Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dulwich International College
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Bmusician 01:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Dulwich International College[edit]
- Dulwich International College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · HighBeam · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)
No notability/unsourced since 2008 Dalisays (talk) 15:22, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - This topic clearly passes WP:GNG:
- Crampton, Thomas (February 15, 1999). "Asians Redefine British Boarding School". The New York Times. Retrieved March 26, 2012. External link in
|publisher=(help) - Sharples, Jennifer (March 17, 2003). "Famous names have learnt to keep up the old school Thais". The Telegraph. Retrieved March 26, 2012. External link in
|publisher=(help) - "Dulwich divorce is final". Phuket Gazette. May 13, 2005. Retrieved March 26, 2012. External link in
|publisher=(help) - Curtis, Polly (May 18, 2005). "Dulwich pulls out of Thai partnership". The Guardian. Retrieved March 26, 2012. External link in
|publisher=(help) - Harris, Ed (May 18, 2005). "Dulwich College severs Thai links". London Evening Standard. Retrieved March 26, 2012. External link in
|publisher=(help)
- —Northamerica1000(talk) 20:33, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Crampton, Thomas (February 15, 1999). "Asians Redefine British Boarding School". The New York Times. Retrieved March 26, 2012. External link in
- Comment - As of this post (diff page), the article has been significantly cleaned-up, and has been expanded. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:15, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Even if the sources weren't available, the unfortunate community consensus seems to be that all verifiable secondary schools are notable. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:37, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Weak keep per WP:HEY. I think that not all, but almost all, secondary schools are notable; see User:Bearian/Standards#Notability_of_High_Schools_at_WP:AfD. Bearian (talk) 18:26, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - passes WP:ORG. In addition, not only does this school educate to year 13 but is a boarding school to boot. TerriersFan (talk) 18:43, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dulwich_International_College&oldid=485085215"
Hidden categories: