Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-cooperation movement of Bihar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Non-cooperation movement of Bihar

Non-cooperation movement of Bihar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: "Non-cooperation movement of Bihar" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article does not assert the significance of the subject. Ethanlu121 (talk) 13:07, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

• Delete Unreferenced, rambling POV piece. Should have been speedied? Neiltonks (talk) 13:20, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Probably because there isn't an obvious speedy criteria that applies, I would guess. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 17:03, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:43, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:43, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

• Delete It is not clear what this article is about. - Kautilya3 (talk) 19:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm not sure what this article is about, either. It appears to be an attempt to link the 20th century Non-cooperation movement with events earlier in the region's history. As such, it looks to me like original research. I note that the same editor recently created the article Non-cooperation movement of South Canara (1836), which has the same problems with original research and lack of sourcing. Perhaps the nominator here might want to bundle the Canara article with this nomination. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:36, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:SYNTH. This article only narrowly escapes WP:A1 speedy deletion. SSTflyer 16:57, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
• Delete as not yet anything to suggest a noticeably better article. SwisterTwister talk 04:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.