Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Yesterday

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Purge page cache if page isn't updating.
Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Contents

Shadow fight 3[edit]

Shadow fight 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Shadow fight 3" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable video game, lacks reviews, fails WP:GNG. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Zibad Rheum[edit]

Zibad Rheum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Zibad Rheum" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not enough context to tell what this article is about. Most of the content pertains to the genus Rheum. Lead suggests it's a particular species endemic to Iran; source at [1] talks about something that Google translates as rhubarb (although if it's a wild species, I suspect it may be Rheum ribes). At any rate, this article seems to be a fork of one of our other Rheum related articles, but I can't tell which one. Plantdrew (talk) 21:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete for now. I am unable to find any sources that support the existence of this particular "species" of the genus. I recommend leaving a query on the talk page of the main article and/or the relevant WikiProject - or simply a notification of the AfD on those talk pages ---Steve Quinn (talk) 03:56, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Neelansh Koshta[edit]

Neelansh Koshta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Neelansh Koshta" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unnotable taekwondo practitioner did not compete at the highest level. Medalling at some obscure off the grid tournament has no effect. The article had been deleted and recreated in various forms previously.PRehse (talk) 12:44, 1 September 2017 (UTC)6

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. PRehse (talk) 13:00, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete The coverage is routine sports reporting and his accomplishments do not meet WP:MANOTE or WP:NSPORTS. He is not listed among the 36,000+ fighters at taekwondodata.com and the World Taekwondo Federation doesn't have a men's 70 kg division. As far as his win in a minor tournament's 74 kg division goes, the WTF does recognize that division, but he's not among the 823 competitors ranked by the WTF in that division. He has never competed at a major event. Papaursa (talk) 23:08, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: last relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

David Barrie[edit]

David Barrie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "David Barrie" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Appears to be a self-penned CV of a "social entrepreneur", accompanied by a verbose list of projects that he's allegedly been part of in (often) some vague and unsubstantiated way. I can't find anything of substance about Barrie online. The occasional news article only mentions his name very briefly. Time for it to go, fails WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 19:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:11, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. It appears that the subject is a UK Councillor but fails WP:NPOL. The problem is that there really is little information there out there about him other than passing mentions, like a recent YMCA project in his town. Also doesn't help that most edits to the article were done by: User:Mrdavidbarrie. Jip Orlando (talk) 15:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

G. M. Felix[edit]

G. M. Felix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "G. M. Felix" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Just a regular poet. He hasn't recieved in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. Greenbörg (talk) 16:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 17:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 17:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 17:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete, though he's clearly been on this Earth for a long time and published some stuff, there is no suggestion here he's won awards or had any recognition. If he'd "well known" by his other name Qasir Amritsari, there's zero proof of this online. If there was any hint of pre-internet success I'd hesitate to vote 'delete', but the prognosis doesn't look good here. Sionk (talk) 20:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:10, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Michael Hamilton (economist)[edit]

Michael Hamilton (economist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Michael Hamilton (economist)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Notability is not established. The only source is not independent of the subject. Does not meet WP:BIO RetiredDuke (talk) 15:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:09, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. He was a lecturer, not a professor, at the University of Georgia after leaving Kodak. I can't find any independent sources on his role at Kodak, only brief mentions from press announcements. Does not meet academic or business people requirements. StarryGrandma (talk) 18:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Iranian Turkic alphabet[edit]

Iranian Turkic alphabet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Iranian Turkic alphabet" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

WP:CFORK and WP:POVFORK of Azerbaijani alphabet. Every thing is copy-pasted from the Azerbaijani alphabet. the lead, sources, external links and etc. And the name of article is WP:OR, WP:POV, meaningless and unscientific. Turkic is a language family and not a specific language. What is this so-called "Iranian Turkic"? Google it and google brings this wiki page and its copies on other websites. This article should be deleted and if it has any useful content, they should be used on the main article. Wario-Man (talk) 03:35, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete Per the nominator. Pure bogus. - LouisAragon (talk) 18:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:32, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:32, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:33, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:55, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 11:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:06, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Delete Wario-Man said it all. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 22:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - Seems to be a hoax, with no reliable sources supporting the existence of such an alphabet. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 02:21, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

The Nude Pube Banglers[edit]

The Nude Pube Banglers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "The Nude Pube Banglers" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

A non-notable band. No reliable sources that give significant coverage and no indication that they've had an impact on their field of music. Also fails general notability guideline. DrStrauss talk 11:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete, an underground band. Geschichte (talk) 08:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment - What does being an "underground" band to do with anything? Do they meet notability for musical groups or not, is the only question, nothing else. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:04, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Hollywood Trails[edit]

Hollywood Trails (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Hollywood Trails" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

It would appear to me that there may well be article subjects that would pass the tests for notability that could be called "Hollywood Trails", perhaps about bicycle or hiking paths in Hollywood (the place in LA) or perhaps one about frequently followed tourism routes in Hollywood (more generally speaking with the meaning the Cinema of the United States.

This article is not about these topics. It is about a business venture called "Hollywood Trails: Eco-Adventure Kewl Bicycle Tours". It was moved to its current title on April 23 2009.

I note that the article was initially created December 6, 2008 as an article about an astrologer.

In its current state, its references - such as they are - are two BlogSpot websites. As self-published sources, they cannot assist the article's claim to have "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

I would argue that this article fails the WP:CORP test. Shirt58 (talk) 10:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Bike tours of Hollywood, Florida, (and 99.9999% of other places) don't generate a lot of media interest. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:04, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Boxifier[edit]

Boxifier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Boxifier" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Prod contested by article creator so here we are. Fails WP:NPRODUCT with no third-party sources given. shoy (reactions) 13:53, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 13:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 13:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)


shoy, Boxifier targets a niche, but it is used by people around the world. Here is an article on a reputable blog [1] that mentions the fact that this product helps researchers to find cures for neurological disorders - www.goo.gl/1wL5u3. I created this page because Boxifier is a mature product with history and results, not some new entry looking for attention. The reason for creating the page is that it is listed in a comparison table with several other products and it is the only one with a missing page. If you don't feel this should be on Wikipedia, that's fine. I just thought it is helpful, because it is used by so many people each day. (User talk:Andreeaken 08:17, 31 August 2017 (UTC))

Unfortunately, that's an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument and some of those articles might very well fail WP:NPRODUCT also. Every article has to stand on its own merits by providing in-depth coverage in WP:RS. I would suggest that you could merge the information into the article of the software company, but they don't have an article either. shoy (reactions) 14:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Would creating an article of the software company in which I could merge this information be flagged as WP:NCOMPANY and the same notability reasons invoked before proposing it for deletion? Ultimately, if this Wikipedia article existing would personally cause you or anyone else trouble then it is just better for it to be deleted. I guess the other articles that clearly fail WP:NPRODUCT were just lucky to not be deleted. (User talk:Andreeaken 31 August 2017 (UTC))
It depends on how notable the company is. Based on what I can find online, they barely have a website, much less coverage in reliable sources. Also, if you feel that other pages fail WP:NPRODUCT, feel free to propose them for deletion. shoy (reactions) 20:28, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 06:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: relist final
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Live at the Jerash Festival 2004[edit]

Live at the Jerash Festival 2004 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Live at the Jerash Festival 2004" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A redirect to the artist's discography was attempted per WP:ATD. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:46, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:46, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:01, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

El Dounya Helwa – Live[edit]

El Dounya Helwa – Live (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "El Dounya Helwa – Live" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A redirect to the artist's discography was attempted per WP:ATD. Current sourcing us user-generated. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:41, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:01, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

The Best of Nancy Clips[edit]

The Best of Nancy Clips (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "The Best of Nancy Clips" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A redirect to the artist's discography was attempted per WP:ATD. Current sourcing us user-generated. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:01, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Awel Mara[edit]

Awel Mara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Awel Mara" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A redirect to the artist's discography was attempted per WP:ATD. Current sourcing us user-generated. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - this doesn't pass WP:NALBUM. Maybe it can be added as a section in the article of the singer. KagunduTalk To Me 09:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Nancy Ajram: Greatest Hits[edit]

Nancy Ajram: Greatest Hits (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Nancy Ajram: Greatest Hits" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A redirect to the artist's discography was attempted per WP:ATD. Current sourcing us user-generated. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment Nancy Ajram is one of the most well known singers in the Arab world. She has an international audience, similar to many kpop groups today. I would like to search for more sources. If this is an official greatest hits album, I am pretty sure there will be sources in Arabic.--DreamLinker (talk) 11:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Any help is appreciated. I used to listen to many of these songs and I am pretty sure it is a notable album. Unfortunately I cannot read Arabic.--DreamLinker (talk) 11:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Warners Solicitors[edit]

Warners Solicitors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Warners Solicitors" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This firm does not seem notable to me. There is nothing in the article to suggest that it is. Tacyarg (talk) 18:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Bardon Park (Western Australia)[edit]

Bardon Park (Western Australia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Bardon Park (Western Australia)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable park. Sure there's information on it but no actual proof of notability. Wikipedia:Existence does not prove notability etc. — IVORK Discuss 13:08, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete. I searched but could find no references suggesting that this is a recognized tourist attraction or otherwise more than an attractive but run of the mill city park in the Maylands neighborhood of Perth's Bayswater suburb. It's not even mentioned in our articles about Maylands and Bayswater, although some other parks are. As such, notability is not established under the guideline at WP:NGEO or otherwise. (Note: there's a more notable Bardon Park in Leicestershire.) --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:05, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Community group https://www.facebook.com/bardonpark/ User:stevenebsary —Preceding undated comment added 06:30, 29 August 2017 (UTC) As the Bardon Park area is significant to Noongar Culture and history with the natural springs in the wetlands also its links to Derbarl Yerrigan (Swan River) http://www.bom.gov.au/iwk/calendars/nyoongar.shtml#djilba

Section substituted in from User_talk:Stevenebsary#Sourcing_relevant_infoIVORK Discuss 07:50, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

G'day mate,
You are doing good work on the article in terms of getting it to conform to Wikipedia's Manual of Style. However unfortunately I do believe the deletion nomination I placed will succeed due to the fact it is just one run of the mill park of many across Perth. Wikipedia being an online encyclopedia can only include articles that are particularly note-worthy. Just because something exists does not automatically qualify it as such. The criteria for notability is laid out in WP:NGEO. If it is deleted, I hope you still have the desire to continue to contribute to Wikipedia. — IVORK Discuss 06:39, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

I am in the process of sourcing relevant info on the park.User:Stevenebsary

It's not about information to prove it exists, I was a resident of Perth for 20 years, it's about proving that it is worthy of an article. That it is relevant to people outside of the local surrounds / city / state / country. — IVORK Discuss 06:56, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

https://library.dbca.wa.gov.au/static/FullTextFiles/052287.003.pdf

Yep, again. This merely states it exists, not that it is particularly notable above any of the other parks that exist across the world. — IVORK Discuss 07:28, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

I disagree, a wildlife sanctuary is important. It has indigenous history https://parks.dpaw.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/downloads/parks/Indigenous%20history%20of%20the%20Swan%20and%20Canning%20rivers.pdf

I'm not sure 30 people camping there in the 1930-60s alone gives it relevance. This is the only mention of the park in the article. DPAW doesn't even list it on the "park finder" on their website, I'd say it'd be pretty hard to find an example of a park with a waterfront that isn't also "a wildlife sanctuary". There is however an article on the Swan River (Western Australia). — IVORK Discuss 07:46, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Indigenous art installation https://facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=692968497568450&id=677400495791917

Tourist attraction park playground https://www.weekendnotes.com/bardon-park/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenebsary (talkcontribs) 08:11, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete Very reluctantly. There just does not seem to be anywhere near enough to establish notability at this time. It is mentioned in WA Parliamentary debate though. As much as I do not like to see the first article by a WP:NEWBIE get deleted, especially given that there seems to be so much good faith here, and having had such trouble myself when I first started, there just does not seem to be enough here for anything remotely core or in-depth or specific to the park. If the indigenous aspect can be built up, I might be convinced to change my mind. Aoziwe (talk) 12:20, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

How is the sv site version related here? This all started due to facebooks import from that source, causing incorrect data there for the place (well in the wrong language). Unfortunately facebook is terrible at places in many ways. Will that version still exist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenebsary (talkcontribs) 13:21, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

I'm inclined not to encroach into foreign language Wikipedias. From what I can tell with the assistance of a translator extension, that article was created by an automated bot. Being that was the case, and no such thing for article creation exists on the English Wikipedia, what I know of their guidelines clearly isn't enough for me to propose deletion. Most foreign language Wikipedias act independently of one another, as even the guidelines after all are all just one big agreed-upon consensus between editors. I am not familiar with the history of that article or the bot that seemingly created it. — IVORK Discuss 14:04, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Note there are sources about community involvement in the park, from relatively local news sources and blogs, but I think these add up and suffice. For example:
  • blog review/description of the park
  • I added that "Nearby residents concerned about the park incorporated the Bardon Park Riverside Restoration Group to address weeds in 2016. The park has been managed by the City of Bayswater since 2006." based on |title=Residents to tackle Bardon Park weeds themselves, of 11 October 2016
  • I added that: "A nature playground was developed for $175,000 and opened in March 2016. The playground features a rock garden which illustrates 'the six Noongar seasons of Birak - the first summer, Bunuru - the second summer, Djeran - autumn, Makuru - the first rains, Djilba - the second rains and Kambarang - flowering.'", based on the City of Bayswater's facebook posting about it: [3].
I think this stuff adds up. What is needed is some helpful development, not eradication of good faith new contributor's work. --doncram 17:26, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: delete or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 12:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep. we have normally kept all substantial city parks as geographic features, and the references are good enough for that. DGG ( talk ) 00:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 01:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) (m) 22:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete, I'm not sure that this is a "substantial city park", to quote DDG. If this were Central Park or Hyde Park then definitely, but I'm not convinced this is anything more than an ordinary suburban park, and none of the sources shown or arguments presented have convinced me otherwise. Lankiveil (speak to me) 22:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC).

Diablogato[edit]

Diablogato (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Diablogato" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unremarkable band, but the article does assert the importance or significance of the subject, so no (A7). I find 30 ghits, most not even related to the band, offering no significant coverage whatsoever; a few mentions here and there is all I can find. The two sources are unconvincing, as mere announcements. Mduvekot (talk) 22:11, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Erik Zachary[edit]

Erik Zachary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Erik Zachary" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

A bit too soon. Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO and WP:ENT. Trivial mention in the sources cited, except for here (a local entertainment publication) and here (an industry publication which looks like a press release). A Google search brought back the same sources and the same trivial mention. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:10, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Krishna Subramanian (COO Komprise)[edit]

Krishna Subramanian (COO Komprise) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Krishna Subramanian (COO Komprise)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Subject does not appear to meet WP:NBIO. Sources are either blogs/user generated content (Forbes link), social networks or press releases, that do not support the claims in the article. I am unable to find any significant coverage of the subject of the article, however there are plenty of articles about Krishna Subramanian, a technological entrepreneur of the same name (but different gender, so definitely not the same person). PGWG (talk) 21:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete. I nominated the article on the firm for AfD, but missed this one. Neither he nor the firm have any indication of notability, and the simultaneous creation of the articles is good evidence that the contributor was an undeclared paid editor DGG ( talk ) 04:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete: Effectively a CV page by a probably connected contributor. A sequence of jobs is described, and some in-role mentions relative to her current and a former company can be found, but nothing to indicate that the subject is of encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 06:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete glorified CV, doesn't meet WP:GNG. jcc (tea and biscuits) 13:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Video Clips 2[edit]

Video Clips 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Video Clips 2" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A redirect to the artist's discography was attempted per WP:ATD. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:31, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete, no references and barely any content. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 08:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Who (film)[edit]

Who (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Who (film)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

See film notability guidelines. Unreleased films are only notable if production is notable, and this article does not indicate anything about production other than that it has started. Because production is not notable, the list is promotional. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

The release date as stated is December 6. So, it's informational rather than promotional. Dynamic80 (talk) 04:35, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 05:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 05:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:59, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Annavarapu Ramaswamy[edit]

Annavarapu Ramaswamy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Annavarapu Ramaswamy" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

There are two problems with this article, tone and notability. First, it consists almost entirely of peacock language written to praise its subject rather than describe him neutrally. Second, there isn't a lot of independent in-depth coverage of the subject, although there is plenty of primary or vanity coverage. The first problem can be solved by stripping out most of the article, which would not leave much, and not enough to sustain musical notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:50, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:56, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:56, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:56, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:59, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep but copyedit to remove peacock language. Add references to solid sourcces.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 14:30, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Gregory Magie[edit]

Gregory Magie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Gregory Magie" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Checking source & related sites shows nothing special. JamesG5 (talk) 02:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - 33 G-hits for NAME + "composer" for this music professor and director. Let's call this one WP:TOOSOON. Carrite (talk) 01:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Shamsun Nahar Khan[edit]

Shamsun Nahar Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Shamsun Nahar Khan" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

An associate professor of pharmaceutical science, whose name is on 35+ journal articles, although never as lead author. The most cited of those articles, according to Google Scholar, has been cited 72 times. Four have been cited at least 35 times each. In some fields that would be excellent, but is modest, I believe, for pharmaceutical chemistry. It's an order of magnitude below the citation figures for the lead authors on some of those articles, such as Atta-ur-Rahman (chemist)[5] and Muhammad Iqbal Choudhary[6]. Her list of scholarships, fellowships, and awards is better than none, but not highly prestigious.

The cited sources are the university where she teaches and a blog self-published by a third party (so not a reliable source for facts about her), plus two sources that appear irrelevant - they don't mention her. A relatively junior academic, who at this time does not meet WP:GNG or WP:PROF. Worldbruce (talk) 21:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 21:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 21:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 21:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Gettingtough – The Race[edit]

Gettingtough – The Race (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Gettingtough – The Race" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No sources and probably fails on WP:GNG Shaded0 (talk) 18:10, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Team Uttejit[edit]

Team Uttejit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Team Uttejit" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable racing team. I haven't managed to find any reliable third-party sources using Google. –barakokula31 (talk) 17:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Jonathan Shaw (canoeist)[edit]

Jonathan Shaw (canoeist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jonathan Shaw (canoeist)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

WP:AUTOBIO; no coverage beyond a couple of articles from local papers and race placements. Not enough for WP:SPORTBASIC. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - this is a brief article about a canoeist who retired in 2012. The article appears to have been created by the canoeist himself. Vorbee (talk) 14:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Teodore Acosta[edit]

Teodore Acosta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Teodore Acosta" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable person. Fails the general and subject-specific notability criteria. — Zawl 16:59, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom. None of his works appear notable. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

EPIDSM Locrian[edit]

EPIDSM Locrian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "EPIDSM Locrian" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

see - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

EPIDSM Phrygian[edit]

EPIDSM Phrygian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "EPIDSM Phrygian" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

see - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

EPIDSM Dorian[edit]

EPIDSM Dorian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "EPIDSM Dorian" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

see - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:35, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

EPIDSM Aeolian[edit]

EPIDSM Aeolian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "EPIDSM Aeolian" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

see - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

EPIDSM Lydian[edit]

EPIDSM Lydian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "EPIDSM Lydian" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

see -Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

EPIDSM Mixolydian[edit]

EPIDSM Mixolydian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "EPIDSM Mixolydian" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

see - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Nausch Hogan & Murray[edit]

Nausch Hogan & Murray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Nausch Hogan & Murray" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No evidence of notability Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Eve Dallas[edit]

Eve Dallas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Eve Dallas" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The article covers a non-notable fictional character. There does not appear to be enough coverage on this character from reliable, third-party sources to justify the character having her own article. While doing a search for resources, all I could find were blogs discussing the characters and promotional information on the novels. All of the information about this character could be covered in the article on the parent series (in Death). Aoba47 (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.Aoba47 (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.Aoba47 (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:45, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Godiva (band)[edit]

Godiva (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Godiva (band)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

(...and by implication Godiva (album) and the redirect at Call Me Under 666)

This is a follow up to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryonic Temple, and is a pretty similar situation, but it gets complicated, so bear with me.

First, there's about two dozen notable things that share the name. So you end up with a search that looks something like this, until you narrow it down to basically nothing as far as news goes. If you switch to open web searches you get some apparent churnalism, passing mention, and very niche promotional interviews, with quaint plugs to remind you to check out their myspace page. And that's really the best of it in a search that pretty quickly wanders off into other topics.

None of the members appear to be independently notable. At first glance, it looks like they're sideways connected to other things that might be, but it's basically a giant almost entirely unreferenced walled garden, including their album, their label, their other label, and their producer.

It's possible that these are not actually overtly promotional, and just made by an over eager fan, but if a few of these go to the bin, probably looking toward a larger AfD at some point. Maybe there's something in German that I'm missing, but there's no article on de.wiki, so that doesn't make me hopeful. TJWtalk 12:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 13:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 13:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 13:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Scenario II (band)[edit]

Scenario II (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Scenario II (band)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC, as I can't find any reliable references to support what is being said. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 12:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 12:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 12:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 12:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per the recent precedent in similar AfDs and the WP:CIL issue, participation here suggests that both are important. —SpacemanSpiff 13:47, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Indian medical college rankings, 2015[edit]

Indian medical college rankings, 2015 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Indian medical college rankings, 2015" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)
Indian engineering college rankings, 2014 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Indian engineering college rankings, 2015 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

There are several issues with these lists. First, there is an issue of copyright in list in quoting an entire list. Second, they are misleading in that none of them is complete, and institutes are arbitrarily included or excluded. The same applies to ratings. Third, the lists are outdated and as such serve very little purpose. As a matter of fact, practically none of them are the targets of other articles. Muhandes (talk) 11:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Blue marble (musician)[edit]

Blue marble (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Blue marble (musician)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

A non notable musician. Article claims a lot of things, but nothing could be corroborated. I couldnt find reliable sources. The subject fails WP:MUSICBIO. No sources as of the nomination date since creation.

Possibly an autobiography (artist name: Matthias; username: Mattix30), subjects date of birth is 30. An article by the same user, "Marble recordings" was speedily deleted. This article might have been previously created by other name. —usernamekiran(talk) 10:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete: For reasons given above, just wanted to note that of the sources added since the nomination only one appears to not be self-created (the "Fuzz Magazine Article"), and that appears to be a blog post. The mention of Matthias De Herdt is also a trivial mention of his previous work as part of a duo among a discussion of several other artists. GiovanniSidwell (talk) 14:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 12:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 12:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 12:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

List of Provisional IRA dead[edit]

List of Provisional IRA dead (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "List of Provisional IRA dead" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

There is a long-standing tradition, especially on Troubles-related articles, of not including lists of the dead on Wikipedia. The policy cited in support of not including such lists is WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Discussions have taken place on many previous occasions, on various different articles, including, e.g., here, here, here, and here. A common theme of such discussions is that whatever about listing or naming people in prose within specific articles, articles devoted to the dead are definitely not to be included. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 09:59, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 12:11, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 12:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. Strongly in agreement with the nom, despite the possibility that some of the deaths are notable, lists such as this should be avoided per WP:NOT. Α Guy into Books § (Message) -  13:06, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep - As a collection of blue links, this has valid navigational purpose. Carrite (talk) 01:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Luigi Rocca[edit]

Luigi Rocca (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Luigi Rocca" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

non notable musician. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC XFhumuTalk 09:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 09:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 09:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 09:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Mandingo (band)[edit]

Mandingo (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Mandingo (band)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO. No significant coverage, not signed to a major record label, cannot find any indication of their albums receiving awards or charting. PGWG (talk) 21:26, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Valley Rose Golf Course[edit]

Valley Rose Golf Course (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Valley Rose Golf Course" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not notable golf course. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable former gulf course (how have I come to be typing this?) which fails WP:MILL and WP:CORPDEPTH.--SamHolt6 (talk) 21:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:26, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - although there is one article that seems to be discussing this topic indepth ([7]), the article is infact routine news about the foreclosure of the course. I could not find any other information that is indepth and from a reliable source about this golf course. Thus, it should be deleted for not being verifiable. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 22:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Al-Shabaka, The Palestinian Policy Network[edit]

Al-Shabaka, The Palestinian Policy Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Al-Shabaka, The Palestinian Policy Network" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

An IP address contested this deletion on my talk page, so I de-PRODed as a courtesy and am bringing it here. My reasoning in the PROD still stands: the sourcing is either connected or promotional, making it not count towards notability per WP:SPIP and WP:CORPDEPTH. The Gnews hits it does have is in citations of the orgs CEO, which certainly doesn't count towards notability for the organization itself, since it is not significant coverage. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:37, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment (before I decide). Give these folks credit for doing something with nothing. The article is breathy; I volunteer to fix that if it's a keep. They (yes the boss) are getting quoted in the world press, for example al-Jazeera[8]. And the ECFR too[9]. Rhadow (talk) 22:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Tara Layne[edit]

Tara Layne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Tara Layne" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Actress of questionable notability-also contrary to how it sounds in the article, she herself didn't win a award, but the short film she was in did. Wgolf (talk) 22:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:05, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:05, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. I tried searches for "Tara Siegel" as well as "Tara Layne", and was unable to find evidence to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR at this time.  gongshow  talk  23:40, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

NEO Connect[edit]

NEO Connect (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "NEO Connect" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable product of a non-notable company. References are PR. No in-depth coverage in independent sources. Pontificalibus (talk) 15:35, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Pontificalibus (talk) 15:58, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Disagree with the proposed deletion. Article can be improved with further citations from independent sources, or alternatively should be merged with NEO Exchange which has more notability. --CorSter (talk) 04:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
The reason I nominated the article was because I couldn't find further citations from independent sources. If you know of any please do add them. I would oppose a merger with NEO Exchange because this product has nothing to do with NEO Exchange, other than being created by the same company.--Pontificalibus (talk) 14:37, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:09, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Kasturi Suman Kumar[edit]

Kasturi Suman Kumar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Kasturi Suman Kumar" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

An exact page called Suman kumar kasturi has already been deleted. The editor seems to be creating a self promotion page using his website as reference. Most references in the page are irrelevant. For example, the editor claims this person is an air force officer and mentions the air force website as reference. There is no mention of the author on the public website(as should be the case). The editor in question has been using SOCK's to create new accounts and you can read more Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Venuanki. I have explained to a SOCK of the editor why this article does not meet WP:NOTABILITY and should be deleted User_talk:Adamgerber80#Removed_the_previously_added_category._Please_consider_reconciliation. Adamgerber80 (talk) 01:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:45, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Misa Uehara (actress, born 1983)[edit]

Misa Uehara (actress, born 1983) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Misa Uehara (actress, born 1983)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:NACTOR, as tagged since September 2008. Incorrect BLPPROD tag was removed because of external links. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 00:38, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 04:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 04:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:28, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Home Assistant[edit]

Home Assistant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Home Assistant" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:PRODUCT, as tagged since March 2017. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 00:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 04:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 04:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 04:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete Article reads like a list of features or a service brochure, fails WP:PRODUCT and WP:MILL as nothing differentiates the service from others in the industry.--SamHolt6 (talk) 03:54, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Rouse High School[edit]

