Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Purge

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Guide to deletion
Centralized discussion
Proposals: policy other Discussions Ideas

For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard.

Note: entries for inactive discussions, closed or not, should be moved to the archive.

Purge server cache

Contents

Jump5[edit]

Jump5 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jump5" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No indication of notability as per WP:MUSIC of any chart entries, national headlining tour or substantial sources. The group disbanded in 2007. Karst (talk) 15:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Delete - Page only has one reference and not much else out there establishing notability. Meatsgains (talk) 15:36, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Heidelberg Police Department[edit]

Heidelberg Police Department (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Heidelberg Police Department" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable former regional police structure. GermanJoe (talk) 15:30, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

  • More details This "Polizeidirektion" got merged into a neighboring department in 2013/2014 (the distribution of police departments and responsibilities has been completely changed with a huge reform in 2013). Almost the entire article (from 2007/2008) is now wrong/outdated. While Heidelberg is sometimes mentioned in outdated listings or in passing mentions as acting office (in crime reports and similar articles), a German-language source in Google revealed no in-depth coverage about the department itself. Several links in the English-language search are false positives ("Lower ..." is a different office, and there is another town called "Heidelberg" in the United States). GermanJoe (talk) 15:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Globalization Partners[edit]

Globalization Partners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Globalization Partners" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

May be WP:TOOSOON for this company. Currently fails WP:NCORP as written, only source is essentially a self-interview with Inc. and the only additional RS I could find was a Boston Globe story on the Inc. listing. Username of article author is a possible COI. shoy (reactions) 15:23, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 15:23, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 15:23, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahmoud Abbas Holocaust Denial

Richard Easter[edit]

Richard Easter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Richard Easter" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Inadequate evidence of notability. Only one of the references cited is currently accessible, and that one has no "significant discussion". Maproom (talk) 13:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

List of Metroidvania games[edit]

List of Metroidvania games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "List of Metroidvania games" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Per this discussion, there was no consensus to split this list off to its own page. The one person who was in favor of a split ended up changing his mind through the discussion (but didn't strike though his position). All the history is preserved at Metroidvania. The conclusion of the discussion was that "Metroidvania" is an impossibly vague term and it's not Wikipedia's place to define it strictly through this list. Axem Titanium (talk) 13:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Axem Titanium (talk) 13:09, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete on the nom's principle and the past discussion linked - the full list of every possible game in a genre is just not feasible. I only note that there is a significant contribution from one editor beyond the split that we might want to consider a history merge at deletion just to retain those contribution. --MASEM (t) 14:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment - There is a whole list of Category:Video game lists by genre, are you suggesting that all of them should go also, or that "Metroidvania" is inherently a more difficult thing to categorize? I'm not sure that I buy that argument, especially if there is WP:RS backup for each listing. shoy (reactions) 15:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Michael Strano[edit]

Michael Strano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Michael Strano" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This article lacks independent sources to establish notability. That may be down to the author's inexperience (he has no other contributions here before or since creating this article) but it looks more like a simple WP:PROF failure. Guy (Help!) 12:46, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:53, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:53, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:53, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep. Strano holds a named chair at MIT and therefore should be a snow keep per WP:PROF#C5. The article also lists a number of awards which would probably meet WP:PROF#C2. Joe Roe (talk) 14:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Joe Roe (talk) 14:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Consolidating act[edit]

Consolidating act (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Consolidating act" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

An unremarkable law. 333-blue 12:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:53, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Vladimir J. Konečni[edit]

Vladimir J. Konečni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Vladimir J. Konečni" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article replete with promotional language and peacock terms, created by a WP:SPA, with virtually all references being primary sourced to the subject's own work. It needs world class cleanup or WP:TNT. Guy (Help!) 12:30, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep per WP:DINC. Is there any doubt that Konečni is notable? Joe Roe (talk) 14:46, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Douglas D. Taylor[edit]

Douglas D. Taylor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Douglas D. Taylor" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Frankly, this reads as a WP:COATRACK. It was originally apparently a promotional article, but by now all the puff has gone and we're just left with a minor controversy and the fact that he's in bed with OMICS Group, the fraudulent academic publishing house. Guy (Help!) 12:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Keep I think the judgment of previous reviews can be trusted, and there was full knowledge of material to be removed in the 2nd nomination. The subject is lightly notable. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 12:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep Even with the fluff removed, the subject still is notable. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment I've removed the controversial material, which was a blatant violation of WP:BLP. Predatory journals frequently list academics on their 'editorial boards' without their consent or knowledge, and other than that there was no source to back up the claim that Taylor is/was actually involved with OMICs. The retraction is due to dodgy figures in a multi-authored paper, so a very minor controversy indeed, and the only source we had for it was the blog Retraction Watch. With that gone, there isn't much of the article left. Joe Roe (talk) 13:42, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
    • There's apparently no "blatant" violation of WP:BLP in what was removed. I have restored the material for now. I'd like to see a link to something that explains how predatory journals frequently list academics on their editorial boards. That part of the content may be of little note anyway. As for the "minor controversy", it appears to have enough weight for the mention it receives, but I'm open to discussion on the article's talk page. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 14:00, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
    • I have re-removed the part about the predatory journal due to lack of secondary RS sourcing, and I doubt there would be any for that. For the remainder, there is enough evidence that the retraction occurred. It's just a matter of research to see how much weight that carried in reliable sources. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 14:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment. The subject's citations according to Google Scholar appear to satisfy WP:PROF. I see no problem with including the retraction, though it's a shame the details are paywalled, but as the subject (per previous AfD) has denied involvement with the OMICS journal, that part should definitely be removed. What is really needed is more information about his undoudtedly notable research, but AfD rarely results in such improvements. Espresso Addict (talk) 14:20, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep. Per the previous AfDs, Taylor held a full professorship, is highly cited, and has received extensive coverage as the discoverer of exosomes, so is clearly a notable academic. The article is a bit coatracky right now, but that's a reason to re-add some well-sourced biographical material, not delete it. Joe Roe (talk) 14:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
To that regard I started by adding one of the discoveries related to exosomes that was published in the journal Gynecologic Oncology. Just performing a Google Scholar search turns up a number of hits. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:34, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Wahid Zaland[edit]

Wahid Zaland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Wahid Zaland" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails GNG: Unable to identify any independent, reliable sources in any language offering more than a trivial mention. The given reference is an utterly trivial mention. —swpbT 12:25, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Management College of Southern Africa[edit]

Management College of Southern Africa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Management College of Southern Africa" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This article contains no evidence of notability and no reliable independent sources about the subject. Guy (Help!) 12:08, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

EarthVision 10[edit]

EarthVision 10 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "EarthVision 10" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable online fan music contest. No coverage in independent, reliable sources. Kolbasz (talk) 12:08, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

European Polytechnical University[edit]

European Polytechnical University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "European Polytechnical University" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Private university with no independent sources. All references are directories or press releases, nothing to satisfy WP:GNG. Guy (Help!) 11:50, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Jean Aimé Pierre Guerrier[edit]

Jean Aimé Pierre Guerrier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jean Aimé Pierre Guerrier" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable soldier. The Chevalier grade of the French Legion of Honour does not qualify as France's highest military honor (one would have to have been awarded the Grand Cross of the Legion of Honour to claim the highest grade of award), and Guerrier's other decorations are merely campaign decorations (i.e. he participated in, but did not distinguish himself in, several military campaigns). WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:46, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

The French National Order of the Legion of Honor is France's highest military award. Higher ranks within the Order, in addition to other criteria, are subject to seniority within the Order. The award being bestowed posthumously onto Lt Guerrier, a higher rank within the Order can never be achieved, thus reiterating that this the highest military award that could be bestowed. Lt Guerrier distinguished himself several times and was awarded the following:

  • He received the Legion of Honour.
  • He received the highest level of citation (mentioned at the Army level) and was awarded the Croix de guerre des théâtres d'opérations extérieurs (War Cross for foreign operational theaters) with "Palm" for his gallantry in Indochina.
  • He received another citation (mentioned at the Division level) and was awarded the Croix de guerre 1939–1945 (War Cross 1939–1945) with "Silver Star" for his gallantry in World War II.
  • He received the Medaille Coloniale. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmontabe (talkcontribs) 23:29, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment @Cmontabe: The article mentions that Guerrier received the Croix de Chevalier (the Knight's Cross) of the Legion of Honour. This is, in fact, the lowest grade of that honor, and has, according to the Legion of Honour article, been given out almost one million French and foreign citizens over the centuries. According to the footnote at WP:SOLDIER, only the highest grade of the Legion of Honour (the Grand Cross) would impart presumed notability. The various Croix de Guerre medals are what are known as campaign medals that are given to all service personnel who serve in a particular operational theater. They do not denote any special notability, even if mentioned in dispatches. The Medaille Coloniale is a similar campaign medal, reserved for operations that occurred in territories that were, at the time, French colonies. Again, no special notability is indicated by such a medal. Failing the requirement of having received his nation's highest honor, we would need evidence of significant coverage of Guerrier in independent sources. The mentions you have found of Guerrier in various databases of military honors is not sufficient, as such databases list ALL recipients of such honors. We'd need to see that someone (preferable several someones) took the time to write a significant piece of work (a book or book chapter, or magazine or newspaper article beyond his own home town) to be able to say that this person was notable. (See WP:BIO and WP:GNG.) WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 01:53, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete - fails WP:SOLDIER Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:39, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:39, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment. This is a tricky one. Chevalier of the Légion d'honneur for service is far too common (with a maximum permitted number at any one time of "just" 113,425!) to qualify under WP:ANYBIO #1. However, does it qualify under WP:SOLDIER when awarded for gallantry? It does appear to be true that, while it is commonly awarded for service, it is indeed relatively rarely awarded for gallantry, but I'm not sure it is awarded rarely enough to qualify (according to the Légion's website, a maximum of twenty special awards may be made every year to those who do not qualify through length of service to the nation - this includes awards both for gallantry and for such people as Olympic gold medallists - but the implication is that more than this may have been awarded during major wars). I would also dispute that the Croix de guerre is a campaign medal - it is awarded for gallantry (and not, as alleged above, to all personnel who serve in a particular theatre), but it is certainly too low to confer any sort of automatic notability. The problem is that France, in common with some other countries, diverges from the system of first-, second- and third-level gallantry decorations that we see in the USA and the Commonwealth, for instance, and therefore is not really covered as far as decorations are concerned by WP:SOLDIER. Nobody is ever given anything other than Chevalier the first time - you can only get the highest grade by being awarded it five times; so I very much doubt that anyone has ever become a Grand Cross through gallantry alone, thus qualifying nobody under WP:SOLDIER. I would like to see figures for the numbers of Légion d'honneur awards made for gallantry, but sadly I have been unable to find any. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:17, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Comment @Necrothesp: I refer you to footnote 1 of WP:SOLDIER where the Legion of Honour is specifically mentioned, limiting presumed notability only to those who have received the highest grade of the honor. The article on the Croix de guerre 1939–1945 (France) does not mention any particular gallantry required to be awarded the medal, although the Silver Star that Guerrier earned does denote gallantry. Also, this article published by the Pentagon's Institute of Heraldry does mention that the Croix de Guerre was only awarded to those who were mentioned in dispatches (i.e. had demonstrated some level of gallantry). However, none of this rises to the level of notability generally required for soldiers, and there is no evidence of the kind of significant coverage needed for WP:GNG. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!!
      • I was the original source (although not writer) of that footnote, although it was really a response to those who were saying that the Légion d'honneur for service met the notability requirements (which it obviously does not, given how ubiquitous it is)! And I think you need to reread the Croix de guerre article. "The Croix de guerre may either be awarded as an individual or unit award to those soldiers who distinguish themselves by acts of heroism involving combat with the enemy." The silver star simply denotes the recipient was mentioned in divisional despatches. You will note, I did not say "keep", but I don't think it's an automatic no keep either. -- Necrothesp (talk) 07:45, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  11:03, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Cascade Server[edit]

Cascade Server (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Cascade Server" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Procedural AFD - was PRODed, but has been deleted at PROD before. Also CSDed. PROD was "Concerns: notability: significant independent RS coverage cannot be found. A promotional article that's been edited by accounts with conflicts of interest." I concur - this is blatantly deletable and needs to be killed properly as it stands, probably with SALTing. David Gerard (talk) 10:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 10:52, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 10:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Nene derby[edit]

Nene derby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Nene derby" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Relisting of debate that got caught up in a bit of an unfocussed and inconclusive debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A62 derby.

I can't find any decent evidence that this derby is notable, and none is provided in the article. The rivalry may well exist (that is not being contested) but there is not sufficient non-routine documentation of it to pass the general notability guidelines. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 10:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 11:58, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 12:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Alicja Ruchala[edit]

Alicja Ruchala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Alicja Ruchala" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. " I looked for sources, but only found minor coverage, the best was a short news report in an online but mainstream Polish portal at [1]. I don't think she passes WP:NMODEL yet, but maybe someone can find something better. Also, considering how easy it is to be a notable sportsmen, I wonder if NMODEL isn't too tough. The article and the source I found notes she has been a cover girl for notable magazines (Vogue, Elle). Maybe that should be enough. Thoughts? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

PSTS Group[edit]

PSTS Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "PSTS Group" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:COMPANY. Not much verifiable sources exist. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 09:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Anna Klingmann[edit]

Anna Klingmann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Anna Klingmann" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Clearly promotional article; largely unreferenced, what refs there are are self-references. No evidence of meeting notability requirements. Has been tagged for almost three years without action. Even if she were prima facie notable, this article does not meet WP:BLP as there are zero RSes even to form a culled stub from. News searches mostly find other people called Anna Klingmann. Links to the book are mostly primary. I'm willing to be convinced ... David Gerard (talk) 09:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 09:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 09:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 09:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete. Inappropriate promotional bio with negligible sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 12:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC).
  • delete full of uncited claims bordering on self promotion. LibStar (talk) 15:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

EPIK[edit]

EPIK (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "EPIK" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Seems spammy: a company/government program that exists, but has next to no coverage about itself (the usual few mentions in passing can be found in the Google, of course). Seems to fail WP:NCOMPANY. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

60 seconds![edit]

60 seconds! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "60 seconds!" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable video game. I can't find any reliable references for the topic. Metacritic is useless. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete I can only immediately find 3 sources, one a press release, one a very very brief "this game exists" article at Kotaku AU, and then a blog written by the developers but posted at Gamasutra. While the latter is a prime source we'd want to use, that really seems to be the only source of any significant content that we'd pull from, and there is otherwise a lack of 3rd party sourcing, so GNG is unfortunately not met. --MASEM (t) 14:22, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Medal of National Defense Service[edit]

Medal of National Defense Service (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Medal of National Defense Service" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No evidence of any notability for this medal, sources are official pages, not independent ones. Fram (talk) 07:52, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Weak keep. We do not have Wikipedia:Notability (awards), Wikipedia:Notability (military) do not cover medals, and any coverage of this seems to be in Chinese only. That said, I think there is a presumed notability extended to ALL military awards; through I know well WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST is not a valid argument, there are numerous awards about military medals and awards that have similarly no refs but primary ones. I will in fact ping MILHIST project, because I think we need to add a section about military awards to NMIL SNP. Anyway, in my opinon any military medal or award that has been recognized by the state is notable because it is significant in its field. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
    • This is an award given automatically if you stay in the army for long enough. It doesn't indicate bravery, having fought in noteworthy battles, or anything else. That your employer gives you a token recognition for staying with the company for X years is not uncommon at all. I fail to see why such a medal would be in any way notable, even if it is "recognized by the state" (which is in most countries the employer of the soldiers in the first place). Why would this be "significant in its field"? Fram (talk) 10:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
    • And of course, for everything that doesn't have a SNG, the GNG applies, not some presumed notability. Fram (talk) 10:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep for now. I agree that this could probably use a good robust policy discussion. I would not want to see this article deleted on the basis of the absence of such a policy, in the case that there is general agreement that such a policy should be discussed, and likely (to some extent) developed. TimothyJosephWood 14:26, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Do we really need policies for all kind of articles specifically? The same was asked (by other people) at a recent AfD I started for a beauty pageant as well. We have a GNG which should apply to all articles, SNG are way too often a method to lower the bar for a certain type of article preferred by some group (a Wikiproject usually) which would otherwise have trouble meeting the GNG requirements. Basically, "keep because we don't have a policy for these" is simply an invalid reason, we have a policy (well, a guideline, all these notability rules are guidelines) and no good reason not to apply it here. Fram (talk) 14:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
      • I would say the WP:NEXIST of this article in particular will be difficult to judge without input from someone who speaks the language.
Otherwise, I'm not suggesting a lowering of the bar so much as I think the bar, on these types of subjects, might not fit into a neat continuum. Looking at the US Army, with which I'm most familiar, the singularly important source re awards is AR 600–8–22, coverage elsewhere is just icing on the cake, and a lot of the sources you may find (armystudyguide etc.) I would expect to be mostly copy/paste or minor rewording of the official regulation.
Looking at the example above of the ASR, the award itself is not for outstanding actions, but the fact that it's going to be relevant to basically every notable soldier in the past 30 years, makes it seem a lot like understanding that award is going to be somewhat important in understanding all those individuals. TimothyJosephWood 14:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
I prefer not to discuss other articles at this AfD, as that only muddies the water in general. But in any case, the main source you give is a very fine one to use once notability has been established, but does absoluetly zero to establish that notability. And I doubt that the ASR is a notable aspect for any notable soldier of the last 30 years. It's like the certificate you get when you finish elementary school (well, in Belgium you get one, no idea if this happens in the US): almost every notable person will have it, but that doesn't mean that the certificate is notable or relevant for them. Fram (talk) 15:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
You're probably right that we're getting well off topic. A discussion has been started at MilHist. TimothyJosephWood 15:08, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Human Kinetics (publisher)[edit]

Human Kinetics (publisher) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Human Kinetics (publisher)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This advertorial lacks substantive sources. It has been tagged with serious issues for years with no resolution (and none apparently possible). Virtually all substantive content is by a small number of WP:SPAs. While it has superficial referenciness, the references themselves are press releases, namechecks, product listings or directories. None of the purported sources establishes notability per WP:GNG, none of them amounts to any independent article about this subject. Guy (Help!) 07:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:58, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:58, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

CADbro[edit]

CADbro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "CADbro" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Software program that fails WP:NSOFT. noq (talk) 07:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:58, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:58, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Crimson Knight[edit]

Crimson Knight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Crimson Knight" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Does not meet WP:GNG. This source provides some minor coverage, but it's routine about the horse's performance in a race, and additional source searches are only providing passing mentions. North America1000 06:48, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:49, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:49, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:49, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:49, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Larry Bone Collector Williams[edit]

Larry Bone Collector Williams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Larry Bone Collector Williams" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

May not meet WP:NSPORTS guidelines, specifically WP:NHSPHSATH. WP:NCOLLATH is debatable though. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 06:46, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Keep Covered in ESPN, USA Today, NY Times and Bleacher Report. Easily passes GNG. BlackAmerican (talk) 07:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Barikad Crew[edit]

Barikad Crew (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Barikad Crew" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Does not meet WP:BAND. Sources discuss the band in relation to a tragedy that occurred, (e.g. [2], [3], [4], [5]), but I have not found significant coverage about the band itself. North America1000 06:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Haiti-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

WikiConference[edit]

WikiConference (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "WikiConference" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No sources, not really something that notable, could be redirected to another page discussing what the conferences are. Andise1 (talk) 06:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

DJ Games[edit]

DJ Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "DJ Games" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Absolutely no reliable sourcing found whatsoever. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Joox (music streaming)[edit]

Joox (music streaming) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Joox (music streaming)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This music streaming company/service does not appear to satisfy WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. I just closed the first AfD as no consensus for lack of participation and will try again. Safiel (talk) 05:28, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • leaning delete - may be a WP:TOOSOON. I see the following minor but proper coverage [6][7] and a few that look like articles but read like press releases. I'm willing to be convinced ... - David Gerard (talk) 10:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Joven[edit]

Joven (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Joven" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

There is nothing in this disambiguation that could justify its existence. All the results are partial, and excepting, maybe, Joven Clarke, none is simply known as Joven. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 05:24, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep I've made substantial changes, making this a {dab|given name|surname} page. Tequila was clearly a valid entry and numerous given name and surname mentions throghout Wikipedia. Also a word that is easily misspelt, so added a useful see also section. Numerous valid entries now, located using dabfix. No benefit to readers if deleted; can help them find what they are looking for. Do the changes convince you to withdraw the nomination Tbhotch, or do you still think the page doesn't meet guidelines? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 12:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Lexprompt WRITE[edit]

Lexprompt WRITE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Lexprompt WRITE" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

