Many of these football templates are assessed as "stub" because the bio tag had previously been auto-assessed as a stub for having a stub template in the article. The trouble is, a few of them no longer have stub templates, but never got reassessed. For instance, see Jon Runyan. I'd suggest that if all previous stub assessments are auto=yes andif the article no longer is in a stub category, that this bot not assume the article is a stub. Does this sound like a positive change? – Quadell(talk) 17:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
So basically don't copy any stub ratings that are in templates marked as auto=yes? Sounds eminently sensible to me. [[Sam Korn]](smoddy) 17:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Approved. Looks good. – Quadell(talk) 17:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.