Rouse High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Rouse High School" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article makes no claim of notability. What sources I could find were local routine coverage and mere mentions. Since schools have no innate presumption of notability, the fact that the subject fails GNG indicates deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:03, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:04, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:04, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep -- Au contraire. I don't like boring articles, but the guidance is this: "Articles on high schools and secondary schools, with rare exceptions, have been kept when nominated at Articles for Deletion except where they fail verifiability." Rouse exists.[10] There are sixteen articles about other high schools in the county. Fine. I'll keep my powder dry for a fight I believe in. I don't believe enough in this one. I'm fine with this direction. Rhadow (talk) 22:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
I see that you, like many others, have fallen victim to circular reasoning. While I understand the political issues behind deleting articles about schools the community has decided that "Secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist." Chris Troutman (talk) 22:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Keep This is a pubic high school in Texas with thousands of students. Back before high schools were routinely kept in AFD because of the presumption of notabiliy (not a claim of inherent notability, like for tiny hamlets or every sports person who played one minute in the major leagues, and not a regurgitation of common outcomes, so forget the "circular reasoning " sophistry) I had occasion to search for reliable sources to support general notability and notability per WP:ORG. In each case for a large US public high school, suitable refs could be found, but not necessarily instantly and without paywall and online. Many large regions of the US have no newspaper available online, and it is not practical to dash to some college library in the state the school is located in to verify that such high schools get significant coverage in the state's major newspapers. Found that the Austin American-Statesman had coverage of a knife attack on an art teacher in a classroom ( they still will let students use Xacto knives in class.) Then there was a male student charged withraping a female student in a closet in the same art department. A teacher/coach was charged with sexually assaulting a student. As the school added upperclassmen to the initial freshman class, the violleyball program was covered for moving into a more demanding conference or bracket. The program similarly received praise. That was all the articles I could view in the Austin paper without subscribing. There were several more links to stories abut programs and non-routine occurrences at the school, such as coverage of the arts proram, Will try and check other Texas newspapers when time permits. Edison (talk) 02:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
I am aware of these mere mentions by local media coverage, as I explained in my nomination. I don't find that coverage enough for GNG. Please be careful with attempted accusations about sophistry, especially when you mispell the term and fail to refute the point. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Helen Rupp[edit]

Helen Rupp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Helen Rupp" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No valid refs and no indication of notability. Fails WP:NM. Nick Number (talk) 20:58, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 21:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 21:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 21:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Jamie Edge[edit]

Jamie Edge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jamie Edge" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article concerns a footballer who fails the sport-specific notability guideline because he has never played at senior international level or in a fully professional league. Note that although he was on the books of pro clubs, he never played first-team football for them. There doesn't seem to be enough independent non-routine coverage to satisfy the general notability guideline. Previously deleted by PROD (twice, apparently), hence we're at AfD. Struway2 (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 19:52, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 19:52, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Struway2 (talk) 19:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Roc City Thunder[edit]

Roc City Thunder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Roc City Thunder" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Appears to fail WP:GNG. They attempted to join a couple of leagues, but ended up playing independently against other non-notable semi-pro teams. I was not able to find any non-self published game coverage. Reliable non-primary sources are significantly lacking as well as a severe lack of significant depth of coverage. 99% of media coverage (most of it local) was only about the announcement of the team, which might also run afoul of single routine announcement. Yosemiter (talk) 19:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

I think that's a misapplication of WP:ROUTINE. Nonetheless, I'll concede that the coverage largely lacks depth, but I see at least two sources in the article that seem to satisfy under the GNG. Powers T 19:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
@LtPowers: I did say "might" run afoul, mostly because the first line in routine is "Per Wikipedia policy, routine news coverage of such things as announcements,..." and it is certainly mostly covering the announcement of the team. But WP:routine in general is very subjective. If they had played a game against a notable team or two, I would likely never have nominated it. I added all the references I could find (it only had one dead one before I came across the page and it is still there as I could not find an archival source for it) and it does not appear to meet WP:GEOSCOPE. Which two sources specifically would you say meet GNG? Yosemiter (talk) 20:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
That would be the Reporter and the Finger Lakes Times articles. They're thin, but sufficient IMO. Powers T 13:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 19:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 19:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 19:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Appius Claudius Pulcher (consul suffectus)[edit]

Appius Claudius Pulcher (consul suffectus) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Appius Claudius Pulcher (consul suffectus)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I am also nominating the following related page for the reasons stated below:

Publius Claudius Pulcher (consul suffectus) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Hoax. The short and sweet part of this argument: I have consulted the standard references about people living at this time in the Roman Empire -- Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, Géza Alföldy, Konsulat und Senatorenstand unter der Antoninen, & Paul Leunissen, Konsuln und Konsulare in der Zeit von Commodus bis Severus Alexander -- & have found no Claudius Pulcher that matches either of these two people. (There are only two Claudii Pulchri known to have lived during the Roman Empire: one who is mentioned in a legal decision of the Emperor Marcus Aurelius, but is not thought to have anything to do with the Republican family, as these articles assert; the other, who lived in the 1st century AD, is known only from an inscription where he took credit for repairing one of the city gates of Ostia, & might be a suffect consul. It's obvious neither are the people of these articles.) The person who created these articles cites a book written by Christian Settipani, but as that work runs almost 600 pages & no page number has been provided in either article, I strongly suspect Settipani's book will not confirm anything in either article; in other words, Settipani is being used deceptively to mask this deception.

The long & ugly part of this argument ("Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'entrate.") Some of you may remember an editor of the username G.-M. Cupertino, who was banned for (amongst other things) abusive behavior, who abusively socked for a while under different user names (including Dgarq until he finally went away. This person has left us reminders of his time here: about 100 biographical articles of varying reliability written to support his theories/fantasies of family lineages. I'm guessing the reason he cites Settipani is due to the latter's investigation into Descent from antiquity, which I confess seems to me to be borderline fringe theory; & if it is not, this banned editor's work makes it appear to be very fringey. His work has the following tells: subject is a person unfamiliar to even serious students of the period, yet provide birth & death dates; the articles are written in the style of a genealogical or prosopographical entry; little information about the person, but extensive detail about ancestors & descendents to the point of genealogical cruft (to use deprecated jargon); & a citation at the end of Settipani's book, Continuité gentilice et continuité sénatoriale dans les familles sénatoriales romaines à l'époque impériale without any page numbers -- & rarely any other work.

I've compiled a list of some of the questionable articles he's created -- the subject area of biographies of the Roman Empire is infested with them -- & because sometimes the article is about a real person (& because I'm an inclusionist at heart, but this mess is making me rethink that stance), I plan to vet them when I can find the time. (I don't own a copy of the Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, & in some cases I'd like to also verify against the Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire, which means I need to schedule trips to the library.)

If this mess were simply limited to en.wikipedia, that would be the end of the matter. (And I'd have something to keep However, G.-M. Cupertino has been a busy boy & has also been socking on fr.wikipedia & bg.wikipedia, where identical articles appear. And because we have mirrors of this hoax beyond en.wikipedia, there are bogus entries in Wikidata. This makes me physically sick, because now it will be even more difficult to purge Wikipedia completely of his misinformation. (As an aside, do we have any contacts with either project? If someone in fr.wikipedia could comb through Settipani's book & provide complete source info for their articles, it would make it much easier to purge the rest of his misinformation.) -- llywrch (talk) 18:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. llywrch (talk) 19:13, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Comment: I'm copying a comment I left back at WP:Classical Greece and Rome, since it's about the same thing I would say here. The gist of my comment is that I suspect the articles aren't hoaxes, but that they're about individuals whose existence is largely inferred rather than proven, or who probably existed but are known almost entirely because of their connection to known persons. In this respect they're a bit like figures in better-regarded sources, like Birley, who are sometimes connected by shadowy individuals about whom little other than the name is known, and whose relationship is uncertain, but Settipani seems to build such individuals into houses of cards that give the illusion of well-established and unimpeachable biography and genealogy. Here's what I posted:

"I can't really read French (well, I can read it... I just have no idea what most of it says!), but I'm reasonably sure that they're not deliberate hoaxes, but actually found in Settipani. However, I suspect they're individuals whose existence is merely inferred from various sources, such as filiations or other indications that someone was the son, grandson, father, or grandfather of someone else. For example, "this woman and her sister were of consular rank and descended from the family of so-and-so, who had been consul two generations earlier, therefore their father must have been consul at some time, and he would have been the son of the earlier consul and named after his father. His wife's name must have been so-and-so, because that's how this name borne by one of the daughters and her descendants probably came into the family". Without seeing Settipani's sources, I can only guess what they really say, but chances are these are individuals who "probably" existed, or of whom traces exist, possibly even the name of someone who might be the same person (or maybe some other member of the same family who happened to live at the same time). They're probably not worth articles of their own, but might be worth mentioning in the articles of the notable (and reasonably certain) individuals who seem to be connected by them. But I don't think they're actually hoaxes. P Aculeius (talk) 23:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)" P Aculeius (talk) 02:27, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete no evidence this person existed, and even less that they meet notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Arid Uka[edit]

Arid Uka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Arid Uka" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

According to WP:CRIME: "People known only in connection with one event should generally not have an article written about them. If the event is notable, then an article usually should be written about the event instead". Well, that is complete here at 2011 Frankfurt Airport shooting. The subject is not notable for anything else and all the coverage referring to him was written within the context of the incident. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 17:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Redirect, merge or delete per my first AfD nomination: "This article fails WP:BLP1E. The subject is only notable as the perpetrator of the 2011 Frankfurt Airport shooting, and unlikely to become notable for anything else. This article, which was created today, essentially duplicates the content of the article about the shooting, which also makes it a content fork."  Sandstein  17:53, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

A. V. Thomas[edit]

A. V. Thomas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "A. V. Thomas" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Poorly sourced article with just 5 lines about the individual, with the rest of the article being promotional toward a company (of the same name) he founded. A web search shows up only results of the same business. Mark the trainDiscuss 17:13, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 17:13, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 17:13, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 17:13, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Speedy keep - he was a state-level and national politician. Anything that might otherwise be poor regarding the article can be fixed. - Sitush (talk) 17:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC) I've just restored the last good version. - Sitush (talk) 17:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Keep: But article needs work! - Ret.Prof (talk) 19:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator per WP:NOTCLEANUP. (non-admin closure) jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

List of African-American neighborhoods[edit]

List of African-American neighborhoods (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "List of African-American neighborhoods" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Completely unsourced and fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:52, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 18:04, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 18:04, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep. A valid navigational list of blue-linked neighborhood articles. It's sufficient that sourcing can be found in those articles.--Arxiloxos (talk) 20:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Molly Seavy-Nesper[edit]

