Parliament which meant that the main works could only begin as winter was approaching. The heavy construction work took place in difficult weather - three frightful winters and two wet summers - in desolate country miles from public roads which required teams of horses to bring materials across the moors and hillsides to the remote work sites. Life on the moorland was hard for the railway navvies and it was difficult to hire and keep men in the very wet conditions which at times prevented any progress. When the NBR's directors toured the Hawick-Hermitage section in January 1862, a number of defects were found including a collapsed wall at the north end of Teviot viaduct due to shoddy specifications, a succession of landslips which required the directors to proceed in a ballast wagon and a stark lack of progress at Stobs. On two of the construction contracts, the NBR's chief engineer had to take over from the contractors whose equipment was sequestrated and sold.
By September 1861, the southern section of the line was ready for traffic but none could be carried as the Caledonian Railway had failed to lay the connection with its newly-constructed Port Carlisle branch at Port Carlisle Junction. This was grudgingly done after a request by the NBR but the single-line laid was rejected by the Board of Trade which insisted on a double-track connection. When the connection was finally laid and access obtained to Carlisle Citadel station, the Caledonian charged the rate for 4 miles (6.4 km) for the 1 1⁄2-mile (2.4 km) approach and refused to accept NBR telegraph wires on its branch or NBR passholders who were dropped off at Port Carlisle Junction. The Border Union Railway was opened in sections: freight services were introduced between Carlisle and Scotch Dyke on 12 October 1861 followed by the passenger service on 28 October, this service was extended to Newcastleton on 1 March 1862 and to Riccarton Junction on 2 June. Opening throughout came on 1 July 1862.
Naming and branches
The name Waverley Route first appeared in NBR minute books towards the end of 1862 and headed the first timetable of Hawick-Carlisle services. Although no indication exists as to how it was chosen or who was responsible, it was inspired by the Waverley Novels by Sir Walter Scott who lived at Abbotsford House near the route of the line and had taken an active interest in early railways. Scott's portrait often adorned posters and timetables and the Scott Monument in Edinburgh became the route's leitmotif. The first class of locomotive specially built for the line, Drummond's 4-4-0 of 1876, were known as the Abbotsford Class, No. 479 bearing the name so closely associated with Scott.
On the same day that the Carlisle extension was opened, services also began running on the Border Counties Railway. It branched off the Waverley Route at Riccarton Junction and ran south to join the Newcastle and Carlisle Railway at Hexham. This provided the NBR with a connection to Newcastle and the East Coast line over North Eastern Railway (NER) metals. The NER extracted a high price from the NBR in the form of running rights from Berwick-upon-Tweed to Edinburgh which were fully exercised by the NER, thereby greatly reducing the role of the Scottish company on the East Coast line.
The Waverley Route spawned a series of branches serving the towns and villages in the Scottish Borders: a branch line from Kelso Junction near St Boswells reached Kelso where it met with an NER branch from Tweedmouth. The NBR Chairman, Richard Hodgson, sought to link the Waverley Route with the Edinburgh-Berwick line between Ravenswood Junction, north of St Boswells, and Reston; the branch between Reston and Duns had been completed in 1849 and a western section to St Boswells was promoted as the Berwickshire Railway which opened throughout on 2 October 1865. Other towns to be connected were Jedburgh by the independent Jedburgh Railway which was inaugurated on 17 July 1856 and worked by the NBR, Selkirk via the Selkirk and Galashiels Railway also opened in 1856 and operated by the NBR, while Langholm received a branch from Riddings Junction, and Gretna one from Longtown. One of the last branches to be constructed was the Lauder Light Railway in 1901 which replaced an omnibus subsidised by the NBR omnibus providing access from the town of Lauder, famed for its trout, and connecting with trains at Stow.
The opening of the Waverley Route resulted in a decline in the Edinburgh-London goods traffic carried over the East Coast line from 4,045 tonnes in 1861 to 624 tonnes in 1863. However, despite the NBR's best efforts to make use of its line, the lack of facilities for through bookings of goods or passengers south of Carlisle meant that there would be no traffic over the Waverley Route except that which had been specifically consigned to the NBR. The London and North Western Railway (L&NWR), which had worked the Lancaster and Carlisle Railway since 1857, had established an efficient cross-border service with the Caledonian Railway and the two companies concluded a secret agreement to deny a share of the Carlisle traffic to the newcomer by providing that traffic from the south for Edinburgh had to be sent by the Caledonian main line unless previously consigned to the NBR's line. This was so effective that locomotive parts ordered by the NBR from The Midlands reached the company's St Margarets works in Edinburgh via the Caledonian.
