Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Herald

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor Talk 08:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Jonathan Herald[edit]

Jonathan Herald (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · HighBeam · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Not notable as a doctor under GNG or ANYBIO. Most notable aspect is serving on editorial board of Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports, which does not itself appear to be notable. Even if it was, Herald's merely being on the editorial board does not seem like enough to pass any notability threshold. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:18, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:18, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete Agree with the above. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:47, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak delete There is a bit more available in a number of IRS about what the subject does, and the article could be expanded a bit. The subject has also co-authored a number of papers, some as lead author, some of which have been cited a non trivial number of times. Not sure though that there is quite enough to be notable. (If the subject played any code of football the article would be a speedy/snow keep.) I am open to being convinced to keep. Aoziwe (talk) 10:20, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep Have found a couple of suitable articles via ProQuest and will add them to article to see if that helps justify the page. Cabrils (talk) 23:11, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Was there any kind of DOI for the two sources you added? I'd like to look at them if I have access to them. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete Can't find sources to support notability. Natureium (talk) 23:30, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  • delete surgeon marketing. We have seen this show before.Jytdog (talk) 21:30, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete a non-notable doctor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:54, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.