Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonichu (Comic)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Sonichu (Comic)

Sonichu (Comic) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: "Sonichu (Comic)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No indication of subject's notability. The article's subject is Sonichu, a comic written by Christian Weston Chandler, who himself was the subject of several articles deleted in the past five years. The sources that can be found on the comic are generally unreliable Internet media, e.g. blogs, Youtube, wikis--the comic has never been mentioned in any reliable online or print media. 0xF8E8 (talk) 07:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

• Delete Downright kind compared to the litany of past AfD'ed and speedied versions, but under the title alone without (Comic) appended, it has been protected for six years; clearly evasion of that block, along with a SPA editor in CwCCHANsonichu (talk · contribs) who clearly isn't here for any other manner (their two edits on the retired Falcons quarterback Chris Chandler's article to be about the comic author are clearly WP:BLP-violating). No improvement in notability except in negative terms. Nate • (chatter) 16:18, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
• Delete for the reasons mentioned above. I also assume that if you went digging around the accounts that created Sonichu and Christian Weston Chandler you'd unearth over half a dozen sockpuppets. Emperor (talk) 04:43, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Emperor (talk) 04:49, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

• Delete as still questionable for the necessary improvements including notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:59, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.