As a consequence, the initial results of the Waverley Route disappointed and led to heated discussions at NBR board meetings. A lobby developed, featuring in particular shareholders from Glasgow, which called for the line to be abandoned or sold to the Midland Railway. The campaign was led by Archibald Orr-Ewing, an NBR director who described the line as "the most serious burden on the North British". By 1872, expenditure on the Border Union Railway had reached £847,000, £199,000 more than the capital hitherto raised, and a further £300,000 was required. In addition, no shipping company was prepared to start a service to Ireland from Silloth, even though the port had assumed greater importance for the NBR as a result of the difficulties at Carlisle. As a result, although it had not been the NBR's intention to own ships, it became necessary to acquire the paddle steamers Ariel in 1862, followed by Queen amd Silloth in 1864, in order to operate a passenger and goods service between Silloth and Liverpool, Dublin and Belfast.
The financial picture changed with the decision of the Midland Railway to construct the Settle-Carlisle Line. Intent on establishing an Anglo-Scottish main line to rival the East Coast and West Coast lines, the Midland's ambitions had been stymied by the L&NWR upon which the Midland depended for access to Carlisle via the Ingleton branch. The L&NWR's insistence on operating the service between Ingleton and Low Gill as a rural branch line led the Midland in 1866 to apply for Parliamentary authorisation to construct its own line to Carlisle. However, in the wake of the Overend Gurney crisis and an offer by the L&NWR to grant running powers between Ingleton and Carlisle on reasonable conditions, the Midland began to have second thoughts and requested the abandonment of its proposed scheme in 1869. Both the NBR and the Glasgow and South Western Railway petitioned against the abandonment on the basis that it would leave them dependent on the L&NWR's monopoly at Carlisle; they also resented the fact that they had been used by the Midland as a means to negotiate terms with the L&NWR. The House of Commons Committee hearing the case for the bill took the same view and the Midland was obliged to proceed with construction of the Settle-Carlisle line.
A through service between St Pancras and Edinburgh began on 1 May 1876 after new rails had been fitted to the Waverley Route at a cost of £23,957 in order to equip the line for Midland trains. The block telegraph was still being installed when the first through services traversed the line. Upon the completion of the Midland's line, the Waverley Route attained main line status.
The opening of the Forth Bridge in 1890 led to an increase in traffic carried over the Midland's line to stations north of Carlisle. Receipts in June, July, August and September of that year were £6,809 higher than the corresponding months of the previous year.
Throughout its lifetime, the Waverley Route only achieved moderate success. Even during its best years, returns from the line's intermediate stations were meagre. In 1920, the eleven stations between Stobs and Harker on the traffic desert between Hawick and Carlisle raised only £28,152 in receipts, with Longtown contributing the bulk of this amount. The line was challenging to work due to its severe gradients requiring costly double-heading and difficult to maintain particularly in winter.
As a result, right from the first year of its existence, there were calls from within the NBR to close the line which was considered as a millstone by its successive operators. Too far east of the Scottish industrial heartland in the Clyde Valley and traversing thinly-populated countryside for much of the way, the Waverley Route lived off cross-border passenger services and traffic generated by the wool textile industries in Galashiels, Selkirk and Hawick. As a passenger artery, the effectiveness of the route to compete with Edinburgh-London traffic was hampered by its slower journey times compared with the East Coast and West Coast lines, requiring the line's operators to compensate by laying on superior rolling stock. In 1910, the West Coast and East Coast lines achieved a journey time of eight hours and fifteen minutes over their respective distances of 400 miles (640 km) and 393 miles (632 km), whereas the Midland's expresses via the Waverley Route covered the 406 3⁄4 miles (654.6 km) in eight hours and forty minutes. A reasonable number of passengers were carried from Edinburgh to Leeds and Sheffield but thereafter loads were lighter. A survey conducted in July 1963 on a peak Saturday Edinburgh-London service showed less than 40 passengers were carried between Kettering and St Pancras, although the train had been standing room only as far as Leeds. Local services fared little better as motor transport made inroads from the 1920s onwards resulting in the successive closures to passenger traffic of the Waverley Route's branch lines: Lauder on 12 September 1932, Dolphinton on 1 April 1933, Duns to Earlston and Jedburgh on 12 August 1948, Duns and Selkirk on 10 September 1951, Hexham on 15 October 1956 and Peebles and Eyemouth on 5 February 1962.