Molly Seavy-Nesper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Molly Seavy-Nesper" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

WP:BLP of a radio producer, which is referenced entirely to primary sources with no evidence of reliable source coverage about her in media provided at all. Being an "online media" producer for a radio show, even a national one, is not a notability criterion that guarantees a Wikipedia article to every such person who exists -- it would be fine if she could show enough media coverage about her to pass WP:GNG, but not if the only sources you can provide are the self-published websites of the show she works on, her alma mater and an organization she's a member of: media other than her own paycheque provider need to be writing about her work to make her notable for it. Bearcat (talk) 16:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

   I am the creator. My only dog in the fight is having decided to clear up my doubt about whether she is the Molly C. V. Nestor i keep hearing about, or not.
   I have no idea whether we customarily apply identical standards to people associated with profit-driven org'ns and to people associated with gov't-grant receiving non-profits. (Perhaps it's irrelevant, but i notice that the POTUS considers her employer less reliable than his financial contributors!)
   (BTW, please help me dispel my illusion that there are no better sources than the respective degree-granting institutions, as who holds their academic degrees, than those institutions' own statements.)
   Hmm, John Hancock is giving me another 22 years, but the trend in my editing rate leaves me unwilling to undertake a self-remediation project at this point.
--Jerzyt 04:03 & :08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Rhian Sugden[edit]

Rhian Sugden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Rhian Sugden" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable model, only sources available are passing mentions in local newspapers or tabloids. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 15:01, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 15:01, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Christian Vit[edit]

Christian Vit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Christian Vit" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable bit part actor. Only sources available are passing mentions or tabloid journalism. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:53, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 15:03, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 15:03, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete a collection of bit parts do not make one notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

List of all Patrouille Suisse Pilots[edit]

List of all Patrouille Suisse Pilots (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "List of all Patrouille Suisse Pilots" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Topic fails WP:LISTN and none of its entries appear to be individually notable people. – Joe (talk) 14:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 14:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 14:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 14:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 14:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nominator. Certainly fails WP:LISTN. Just a list of non notable people. Ajf773 (talk) 19:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete per nominator: this kind of article isn't in line with Wikipedia's inclusion criteria as nominal rolls and the like are not useful encyclopedic content. Nick-D (talk) 23:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Gordon Carson[edit]

Gordon Carson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Gordon Carson" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Gordon Carson was an NCO with E Company, 506th Infantry Regiment (United States) during World War II. His rank (staff sergeant) does not make him notable under WP:SOLDIER; no awards are indicated although he probably was awarded at least one Purple Heart because he suffered a wound. Carson served in all three major actions involving E Company during the war. In Austria, he married a Polish woman who was a displaced person; their experience with Carson's wife negotiating the War bride "pipeline" is probably not unique. After returning home, Carson became a coach and later an insurance salesman and was selected as the Junior Chamber of Commerce Man of the Year Award in 1953. There is no significant coverage of his post-war life. Carson was not depicted in the Band of Brothers miniseries. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 14:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 14:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 14:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Ferring F.C.[edit]

Ferring F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ferring F.C." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Club hasn't competed in an FA cup competition or played at level 10 or higher of the English football league system Kivo (talk) 13:52, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 14:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 14:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 14:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete Doesn't meet the generally accepted criteria for English football clubs (see here for an AfD on a club that did meet the criteria). Number 57 17:45, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Coco (2017 musical film)[edit]

Coco (2017 musical film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Coco (2017 musical film)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This was discussed 18 months ago and it still has no release date. Also, the title seems to be wrong. — Film Fan 13:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 14:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 14:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep - While the film has no release date, it looks like it is notable enough by the sources. Perhaps adding "Category:Cancelled films" instead? 47.208.20.130 (talk) 23:56, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Petrified (disambiguation)[edit]

Petrified (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Petrified (disambiguation)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This disambiguation is so small that it can easily be accomplished by a hatnote instead, though I doubt it needs even that. The only other actual article besides the main one is Petrifaction in mythology and fiction.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

The Centre for Corporate Public Affairs[edit]

The Centre for Corporate Public Affairs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "The Centre for Corporate Public Affairs" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Delete. Fails notability; checked Google (lots of hits, all advertising/promotion), Google Books (nothing), Google News (nothing), and Google News Archive (nothing). Page created in 2008 and recently re-vamped but still has no sources provided. Corporate promotion with material lifted directly from organization website (copyvios removed). Possible COI from recent editors. Loopy30 (talk) 12:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 12:52, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 13:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 13:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

LifeSource Water Systems[edit]

LifeSource Water Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "LifeSource Water Systems" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPIP. References provided are either mentions-in-passing (fails WP:CORPDEPTH) or rely almost exclusively on company produced material and/or quotations (fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND). Lack of WP:SIGCOV. Edwardx (talk) 10:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 12:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 12:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Keep: Hi, I'm a paid editor for LifeSource, which I've disclosed on the article's talk page. I usually avoid paid editing because the articles in question are often too obscure for inclusion, but I took interest in this one because I felt that it was sufficiently notable and just in need of some cleanup. Namely, it's an 80 employee company with 11 physical locations in 5 different states and has a 33 year history and had a revenue of $15M in 2016, which puts it above many existing small business articles. Also, looking at this press release, they seem to have started a sizable project recently in Peru. I think that the article's biggest issue right now is its low number of secondary sources, but that may in part be due to the company's existence before the days of the Internet, and per WP:NPOSSIBLE, I think it should be given the benefit of the doubt there. --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 22:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Self religion[edit]

Self religion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Self religion" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Delete This article fails Notabilty. It is based on the theory of one author, Heelas and the other references used to support the article are passing and mostly citing Heelas' single use of this term. Elmmapleoakpine (talk) 22:19, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

    • I will add that I think this article also violates WP:SYTH in that the sources used are tangental and do not agree. I also think it is significant that this article was created by two former administrators who were both found by arbitration committees to be abusing Wikipedia as part of a well documented POV campaign. As a result both are no longer admins. Elmmapleoakpine (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:51, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:07, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:07, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More input needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

The Black Book (Rebus)[edit]

The Black Book (Rebus) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "The Black Book (Rebus)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Redirect to Rebus (TV series). This unsourced articled does not establish notability and contains information about the tv episode that is adequately summarized in the article about the tv series. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:18, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 12:26, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages to be redirected to the same target for the same reason:

A Question of Blood (Rebus) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Strip Jack (Rebus) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Let It Bleed (Rebus) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Resurrection Men (Rebus) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The First Stone (Rebus) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The Naming of the Dead (Rebus) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Knots and Crosses (Rebus) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Well, I would oppose this, obviously; the reason I set these pages up in the first place was because I thought they were useful additions to the project.
The rationale for deletion is that the article “does not establish notability” and that the content is “adequately summarized” in the series article.
First, the notability guideline for television says that “an individual radio or television program is likely to be notable if it airs on a network of radio or television stations (either national or regional in scope), or on a cable television network with a national audience” The article already stated that it was made for STV when it was tagged for this, so it already met this requirement. All these episodes have been shown numerous times by STV [11], and ITV in England (on a continuous loop, it seemed, a few years ago), and more recently on Drama [12] , as well as overseas.[13]
Second, that they are adequately summarized in the series article. Well, I would expect that; the purpose of having episode pages is to extend the information on them beyond a summary, which they did when they were written. If the series page has more information now, the remedy would be to expand and improve the episode pages, not collapse them back down to the summaries. I would suggest that would be a better course of action, and also to create pages on the episodes that don't yet have them. Swanny18 (talk) 21:21, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
PS: I've just deleted the notability tag from the Black Books (Rebus) article, as it meets the criteria for the guideline linked. Swanny18 (talk) 23:42, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment, why is this and the others here for deletion, the nominator wants them redirected, this discussion should be closed and redirect discussion taken to the talkpage. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) (m) 04:48, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:08, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Abak/Midim Clan[edit]

Abak/Midim Clan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Abak/Midim Clan" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:GNG. Article shouldn't be a standalone page, it should be integrated into Abak page. Zazzysa (talk) 18:02, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 17:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 18:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete and Merge as per nom. Tecrum (talk) 10:10, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note that the nomination is only proposing a merge, but a "delete and merge" !vote is present. Also of note is that deleted articles are often not merged, as most users don't have access to them after deletion occurs.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment - please note that merge and delete is not possible per licensing rules. When merging, the page history must be preserved for attribution. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 09:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Merge to Abak. EMachine03 (talk) 13:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Condemned 84[edit]

Condemned 84 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Condemned 84" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

no sources apart from their own website. CelenaSkaggs (talk) 18:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 19:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 19:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 19:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Week keep I've found coverage from 1992 in the Washington Post and a more recent review in a German magazine: [14]. There are a lot of mentions in google book searches too, most of which can't be previewed, but demonstrate that this band has had a lasting influence. By no means brilliant sourcing, but also by no means completely obscure. SmartSE (talk) 19:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment. They had both a single and an album on the UK Independent Chart in 1986 - no. 21 and no. 26 respectively (from Barry Lazell's book Indie Hits). It seems likely that print coverage exists from the mid-80s, but none of my books on punk have anything in them about this band. --Michig (talk) 06:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Chris Carmouche[edit]

Chris Carmouche (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Chris Carmouche" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No significant coverage in reliable sources. Claim that he "won a Grammy" is a bit exaggerated, him being one of 14 producers (and only working on three tracks Speakerboxxx/The Love Below#Personnel). Sources only mention him in passing, which isn't too surprising as a producer but nothing that's in-depth enough to write a verifiable biography. menaechmi (talk) 19:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 19:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 19:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep. WP:BAND states that winning a Grammy makes someone notable, and the official Grammys website states that he won one. Maybe it was part of a group effort, but the page doesn't state it was awarded to a group, but to him. Could it use more information? Absolutely, but the article doesn't merit deletion on notability. 331dot (talk) 19:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Comment WP:BAND states that someone may be notable if they win a Grammy, but defers to WP:BASIC. Beyond the Grammy statement, the only verifiable information that exists is that he worked with Big Boi in 2011.[15][16][17] There's no way to satisfy WP:BLP or WP:V. menaechmi (talk) 20:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
ALL the audio engineers who worked on Speakerboxxx/The Love Below won Grammys for their work on the album, so if Carmouche is notable, then by that logic John Frye, Vincent Alexander, Matt Still and Moka Nagatani are as well... with three wins in total, Frye has a better claim to notability than the others. Richard3120 (talk) 22:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
In that case, we could redirect to the album that he got the Grammy for. 331dot (talk) 22:47, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:53, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete the grammy is for an album, not in this case given to an individual as such, so it is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Kimberly Corban[edit]

Kimberly Corban (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Kimberly Corban" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Contested PROD (after it expired, but before it was deleted with no rationale). The concern for PRODing this is that it meets WP:BLP1E conditions 1) Reliable sources only cover her in the context of challenging Obama on Gun control 2) She has remained, and is likely to remain a low-profile individual, and 3) the event was not significant. menaechmi (talk) 19:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep Was a BEFORE performed prior to nom? I see a number of book references - [18] [19] [20]. Beyond the copious initial 2016 references, this continues through 2016-2017 - [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27]. Yes - lots of right-wing less-reliable outlets (but they still demonstrate reliablity. Seems she's become a rape-surviving pro-gun poster-girl for the NRA - and it doesn't look like that's going away.Icewhiz (talk) 05:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Yes, it was, thank you. Of those book mentions, one is part of a link (included in a book, why would you do that?) to the Washington Post article on her, and both the second and third are again about her interaction with Obama. Passing mentions in articles that say "She'll be joining us later on the show"[28], a name-check in an article about the women's march [29], "8 NRA Twitter accounts to follow in 2017" [30], and an article to tell people to watch the video [31] aren't claims of notability. The three interview with her about her sexual assault are primary and don't count towards notability, and would be an awful article to have to write. menaechmi (talk) 14:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete one-event notice, not sustained notability. If for some reason the article is kept it needs to be serverly revisied to remove the POV-pushing "brave decision" and other unecyclopedic language.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:52, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep, prominent public figure. Covered in many RS. Antrocent (♫♬) 18:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Stage & the City[edit]

Stage & the City (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Stage & the City" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

After a thorough search, I am unable to find any substantive RS referencing "Stage & the City." This may be a case of TOOSOON. Chetsford (talk) 20:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Merge to the parent company Anna Fiorentini Theatre and Film School for the time being. There's actually plenty of info on Stage & the City; it gets 88,000 Google hits. But may take some time (or else targeted searching website by website, which I don't have time to do) before sufficient notable RS sources review it substantially. Softlavender (talk) 21:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:21, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:49, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Bluegrass companies[edit]

Bluegrass companies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Bluegrass companies" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Originally proposed for deletion for non-notability but tag removed. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Ifnord (talk) 00:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

  • I dont understand the process but I will help in any possible way to save this page, this company really helped us out in Greenville al and furthermore some of the work I used to do with them was definitely notable if you deam nuclear decommissioning important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.223.3.176 (talk) 02:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • It may not seem notable to y'all but this company provided a younger me and others the best jobs in lower Alabama and really saved this community. Furthermore how are the department of energy etc sources not good enough? Is this how wiki works some guy can just delete something that had been worked on by me and others from here for three years? Who is getting hurt by this article? They helped decommission a fusion reactor with people from south Alabama what more could you people want? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1005:B11C:9DF4:9115:A6D4:A8EC:64AA (talk) 02:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

I read in the AFD area that "When making your case or responding to others, explain how the article meets/violates policy rather than merely stating that it meets/violates the policy" It appears as thought this protocol is not being followed here, my stance is "keep" obviously i have contributed to the article however see the following link to google scholar which references the company https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=bluegrassbit&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C1

bluegrass companies represents a combination of 5 companies that are owned by the same individual, this name has recently become dominant in the organization over bluegrass bit hence why it was used for the article title... look through those google scholar references much of the knowledge and protocol contained in those articles was provided by this set of companies, and must be deemed notable unless one is biased against the company for a personal reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.111.114.126 (talk) 16:41, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

more sources: ler. "Given the superior performance of the concrete shaver, the Environmental Restoration contractor at Hanford purchased the system and fully intends to utilize it during decommissioning of F and DR reactors. Other DOE sites which have expressed significant interest in the shaving system include the Rocky Flats Environmental Restoration Site and the Nevada Test Site. The system would be used to decontaminate large pads. Service providers, e.g., WM’99 CONFERENCE, FEBRUARY 28 – MARCH 4, 1999 Bluegrass Concrete Cutting Inc., are also expressing an interest in the technology and may include it in their full line of services." http://www.wmsym.org/archives/1999/30/30-2.pdf

"There have been several DOE funded D&D activities that are relevant to the dismantling of large radioactive equipment. A TFA report entitled "Melter Glass Removal and Dismantlement" from ORNL8 summarizes these various activities. These activities include the D&D Chicago-Pile No. 5 (CP-5) research reactor, the size reduction of the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR) Vacuum Vessel, and D&D work at the INEEL South Tank Farm in January 2000. Technologies used included the Dual Arm Work Platform (DAWP) at CP-5 (DAWP developed by ORNL), diamond wire cutting by Bluegrass Concrete Cutting, Inc. at the TFTR, and the Modified Brokk Demolition Machine (at the STF)." http://sti.srs.gov/fulltext/tr2001248/tr2001248.html

--208.111.114.126 (talk) 16:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)


"Arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations or their products." from the notability corp section on wiki, bluegrass has been cited by more than 3 government aka independent sources for items which are notable, i rest my case.KEEP. --208.111.114.126 (talk) 17:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)


Also just watch some of the videos on their page https://www.facebook.com/Bluegrasscompanies/ it is honestly interesting stuff, maybe it is not notable? but I would really like to understand why if not, and I understand facebook is not a source just figured it may be interesting to understand what they do... I have read the notability wiki page and I have not seen where this is not notable as they are referenced in more than 3 scholarly works published by the gov websites where they are not a casual mention but part of the team that yielded the information the whole articles are on. --208.111.114.126 (talk) 19:39, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
The notability guidelines are not arbitrary, they are applied to every discussion on notability. Besides reading those, I would also point out WP:SOCK. You may not create accounts or use different IPs in an effort to distort consensus. Ifnord (talk) 17:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

i was using my cellphone (sorry i can't control which tower it connects to) and i never claimed to be someone else or attempted to act as if the accounts were different people .... I have read them and you have yet to present a real counter argument, I thought this was to be a discussion not absolutism, where one party present no willingness to engage in discussion. --208.111.114.126 (talk) 21:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)


if you can present a real counter argument against their .gov and other scholarly sources then go ahead and reason with me, I am willing to come to an agreement of not notable or notable but I want to at least follow the afd process as it should be done.--208.111.114.126 (talk) 21:58, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:56, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

glad to see process being followed correctly, looking forward to a productive discussion --208.111.114.126 (talk) 16:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Saif Group[edit]

Saif Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Saif Group" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No in-depth coverage. Name-checks only. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Greenbörg (talk) 07:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 08:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 08:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep Clearly notable conglomerate, based on the article's content. See this coverage by Forbes for example. Also covered in other reliable news refs. Mar4d (talk) 13:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Mitchell Bailey[edit]

Mitchell Bailey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Mitchell Bailey" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:NM - promotional Atsme📞📧 03:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Adding - WP:MUSICBIO - making note that the following does not meet the criteria (my bold): except for the following: Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves, and all advertising that mentions the musician or ensemble, including manufacturers' advertising.[note 3] Most of the cited sources are interviews with the rapper talking about himself and his hopes of becoming notable. He distributed his own album via iTunes Hip Hop and was not notable enough to make the Top 40. Needs time to incubate, not ready yet. Atsme📞📧 18:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep: A cursory search reveals a lot of press, especially in Canada, including major news venues: [32], [33], [34], [35] [36], [37]. He has also performed at SXSW: [38], [39], [40] and, according to the wiki article, several other music festivals. There's more out there but it requires a lengthier search than I performed, plus possibly some added or subtracted keywords to narrow the search to this person (due to the common name). Softlavender (talk) 03:40, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Comment by nominator - re: the links provided above:
  1. Forbes Music Entertainment is a private marketing company (not affiliated with Forbes) that provides record label services and helps independents market themselves.
  2. The 1st CBC link is promotion of him and FME, and in the article he states that he is currently only in Nova Scotia with hopes that FME can get him promoted. FME is a far cry from having a Sony or Atlantic Records label.
  3. Cape Breton Post is local coverage of news, events, and sports from communities in the Cape Breton Regional Municipality and the counties of Inverness, Richmond and Victoria. Hardly fits the bill for notability.
  4. Rhyme Junkie promotional interview wherein he speaks about himself and his 1st album, and the billboard in his hometown. He said, "We were gonna pay them – it’s like $700 here to have the ad up for a whole month." But the hometowners didn't charge him. Hardly notable. (music networking)
  5. Artist interviews, again pure promotion, (music networking).
  6. Canadian Beats, 40 Canadian music fans working hard to promote all the musical talent that Canada has to offer - promotion.
  7. Rhyme Junkie again, only this time they list songs for sale. Pure promotion.
  8. He was not a star attraction at the music festivals, he was just another entertainer who hasn't become notable except for his own promotions, marketing, and self-promoting interviews.
  9. He does not meet WP:NM per Note 1: someone simply talking about themselves in their own personal blog, website, book publisher, social networking site or music networking site, etc., does not automatically mean they have sufficient attention in the world at large to be notable. If that was so then everyone could have an article. Wikipedia is not a directory.
  10. And keep in mind the COI/business manager creator pointed out below by Argento. Atsme📞📧 04:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
None of the 9 links I provided are the subject "simply talking about themselves in their own personal blog, website, book publisher, social networking site or music networking site". Moreover, CBC News is the news arm of Canada's public broadcaster, equivalent to PBS news and BBC News. Softlavender (talk) 05:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
CBC is the only RS that meets the requirements for notability, and in that interview 3+ months ago, the young hopeful rapper admitted that he'd like to be as successful as Nova Scotia rapper Classified (rapper). Wanting to be successful does not substantiate notability. I thought Yani Sherbatov was a borderline notable fighter, far more notable than this local rapper, but his article was deleted. The other 5 sources you provided are not reliable for establishing WP:NM notability, and neither are the performances. He's simply one of thousands of hopefuls at this stage of the game, and clearly needs more time in the incubator. Atsme📞📧 06:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
It is not true that "CBC is the only RS that meets the requirements for notability". He has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician. Softlavender (talk) 06:51, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Regardless, his goal is to be notable - not that he is notable, and dreaming or hoping for something is not worthy of inclusion in WP. Read the promos - that is all we see covered in any of the sources - it is promo, RS or not. How can you not see that it is anything but promotional? Atsme📞📧 18:06, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
The subject meets WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. See WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. -- Softlavender (talk) 06:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Comment: That's a valid concern; however personally I think the issue can be dealt with by editing/copyediting/cleanup, and also placing the COI notice on the talk page instead of on the article itself. Softlavender (talk) 00:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nova Scotia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. He does not pass WP:MUSICBIO, and the sourcing is not adequate to state that he passes WP:GNG in lieu. While it's true that the CBC is Canada's national public broadcaster, the CBC link provided here is not from the CBC's national news division, but from its local station in the subject's own hometown, so it does not demonstrate that he got reliable source coverage beyond just the CBRM alone. The Cape Breton Post is also local coverage; LocalXpress is a hyperlocal webmedia startup, not a widely distributed daily newspaper that counts toward GNG at all; and virtually all of the other references are PR blogs. A musician does not automatically get to have a Wikipedia article just because the local media in his own hometown paid him some attention, because that's simply to be expected — to get a musician past NMUSIC, the reliable source coverage has to expand outward beyond just the hometown local outlets. Plus the conflict of interest issue doesn't help — COI isn't a deletion criterion in and of itself if the article can be repaired, but this can't yet. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he's got a stronger notability claim than he does right now. Bearcat (talk) 14:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Daryl Ng[edit]

Daryl Ng (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Daryl Ng" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Promotional content regarding person. Barely GNG. The coverage by SCMP in the citation was just about he made a decision for the company to employ Arup to make some design and research, which barely made him pass GNG due to the coverage of the works of Sino Land. Matthew_hk tc 18:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:16, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:16, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Comment SCMP, the newspaper, according to its website[41], was closely connected with Daryl Ng's father/family's Sino Group for Sino Junior Reporter Programme. All other citation were either routine coverage of his position on public organization, and/or primary source and/or Sino Group, not any of them a notable coverage of Daryl Ng himself. Being son of a billionaire and on a position of a listed company, is not qualified to notability himself. Matthew_hk tc 03:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
The SCMP citation was removed by the possibly paid editor in this edit, so the current version. None of the non-primary source (and source the not connect with Sino Group in business/sponsorship, such as OUHK and SCMP) was actually about Daryl Ng. Matthew_hk tc 03:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Leaning keep I do see a lot of coverage (both trivial and not-so-trivial) in Chinese, ranging from his civil/social activities to his support for/ties with Carrie Lam to his real estate development plans. There appears to be even paparazzi reports on who he's with during social gatherings. I think the coverage satisfies WP:GNG even though I agree that his notability derives mainly from his super-rich father and not at all from his individual accomplishments. Timmyshin (talk) 06:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
(Find sources: "黃永光" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)
(Find sources: "黄永光" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)
The coverage just a trivial level news coverage, just he bought some property again, or political linking of lunch/dinner meeting with chief executive candidate, without significant coverage that wrote in WP:GNG: "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail. Matthew_hk tc 11:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Those coverage, was still circulate on the same tone as similar to current wikipedia article, his education, and then because of his interests in environment and his position in the company, listing out the works of the company and then claiming it is under his leadership; the in-depth coverage was on the projects but not on himself. Not sure other wikipedian would agree they were in-depth coverage on the person. Matthew_hk tc 08:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Meh. I think being a taipan of Sino plus winning innovation prices would be enough to make him notable, but I'm also open to a WP:TNT deletion due to promotional concerns. Deryck C. 12:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Goodsell Amplifiers[edit]

Goodsell Amplifiers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Goodsell Amplifiers" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable product. It's not hard to find reviews, but I don't think these inherently establish notability; I'm looking for in-depth coverage of the unique design, features, construction, etc. The article provides no such references, and I'm not having much success finding any. Almost all the viable links and references in the article are self-sourced, so it reads like an advertisement. Mikeblas (talk) 15:34, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 15:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 15:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Takuya Imahori[edit]

Takuya Imahori (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Takuya Imahori" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Does not seem to meet WP:CREATIVE. No major works,no evidence of recordings. The awards for all of them for composers at an early stage of their career. We translate that as "not yet notable" . The reviews seem to be relatively routine reviews of individual performances. DGG ( talk ) 01:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • The first edition of the article was just a stub and now translated full of the article from Japanese Wikipedia. 93.36.178.162 (talk) 10:49, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep expanded article, makes claim of major international awards for composing, Sadads (talk) 03:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:07, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak delete - Although there is coverage of this composer, there just isn't enough significant coverage. Also, the composer has not won "a major music competition not established expressly for newcomers". (WP:COMPOSER) RileyBugz会話投稿記録 22:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Cityscrapes: Los Angeles[edit]

Cityscrapes: Los Angeles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Cityscrapes: Los Angeles" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Cannot find any significant coverage from reliable sources that indicate notability. Fails WP:NMOVIE; Cannot find any full length reviews, major awards, etc. --Darth Mike(talk) 19:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 07:03, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Jamaica Craft[edit]

Jamaica Craft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jamaica Craft" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Little coverage in independent, reliable sources to suggest she passes biographical notability standards. Her biggest claim to fame is working with Usher and notability isn't inherited. DrStrauss talk 11:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. The notability claim of being a backup dancer is not convincing. Article full of OR and sourced by a single non-RS webzine. Seems to be a fanpage. Agricola44 (talk) 14:31, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Very weak delete - Although there is some coverage in independent and reliable sources, there just isn't enough. The state of the article just pushes this over the line for me. If this could be cleaned up, then I would be willing to change my vote to a keep. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 02:35, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Architeam[edit]

Architeam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Architeam" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No evidence could be found that this is a notable organisation. There are many other organisations with the same name, and e.g. the Architeam awards are not from this organisation. Fram (talk) 12:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:06, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Nikolai Tsankov[edit]

Nikolai Tsankov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Nikolai Tsankov" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable individual who fails WP:GNG and is in violation of WP:NACTOR. Probable autobiography given creator name. SamHolt6 (talk) 15:20, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

  • How about if we somehow merge those two so I can have the article about me in English as well? I reside and work in the US, and would very much appreciate the opportunity to update the data with the latest and most accurate info about me:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Tsankov + https://bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/Николай_Цанков_(актьор) = me

Thanks,

Nikolai Tsankov --Nikotsan (talk) 16:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:08, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:22, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Unless his Bulgarian work is much more substantial than what is listed in IMDb, he doesn't satisfy NACTOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:34, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Bhagawati Prakash Sharma[edit]

Bhagawati Prakash Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Bhagawati Prakash Sharma" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Lots of puffery here, but ultimately insufficient claim to notability. No coverage in secondary sources, and so does not meet WP:GNG. Claims in the article about lots of publications, but cannot be seen on google scholar (suggesting they are from dodgy journals and publishers); research gate link shows much output but no impact (hasn't been cited a single time, thus fails WP:PROF). Much was made in the previous AfD about him being the "vice-chancellor of Pacific University", but there is little evidence that said private university, despite its grandiose name, counts as a "major academic institution". Private universities in south Asia are very common; furthermore, it is really a stretch to apply WP:PROF to an academic whose own research gate profile documents 0 citations of his work. Also substantial evidence of promotional intent in the history. Delete. Vanamonde (talk) 15:40, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:09, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. Reads as a CV, from which it was probably drawn. GetSomeUtah (talk) 22:39, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:46, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete The vice-chancellor of a university is generally notable. Generally. Because generally to become a VC, a person has to go through a lot of hoola-huppas. It is generally assumed that if a person is VC, he has done a lot of substantial, notable work. Thats why enwiki policy says VCs are generally notable. But in this case, the subject fails WP:PROF. On a side note, the history of the article is not at clean. Lots of puffery, single purpose COI accounts. —usernamekiran(talk) 10:01, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Shakir ul Qadri[edit]

Shakir ul Qadri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Shakir ul Qadri" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No in-depth coverage so seems to fail WP:NAUTHOR. He will fail WP:GNG too. Greenbörg (talk) 16:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 17:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 17:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:09, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete I've tried searching with both the subject's name and his better known epithet. I can't find anything reliable about him; all hits which come up are for different individuals with similar names. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:00, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak keep on the basis of a fuller Urdu Wikipedia page suggesting better sourcing available. Bondegezou (talk) 16:09, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
No RS cited on Urdu WP. --Saqib (talk) 07:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Kanwal Feroze[edit]

Kanwal Feroze (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Kanwal Feroze" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Tamgha-i-Imtiaz is not enough for stand-alone article. No in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 16:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 17:04, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 17:04, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 17:04, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:10, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep - Apart from the sources already provided in the article that have entire paragraphs on him. The fact that he's a recipient of a civilian award and is a PhD. Here's: The Nation & Express Tribune - Mfarazbaig (talk) 10:22, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Anton De Ionno[edit]

Anton De Ionno (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Anton De Ionno" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

An apparently self-started article and contested prod, this article has no demonstration of notability and I couldn't find much on a Google search. Fails WP:ARTIST and does not have significant coverage about the subject in any periodicals I could find. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 16:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 17:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 17:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:58, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:11, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:26, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Northern (genre)[edit]

Northern (genre) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Northern (genre)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Aside from the one reference, I could only find a couple of other passing mentions of this so-called genre.[44][45] Clarityfiend (talk) 06:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 08:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 08:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep (as article creator). My original source was Scarlet Riders, which was in the references for a time but appears to have been removed at some point. I've put it back in again. I do not have my copy available at the moment, so I cannot add inline citations nor quote from it right now. I am sure I have had other sources as well, which I will try to find again (this was an early article for me and I'm afraid I didn't properly cite things as I should have done). - AdamBMorgan (talk) 12:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Gary Birdsong[edit]

Gary Birdsong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Gary Birdsong" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This biography of a traveling fundamentalist Christian preacher seems to exist only to mock him. One of the sources is a dead link to a USA Today article which may have mentioned him in the context of campus preachers. Outside of that dead link, the coverage is all local and campus news. Gary Birdsong may be a fixture on North Carolina campuses, but that doesn't make him notable. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC) World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Based upon the cited sources, he certainly seems notable per WP:N. Seppi333 (Insert ) 21:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep -- Meets the GNG. See also this source not already used in the article. The USA Today story makes the coverage sufficiently non-local, but even without it the depth of local coverage is enough. The fact that the USA Today link is dead is irrelevant, and anyway it's archived. It does more than mention him, it's mostly about him. If the article exists mostly to mock him, well, if that's a deletion criterion WP is going to lose huge numbers of biographical articles, isn't it? Central and Adams (talk) 21:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Digital Marketing in Bangladesh[edit]

Digital Marketing in Bangladesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Digital Marketing in Bangladesh" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

per WP:NOT. The references are a collection on news from Bangladesh on the topic of digital marketing, but they all appear to be WP:MILL coverage, and many are about "global digital marketing events" that happen to be in Bangladesh.

Sent to AfD because there are several similar articles (such as E-commerce in Bangladesh); they may be possible merge targets, or might be best deleted as well. Digital marketing has its own problems, but may also be a possible target. Power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:10, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Merge to E-commerce in Bangladesh. I am surprised there aren't more E-commerce in Country articles, as there are considerable differences between countries and notable local features. E-commerce in China for example is an eminently notable topic. However I see we have only E-commerce in India and then the shorter E-commerce in Bangladesh. As for digital marketing, according to E-commerce it's a part of that subject. For that reason I think this belongs in E-commerce in Bangladesh unless eventually a WP:SIZESPLIT is called for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pontificalibus (talkcontribs) 05:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Brian Rose (media)[edit]

Brian Rose (media) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Brian Rose (media)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No real notability or wide-spread coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 05:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 08:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete another run-of-the-mill positive ideas writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Dale Badway[edit]

Dale Badway (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Dale Badway" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

promotional article started by apparent undeclared paid editor, banned 5 years ago for sockpupettry. The only thing that might be actually notable here is false: He did not win a Tony for 2012 revival of P&B. The show won the award. His role as "one of the producers" is either unmentioned or barely mentioned in all reports of the award. DGG ( talk ) 04:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 07:56, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 08:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

DreamFunded[edit]

DreamFunded (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "DreamFunded" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This page is just an ad for an organization. Runs afoul of WP:PROMO, WP:COI and WP:TOOMANYREFS. Brian-armstrong (talk) 04:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Brian-armstrong (talk) 04:34, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Brian-armstrong (talk) 04:34, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page because it appears to have been edited by the same COI entity and is related to this organization.

Manny_Fernandez_(angel_investor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Bossing & Ai[edit]

Bossing & Ai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Bossing & Ai" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Does not satisfy television notability. Poorly sourced. No explanation of why this show that has not yet aired is notable. No independent sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:04, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:04, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Probably delete due to lack of sources that are independent and not promotional. If not deleted, then history merge with Draft:Bossing & Ai. One is the copy-paste of the other. If deleted, be sure to delete both. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:10, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
User:Steve Quinn tried to draftify the article. Draftifying is sort of a compromise between deletion and retention. The author then restored the article in draft space, showing that the author did not want the compromise of having it in draft space. I am willing to leave the draft in draft space if the user plans to work on it, but for now, by rejecting draftification, the author has chosen to have a deletion discussion. As nominator, I !vote Delete. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:35, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete promotional sources and trivial coverage do not meet notability criteria. not a platform for promotion. Also, probably too soon. Retain in the draft space until it can be approved for the mainspace is an acceptable option. If the outcome is other than delete then the history merge as described by Smokey Joe would seem to be necessary. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 06:05, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Admin comment I've already merged the histories of the two pages, so if "draftify" is the final result then it all that is necessary is to move to draft. Primefac (talk) 12:08, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Draftify. I agree that the article's creator hasn't demonstrated encyclopedic notability for this not-yet-aired program. But the program is scheduled to begin airing just a few days from now. It is possible that, if the show remains "on the air" for an entire season, it might well be possible to demonstrate notability at some later date. Moving to Draft space seems a reasonable accommodation for that possibility. NewYorkActuary (talk) 12:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

RapidVisa[edit]

RapidVisa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "RapidVisa" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:CORPDEPTH and apparent case of paid editing Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:46, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Only notable for being brought to court, but as the case was dismissed I do not believe the article subject is any different from other visa services and as such fails WP:MILL. Also, the current article seems to promotional and was created by a UDP editor.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:49, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak keep - Although it was made by a paid editor, this service seems to be notable. It has in depth coverage in reliable sources. It passes WP:ORGDEPTH. The specific criteria that could be contestable is whether or not the coverage is routine. I believe the coverage not to be routine, as the articles are not simple statements or notices that something is happening with the company. In fact, the article in The Colorado Springs Business Journal was published on Nov. 9, 2015, while the court thing was finished on Sept. 2 (at least according to what I understand of the source). Overall, this is definitely not routine, and I don't think that it is promotional either. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 22:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

The Aetherverse[edit]

The Aetherverse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "The Aetherverse" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Lack of notability. New E-book with non-notable authors. Main editor appears to be adding to links/mentions in multiple articles MartinezMD (talk) 03:45, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete. I am unable to find coverage to show that this book meets WP:GNG or WP:BKCRIT.  gongshow  talk  03:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. Nothing to indicate notability is met, as stated. 331dot (talk) 08:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Chessbrah[edit]

Chessbrah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Chessbrah" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

It looks like all of the sources are primary and/or brief mentions of the subject, and I'm not seeing sufficient other sourcing out there to satisfy WP:GNG. We would need in-depth coverage of "chessbrahs" beyond coverage of Hansen and other involved individuals, and in publications not connected to the people involved (either financially or personally). Hansen himself is notable, however, and this is so closely associated with him that a redirect may make sense. (a merge only if reliable secondary sources are used, as including material based just on primary sources would be undue/promo). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: lack of participation
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) 03:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Rashmi Jha[edit]

Rashmi Jha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Rashmi Jha" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Actress who falls under too soon-only one role so far. Either delete or redirect to the film. Wgolf (talk) 22:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:11, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:11, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:41, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) 03:05, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Miss Teen US Latina[edit]

Miss Teen US Latina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Miss Teen US Latina" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The article has no significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject; not suitable for a stand-alone article. Richie Campbell (talk) 22:53, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: no participation
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) 03:05, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Kevin Cuenca[edit]

Kevin Cuenca (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Kevin Cuenca" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Only passing mentions in the media, a before showed much the same. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 02:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:26, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Rare Demos and Freestyles Volume 1[edit]

Rare Demos and Freestyles Volume 1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Rare Demos and Freestyles Volume 1" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

None of the selections from this "rare" demo series are detailed in significant coverage. Their lack of chart success and recognition also certainly WP:NALBUM. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 02:03, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Rare Demos & Freestyles Vol. 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Rare Demos & Freestyles Vol. 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Horace Ladymon[edit]

Horace Ladymon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Horace Ladymon" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Looks like a WP:PROMO to me. Only notable for being a president of one corporation. Fails WP:NBIO. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:46, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)