Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump's Mar-A-Lago Barack Obama Assassination Plot Investigation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Extended BLP-violating coatrack in an election year. This event might be a basis for an appropriately-written article, but it is unsalvageable within Wikipedia policy as written. Originating editor warned blocked for abusing Wikipedia for editorializing. Acroterion (talk) 00:13, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Donald Trump's Mar-A-Lago Barack Obama Assassination Plot Investigation

Donald Trump's Mar-A-Lago Barack Obama Assassination Plot Investigation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: "Donald Trump's Mar-A-Lago Barack Obama Assassination Plot Investigation" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Per previous PROD by SisterTwister: "Still suggests questionability for WP:EVENT and WP:GNG, nothing suggesting it's own long lasting independent notability."

Additionally: author shows no intention of adhering to WP:NPOV, continuing to add blatant editorializing content after being informed of policy. Falls under WP:DEL14 as WP:BLOG and/or WP:SOAP. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 23:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

VOTE KEEP!!!!! A) Death Threats against Presidents are Notable (other assassination attempts or threatened attempts get articles) B) Threats made by the right-hand man of a candidate are doubly so C) I have tried to remove the suggested problems you pointed out. Your comment of "no intention" is plainly unfair. I already made most of the changes you suggested on the talk page already, and I will go back and double-check that I have removed all of the remarks which you did not enjoy. D)You are welcome to edit the article; it belongs to all of us (indeed, to History, now.) Why do my "intentions" even matter? What matters is that we leave as much of a historical record as possible to future generations. If we have room for 10 million Reality TV star articles, we can afford an article on The Republican Nominee's personal servant's plot to kill the president. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crack Cocaine Aficionado (talk • contribs) 00:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

• Delete as I still confirm my PROD, nothing convincing to keep, still questionable. SwisterTwister talk 00:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.