In terms of goods traffic, coal was brought in and out of the Tweed town mills and Cheviot wool brought from local farms. As a consequence, once new road transport techniques allowed farmers to move their sheep to market in one move and merchants to shift coal from pit to boilerhouse without using the railway, the writing was on the wall for the line.
In March 1963, the British Railways Board published Richard Beeching's report on the Reshaping of British Railways. The 148-page document proposed the withdrawal of passenger services from 5,000 route miles (8,000 km) considered as unremunerative, and the closure of over 2,000 stations. Among the lines whose passenger service would be affected was the Waverley Route. A map annexed to the report indicating that the section between Hawick and Carlisle fell into the lowest category of unremunerative line - those enjoying a weekly patronage of less than 5,000 passengers, with the Hawick-Edinburgh stretch faring little better in the category reserved for lines with 5,000 to 10,000 passengers a week. At the time, the Waverley Route was running at an estimated annual loss of £113,000, with an average operating cost per train mile for diesel-hauled freights of 12.390 shillings, one of the worst in Scotland. For British Railways, the line was seen as a high-cost alternative to the West Coast Main Line whose retention could not be justified by its dwindling freight traffic which could be diverted to the West Coast. As a result, as from the publication of the report, the Scottish Region and the London Midland Regions of British Railways, which had responsibility for the section south of Longtown, both assumed that the line would definitely close as proposed by Beeching.
The Beeching report was received with dismay in the Borders, as although many were not surprised to see the Langholm branch slated for closure, the loss of the whole Waverley line came as a shock, particularly as more rural routes such as the West Highland Line were not mentioned in the document. The closure proposal entailed economic and social implications of concern to a number of Government ministries, including the Scottish Office which, in April 1964, requested the Minister of Transport to ask Richard Beeching to postpone publication of closure notices for the Waverley Route. The Scottish Economic Planning Council also asked the Minister to hold fire on any proposals given the nature, size and importance of the region served by the line. In the 1964 general election, the Conservative Member of Parliament for Roxburgh, Selkirk and Peebles, Charles Donaldson, whose constituency covered Hawick and who had voted for the Beeching report, saw his majority cut by the Liberal candidate, David Steel, who had opposed closure of the Waverley Route. Steel overturned the Conservative majority in a 1965 by-election with his opposition to the line's closure being one of the three main local issues of his campaign.
The election of Labour in October 1964 did not stop the programme of Beeching closures, despite the party's manifesto commitment to halt major closures. The intention remained to proceed with the closure of the Waverley Route, although the timing of the proposal was a matter of debate between the new Minister of Transport, Barbara Castle, and the Secretary of State for Scotland, Willie Ross, who was acutely aware of the sensitivity of the closure proposal for the Borders region and the wider context of Scottish economic development. The proposal for the closure of the entire line and its 24 stations was finally issued on 17 August 1966 with the mention that closure would take place on 2 January 1967 if no objections were received; replacement bus services were to be provided by Eastern Scottish. British Rail estimated that a net financial saving of £232,000 would be made from closure. 508 objections to closure were lodged with the Transport Users' Consultative Committee (TUCC) in Edinburgh within the allotted six-week period, and a public hearing was held in Hawick on 16 and 17 November 1966. Representatives from the County councils of Berwickshire, Roxburghshire and Selkirkshire and the Town councils of Galashiels, Jedburgh, Innerleithen, Hawick, Kelso, Selkirk and Peebles attended the meeting to fight the case against closure. There were no representatives from English councils; only Northumberland had contacted the TUCC requesting to be informed of the outcome. Arguments made against closure included the inadequacies of local roads and the damage which would be caused to the fabric of Borders life, whilst British Rail pointed to the falling patronage of the line and the increased car ownership in the area. The TUCC's 15-page report was submitted to Barbara Castle in December 1966, but it was only in April 1968 that she reached the conclusion that the annual subsidy required for the line's retention - £700,000 for the whole route or £390,000 for Hawick-Edinburgh - could not be justified. In the meantime, British Rail's Network for Development plans published in May 1967 confirmed that the line was neither considered as a trunk route to be developed, nor as a rural branch line qualifying for subsidy on social grounds.
|This section requires expansion. (June 2015)|
Cut off from Edinburgh to the north and Carlisle to the south, those lacking a car had no option but to travel by bus. As of 2014[update], the main bus service to Edinburgh takes more time than a Victorian steam train and double the time of a commuter train in 1968. The Galashiels-Edinburgh X95 service took 75 minutes in 2006 to travel the distance, this journey time increasing to 86 minutes northbound in 2010 and May 2011 as a result of timetable changes. This compared unfavourably with the last Waverley Route timetable in 1968-9, according to which the slowest train took 65 minutes over the same distance, whereas the fastest managed the journey in 42 minutes.