There is absolutely no credible claim of significance for this software. But it is technically not eligible for A7, so sending it to AFD. A previous draft Draft:Lexprompt WRITE was declined at AFC. I am unable to find any significant coverage in reliable independent sources. This is simply a plug-in for MS Word which has been recently launched. WP:TOOSOON and clearly not notable at this point. -- Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom - David Gerard (talk) 09:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete per nominator, no claim of significance. Ayub407talk 14:15, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Euryalus (talk) 11:23, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

New challenge arts and sports club[edit]

New challenge arts and sports club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "New challenge arts and sports club" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable (A7), no sources, and appears promotional. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 04:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Eurovision 2016 Family Travel[edit]

Eurovision 2016 Family Travel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Eurovision 2016 Family Travel" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Does not cite any sources, notability questionable, wrong language in large parts. (No apparent relation to Eurovision Song Contest 2016.) Regards, HaeB (talk) 04:28, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete: unless the editor Gregjarlot can convince us otherwise, this looks like it's simply the itinerary of his family holiday, done up in a style that makes it look like it's an international contest. It's certainly nothing to do with the Eurovision Song Contest. Richard3120 (talk) 14:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

List of American children's television series (Q–Z)[edit]

List of American children's television series ‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of American children's television series (A–H) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of American children's television series (I–P) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of American children's television series (Q–Z) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of Australian children's television series ‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of Australian children's television series (A–H) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of Australian children's television series (I–P) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of Australian children's television series (Q–Z) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of British children's television series ‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of British children's television series (A–H) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of British children's television series (I–P) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of British children's television series (Q–Z) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of Canadian children's television series ‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of Canadian children's television series (A–H) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of Canadian children's television series (I–P) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of Canadian children's television series (Q–Z) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

These pages are unsourced lists that should really be done as categories, NOT as list pages. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:52, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:16, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:16, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:16, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Rowena Sánchez Arrieta[edit]

Rowena Sánchez Arrieta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Rowena Sánchez Arrieta" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Does not meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Source searches are only providing passing mentions, such as [8] (translated article) and [9]. North America1000 03:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

J8ded[edit]

J8ded (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "J8ded" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Does not meet WP:WEBCRIT. Source searches are only providing passing mentions, such as [10], [11]. North America1000 03:26, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:28, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Animal World[edit]

Animal World (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Animal World" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article about a non-notable book, written like a book report or review. Unsourced, no sources found, but Spanish search may turn up something. Possibly redirect to The Animal World, if deemed not notable. ansh666 03:12, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:25, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. ansh666 03:46, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • It looks like it was the focus of this journal article in the Anales de Literatura Hispanoamerican. I'm not entirely familiar with this journal, so I don't know how exclusive they are. It makes it seem like there might be coverage out there, probably in Spanish. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:42, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment I came here in response to Tokyogirl79's post. I found two scholarly sources that appear to give this substantial coverage: [13] and [14]. Unfortunately my Spanish is perhaps good enough to find these, but not near good enough to evaluate them: so I'm just going to leave them here for others to look at. I will note, though, that I would tend to consider coverage in two scholarly pieces more than enough to keep. Vanamonde (talk) 10:13, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Upsilon Sigma Phi[edit]

Upsilon Sigma Phi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Upsilon Sigma Phi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Being "oldest" does not make it notable; having notable alumni does not make it notable; having existed under the reign of Ferdinand Marcos does not make it notable. Having been created by a WP:SPA[15] argues against its notability. What would make it notable would be non-trivial discussion of it in reliable independent secondary sources... Which appear not to exist. KDS4444 (talk) 03:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:26, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Burnt Orange Report[edit]

Burnt Orange Report (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Burnt Orange Report" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Does not meet WP:WEBCRIT. Several source searches are only providing passing mentions, such as [16], [17], [18], [19]. North America1000 03:07, 30 August 2016

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:13, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:13, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:13, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Sound Space Studios[edit]

Sound Space Studios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Sound Space Studios" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Source searches are only providing passing mentions, such as [20], [21], [22]. North America1000 03:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete: fails WP:CORP. I'm not sure why the first AfD failed, seeing as the two keep arguments (one from the article's creator) were essentially "a famous album was recorded there, so the studio must be famous as well". Anyway, it looks very much as though the studio is now closed – the official website is dead, its Facebook and Twitter accounts haven't been updated since September 2014, the trading company appears to have been dissolved in November 2015, and its business address is currently up for sale or rent. So no chance of any future recordings adding to the studio's notability – there's really nothing else to say about the studio apart from the fact The Holy Bible was recorded there. Richard3120 (talk) 04:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete, I can't find anything. Dissolved. Though something of this name appears to exist. Apparently the current or recent one isn't even the original faintly noteworthy one - David Gerard (talk) 10:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

UP Engineering Radio Guild[edit]

UP Engineering Radio Guild (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "UP Engineering Radio Guild" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The engineering radio guild of a university created four years ago by a WP:SPA that has developed no references since its creation and which remains without independent notability. Delete per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. KDS4444 (talk) 03:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

University of the Philippines Singing Ambassadors[edit]

University of the Philippines Singing Ambassadors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "University of the Philippines Singing Ambassadors" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

A university choral group without independent notability. Delete per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. KDS4444 (talk) 03:00, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Justin Briner[edit]

Justin Briner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Justin Briner" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Funimation voice actor with some recent lead roles in Seraph of the End, Heavy Object and My Hero Academia. However, I cannot find any independent secondary source coverage. None of the above titles mentioned have notability on television, maybe Funimation subscription service at best, otherwise have to wait until the DVD maybe. ANN articles are all cast announcements. One appearance in anime conventions. WP:TOOSOON? AngusWOOF (barksniff) 02:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 03:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 03:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 03:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 03:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 03:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 03:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

U.P. Naming Mahal[edit]

U.P. Naming Mahal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "U.P. Naming Mahal" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

A university anthem without any independent notability. KDS4444 (talk) 02:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

University of the Philippines ROTC[edit]

University of the Philippines ROTC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "University of the Philippines ROTC" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

A campus ROTC program without independent notability. Delete per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES KDS4444 (talk) 02:58, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:04, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:04, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

University of the Philippines School of Labor and Industrial Relations[edit]

University of the Philippines School of Labor and Industrial Relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "University of the Philippines School of Labor and Industrial Relations" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable subunit of a university. Delete per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. KDS4444 (talk) 02:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:04, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:04, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. The article was speedy deleted by Acroterion per WP:G3. North America1000 04:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Chigamauga pruitt[edit]

Chigamauga pruitt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Chigamauga pruitt" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unsourced, possibly a hoax. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 02:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete under G3. Clearly hoax. Ueutyi (talk) 03:09, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Aleksandar Ljubić[edit]

Aleksandar Ljubić (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Aleksandar Ljubić" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable, unsourced BLP. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 02:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment. Well, the guy certainly is notable, 2015200520022012, 2015. The article is unsourced indeed, and might easily be a copyvio of something (it was created in a single swath), so WP:TNT might be applicable. No such user (talk) 13:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

UP Circuit[edit]

UP Circuit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "UP Circuit" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable student organization of a university. Article's references are all primary ones generated by the organization itself or its university. No independent notability. Delete per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. KDS4444 (talk) 02:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

University of the Philippines College Admission Test[edit]

University of the Philippines College Admission Test (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "University of the Philippines College Admission Test" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This is a college admissions exam. It is not even a subunit of the university for which it exists, it is only a test to get into that university. No subject-specific guidelines exist for retaining this kind of article, and it does not meet WP:GNG on its own terms. KDS4444 (talk) 02:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

This is THE college admissions exam for THE national university of the Philippines, a system of constituent campuses. This is the only way into the most important university in the country (though arguably Ateneo de Manila is equally important) and determines not only admission, but which campus and which major. Does that make it important enough to be included in Wikipedia? It is not a nationwide test like the US ACT or SAT but it is significantly more determinant and for a top university. Neither the ACT or the SAT is the sole determinant of admission nor do they determine campus or major. Imagine a single test given to decide if a student entered an Ivy League school, which school, and what they could major in. Would that be notable enough to have its own article? --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 05:42, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

National Institute for Science and Mathematics Education Development[edit]

National Institute for Science and Mathematics Education Development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "National Institute for Science and Mathematics Education Development" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

A non-notable extension research arm of a University, unreferenced and unlikely ever to become so. As a university subunit, delete per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. KDS4444 (talk) 02:48, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Jorge B. Vargas Museum and Filipiniana Research Center[edit]

Jorge B. Vargas Museum and Filipiniana Research Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jorge B. Vargas Museum and Filipiniana Research Center" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable subunit of a university. Delete per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. KDS4444 (talk) 02:46, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

European Flavours & Fragrances[edit]

European Flavours & Fragrances (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "European Flavours & Fragrances" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Subject doesn't appear to be notable. Nominated for CSD twice, and the article appears to have been created via AfC, but I'm not sure if whether it's been properly accepted or not. Adam9007 (talk) 02:36, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Delete as this is still A7 and G11 material but the nominator apparently believes being "an accredited member" is sufficient (they are violating their interaction ban against me as it is). This has nothing at all for independent notability and substance. I'll also note this was actually moved to mainspace by the author themselves, a recent concern regarding Drafts, so it was never actually reviewed (the author moved it twice without consultation of reviewers). SwisterTwister talk 02:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
    • The nominator? You mean me? Interaction ban? To whom are you referring? I'm not on an interaction ban with anyone. Oh, and I'm not the only one who's contested the A7. Adam9007 (talk) 02:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Note for closing admin: No one else ever actually contested an A7 here, and I have kindly asked the user to stay away from me given they continuously remove my changes (see User_talk:Adam9007/Archive_2#Article); one other time before I mentioned my concerns about their removing my changes, also. SwisterTwister talk 02:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Did you read the talk page? Adam9007 (talk) 02:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

K. T. Gray[edit]

K. T. Gray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "K. T. Gray" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Found no significant coverage in RS. —swpbT 13:11, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 14:26, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 14:26, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 14:26, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 14:26, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 14:26, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 14:26, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Redirect Nothing to show individual notability, only one major VA role. Esw01407 (talk) 14:07, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jujutacular (talk) 02:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

3000 Nights[edit]

3000 Nights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "3000 Nights" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unremarkable movie with only one reference, no one notable in the film. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:29, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Weak keep - The page needs additional references but it doesn't look like that will be an issue [23]. Meatsgains (talk) 02:39, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep the nom should read WP:BEFORE. I found these reviews in seconds: one, two, three, four, therefore easily meeting WP:GNG. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 06:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • The film is very notable and won this list of international awards. DO NOT DELETE THE WIKIPEDIA ENTRY: -Circle Jury Award, Washington, DC International Film Festival, USA - Young Jury Award, International Film Festival on Human Rights, Switzerland - Jury Award, Women’s International Film and Television Showcase (TheWIFTS), USA - Audience Award, Annonay International Film Festival, France 2015 - Audience Award, Valladolid Film Festival, Spain 2015 - TaoEdu Youth Award, Taormina International Film Festival, Italy 2016 - Best Screenplay, Carthage Film Festival, Tunisia 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nourchamoun (talkcontribs)
  • Keep - This topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
Source #1 - Variety (magazine) - Dubai Festival: Doc Helmer Masri Moves Into Fiction With ‘3000 Nights’
Source #2 - Variety (magazine) - Toronto: Palestinian Drama ‘3000 Nights’ Picked Up By Mad Solutions For Distribution In Arab World (EXCLUSIVE)
Source #3 - The Hollywood Reporter - '3000 Nights': Film Review
Source #4 - Hindustan Times - At Dubai fest, stories of suffering women and their battles
Source #5 - Screen International - '3000 Nights': Review
Source #6 - The National (Abu Dhabi) - Toronto International Film Festival: 3,000 Nights is a metaphor for the Palestinian occupation
This !vote was decided based on the General notability guideline. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 13:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 13:22, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies[edit]

Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

At ticket:2016082210003947 an employee of the organization requested the deletion of this article, and in response, I am nominating this for for deletion.

