|This page is an essay, containing the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors on Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Essays are not Wikipedia policies or guidelines. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.||
|This page in a nutshell:
It is important when Assuming Good Faith, that in order to not Bite the newbies, we must begin with a position of assuming that an editor knows nothing about the rules and policies of Wikipedia.
- Assume Ignorance of the Rules
Even the best Administrator does not 100% know all of the rules and policies, or at least their proper/current interpretation.
When faced with a situation with another editor, you therefore not only need to assume good faith, but you need to take it one step further: Assume Ignorance of the Rules.
Time and time again, editors have been mentioned at Wikiquette (while it was still active) or these days at the Administrator's Noticeboard for Incidents for having violated some policy or guideline who then loudly state, "I didn't know that!"
There are many reasons that new editors make inappropriate edits to an article. They may not understand Wikipedia, they may think it's harmless and/or funny. They may also have read that there is always someone around to revert vandals, and wanted to know if it's true.
They might have even been given a standard template warning once or twice, which they may not understand due to jargon.
In other words, they may just be ignorant of all the rules.
When dealing with this kind of editor, we must start with the understanding that the editor knows nothing, and until provided the chance to see and understand those rules, they may not change.
For this reason, welcome templates are good beginnings. Many of them show the editor the cornerstones of Wikipedia and how to edit. They are a distinct and direct "showing of the rules".
After being made aware of the rules, they have no excuses.