Infrastructure and services
The initial service between Edinburgh and Carlisle consisted of four trains each way daily: an express, a fast, a local and a Parliamentary. Journey times were 3 hours and 3 minutes for the express and fast trains, and 4 hours and 36 minutes for the local and Parliamentary services. There were no through services; the express and fast trains connected with services from England at Carlisle. Passengers departing Edinburgh at 9:45 am would arrive at London Euston at 9:50 pm, while an afternoon service connected with the overnight southbound West Coast express. Two stopping services each way were provided on Sundays. After the Midland opened its Settle-Carlisle line, its services via the Waverley Route were beset by delays and poor timekeeping. During July 1880, the three daily St Pancras-Edinburgh expresses lost between them 2,345 minutes, of which 835 were the fault of the NBR; in the opposite direction, 2,565 minutes were lost with 1,099 on the NBR. The late running of trains led to complaints from passengers and traders would not use the line as the journey time was too long.
By July 1914, the first departure from Edinburgh was a through service to Carlisle at 6:15 am. The service called at all of the line's 31 stations, including Abbeyhill, Piershill and Portobello, and took 275 minutes to traverse the 98 1⁄4 miles (158.1 km), with 16 minutes spent waiting at Galashiels, St Boswells and Hawick. The first arrival of the day in Carlisle via the Waverley Route was however a 6:00 am service from Hawick which arrived at 8:18 am after a 15-minute stand at Riccarton Junction to connect with the 6:40am service to Newcastle. Three daily corridor restaurant car expresses ran to St Pancras, of which one had through coaches for Bristol. Carlisle was reached after a non-stop 131-minute run at an average speed of 45 miles per hour (72 km/h). A fast arrival in Carlisle was essential as the corridor coaches were allowed a maximum of 8¼ hours for the next 409 miles (658 km) to St Pancras. In total, there were nine through trains to Carlisle on weekdays (ten on Saturdays) including a 10:00 pm sleeper to St Pancras and a 10:15 pm night train to Euston; during the high summer season, an additional sleeper ran non-stop to Carlisle. A very similar service was provided in the opposite direction from Carlisle, with the fastest service being the 12:45 pm express from Carlisle which had departed St Pancras at 4:50 am and took 135 minutes for its non-stop run to Edinburgh. The sleepers ran on Sundays, a day on which there were otherwise no services on the line save for a morning and afternoon trains in both directions between Hawick and Edinburgh.
Service levels declined substantially after the Second World War and a number of years were to pass before improvements were made. The timetable in June 1957 showed six through services between Edinburgh and Carlisle; by this time, six of the line's 31 intermediate stations had been closed and the Border Counties line had closed to be replaced by a bus service provided by Norman Fox. There was only one express service to London: the 10:05 am restaurant and trailer composite from Edinburgh-St Pancras which took 160 minutes to reach Carlisle. There was also a 9:45 pm sleeper service to St Pancras but this only carried passengers from stations south of Edinburgh and not Edinburgh itself. Hawick and Galashiels, which benefited from a good service in 1914, saw different outcomes: Hawick continued to enjoy a reasonably good service with six through services calling there as well as four trains to Edinburgh starting there. However, stations north of Hawick did not generally benefit as services to Edinburgh made few stops en route. The stations to the south of Hawick fared a little better as trains were extended to Riccarton Junction on Wednesdays and Saturdays. Just as in 1914, no Sunday stopping services ran south of Hawick; three trains ran from Edinburgh and two from Hawick, with journey times of between 85 and 103 minutes compared with 130–140 minutes in 1914. The improved times came however at the detriment of the smaller intermediate stations which had previously benefited from a more regular service.
The last timetable for the Waverley Route from 6 May 1968 showed one train each way to and from St Pancras, one to and from Carlisle with through coaches for St Pancras, three to and from Carlisle and two to and from Hawick, with two extra services on Saturday. The fastest service was the 4:44 am from Carlisle which arrived in Edinburgh at 7:12 am with stops at Newcastleton, Hawick, St Boswells, Melrose and Galashiels. The slowest service was the next train which departed Carlisle at 9:20 am and arrived in Edinburgh at 12:13 pm with stops at all 14 intermediate stations before Galashiels.
Freight played a secondary role to passenger traffic for the majority of the Waverley Route's history. Located too far from the heavy industries of Central Scotland and the traffic in raw materials which they generated, it had to be content with a modest traffic in coal, wool and livestock. Goods traffic took on a new importance during the Second World War when the Waverley played a key role in moving personnel and supplies to the naval and military bases in Scotland. The amount of freight carried continued to rise after the war as passenger traffic tailed off with the route's downgrading, leaving ample capacity for the line to become a freight artery. This new role was aided by the construction of industrial plants closer to the route and the allocation to the line of the larger class of 2-10-0 locomotives, as well as the decisions taken by the Scottish Region of British Railways, firstly, to move fitted and semi-fitted freights from Carlisle for Aberdeen, Dundee and Perth over the Waverley Route, and secondly, to replace the old Niddrie and Portobello yards with a giant new marshalling yard alongside the line at Millerhill. The yard was in full operation by April 1963 and by November was handling an average of 21,000 wagons per week. However, although the yard flourished during its early years, changes in the national rail freight scene and the decline in the traditional Scottish industries resulted in it falling largely empty by the mid-1960s. A severe blow was dealt to Millerhill with the closure of the Waverley Route and by 1986 it was a mere a secondary marshalling point. The Down yard closed in 1983 and all the tracks were lifted except for two siding lines into Monktonhall Colliery; the colliery closed in 1989 before reopening briefly between 1993 and 1997 when final closure occurred and the lines were lifted.
Motive power and sheds
|This section requires expansion. (May 2015)|
|This section requires expansion. (May 2015)|
Passenger services were reintroduced on the freight-only section between Portobello Junction and Millerhall when, on 3 June 2002, stations were opened at Brunstane and Newcraighall. The reopening was part of the Edinburgh Crossrail scheme aimed at relieving congestion in Edinburgh by providing a rail service from the east. Brunstane was built in simple fashion with a single platform, while Newcraighall, which serves the large Fort Kinnaird retail park, is a larger station with a bus interchange and park and ride facility. Newcraighall is the terminus for services to and from Fife, a half-hourly train to Dunblane via Waverley and Haymarket having initially been provided before services were extended to Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath. Reintroduction of passenger services was a success and provided a psychological boost for campaigners seeking the reopening of the Waverley Route.
In June 2006, the Waverley Railway (Scotland) Act was passed by the Scottish Parliament by 114 votes to 1. The Act authorised the construction of 31 miles (50 km) of new track from Newcraighall to Tweedbank via Galashiels. The Scottish Executive provided £115 million towards the £151 million estimated cost of the project.
Preparatory works were formally initiated in March 2007 by the Deputy First Minister, Nicol Stephen. It was envisaged that the main construction works would commence in 2011 and services would begin running in 2013. However, problems in the tendering procedure resulted its cancellation in 2011 with the project being handed over to Network Rail at a revised cost of £295 million. Works were initiated in November 2012 with BAM Nuttall appointed the following month as the main contractor.
Tracklaying was completed in February 2015 and services are scheduled to commence on 6 September 2015. Reopening the line as far as Carlisle has not been ruled out by the Scottish Government, although campaigners have raised doubts over the infrastructure capability of the new line amid concerns that it may make future expansion difficult.
Railway preservation societies
Waverley Route Heritage Association
By 2002, the voluntary Waverley Route Heritage Association (WRHA) had laid a short section of track at Whitrope Siding, south of Hawick. The Association's intention is to create a heritage railway between Whitrope and Riccarton which is generally aimed at the tourist market.
A heritage centre and two-coach platform has been constructed on the site of Whitrope Siding, which never previously had a platform, although it was an unofficial stopping place and access was via a stepladder in the guard's brake van. Just north of Whitrope Siding is Whitrope Summit and Whitrope Tunnel; the WRHA has extended its running line for about 750 metres (2,500 ft) to the south portal of the tunnel. Track was also laid at Riccarton Junction but this has subsequently been lifted. The WRHA's first locomotive, Fowler 0-6-0DM diesel shunter no. 4240015, arrived on 9 December 2009, having previously been based at Hartlepool Nuclear Power Station and the Rutland Railway Museum.
On 18 July 2010, the heritage centre was officially opened by the local Member of Parliament and Secretary of State for Scotland Michael Moore in the company of veteran campaigner Madge Elliot who led the campaign to save the Waverley Route in the late 1960s. To mark the 150th anniversary of the opening of the Waverley Route on 1 July 2012, Whitrope Siding saw its first passenger train since the line's closure in 1969.
Friends of Riccarton Junction
In 1997, the Friends of Riccarton Junction, a railway preservation society, was set up with the objective of restoring as much as possible of Riccarton Junction station. A lease was taken from the Forestry Commission of the former generator house, a platform and the surrounding area. More than 300 yards (270 m) of track at the station was laid and the station house and platform with its red telephone box were restored. Open days were held in August 2004 and October 2005, Following disputes with the WRHA and financial difficulties in 2005/6, the society folded in 2006 after internal disputes surfaced at an annual general meeting.
One of the founding members of the Friends of Riccarton Junction was subsequently involved in carrying out restoration works to Melrose station in 2010.
- Network Rail Timetable, May 2015
- "Borders Railway". Transport Scotland. Retrieved 2015-03-17.
- Thomas (1969), p. 21.
- Thomas (1969), p. 14.
- Thomas (1969), pp. 23, 84-85.
- Awdry (1990), p. 129.
- Thomas & Paterson (1984), p. 103.
- Thomas (1969), p. 23.
- Thomas (1969), pp. 23-24.
- Awdry (1990), p. 128.
- Thomas (1969), p. 24.
- Caplan (1985), p. 8.
- Ross (2014), p. 23.
- Ross (2014), p. 24.
- Awdry (1990), pp. 128-129.
- Thomas (1969), p. 37.
- Thomas (1969), p. 41.
- Thomas & Paterson (1984), p. 104.
- Thomas (1969), pp. 84-85.
- Thomas (1969), p. 85.
- Ross (2014), pp. 41-42.
- Ross (2014), p. 40.
- Thomas (1969), p. 87.
- Thomas (1969), pp. 87-88.
- Thomas (1969), p. 88.
- Ross (2014), p. 44.
- Awdry (1990), pp. 118-119.
- Awdry (1990), p. 119.
- Thomas (1981), p. 60.
- Ross (2014), p. 55.
- Ross (2014), p. 56.
- Ross (2014), p. 61.
- Thomas (1969), p. 89.
- Thomas & Paterson (1984), p. 105.
- Thomas (1969), pp. 89, 199.
- Caplan (1985), p. 10.
- Caplan (1985), pp. 10-12.
- Thomas (1981), p. 62.
- Caplan (1985), p. 12.
- "Maps & Gradients | Waverley Route Heritage Association". Wrha.org.uk. Retrieved 2015-05-03.
- "Image of gradients on route" (JPG). Wrha2.files.wordpress.com. Retrieved 2015-05-03.
- Thomas (1969), pp. 89, 92.
- Thomas (1969), p. 92.
- Thomas (1969), pp. 93-94.
- Thomas (1969), p. 94.
- Thomas (1969), pp. 94-95.
- Thomas (1969), p. 95.
- Caplan (1985), p. 5.
- Thomas (1969), p. 96.
- "The Drummond D27 & D28 (NBR Class M) 'Abbotsford' 4-4-0 Locomotives". The LNER Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2015-05-25.
- Awdry (1990), p. 118.
- Caplan (1985), p. 9.
- Thomas (1981), pp. 61-62.
- Awdry (1990), p. 117.
- Awdry (1990), p. 140.
- Awdry (1990), p. 159.
- Thomas & Paterson (1984), p. 106.
- Awdry (1990), p. 86.
- Thomas & Paterson (1984), pp. 104-105.
- Thomas (1969), p. 162.
- Ross (2014), pp. 57-58.
- Ross (2014), p. 58.
- Thomas (1969), pp. 199-200.
- Ross (2014), pp. 58, 60.
- Thomas (1969), p. 163.
- Bairstow (1994), p. 23.
- Bairstow (1994), pp. 25-26.
- Bairstow (1994), p. 26.
- Thomas (1975), p. 108.
- Thomas & Paterson (1984), p. 107.
- Thomas (1981), p. 66.
- Thomas & Paterson (1984), pp. 106-107.
- Bairstow (1994), p. 46.
- Thomas & Paterson (1984), p. 108.
- Thomas & Paterson (1984), pp. 108-109.
- Awdry (1990), p. 142.
- Awdry (1990), pp. 117, 140.
- Awdry (1990), pp. 131, 157.
- Thomas (1981), pp. 65-66.
- Spaven (2015), p. 24.
- Spaven (2015), p. 28.
- Beeching (1963), part 1, p. 102.
- Beeching (1963), part 2, map 9.
- Spaven (2015), p. 29.
- Spaven (2015), pp. 30-31.
- Spaven (2015), p. 31.
- Mullay (2006), pp. 128-129.
- Mullay (2006), p. 130.
- Spaven (2015), pp. 28-29.
- Spaven (2015), p. 32.
- Faulkner & Austin (2012), pp. 37-38.
- Spaven (2015), p. 42.
- Spaven (2015), p. 45.
- Spaven (2015), pp. 50, 52.
- Mullay (2006), p. 128.
- Mullay (2006), p. 129.
- Spaven (2015), p. 53.
- Spaven (2015), p. 55.
- Spaven (2015), p. 67.
- Spaven (2015), p. 59.
- Spaven (2015), p. 217.
- "Blog and News Articles". Scotjobsnet.co.uk. Retrieved 2015-05-03.
- Thomas (1975), p. 106.
- Caplan (1985), p. 24.
- Caplan (1985), pp. 24-25.
- Caplan (1985), p. 25.
- Caplan (1985), p. 29.
- Darsley & Lovett (2012), Passenger services.
- Caplan (1985), p. 33.
- Rhodes (1988), pp. 105, 108.
- Caplan (1985), p. 34.
- Rhodes (1988), p. 108.
- Darsley & Lovett (2013b), fig. 95.
- Rhodes (1988), p. 111.
- Oglethorpe, M.K. (2006). "Monktonhall Colliery". Canmore. Retrieved 2015-07-29.
- Cross (2010), p. 9.
- Darsley & Lovett (2013b), fig. 106.
- Darsley & Lovett (2013b), fig. 107.
- Darsley & Lovett (2013b), fig. 103.
- Darsley & Lovett (2013b), fig. 102.
- Spaven (2015), p. 183.
- "MSPs vote 114-1 to give final go-ahead to Borders rail link". The Scotsman. 2006-06-15. Retrieved 2015-06-24.
- "Borders railway link bill passed". BBC News. 2006-06-14. Retrieved 2015-05-03.
- "Cash case 'weak' for Borders line". The Scotsman. 2005-03-15. Retrieved 2015-06-24.
- "Waverley line assessment starts". BBC News. 2007-03-27. Retrieved 2015-05-03.
- "'Defining moment' as government agency takes reins of Waverley Line". Southern Reporter. Retrieved 2015-05-03.
- "Timetable set for Borders railway". BBC News. 2008-08-06. Retrieved 2015-05-03.
- "Rail reopening faces fresh delay". BBC News. 2009-11-03. Retrieved 2015-05-03.
- "Borders Railway moves closer to reality" (PDF). Railway Herald (228). 2010-06-28. p. 6. Retrieved 2010-06-29.
- "Scottish rebuild progress". Railway Gazette. 2010-03-24. Retrieved 2010-06-29.
- "Borders rail link tender process scrapped". BBC News. 2011-09-29. Retrieved 2011-10-12.
- Carrell, Severin (2012-11-05). "Scottish Borders boost as line shut in 1960s moves step closer to reopening". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 2012-11-10.
- Henderson, Damien (2012-12-14). "Borders Railway builders appointed". The Herald. Retrieved 2012-12-14.
- "Borders to Edinburgh railway: Track laying gets under way". BBC News. 2014-10-09. Retrieved 2014-10-12.
- "Alex Salmond may reopen Waverley rail link". Edinburgh Evening News. 2014-04-25. Retrieved 2015-05-03.
- Dalton, Alastair (2014-04-29). "Borders Railway cuts ‘could hold back development’". The Scotsman. Retrieved 2015-05-03.
- Spaven (2015), p. 208.
- Cross (2010), p. 81.
- Darsley & Lovett (2013a), fig. 98.
- Darsley & Lovett (2013a), fig. 94.