This article was started in 2006. So far as I can tell, none of the information in it has ever been backed by a citation. It seems fair to consider whether this article meets Wikipedia's own criteria for inclusion. Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:08, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 19:52, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 19:52, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
The University of Pennsylvannia's Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) (the gold standard for evaluating think tanks) ranks IPCS in 2015 as 77th among all foreign policy and international affairs think tanks (the highest rank for an Indian think tank in that area), and 48th among all think tanks in China, India, Japan, and South Korea.[24]. They ranked 24th on the latter list in 2012.[25] So much has been published by IPCS that it can be tedious to find material about the organization, but some does exist, such as [26] Trim article so that it doesn't just echo the organization's website, keep, and improve. --Worldbruce (talk) 20:05, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep and yes, please improve. I am swayed by Worldbruce's expertise, and by the number of Google Book hits and JSTOR hits. Drmies (talk) 02:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jujutacular (talk) 02:28, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep - I was looking into the sources myself but Worldbruce beat me to it. My conclusions are exactly the same. It is a very notable organisation. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Eddie Grey (Composer)[edit]

Eddie Grey (Composer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Eddie Grey (Composer)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable musician. Grey is prolific, but not apparently notable. He creates the kind of music that all television shows and commercials need, but for which he has not received any significant attention in independent sources. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 00:27, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Eddie is notable. He is the sole composer for the Emmy nominated show, "Born This Way." There are many independent sources that need to be cited. But just to give a couple about his significance. http://www.clintproductions.com/#!Music-on-Born-This-Way-Season-2/c1q8z/578d55030cf2779eabefdcf8 http://top40-charts.com/news.php?nid=80828 — Preceding unsigned comment added by I am jewsus (talkcontribs) 01:35, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:18, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Eddie Grey is notable. He has written many theme songs for different TV shows (DirectTV’s “Celebrity Beach Bowl” to mention one) http://www.hftracks.com/#!music/cjg9, music for top production music labels such as Megatrax, and is head music composer for Season 2 of Emmy nominated TV show "Born This Way". His work is notable and his page of great interest to the composers/musicians community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:6000:610B:6700:1CA:3186:B6A5:6125 (talk) 02:11, 16 August 2016 (UTC) 2606:6000:610B:6700:1CA:3186:B6A5:6125 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 2606:6000:610B:6700:1CA:3186:B6A5:6125 (UTC).

Let me also cite section 10 of the notable (musician) wikipedia guidelines. Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article. Read WP:BLP1E and WP:BIO1E for further clarifications) Since he is the composer of an Emmy nominated show, that is enough to satisfy the notable claim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.79.84.123 (talk) 19:25, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:27, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment There is not a reliable source to indicate that Grey is the composer for Born This Way. He is a composer, but not necessarily the only composer. His involvement in the show might merit a redirect to the page about the series, but there is not sufficient coverage about Grey in reliable sources for either this achievement or for his career at High Frequency Tracks on which to build an article. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 02:34, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

/* Eddie Grey (Composer) */ Eddie Grey is cited as being the main Composer on the Wiki page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Born_This_Way_(TV_series) and also on the end credits of every episode. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:6198:C00:200C:616A:BB81:EC27 (talk) 03:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Comment The addition of Grey as the composer was made (without citation) by the same editor (I am jewsus) who created Grey's article, so this is not significant. The IMDb listing for Born This Way does not list Grey. Nor does AETV's site for the show. This may be an oversight, or it may be an indication that, while Grey composed the music for the show, the music is not an integral feature of the show, and therefore his role as the composer of the show's music is largely irrelevant. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 03:51, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

As a Music Enthusiast, I know his work to be very much respected. I first heard his song "Pygmalion's Statue" through the IML Contest.

http://imlcontest.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.215.74.49 (talk) 05:01, 16 August 2016 (UTC) 66.215.74.49 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Grey is an up and comer and he is here to stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.215.74.49 (talk) 04:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Eddie is a top notch composer and his work should be recognized. He wrote the theme music for the DirecTv "Fantasy Football Channel" and also for the film trailer "Life On The Line" among other things. His work is out there and being heard by thousands of peoplePcoggins (talk) 05:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC)Pcoggins (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

I love this album by Grey released by one of the biggest publishers in the country https://soundcloud.com/minimalistsynth/sets/minimalist-synth/s-Pnwvh I know that my contemporaries have been influenced by its Cinematic/Electronic/Orchestral approach.168.8.200.2 (talk) 16:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

The IMDB page does have Grey. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by I am jewsus (talkcontribs) 09:03, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

References

Listed as Composer for 1 Episode because IMDB has not yet listed the other 10 episodes as it is currently still airing. He will be listed as the Head Composer for the show once those pages are available. https://pro-labs.imdb.com/title/tt5929726/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:6198:C00:68D2:212C:F2B3:45D4 (talk) 19:10, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Eddie Grey IMDB http://www.imdb.com/name/nm8365793/?ref_=fn_al_nm_2 I have watched every episode from 1 to 4 thus far of Season 2 and end credits do show MUSIC BY EDDIE GREY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:6198:C00:68D2:212C:F2B3:45D4 (talk) 18:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Comment Even if it turns out to be true that Grey is the composer for Season 2 of Born This Way, at best that merits a redirect to the article about the show, not an entire article on Grey himself. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:44, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:52, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete - Regardless of the various claims made by IPs and new editors, it doesn't appear that the subject meets the WP:GNG - that is, there aren't multiple (usually shoot for 4-5) reliable sources that cover the subject in significant detail. FYI, the sources should not be database entries, but rather, articles written by journalists or professional writers. Common sources to be used or not used can be found at WP:MUSIC/SOURCES, as a starting point for examples. Sergecross73 msg me 17:19, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jujutacular (talk) 02:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Bangladesh women's cricket team tour of Ireland 2016[edit]

Bangladesh women's cricket team tour of Ireland 2016 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Bangladesh women's cricket team tour of Ireland 2016" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No indication of significance. Promotional at best. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:08, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 05:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 05:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 05:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep International cricket tour by two top-tier teams. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 06:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep International cricket tour by two national team. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 08:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep Maintains WikiProject guidelines & also important for all of national team, which arranges a tour. So, keep it. And close the discussion immediately. - Suvray (talk) 15:16, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Noel Gillespie[edit]

Noel Gillespie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Noel Gillespie" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Essentially the same as the 1st AfD except that he has a few other things to his career now, but they are still trivial because he's only an assistant coach for 2 professional teams and then a coach for a non-major basketball team, there's nothing convincing for his article. SwisterTwister talk 02:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:22, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:22, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete - Subject does not meet general notability requirements as an assistant coach in the NBA. Meatsgains (talk) 02:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:39, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Cantaloupe Aqua[edit]

Cantaloupe Aqua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Cantaloupe Aqua" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:NBUSINESS. Little assertion of notability in the article itself (once all the self-promotional material is removed) - relies on either WP:PRIMARY or WP:NOTRELIABLE or WP:SELFPUBLISH sources. Dan arndt (talk) 23:35, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 23:38, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 23:38, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:30, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as corporate spam. No indications of notability and sufficient RS coverage to meet GNG cannot be found. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:46, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete - Page reads like an advertisement and the hotel lacks notability. Meatsgains (talk) 02:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete - puffed up, but no claim or evidence of notability - David Gerard (talk) 09:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

WikkaWiki[edit]

WikkaWiki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "WikkaWiki" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unreferenced since creation in 2004, survived a very early VFD (see Talk:WakkaWiki). No evidence or statement of notability; two passing mentions in RSes. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WackoWiki (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WakkaWiki. David Gerard (talk) 22:23, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:30, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete - age relies heavily on primary sources and lacks independent coverage. Meatsgains (talk) 02:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

WakkaWiki[edit]

WakkaWiki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "WakkaWiki" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unreferenced since creation in 2004, survived a very early VFD (see Talk:WakkaWiki). Long dead software product. No evidence or statement of notability. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikkaWiki and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WackoWiki (2nd nomination) - David Gerard (talk) 22:22, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:31, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

WackoWiki[edit]

WackoWiki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "WackoWiki" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Promotional tone, one passing mention in an RS, no other third-party references since creation in 2004, tagged since 2013. Two AFDs (both at that page), one a delete, the second a keep; but not up to scratch in 2016. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WakkaWiki and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikkaWiki - David Gerard (talk) 22:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:31, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Aiden Aizumi[edit]

Aiden Aizumi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Aiden Aizumi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Aizumi is an activist and writer who has not received coverage of the level that would signify being notable. No sustained broad coverage of the level that would pass the General notability guidelines for Wikipedia. John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:31, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep There are enough reliable sources that profile Aizumi. In addition, he continues to be in the news--with several outlets citing him as a transgender activist. I've added sources to the article. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:42, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete - Most of the subject's coverage in RS are only local. Meatsgains (talk) 03:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

FirstOne TV[edit]

