Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Noticeboard[edit]


Arbitrators, clerks and trainees: Please coordinate your actions through the mailing list. The purpose of this page is for editors who are not clerks to request clerk assistance.

Template deletion[edit]

I was one of the first draft of arbitration clerks and as part of my duties in 2006 I created a long-disused template which is taking a long time dying. I know how busy a clerk's Wikipedia life is, but I think it might be helpful to get the current clerks' opinions on this.

In 2006 my approach would have been to clean up our own mess: delete obsolete templates and clean up the references (by transclusion, annotation, etc) and move on. In the unlikely event such an ethic persists, let some kind clerk please just do it. --TS 20:08, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Broken links at evidence phase of "Christianity and Sexuality" case[edit]

Hey there. Homosexuality and Roman Catholicism was changed to Homosexuality and the Catholic Church per result at Talk:Homosexuality and the Catholic Church/Archive 6#Requested move 18 April 2017. Therefore, multiple links at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Christianity and Sexuality/Evidence#Evidence presented by Callanecc, including "history offset" ones (e.g. [1]), are broken. Can the links at that section be changed from Homosexuality_and_Roman_Catholicism to Homosexuality_and_the_Catholic_Church, so the links are accessible, fixed, or something? --George Ho (talk) 23:09, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Housekeeping needed for War of the Pacific[edit]

Resolved

The final decision of Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/War of the Pacific needs a bit of clean up. In particular: the placeholder sections labelled "Template" need to be removed, and the sections headers "Principles", "Findings of fact", "Remedies", and "Enforcement" are all unnecessarily repeated a second time. Additionally, the "Implementation notes" and vote on the motion to close are usually not repeated on the main case page, since they are on the /Proposed decision subpage, so they should be removed too. Mz7 (talk) 03:16, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Done. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 03:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Excellent, thanks! Mz7 (talk) 04:33, 24 July 2017 (UTC)