- "Disused Stations". Subterranea Britannica.
- Darsley & Lovett (2013a), fig. 96.
- "Heritage Association on track for more success". Hawick News. 2008-09-22. Retrieved 2015-07-10.
- "Disused Stations". Subterranea Britannica.
- "Full steam ahead for WRHA after arrival of locomotive". Hawick News. 2009-09-10. Retrieved 2015-07-10.
- "Moore reaffirms support for rail return". Hawick News. 2010-07-22. Retrieved 2015-07-10.
- "Full steam ahead at Whitrope". Hawick News. 2012-07-06. Retrieved 2015-07-10.
- "Derailed boss steamed up over shunting". Hawick News. 2006-03-09. Retrieved 2015-07-13.
- "Refurbished Riccarton on the right track". Hawick News. 2004-07-30. Retrieved 2015-07-13.
- McClounie, Pam (2005-10-07). "Station under restoration". Cumberland News. Retrieved 2015-07-13.
- "Railway feud erupts into bitter scenes". Border Telegraph. 2003-07-15. Retrieved 2015-07-13.
- Darsley & Lovett (2013a), fig. 91.
- McGilvray, Ally (2010-09-28). "Plans to reopen Melrose station on track". Border Telegraph. Retrieved 2015-07-13.
- Awdry, Christopher (1990). Encyclopaedia of British Railway Companies. Sparkford: Patrick Stephens Ltd. ISBN 1-8526-0049-7. OCLC 19514063.
- Bairstow, Martin (1994). The Leeds, Settle & Carlisle Railway. Halifax: Martin Bairstow. ISBN 1-871944-09-0.
- Beeching, Richard (1963). "The Reshaping of British Railways" (PDF). HMSO.
- Caplan, Neil (1985). The Waverley Route. Railway World Special. Weybridge: Ian Allan. ISBN 0-7110-1541-4.
- Cross, David (2010). Last Years of the Waverley Route. Hersham: Oxford Publishing. ISBN 978-0-86093-633-6.
- Darsley, Roger; Lovett, Dennis (December 2012). Hawick to Galashiels including the Selkirk Branch. Scottish Main Lines. Midhurst: Middleton Press. ISBN 978-1-908174-36-9.
- Darsley, Roger; Lovett, Dennis (September 2013a) [October 2010]. Carlisle to Hawick. Scottish Main Lines. Midhurst: Middleton Press. ISBN 978-1-906008-85-7.
- Darsley, Roger; Lovett, Dennis (December 2013b). Galashiels to Edinburgh including the Lauder and Dalkeith Branches. Scottish Main Lines. Midhurst: Middleton Press. ISBN 978-1-908174-52-9.
- Faulkner, Richard; Austin, Chris (2012). Holding the Line: How Britain's Railways Were Saved. Hersham: Oxford Publishing Co. ISBN 978-0-86093-647-3.
- Marsh, Richard (1978). Off the Rails. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. ISBN 0-29777-387-9.
- Mullay, Alexander J. (2006). Scottish Region: A History 1948-1973. Stroud: Tempus. ISBN 0-75243-686-4.
- Rhodes, Michael (1988). The illustrated history of British marshalling yards. Sparkford: Haynes Publishing Group. ISBN 0-86093-367-9.
- Ross, David (2014). The North British Railway. Catrine: Stenlake Publishing. ISBN 978-1-840336-47-4.
- Spaven, David (2015) . Waverley Route: The battle for the Borders Railway. Edinburgh: Argyll. ISBN 978-1-908931-82-5.
- Thomas, John (1969). The North British Railway 1. Newton Abbot: David & Charles. ISBN 0-7153-4697-0.
- Thomas, John (1975). The North British Railway 2. Newton Abbot: David & Charles. ISBN 0-7153-6699-8.
- Thomas, John (1981) . Scotland. Forgotten Railways. Newton Abbot: David & Charles. ISBN 0-7153-8193-8.
- Thomas, John; Paterson, Alan J.S. (1984) . Scotland: The Lowlands and the Borders. A Regional History of the Railways of Great Britain 6. Newton Abbot: David & Charles. ISBN 0-946537-12-7.
- Hamilton Ellis, Cuthbert (1955). North British Railway. Ian Allan. ASIN B000J2VH7E.
- McCartney, R.B. (1991). The Railway to Langholm. R.B. McCartney. ISBN 978-0951785805.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Waverley Route.|