FirstOne TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "FirstOne TV" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No independent sources Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:36, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Sunmist (talk) 10:41, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:31, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete per WP:PROMO as spam. The article largely consists of:

References

  1. ^ "Countries | FirstOne TV - Watch TV when and where you want!". www.firstonetv.eu. Retrieved 2016-08-15. 
... an incredible amount of coat rack for one paragraph. The article created by a single-purpose account Special:Contributions/Lars-Marcel with no other contributions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Clean Energy Ministerial[edit]

Clean Energy Ministerial (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Clean Energy Ministerial" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No reliable sources to prove notability. The sources used in the article are primary or otherwise unreliable sources. First AfD was closed as no consensus for lack of participation. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:23, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:58, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:31, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Music Video Production Association[edit]

Music Video Production Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Music Video Production Association" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

A search shows only 12 hits for this award on Google News, and only 15 on Google Books... None of these appears to discuss the awards themselves but instead are mentions of some production company or another receiving the award. While there are lots of plain Google hits, the number of reliable, independent, verifiable, published, non-trivial discussions seems to suggest this award is, in fact, not notable. Article has existed for 8 years with no new references beyond its own official website and its awards site (which are the same site). Maybe this one does not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. KDS4444 (talk) 11:56, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:15, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:15, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:32, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Vampire Season Monster Defense[edit]

Vampire Season Monster Defense (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Vampire Season Monster Defense" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Looking through the WP:VG/RS custom Google search engine, I see but a few results; Metacritic listings, and tables of releases. No several, in-depth, significant coverage. Does not meet WP:GNG. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 04:16, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:33, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Rename as "Vampire Season" and weak keep. Reviews from three vetted WP:VG/RS: [27][28][29], which I'd consider the barest of minimums. I'd merge to a developer article if one already existed, due to the lack of secondary source development info. czar 03:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Zale "Zalezy" Epstein[edit]

Zale "Zalezy" Epstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Zale "Zalezy" Epstein" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not sure this artist meets notability requirements. The references are line listings with little substance. The artist purports to be Grammy and Juno nominated, but the artist was not nominated, he appears to have been involved on the periphery - a song he may have contributed to was part of an album that was nominated. In spite of what the article states, he has not charted with an single - again he appears to have been a minor contributor. reddogsix (talk) 22:56, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:06, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:39, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Diagramming software[edit]

Diagramming software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Diagramming software" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Ill-defined list that's never been otherwise since its creation in 2004. Functionally a spam magnet list of software, redundant with category:Diagramming software; I removed the spam magnet sections (one was half inline links) and there's hardly anything else to the article. Tagged as such since 2012. PROD was removed, though without the editor doing anything to fix the problems. This article is not useful and attracts spammers. If there is a useful article at this title, I strongly suspect WP:TNT would be needed first; those who feel this is a "keep", I urge you to convince by editing it to demonstrate another path out of its present problems, because waiting for others to fix it hasn't worked. David Gerard (talk) 20:17, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:37, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:39, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete. There's really not much content here to lose, and it looks like everything of use here can be found via the category. - MrOllie (talk) 14:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Belmond Eagle Island Lodge[edit]

Belmond Eagle Island Lodge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Belmond Eagle Island Lodge" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I do not see anything special about this lodge, and there are no reliable sources. The article was redirected in the past, but the author reverted. Ymblanter (talk) 15:14, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:40, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete - Lest someone else misread the lead of the article when skimming, this is a tourism company in a notable region. It does not appear to have any claim to notability itself, and indeed neither the sources in the article nor my own search turned up anything but promotional content. If this isn't the first time it's been created, there may be cause to salt. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:42, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Krishna athal[edit]

Krishna athal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Krishna athal" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

athal is an activist who seems to be lacking the level of coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:36, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mauritius-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:24, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:42, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:42, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Muhd Asyraf Azan[edit]

Muhd Asyraf Azan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Muhd Asyraf Azan" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The sources for this article are very weak. Beyond this, there is no clear indication that Azan has made any contribution to squash that is notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:31, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:15, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:15, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
  • The Squashinfo profile linked from the article says that he has taken part in world championships. WP:NSPORT doesn't have a section for squash, but for most other sports taking part in world championships is considered to imply notability. Is there any reason to treat squash differently? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 09:21, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment Gonna look more later, but there is some coverage available. [30], [31]. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:39, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:42, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep. In the absence of any good reason why squash players should be treated differently from those in most other sports this should be kept as passing WP:SPORTCRIT by virtue of the subject participating in world championships. The only racquet sport with a world championship that has a specific guideline in WP:NSPORT is badminton, so it seems sensible to set the bar for squash players at a similar level. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 17:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Technical Assistance Response Unit[edit]

Technical Assistance Response Unit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Technical Assistance Response Unit" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not seeing any useful sources in my searching. What I am seeing is our own article, other wikis, blogs, press releases, social media of various kinds, and You Tube videos. None of which meet our needs. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:14, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:42, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Jackson Owens[edit]

Jackson Owens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jackson Owens" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Lacks notability independent of his non notable band. Junior award is not major. Outside of a little local interest driven by Far Young promotion he lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. This is just some more Tim Coons promotion duffbeerforme (talk) 12:34, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Keep as a borderline pass of WP:BASIC as has New Zealand press coverage,referenced in the article, of his awards and involvement with the band Far Young, the article needs to be updated if possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atlantic306 (talkcontribs) .21:40, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:21, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:21, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:14, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Tim Alderson[edit]

Tim Alderson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Tim Alderson" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Alderson is a non-notable minor league player. He was a first round draft pick, but no evidence suggests he ever played a major league game. There is a little coverage of him earlier, but it is localized and not enough to pass General Notability Guidelines. John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:26, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:21, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:21, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep reviewing the 2nd nomination and the article itself, I'm convinced of his notability by the arguments that led to it being kept the second time. Notability is not temporary and I think the arguments lade out seven years ago still hold today. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:11, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jujutacular (talk) 02:38, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete Notability isn't temporary, but our views of notability sure have changed. In the last discussion, I only saw three sources presented to make the case for notability. The PPG source is good, the EVT link is dead, and Baseball America is a trade publication and its Prospect Guide, not a regular article, should receive less weight in determining notability. EVTrib does have an article on Alderson being drafted and one on being player of the year, but at this time I don't think that coverage is enough to meet the bar of notability. Also, his career is done, so his odds of meeting WP:BASE/N are almost nil. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:55, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

The Real Radio Show[edit]

The Real Radio Show (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "The Real Radio Show" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG - lacks significant coverage in reliable sources — JJMC89(T·C) 21:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:13, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:06, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:39, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Ayesha Asantewaa[edit]

Ayesha Asantewaa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ayesha Asantewaa" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable disc jockey and radio presenter John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:37, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:58, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:58, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:58, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
  • While there are potentially valid notability claims being made here, in that BBC 1Xtra and CBBC are national services rather than local ones, this drops the ball for properly sourcing the claim — of the three sources here, one is a primary one, one is a Q&A-style interview in a "magazine" that looks for all the world more like a publicity platform for youth entrepreneurs than a real or neutral magazine, and the third is a dead link whose content is unverifiable. Even being a national radio or television host is not an inclusion freebie for an article that's this badly sourced. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can source it better than this. Bearcat (talk) 16:00, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 03:48, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:39, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

The Reformation G.D.N.I.A.F.T[edit]

The Reformation G.D.N.I.A.F.T (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "The Reformation G.D.N.I.A.F.T" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

début album, just a track list Jimfbleak (talk) 05:52, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Bishop Lamont. Being a debut album (if it could really be considered as such given his other releases) is not a reason for deletion. There's a little more here than a tracklist, but I'm not finding sufficient coverage to justify an article at this time. The best I've found is [32], [33], and this which may relate to a previous version of the album. --Michig (talk) 06:58, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Between Us (2004 film)[edit]

Between Us (2004 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Between Us (2004 film)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non notable film. Koala15 (talk) 06:21, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Sunmist (talk) 10:52, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:50, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:50, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Hamisi 'B12' Mandi[edit]

Hamisi 'B12' Mandi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Hamisi 'B12' Mandi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable person. Local radio personality in Tanzania. No reliable sources to be found. Claims of award nominations are not verified by the sources given, and are too vague to verify otherwise. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:18, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:48, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
  • I haven't checked notability yet, but I see no reason to think that the subject is a local rather than a national radio personality. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 11:52, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:34, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:00, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:00, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Javotti Media[edit]

Javotti Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Javotti Media" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The page continues to lack and/or fail WP:BIO and WP:MUSICBIO; no proof of reliable sources within coverage. 206.125.47.10 (talk) 11:22, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Keep: I believe that this page had good enough proof of cited sources in referencing its history and artists. There wouldn't be anything wrong. DBrown SPS (talk) 11:18, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:48, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:34, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Southwest Airlines Flight 345[edit]

Southwest Airlines Flight 345 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Southwest Airlines Flight 345" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Nominated as a G4 recreation CSD. The article was slightly expanded with a few extra sources from the original, so I refused the CSD, but it is mostly the same as the previous version deleted at AfD, so bringing here. Black Kite (talk) 23:10, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Keep or redirect - This is a likely search term, therefore, it should be kept or redirected to Southwest_Airlines#Incidents_and_accidents. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete as G4 tagger per the previous afd. Pppery (talk) 00:12, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment: Though there were no fatalities, this was a hull loss accident and I thought that this was generally considered sufficient to justify an article on wiki? The article has weaknesses, notably a lack of a definitive conclusion of pilot error (though this sounds like the conclusion) but does have a variety of sources. Nose wheel collapses are not uncommon, but landing on a nose wheel (as happened in this case) is much less common, as I understand it. Several delete !votes at the previous AfD noted that it was not a hull loss accident, or speculated that the aircraft would be repaired; according to the article, these suppositions were incorrect. EdChem (talk) 14:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Keep, as hull loss does appear sufficient under AIRCRASH. EdChem (talk) 22:26, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:50, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep - the previous discussion referred, repeatedly, to WP:AIRCRASH, but as a hull-loss, this incident passed that criteria. Epson Salts (talk) 13:50, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep - Hull loss, death and/or injury is not necessarily a requirement to sustain an article. Also, recreation was not by original creator, but another editor. Mjroots (talk) 20:19, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment: Citing WP:AIRCRASH is completely inappropriate in this discussion; as the page itself says, Because this is an essay and not policy and also because it should not be applied to stand-alone accident articles, it is recommended that it not be cited at Articles for Deletion discussions for either keeping or deleting. Given that both AfD discussions for this stand-alone accident article have incorrectly relied on AIRCRASH, I think this needs other notability-based arguments to back up any !votes. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:45, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Southwest_Airlines#Incidents_and_accidents; I'm not seeing individual notability, but it does meet the guidelines for inclusion in WP:AIRCRASH. ansh666 21:23, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete or redirect; if the latter, then to Southwest_Airlines#Incidents_and_accidents, which has info on the landing. Like Ansh666, I do not see individual notability, and as noted above, WP:AIRCRASH does not apply to individual articles like this one. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:36, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane2007 talk 01:34, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep This article meets the criteria for a keep, in part, because it was a hull loss (plane destroyed). For years to come, readers will look up crashes of major airlines. This is one of them. There are many reliable sources that document this crash of a Southwest Airlines flight. Southwest Airlines is one of the largest airlines in the world but not the largest. Usernamen1 (talk) 04:12, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

World Space Commission[edit]

World Space Commission (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "World Space Commission" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:GNG Kleuske (talk) 11:26, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:52, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:52, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Errrm.... Northamerica1000... Thanks for your enthousiasm, but the organisation is a fictional one. Sorry if I did not make that clear enough. Kleuske (talk) 09:49, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
I didn't list it at the above delsort pages, a different user did. I have removed the entry from the delsort pages (diff, diff) and struck the delsort notices atop. North America1000 10:28, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry... My bad. Kleuske (talk) 12:04, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:24, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:30, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

B. U. Gosawi[edit]

B. U. Gosawi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "B. U. Gosawi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unable to find any reliable sources which will prove notability.

Hindustan Janata Party itself is not a big party. It's president is not notable as not covered much in the news.

He contested election, but did not win any election. Marvellous Spider-Man 12:23, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:20, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:20, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Delta Phi Nu[edit]

Delta Phi Nu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Delta Phi Nu" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The sources are WP:PRIMARY. I couldn't find any evidence of notability. Marvellous Spider-Man 13:47, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment, added women project to article talkpage so participants are notified of this afd. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:47, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus on deletion although I see agreement that the two terms aren't synonymous. This looks to be somewhat more than a dictionary definition so I am not inclined to delete on that basis. I will leave it to the community to redirect or merge as appropriate. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:30, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Allamah[edit]

Allamah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Allamah" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Reason Similar to existing article Ulama. It is just overlapping title Syed Rahmat Ullah Shah (talk) 19:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:06, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:06, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment Allamah is not that similar to Ulama'. One is an honorific title and the other is a term for a class of people. However, I'm not sure what to do with this article. Although the title is mentioned is some encyclopedias like this one, it's hard to find coverage in RSs for it beyond a dictionary definition. Eperoton (talk) 01:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Is the ulama-allamah relation similar to king-majesty or priest-monsignor? In other words, are people that have the occupation ulama addressed to with allamah? If so, I would not mind merging/redirecting --HyperGaruda (talk) 04:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
I can say yes. It is not exactly occupation. I will say that if a person is considered as well educated or knowledgeable on his subject preferably religious subject then he is titled as allamah.Syed Rahmat Ullah Shah (talk) 12:27, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
I see only a handful of names associated with that title. Not sure if that's because it's very selective or just not very common. Eperoton (talk) 05:03, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
And by that I meant in books. It occurred to me that one often hears the combination "Allamah Dr." in the Arabic-language media. So, perhaps you are right in that can now be applied to any member of the Ulama as a personal mark of respect. In the absence of RSs on this point, I won't venture to say. Eperoton (talk) 13:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Alim is used for male, Alimah for female, but this use is in its singular form. It is title for respect to some scholar often used for religious scholars. It is upto the reader how to perceive it as a claas or as a title.Uluma or Ulama is same but its plural form. It also sounds good if it simply merge to the original page Ulama. Rahmatgee (talk) 12:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:52, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
@MezzoMezzo: While the article looks as a dictionary one, the issue, itself, is notable. When Polymath has an article, it is reasonable for Allamah as well. Please, reconsider your vote.--Seyyed(t-c) 02:50, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NOTDICT. It is plausible that the article could be expanded and sourced to rise above being a dictionary definition, but in its present form it is not helpful. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:18, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep. and expand. The term is not the exact equivalent , and is more than a directory entry. DGG ( talk ) 04:07, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Merge to Ulama. I agree the subjects are not identical, but there is overlap in the sense that both deal with those who have distinguished themselves in a scholarly way. I think that the content could be placed after Ulama#Usage of the word 'Alim' in the Quran and make sense. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:06, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist -- Dane2007 talk 01:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane2007 talk 01:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Verónica Orozco (album)[edit]

Verónica Orozco (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Verónica Orozco (album)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:NALBUM. Usual story of an actress singing a theme song in a movie, and then making an album to capitalise on it. No reliable references and no substantial coverage found of a record that wasn't a particularly great success even in her home country – ten years on and she still hasn't made a follow-up, preferring to concentrate on her acting career. Richard3120 (talk) 19:38, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 19:38, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 19:38, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 19:38, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep or merge to Verónica Orozco per this from Billboard, which states "The actress and singer/songwriter's self-titled pop-debut went gold in Colombia". I'd say that constitutes a pretty decent success in her home country. The chances of coverage in Colombian sources not existing are extremely slim. --Michig (talk) 19:18, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:30, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Cylon Heavy Raider[edit]

Cylon Heavy Raider (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Cylon Heavy Raider" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This topic currently fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 18:54, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:54, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Leaning delete. No evidence of independent notability. I am open to being convinced otherwise. Josh Milburn (talk) 02:19, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:32, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete. Gets a few hits here and there on Google News and Google Books, but I don't see significant coverage. If there were a source that described how they were designed, who designed them, and what kind of legacy they had in science fiction media, maybe we'd have something. But this looks like it belongs on Wikia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

CrazyFlie[edit]

CrazyFlie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "CrazyFlie" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. I have been unable to find any suitable sources. For example, the first couple of pages of results from a Google search for "CrazyFlie" contained several pages on the web site of the company producing CrazyFlie, web pages selling CrazyFlie, YouTube, several github pages, Twitter, instructions on using CrazyFlie, etc etc, but I found not a single case of substantial coverage in an independent reliable source. Trying adding other words in the search term along with "CrazyFlie" made no difference. The article was proposed for deletion, with lack of independent sources given as part of the reason. The creator of the article then removed the deletion proposal, and added a number of references, but they are merely reports on projects which have used CrazyFlie; while they all mention CrazyFlie in the course of describing the projects, none of them actually gives substantial coverage of CrazyFlie itself. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:16, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Hello JamesBWatson, I created the page for Crazyflie this morning. I tried to add a few more sources to save it from deletion last time. But it seems it has been marked for deletion again. I am a grad student and this is my first time contributing to Wikipedia. I can see from the talk page that the deletion has been requested due to lack of independent sources. I would like to know what sort of sources I could get in order to improve the article. Because you are right when you say that googling Crazyflie only gives company links and github projects. Sadly it is a very small enterprise made by students like me. So finding myriad sources for it can be tough. Mostly people use it for projects and such. My motivation to create a page ironically, was because when I started working on the project and decided to Google Crazyflie, I didn't find any Wikipedia page for it and I wanted to add one,so that students like me , who want to work on Crazyflie have some basic information to start with. I have also not done this due to any collaboration with the company or to advertise about them. Infact I even mentioned a few problems it has, to be as unbiased as I could. I really want to save the page. So any help or insight will be highly appreciated. Thank you.Jayneeshw (talk) 20:38, 16 August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayneesh (talkcontribs)
@Jayneesh: (aka Jayneeshw) I fully understand what you are saying, and I do sympathise with you, as I have explained at greater length on your talk page. However, I'm afraid that what you are saying is actually confirmation that the subject does not satisfy Wikipedia's requirements for an article. A "very small enterprise made by students" for which finding sources is "tough" pretty certainly won't satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:40, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Dat GuyTalkContribs 20:58, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom. I waded through the refs somehow expecting to find a notability gem that had been overlooked. I was out of luck. This gives all the appearance of a student business project. If so it is way too soon to be making an article here.  Velella  Velella Talk   20:56, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:32, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Scott Pryor[edit]

Scott Pryor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Scott Pryor" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable filmmaker. This was part of a promotional walled garden with the two films done deleted by AfD. (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The List (2015 film) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Submission (2017 film)) Peter Rehse (talk) 14:48, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:26, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Hamilton Lane[edit]

Hamilton Lane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Hamilton Lane" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Completing nomination on behalf of Mjnm2015 (talk · contribs). They offered no rationale, but after looking into the matter, I believe that the notability of this company is unclear. The company does exist, which is good as far as it goes, but I don't see anything in third party, independent sources that talks about the company as a company. I see lots of PR newswire-style market movements - Hamilton Lane added X company to Y fund and such - but that doesn't confer notability. Even if the company were notable, we lack sources with which to build a proper article. I'm happy to withdraw this if someone can find sources showing the company to be notable, but I'm coming up blank. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:20, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment -- searching for "Hamilton Lane" "private equity" yields some coverage, such as "Hamilton Lane Slams Secondaries as Zombie Lifeline" & more (link). But it's mostly about the deals it participated in, other firms it plans to acquire, and funds it raised. So it appears to be an entity of some note, as an advisor to pension funds, but I'm not sure if this is sufficient to meet CORPDEPTH and GNG. Ping Northamerica1000 for comment. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:06, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:18, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:35, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete on second thoughts. I cannot find anything better that what I included above. Insufficient to meet GNG and COPRDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:33, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:29, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

CLARK the band[edit]

CLARK the band (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "CLARK the band" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Delete. Full disclosure: I'm actually the original creator here, in 2005 when our notability and sourcing rules were very different than they are today. This is a band that has no strong claim to passing the 2016 version of WP:NMUSIC — the strongest thing here is that it temporarily had two members who later joined Arcade Fire, but they weren't core members of this project: this was a "rotating lineup" collective that had only one constant member, so session players can't be the notability in and of themselves. And more importantly, there's no strong reliable source coverage to get them past what NMUSIC demands now — the only RS-worthy source here is a single album review in Exclaim!, but it doesn't substantiate anything that would constitute an NMUSIC pass, and I can't locate any stronger sourcing that would fix the problem. Bearcat (talk) 15:38, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:33, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:33, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:33, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:28, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Snapdragon chipset 821[edit]

Snapdragon chipset 821 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Snapdragon chipset 821" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

DePRODed and detagged without addressing the issues. Concern was: UNsourced speculation about a non notable software or hardware component Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:13, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:28, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Chinonophobia[edit]

Chinonophobia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Chinonophobia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

First of all, it would apparently be "Chionophobia" (the first "n" is spurious), but in any case again there is the usual lack of medical literature. The only significant hit was an AMS article on severe weather phobias in general. Mangoe (talk) 16:35, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:16, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete or redirect to Specific phobia. This phobia has a name in the DSM and ICD and it's not "chionophobia". It's listed specific phobia, subtype "Natural environment (e.g., heights, storms, water)" DSM:300.29/ICD:F40.228. As a term, "chronophobia" fails WP:GNG and should be deleted per WP:DICTDEF and WP:NEO. PermStrump(talk) 04:40, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:26, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Chorophobia[edit]

Chorophobia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Chorophobia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

When I was a kid, I avoided having to dance because I was a social pariah up into high school and a klutz until well into college. It was hardly an unreasonable fear, under the circumstances. Meanwhile we have this made-up thing with no trace in the literature and a lot of claims about what such a phobia would be like which I have to think were the supposition of whoever wrote this, because they don't come from any reliable source. Mangoe (talk) 16:46, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:15, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:26, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

CX CMa[edit]

CX CMa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "CX CMa" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Its been tagged to death, but apparently abandoned by the original author. Much of the article is incomprehensible, or likely wrong. It is a faint eclipsing binary star, one of hundreds of the type, . It is not contained in the list of stars in Canis Major, or the template for stars of Canis Major, a big clue that this is not a notable object per WP:NASTRO. Simbad lists nine papers mentioning the star, an astonishingly low number. Even more astonishingly, four of them are about either this star or a small number of objects including this star. There was a flurry of interest in 1984 that the light curve of some eclipsing variables showed an interesting asymmetry, refuted a few years later. Lithopsian (talk) 16:55, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Sunmist (talk) 13:53, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Sunmist (talk) 13:53, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:25, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Debasis Panigrahi[edit]

Debasis Panigrahi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Debasis Panigrahi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The sources cited here do not appear to support the notability of the subject (indeed, most do not mention the subject). A Google search reveals a book published by a vanity press, and not much more. It may be worth looking for non-English sources to support notability. agtx 18:08, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
  • That does seem to cast serious doubt on the reliability of the Indian Express source. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 18:24, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:24, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Croatian Youth Party[edit]

Croatian Youth Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Croatian Youth Party" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No significant coverage, does not claim notability. A very minor, defunct party. GregorB (talk) 18:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:23, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Rahal-Hogan RH-001[edit]

Rahal-Hogan RH-001 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Rahal-Hogan RH-001" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article fails to meet notability as presently written. Draft version of this article was previously declined for failing notability but User:Rowde moved the article to mainspace without any improvement. Article currently has two external links which discuss the car, but I believe they do not firmly establish notability. The359 (Talk) 18:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

I think all of the article must be written differently and more about the cars and how it began, middle and ended. Rowde (talk) 18:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Comment: Rowde, I legitimately ask you because I know your understanding of English is poor: Do you know what notability means? The359 (Talk) 19:04, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Finding sources Rowde (talk) 19:22, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Comment A great-looking article but where did you find all of this information? Is there some written book you could cite? Mr. Magoo (talk) 16:08, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

From one or two websites Rowde (talk) 16:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:59, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:59, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep while the article could use inline citations and overall improvements to citation and tone. The subject is inherently notable under the auspices of WP:MOTORSPORT and WP:AOWR. -Drdisque (talk) 20:36, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:03, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:23, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

János Balázs, Jr.[edit]

János Balázs, Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "János Balázs, Jr." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The sources are largely not reliable sources. The prizes seem to give no indication of actually being at a level to indicate notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:12, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:22, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Sam Baron[edit]

Sam Baron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Sam Baron" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Baron's work as a filmmaker does not seem to rise to the level to establish notability John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:23, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:46, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:46, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:14, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Hands on Me (Ariana Grande song)[edit]

Hands on Me (Ariana Grande song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Hands on Me (Ariana Grande song)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:NSONGS, no media coverage, no charts. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:56, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:17, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete - Fails WP:NSONGS, virtually no content present, and what is there, is the equivent of someone converting an infobox/track list to prose. Better covered in respective album article. Sergecross73 msg me 19:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

To Mars By A-Bomb (film)[edit]

To Mars By A-Bomb (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "To Mars By A-Bomb (film)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No assertion of notability. GHits are YT, Wiki, IMDB, Reddit, BBC (who aired it) and the like. 14 interviews in an hour also doesn't seem to give weight to any one individual within the film. MSJapan (talk) 02:35, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:27, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:27, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:27, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:27, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:10, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak keep - I have been able to find a lot more sources, although some quite brief. Blythwood (talk) 22:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep - There seem to be enough sources though the article could use improvement. - Reidgreg (talk) 18:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment on sources: I'm not convinced by the sources. We require sources specifically about the film. As for the sources in the article:
  1. The Guardian TV Listing This is essentially a TV listing. Even if I consider this a review, it is a capsule review which still doesn't satisfy WP:NFSOURCES.
  2. Listing on BBC - This is clearly not an independent sources. I mean BBC is obviously going to write about it.
  3. The Cosmic Compendium: Interstellar Travel - Self Published Book I don't think this is a reliable source considering that this is a self published book (by Lulu.com).
  4. KQEK Doesn't satisfy WP:NFSOURCES. This seems to come under WP:USERGENERATED/WP:SPS. The site doesn't seem to be well known and I'm unable to see if they have an editorial process.
  5. Achieving the Rare: Robert F. Christy's Journey in Physics and Beyond Reliable but trivial coverage. I looked at the book and there is simply a passing mention of the movie in a sentence about Robert Christy being consulted. Essentially the entire coverage is one sentence.
  6. Race, Ethnicity and Nuclear War: Representations of Nuclear Weapons and Post-apocalyptic Worlds Again, the name of the film is simply listed in the book with no other information.
Looking at the sources, I'm not convinced that we should keep this article. I'm willing to however redirect it to an appropriate target such as Project Orion (nuclear propulsion)#Depictions on film. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:15, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Ron Smoorenburg[edit]

Ron Smoorenburg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ron Smoorenburg" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:NARTIST. Adam9007 (talk) 01:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Comment Just to point out, WP:NACTOR is actually the guideline that would apply here. SilverserenC 04:48, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:32, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment I've added a number of references to the article. The most important ones include this, this, and this news video. The difficulty with this guy though is that, due to his birth country and where he's worked, sources are really disparate across multiple languages and that makes them hard to locate. There are sources in Dutch from his homeland, sources in Chinese from his early martial arts films with Jackie Chan and others, sources in Thai for the various other martial arts movies he did in Thailand, and recently sources in Hindi and others for his work over the past few years in Bollywood films. SilverserenC 21:28, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete Definitely not notable as a martial artist and I couldn't find anything to support the claim he meets WP:NACTOR. Didn't find enough coverage to convince me GNG is met. Astudent0 (talk) 14:28, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:13, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

List of languages by number of words[edit]

List of languages by number of words (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "List of languages by number of words" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No purpose to this page: measuring the "number of words" in a language is exceedingly difficult to assess given the vastly different structures of languages compared. Article already sparked a name controversy on its talk page after just two weeks in existence. Better delete and forget. — JFG talk 02:13, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:19, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:19, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Rename and keep. The list is useful as a list of dictionaries. There is a relevant discussion on the talk page. Uanfala (talk) 07:11, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment What is a "word"? This is a list of dictionaries. We already have lists of dictionaries Lists_of_dictionaries--Savonneux (talk) 08:27, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
    Each dictionary will have a pretty precise idea of what it counts as a word. Of course, these aren't always directly comparable across dictionaries and much less so across languages, but they do give a reasonable indication of the size and comprehensiveness of the dictionary. This list doesn't overlap with Lists_of_dictionaries, which is a list of lists. Uanfala (talk) 08:57, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
    I'm aware that it is a list of lists. The lists that the list lists are lists of dictionaries though. The article Headword says These values are cited by the dictionary makers, and may not use exactly the same definition of a headword. In addition, headwords may not accurately reflect a dictionary's size. So we have one page that says dictionary word counts are arbitrary, for lack of a better term, and not comparable across languages and this list which does directly compare them. Good thing we have Category:Articles contradicting other articles--Savonneux (talk) 11:00, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
    All the lists there are language- or subject-specific and I can't see how they could possibly overlap in scope with the list brought to this AfD. As for the caveats that go with the number of headwords as a measure of dictionary size, they are quite reasonable, but they are from making it anywhere near arbitrary. Much greater caveats go for example with the use of GDP, but it's still a useful indicator of a country's economic development and we won't think of deleting any of the Lists of countries by GDP. Uanfala (talk) 12:57, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
    GDP is all in units of money. A rose by any other name would smell as sweet but is ice cream one word or two.--Savonneux (talk) 13:10, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep. There are definitions for both words and headwords. Each dictionary needs at least a de facto (case-by-case) one for each of both terms. Of course competing definitions must be aknowledged for, as should other issues too (see the original discussion). I agree that the title might not be the best one, but I think it is relevant to have a list of languages by number of words on authoritative dictionaries (or maybe replace words by entries, and detail each type when available). Because of languages and not because of dictionaries. It should include clarifications on how a language/dictionary pair treats issues that might affect the number. The article is relevant both to show how dificult it is to compare between languages as well as for the value of the specific comparison itself. Comment: I think the very fact that there was a discussion for renaming (currently closed without consensus) serves as argument that there is (at least some) support for it to be kept.Cato censor (talk) 16:20, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
That is literally the definition of synthesis.--Savonneux (talk) 04:28, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
I'm not sure if I follow you. All I proposed may be sourced and worded in a way that does not add qualifiers or coordinating conjunctions that could make it amount to WP:SYN. Cato censor (talk) 13:00, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep. The experts in every dictionary must define to obviuosly difficult matter of what counts as a word. Is ice cream a word or not? Well, for that question spanish has the Real Academia de la Lengua Española and french has the equivalent. Instead od deleting it, it could be improved explaining the caveats of each language in a new column. --Jbaranao (talk) 17:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is at best a synthesis of not-totally-comparable data. It's vanishingly unlikely that, say, Duden and Shogakukan will have the same standards for what counts as a headword. Apparently the Svenska Akademien has only completed A-T, so there's obvious incommensurability among the dictionaries. Furthermore, any such list necessarily privileges the selected dictionaries' definitions of "word" above other, equally valid possible definitions and possible counts. The selection category is words "included in the dictionary considered the most authoritative or complete", but considered by whom? the Wikipedian who added that line to the chart? I don't see how this can be anything other than original research. Cnilep (talk) 02:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
    @Cnilep: what do you think about restructuring it into a list of dictionaries by number of words (in the absence of a readily available better indicator of size)? Uanfala (talk) 08:19, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete This is a very problematic way of comparing languages, and constitutes WP:OR, incompetently done. Example: The entry for Dutch, based on the 14th edition of the Van Dale lists the number of Words as 90,000. Had one of the contributors instead used the Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal the Approximate number of words would have increased fivefold, to 450,000. The aim of the article per [[39]] appears to be to establish the POV that some languages are "richer" than others. To use the word count in a dictionary for that is ahem, unscientific.Mduvekot (talk) 17:12, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
    @Mduvekot:, do you have any objections to repurposing the article into a list of dictionaries? Uanfala (talk) 17:27, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
    @Uanfala: I have a problem with the premise of the article, regardless of its name: that something meaningful can be said about a language on the basis of the number of lemmas in a dictionary. Unless you can find several reliable sources that says that the number of headwords in a dictionary correlates to some property of the language, we should not have an article that is based on the assumption that such a correlation exists. Mduvekot (talk) 13:26, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment: I'm no expert on WP policies, but I think most of the concerns raised here are a matter of WP:AQU. Instead of discussing its deletion two weeks after creation and even before the article's name is settled, shouldn't we be focused on improving it and attemtping to make it viable first, as per WP:BEFORE crit. C? As far as I understand, the concern for a number of commenters in this discussion is about form rather than substance. Cato censor (talk) 12:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Clarification: of course this may be a problematic way of comparing/listing languages, but it may become objective and sourced as well. Just as you can compare/list flags by color, as long as you don't use that to measure beauty. Cato censor (talk) 12:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Colours don't vary between languages though. Here's an entire paper on the concept of what a word is [40] The gist of it is that -> Linguists have no good basis for identifying words across languages (basically that morphology and syntax are very important, which vary drastically, in providing meaning). It's a false comparison.--Savonneux (talk) 13:15, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
So, let's keep it a list, without any reference to comparison? Cato censor (talk) 13:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment - So, first of all, it definitely cannot keep the current title/frame. There is no objective number of words. Language is constantly developing, and even if we took a snapshot, none of these publications actually capture the whole language. In English, for example, you'd have to combine the OED with all manner of specialized/technical/scientific jargon, throw Urban Dictionary in there, etc. It is interesting, however, to think about a list of dictionaries by number of words -- and there are plenty of sources in the history of dictionaries/lexicography as well as the histories of reference, encyclopedias, writing, etc. that would support such a list. The difficult thing is finding sources that span up to the present, and then presenting them in a way that isn't WP:SYNTH. Ideally, we'd be drawing from other reliable sources' similar lists -- and this list does not appear to cite any such sources, as far as I can see... — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment: At this point the list is a list of dictionaries with most headwords. It has little to do with contemporary languages as many of the dictionaries collect, well, linguistic units in use for centuries (e.g. the Deutsches Wörterbuch and the Oxford English Dictionary) or even for millennia (the Zhonghua Zihai). Apart from the seemingly unsurmountable difficulties of defining word across languages at least the Zhonghua Zihai doesn’t even pretend to collect words, but only characters (many of which were only used on one occasion or in one name). There are descriptive dictionaries like the OED that claim to record all words in (current and historical) use and prescriptive ones like the Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia that claim to include only words considered worthy to be recommended for formal style. I am afraid there is little hope for this mess to ever turn into something tidy and encyclopaedic. A well-defined list of descriptive word dictionaries of contemporary standard and dialectal language use, for instance, simply doesn’t seem feasible. Love —LiliCharlie (talk) 10:12, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
P.S. I also recommend reading How do British and American attitudes to dictionaries differ?. Every nation — let alone speech community — has their own notion of what purpose a dictionary serves. Love —LiliCharlie (talk) 10:37, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:13, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

2017 Blancpain GT Series Endurace Cup[edit]

2017 Blancpain GT Series Endurace Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "2017 Blancpain GT Series Endurace Cup" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Spelling mistake Vettelisthebest (talk) 01:13, 30 August 2016 (UTC) Creating deletion discussion for 2017 Blancpain GT Series Endurace Cup Adding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Blancpain GT Series Endurace Cup

Relationship between rugby league and rugby union[edit]

Relationship between rugby league and rugby union (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Relationship between rugby league and rugby union" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This page seems to be POV and frankly written like a school essay (not suggesting cleanup though). The topic seems to also seems to be covered very well at History_of_rugby_league. I would redirect but the term seems improbable. Savonneux (talk) 06:56, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 07:43, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 07:43, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • delete agree with nom. As rugby league was a game derived from rugby union it's better covered in history of rugby league article. LibStar (talk) 16:36, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Therapy Sessions[edit]

Therapy Sessions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Therapy Sessions" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Music event with no sources other than event listings, and no claim to notability; the article has been tagged for questionable notability and lack of sources since 2013. I can't find any sources that are independent of the company behind the events, Freak Recordings and I'd say a mention of Therapy Sessions in that article is sufficient. bonadea contributions talk 06:58, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 07:03, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

CSI Church Kaliakkavilai[edit]

CSI Church Kaliakkavilai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "CSI Church Kaliakkavilai" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable church. There is nothing about this church, either as an organization or as a building, to distinguish it from every other church. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 10:46, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • DElete -- It would be nice if we could keep articles on every NN local church, but we cannot and do not. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:48, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Joe Praize[edit]

Joe Praize (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Joe Praize" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 13:58, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:29, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:29, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Robinsons Place Dasmariñas[edit]

Robinsons Place Dasmariñas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
SM City Masinag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
SM City Calamba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
SM City Novaliches (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Robinsons Place Dasmariñas" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)
(Find sources: "SM City Masinag" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)
(Find sources: "SM City Calamba" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)
(Find sources: "SM City Novaliches" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

as per last AfD. fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. no inherent notability of shopping malls.

also nominating:

LibStar (talk) 02:39, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete as per the nominator. No evidence of notability. Ajf773 (talk) 08:57, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

One2like.de[edit]

One2like.de (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "One2like.de" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:WEB. The meedia.de reference doesn't actually mention One2like. (apologies for the archive.is, Wayback Machine did not have the link) Sunmist (talk) 10:04, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Sunmist (talk) 10:19, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Sunmist (talk) 10:21, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Leader of the Opposition (Bulgaria)[edit]

Leader of the Opposition (Bulgaria) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Leader of the Opposition (Bulgaria)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This seems like WP:OR original research, and that there is no such thing as "Leader of the Opposition" in Bulgarian proportionally-elected parliament. The same reasoning from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List_of_Serbian_parliamentary_opposition_leaders and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leader of the Opposition (Sweden) holds: this title is only applicable to Westminster System and similar. The article is unsourced as to the application and legitimacy of such position, apart from the obvious election results. No such user (talk) 11:34, 22 August 2016 (UTC) No such user (talk) 11:34, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. No such user (talk) 11:38, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. No such user (talk) 11:38, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:SYN. A Parliamentary system does not automatically establish the official existence of an Official Opposition. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 06:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

The One Hundred (band)[edit]

The One Hundred (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "The One Hundred (band)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 12:40, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:46, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:46, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. Quite a bit of coverage from Kerrang! (some cited), a session for BBC Radio 1 ([41]), plus various other bits of coverage: [42], [43], [44], [45], [46]. --Michig (talk) 14:48, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Hany Rambod[edit]

Hany Rambod (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Hany Rambod" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Notability is not inherited from his clients duffbeerforme (talk) 13:02, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:58, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Johann Christian Süss[edit]

Johann Christian Süss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Johann Christian Süss" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Potentially fails WP:GNG Ueutyi (talk) 00:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Mahesh Dutt Sharma[edit]

Mahesh Dutt Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Mahesh Dutt Sharma" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Lack of reliable sources in the article and online makes this article a candidate for deletion. Marvellous Spider-Man 15:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:42, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:42, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:42, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Bismuth (Steven Universe)[edit]

Bismuth (Steven Universe) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Bismuth (Steven Universe)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not all individual episodes of TV shows are independently notable. This one was reviewed on the AV Club (which reviews just about everything, meaning that it doesn't mean that much to be reviewed by them) and mentioned on a blog. That's not enough RS for GNG. Drmies (talk) 15:19, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 18:06, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Fair points. I'll point out that the episode is the first to my knowledge to be a full half an hour instead of a 15 minute short, and it is also the first time that a Crystal Gem from the past has made an appearance. That being said, there is truth that this is of questionable notability, and along the same lines of questionable sourcing as well. I vote keep, but then I am fan, so I am inherently biased here. (PS: I would be alright with merging and/or redirecting the article to an episode list for the series.) TomStar81 (Talk) 03:44, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
  • If the threshold is number of RS, I would vote keep as there are additional reviews by ComicsAlliance, The Mary Sue, Paste (magazine) and iDigitalTimes. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 17:34, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Janine Circincione[edit]

Janine Circincione (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Janine Circincione" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not notable, at least not yet. The NYT article does not even mention her. The New Yorker article is about a show ather gallery. The other 2 refs are notices and not independent DGG ( talk ) 16:03, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:46, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment, added to woman artists project so that participants are notified of afd.Coolabahapple (talk) 14:47, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep No wonder the NYT doesn't mention her. Her name was spelled wrong. It is Janine Cirincione, not Circincione. Try this perhaps? I'll move the page. Mduvekot (talk) 01:36, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:52, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Arthur Brett and Sons[edit]

Arthur Brett and Sons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Arthur Brett and Sons" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Clearly promotional, created by SPA, not encyclopedic, no checkable references, no claim nor evidence of passing WP:CORP, verging on WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CSD#G11. PROD was removed without any fixes to the article. David Gerard (talk) 16:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 16:20, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 16:20, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep The topic is notable, being covered in numerous sources covering the antiques and furniture trade such as Timber Trades Journal; Arts & Decoration; The Connoisseur, &c. Andrew D. (talk) 11:12, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
    • If you have access to good paper sources, please do add them to the article :-) - David Gerard (talk) 00:20, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:49, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Sumeeti Mittal[edit]

Sumeeti Mittal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Sumeeti Mittal" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources ·