Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:FPC)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This star, with one point broken, symbolizes the featured candidates on Wikipedia.

Featured pictures are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article. Taking the adage that "a picture is worth a thousand words", the images featured on Wikipedia:Featured pictures should illustrate a Wikipedia article in such a way as to add significantly to that article, according to the featured picture criteria.

Promoting an image

If you believe an image should be featured, create a subpage (use the "For Nominations" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.

For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-third majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets.

All users may comment. However, only those who have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and with at least 100 edits will be included in the numerical count. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. Nominations started in December are given three extra days, due to the holidays slowing down activity here.

The archive contains all opinions and comments collected for candidate nominations and their nomination results.

If you nominate an image here, please consider also uploading and nominating it at Commons to help ensure that the pictures can be used not just in the English Wikipedia but on all other Wikimedia projects as well.

Delisting an image

A featured picture can be nominated for delisting if you feel it no longer lives up to featured picture standards. You may also request a featured picture be replaced with a superior image. Create a subpage (use the "For Delists" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.

Please leave a note on the talk page of the original FPC nominator (and creator/uploader, if appropriate) to let them know the delisting is being debated. The user may be able to address the issues and avoid the delisting of the picture.

For delisting, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers supporting a delist or replace, and the consensus is in its favor, it will be delisted from Wikipedia:Featured pictures. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-third majority in support, including the nominator. Note that anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. However, images are sometimes delisted despite having fewer than five in support of their removal, and there is currently no consensus on how best to handle delist closures, except that:.If the image to be delisted is not used in any articles by the time of closure, it must be delisted. If it is added to articles during the nomination, at least one week's stability is required for the nomination to be closed as "Kept". The nomination may be suspended if a week hasn't yet passed to give the rescue a chance.

Outside of the nominator, all voters are expected to have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and to have made a minimum of 100 edits. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. As with regular nominations, delist nominations are given three extra days to run if started in December.

  • Note that delisting an image does not mean deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article(s).

Featured content:

Featured picture tools:

Step 1:
Evaluate

Evaluate the merit of a nomination against the featured picture criteria. Most users reference terms from this page when evaluating nominations.

Step 2:
Create a subpage
For Nominations

To create a subpage of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates for your nomination, add a title for the image you want to nominate in the field below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Labrador Retriever) and click the "Create new nomination" button.


For Delists (or Delist & Replace)

To create a subpage for your delist, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.


Step 3:
Transclude and link

Transclude the newly created subpage to the Featured picture candidate list (direct link).

How to comment for Candidate Images

  • Write Support, if you approve of the picture. A reason is optional.
  • Write Oppose, followed by your reasoning, if you disapprove of the picture. All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale that, if addressed, would make you support the image. If your concern is one that can only be addressed by the creator, and if they haven't nominated or commented on the image, and if they are a Wikipedian, you should notify them directly.
  • You can weak support or weak oppose instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
    • To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.
  • If you think a nominated image obviously fails the featured picture criteria, write Speedy close followed by your reasons. Nominations may be closed early if this is the case.
Recommendations added early in the process may be disregarded if they do not address concerns and/or improvements that arise later in the debate. Reviewers are advised to monitor the progress of a nomination and update their votes accordingly.
Prior to giving an opinion, the image should be assessed on its quality as displayed at full size (high-resolution) in an image editing program. Please note that the images are only displayed at thumbnail size on this page. The thumbnail links to the image description page which, in turn, links to the high-resolution version.

How to comment for Delist Images

  • Write Keep, followed by your reasons for keeping the picture.
  • Write Delist, followed by your reasons for delisting the picture.
  • Write Delist and Replace if you believe the image should be replaced by a better picture.
  • You can weak keep, weak delist or weak delist and replace instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
    • To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.
Please remember to be civil, not to bite the newbies and to comment on the image, not the person.

You may find the glossary useful when you encounter acronyms or jargon in other voters' comments. You can also link to it by using {{FPCgloss}}.

Editing candidates

If you feel you could improve a candidate by image editing, please feel free to do so, but do not overwrite or remove the original. Instead, upload your edit with a different file name (e.g., add "edit" to the file name), and display it below the original nomination. Edits should be appropriately captioned in sequential order (e.g., Edit 1, Edit 2, etc), and describe the modifications that have been applied.

Is my monitor adjusted correctly?

Gray contrast test image.svg
In a discussion about the brightness of an image, it is necessary to know if the computer display is properly adjusted. Displays differ greatly in their ability to show shadow detail. There are four dark grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display shadow detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings. Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal shadow detail. Please take this into account when voting.
Highlight test image.svg
Displays also differ greatly in their ability to show highlight detail. There are light grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display highlight detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings (probably reduce the contrast setting). Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal highlight detail. Please take this into account when voting.
Colortest.png
On a gamma-adjusted display, the four circles in the color image blend into the background when seen from a few feet (roughly 75–150 cm) away. If they do not, you could adjust the gamma setting (found in the computer's settings, not on the display), until they do. This may be very difficult to attain, and a slight error is not detrimental. Uncorrected PC displays usually show the circles darker than the background.
Note that on most consumer LCD displays (laptop or flat screen), viewing angle strongly affects these images. Correct adjustment on one part of the screen might be incorrect on another part for a stationary head position. Click on the images for more technical information. If possible, calibration with a hardware monitor calibrator is recommended.
To see recent changes, purge the page cache.
FPCs needing feedback
Lucy Arbell in Massenet's Thérèse.jpg Lucy Arbell in Thérèse
Edgar Allan Poe, circa 1849, restored, squared off.jpg Edgar Allan Poe
Ruins of the Rudra Mala at Siddhpur, Gujarat, retouched.jpg Rudra Mahalaya Temple

Current nominations[edit]

Coldstream Guards in the Crimean War[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2019 at 22:54:32 (UTC)

Original – Joseph Numa, John Potter, and James Deal of the Coldstream Guards just after their return from the Crimean War in 1856
Reason
Stumbled across this while checking out a new archive. I think it's a particularly nice bit of ephemera, good enough for Queen Victoria to get a personal negative of the image.
Articles in which this image appears
Coldstream Guards, Facial hair in the military
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Military
Creator
Hughes & Mullins after Cundall & Howlett; restored by Adam Cuerden
  • Support as nominatorAdam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 22:54, 25 March 2019 (UTC)



Dallol[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2019 at 20:24:16 (UTC)

Original – Dallol is a cinder cone volcano in the Danakil Depression, Ethiopia
Reason
Nice photo of this interesting, difficult to reach and underappreciated (as far as Wikipedia is concerned) place. Fairly recent unanimous FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears
Dallol (volcano)
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator
A.Savin
  • Support as nominatorMER-C 20:24, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment - Could use a bit of photoshopping; slight gamma correction to brighten it a bit (note: not exposure correction, that might blow the highlights in the cone), plus removal of the dark vignetting in the corners/edges. --Janke | Talk 20:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support – EV, and agree with suggestions above. I yield to photographer's edits. Bammesk (talk) 01:43, 26 March 2019 (UTC)



San Francisco Earthquake of 1906, Ruins in vicinity of Post and Grant Avenue[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2019 at 18:30:09 (UTC)

Original – San Francisco Earthquake of 1906: Ruins in vicinity of Post and Grant Avenue. Looking northeast.
Not for voting: {{CSS image crop}} mockup of a possible crop.
Not for voting: {{CSS image crop}} mockup of a possible crop.
Reason
historical image of great encyclopedic value
Articles in which this image appears
1906 San Francisco earthquake, Portal:Disasters, Disaster, Ruins, Lloyd's of London, San Francisco graft trials, and several others
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator
H. D. Chadwick, restored by Yann
  • Support as nominator The quality is not extraordinary, but this is largely compensated by the historical value. – Yann (talk) 18:30, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • There's a couple of areas that could do with a little more cleanup - a streak on the RHS at about y=700 and that stuff in the top left appears to be a smudge and not smoke. By the way, may I interest you in File:San Francisco Fire Sacramento Street 1906-04-18.jpg? MER-C 20:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • @MER-C: Done. I see there is a history here... One thing at a time... Yann (talk) 23:46, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment Not entirely happy with the sky. It looks kind of overblown, in a very dirty way. Though it doesnt' look as bad from some angles on my LCD screen Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 23:32, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
  • @Adam Cuerden: What do you suggest? As I said above, the quality is a bit below other candidates, but I think this is compensated by the historical value. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:37, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Dodge/burn tool? Might also want to crop some sky: The buidings aren't bad at all. I think cropping a little above the two smoke plumes would get rid of a lot of ugly damaged sky with a net improvement to composition. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 23:56, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I am fine with a crop. Should I overload the image? What do others think? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:17, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Up to you. Feel free to remove my mockup when it's no longer helpful. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 11:47, 26 March 2019 (UTC)



Louis Désiré Blanquart-Evrard[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2019 at 11:15:13 (UTC)

Original – Louis Désiré Blanquart-Evrard
Reason
high resolution and quality portrait of one of the inventor of photography
Articles in which this image appears
Louis Désiré Blanquart-Evrard, Albumen print, École des arts industriels et des mines
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator
Self-portrait. Uploaded, stitched and restored by Jebulon
  • Support as nominator French chemist, printer and photographer, inventor of the albumen print process. – Yann (talk) 11:15, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Knee looks a little odd at first, but the bright bits follow the texture of the fabric, and are almost certainly original. Everything else I'd pass without pause. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 11:26, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support - Excellent EV. Mattximus (talk) 19:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support. MER-C 20:26, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Thanks for nom. please notice that 24 March is my birthday date ! (58, oh my Gosh !)--Jebulon (talk) 16:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
  • SupportBammesk (talk) 01:27, 26 March 2019 (UTC)



Marie-Aimée Roger-Miclos[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2019 at 11:13:39 (UTC)

OriginalMarie-Aimée Roger-Miclos, French pianist
Reason
It's a fine photograph of a notable woman.
Articles in which this image appears
Marie-Aimée Roger-Miclos
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator
Jean Reutlinger, restored by Adam Cuerden



Paulette del Baye[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2019 at 09:17:13 (UTC)

Original – Moulin Rouge performer Paulette del Baye, as photographed for fashion magazine Les Modes
Reason
Quite a nice example of fin de siecle fashion photography. Grainy - it's either a lithograph or a very, very high quality half-tone - but the original photo wouldn't have been in colour, so that's the compromise.
Articles in which this image appears
Paulette del Baye; gallery at Paul Boyer
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator
Paul Boyer restored by Adam Cuerden
  • Support as nominatorAdam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 09:17, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • SupportYann (talk) 10:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support - is it just me, or is there a bit of moire in the original scan? MER-C 20:38, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
    • I didn't notice any, but lithograph/high-quality halftone is kinda weird in its nature anyway. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 21:39, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • SupportBammesk (talk) 02:18, 26 March 2019 (UTC)



Henry David Thoreau[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2019 at 22:34:52 (UTC)

Original – Henry David Thoreau, by B. D. Maxham
Reason
completely restored high resolution image of a famous writer
Articles in which this image appears
Henry David Thoreau, Civil disobedience, Pacifism, Civil Disobedience (Thoreau), History of anarchism, Individualist anarchism, Anarcho-pacifism, The Night Thoreau Spent in Jail, Slavery in Massachusetts, and many others
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator
B. D. Maxham, restored and uploaded by Yann
  • Support as nominatorYann (talk) 22:34, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 07:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support It's a slightly odd image, but I can't really den the quality. Would prefer a little more of the original yellow in the balance, but it doesn't actively hurt the image like it does for certain other ones (where the colours are used for effect or help contrast). Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 12:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • SupportBammesk (talk) 02:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)



Edgar Allan Poe[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2019 at 20:56:42 (UTC)

Original – "Annie" daguerreotype of Edgar Allan Poe
Alt 1 - Increased contrast and further retouching.
Reason
One of very few photos of Poe, lovingly restored.
Articles in which this image appears
Edgar Allan Poe
FP category for this image
WP:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator
Unknown; restored by Yann and Adam Cuerden
As I understand it, daguerreotypes did not look like that originally - e.g. as faded and damaged, they just experience rather nasty degradation over time. In any case, it hasnt changed that substantially, other than crop, some contrast, and expansion outwards to remove the severely damaged tarnished area surrounding it. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 11:15, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
@Janke: Do you think that File:Edgar Allan Poe, circa 1849, restored.jpg would be better? Adam's version has more restoration, but this may look like closer to a daguerreotype. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:59, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Daguerrotypes were typically mounted in a glass frame, sometimes with a cover, as a little book. The restorations have removed this. The above mentioned oval restoration (with faded edges) re-inserted in the original frame would satisfy me, looking like a real Daguerrotype. --Janke | Talk 13:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
PD-Art only applies to two-dimensional works, the frames are 3D. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 13:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
We have the picture with the frame under a free license, but without restoration. It comes from the Getty Museum via Google Art Project. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hm. It's a point. I have a suspicion this one will be preferred in articles, though, where the focus is Poe, not historic photography. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 14:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Yes; that's what I think too. Your version is more useful for illustrating Wikipedia articles about Poe, while the picture with a frame might be more appreciated on Commons, as a work of art in itself. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment@Qono: when you introduce an alternate please say you did so in a comment, so the reviewers know the nominator isn't presenting two versions. Also, I think it is inappropriate to take a restoration, add more restoration to it (in this case, not in a significant time consuming way, in my opinion) and present it as an alternate while the original restorer(s) are active editors and could have done so (if they chose to) with a mere suggestion. Same for a photograph or a drawing if the creator is an active editor. Just my two cents. Bammesk (talk) 16:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Got it, I'll be sure to note introductions of alternatives in the future. I'm not sure why it's inappropriate to contribute an alternative. I'm used to the Wikipedia standard of "be bold", but if there are more local norms I'm violating here, please let me know. Thanks. Qono (talk) 16:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Well... you did fail to credit Yann or me, and changed the license from our release into the public domain to one requiring reusers credit you (but not us, since we weren't listed)... that's problematic. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 17:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • In article space, contributors get no credit (or exposure) when their work is used elsewhere (inside or outside wikipedia), so being bold and taking liberty is a nonissue. For visual content (including restorations) contributors get credited when their images are used (for example on the main page), see the archives and notice the footnotes; therefore contributing to others' work and having one's name or username be listed alongside their name would be inappropriate IMO when/if such contributions are non-significant (in creativity or timewise) and when the original contributors are active editors and could do so (if they chose) with a mere suggestion. Bammesk (talk) 17:29, 24 March 2019 (UTC) . . . . fixed the archive link.
  • Well, also note that [1] - the version of the file description Qono used - and this is probably a mistake, but a rather bad one - credits Qono as sole author and mentions neither Yann nor me anywhere on the page. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 18:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I've proposed additional language to the main featured pictures candidates page to help clarify the process for newcomers who want to edit candidates. I propose we continue this discussion there, for those who are interested. Feel free to remove my alternate here, if you would like, Adam_Cuerden. Sorry for the trouble. Qono (talk) 02:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support – EV, I think it fits the article without the frame as well as with the frame. Bammesk (talk) 02:33, 26 March 2019 (UTC)



Rudra Mahalaya Temple[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2019 at 15:06:22 (UTC)

Original – Ruins of the Rudra Mahalaya Temple at Siddhpur, Gujarat
Reason
high resolution image and good quality
Articles in which this image appears
Rudra Mahalaya Temple, List of Monuments of National Importance in Gujarat, Ahmad Shah I, Chaulukya dynasty, Jayasimha Siddharaja, Siddhpur
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator
Bourne & Shepherd, retouched and uploaded by Yann
  • Support as nominatorYann (talk) 15:06, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Can you fix the very obvious blown pixels in the upper left sky? Checking the other copies of the image, the other flaws seem communal, but that's unique to this. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 11:33, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Please forgive my ignorance, but what does this image show that a modern photo doesn't? MER-C 12:29, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • We don't have a recent picture of equivalent quality. As the article was promoted as GA with the same picture of much worse quality, it should be OK. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support. MER-C 17:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)



CG Heart[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2019 at 09:48:50 (UTC)

Original – Computer-generated animation of a beating human heart
Reason
3rd place POTY last year, obvious EV. Also, gotta dilute the birds a little bit for variety.
Articles in which this image appears
Cardiac cycle, Heart, and others
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Biology
Creator
DrJanaOfficial



Delist: Matterhorn[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2019 at 09:39:26 (UTC)

Matterhorn (4,478 m, Walliser Alps, East side) mirrored in Riffelsee, photograph taken from shore of lake Riffelsee.
Reason
Unused, possibly oversaturated, not up to modern standards re: landscapes - in particular noticeable posterisation/JPEG artifacts in the sky.
Articles this image appears in
Zippo
Previous nomination/s
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Matterhorn Riffelsee 2005-06-11 crop.jpg
Nominator
MER-C
  • DelistMER-C 09:39, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Delist --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 17:58, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep I honestly believe that this is a high-quality image and has no major issues preventing it from staying at the featured status. Goveganplease (talk) 05:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
    • One of the guidelines states that "If the image to be delisted is not used in any articles by the time of closure, it must be delisted." Also, the standards have changed over time, so it's expected that photos are taken at a much higher resolution. --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 06:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment – noisy and oversaturated, I don't see posterization, I am Ok with the pixel count for older FPs. I like that it shows the lake, the other images in the article don't show it. I am neutral on the nom. Bammesk (talk) 16:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Delist - Unused Mattximus (talk) 19:18, 24 March 2019 (UTC)



Plumed Whistling Duck[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2019 at 09:11:27 (UTC)

Original – Plumed Whistling Duck (Dendrocygna eytoni), Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia
Reason
High EV. Unusual visitor to my part of the country so unlikely to get another shot at it unless I travel.
Articles in which this image appears
Plumed whistling duck
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator
JJ Harrison



Pacific Reef Heron[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2019 at 09:08:43 (UTC)

Original – Pacific Reef Heron (Egretta sacra), Boat Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
Reason
I first saw species in Thailand in 2011, then I didn't see it again until last year. But it took until march this year to get a good photo. This species has both a light and a dark morph. This illustrates the dark morph well.
Articles in which this image appears
Pacific reef heron
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator
JJ Harrison
  • Support as nominatorJJ Harrison (talk) 09:08, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support. MER-C 10:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
  • SupportYann (talk) 13:48, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 06:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment – I see posterization bands on upper right side of the image. Also wondering what that ghost-like background shadow is above the tail. Bammesk (talk) 15:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
    • (Adam Cuerden) You're correct. I think I derped and post processed in 8 bit instead of 16. I did it again and uploaded over the top. I can't comment about the darker bit of background near the tail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJ Harrison (talkcontribs)
      • JJ Harrison, somehow the region where sky meets ground got worse, I see bands from x,y=(0,1900) to (4200,1400), they are minute, but there were none in your first upload. Bammesk (talk) 01:17, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment Can you ping me when you answer Bammesk, please? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 15:57, 24 March 2019 (UTC)



Spotted Wood Owl[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2019 at 09:04:36 (UTC)

Original – Spotted Wood Owl (Strix seloputo), Pasir Ris Park, Singapore
Edit – Background at 215...
Reason
High EV. Came out well for a fairly tricky back-lit scenario.
Articles in which this image appears
Spotted Wood Owl
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator
JJ Harrison
  • Support as nominatorJJ Harrison (talk) 09:04, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
  • SupportYann (talk) 13:46, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 06:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Oppose - blown highlights are significantly distracting. I may support if the background was darkened, leaving the highlights at 215 or thereabouts. MER-C 12:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
    • Posted edit, but I oppose it. JJ Harrison (talk) 09:37, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Oppose – per MER-C, I would support if the background issue is addressed. Bammesk (talk) 15:42, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support - Goveganplease (talk) 12:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)



Lucy Arbell in Massenet's Thérèse[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2019 at 14:25:50 (UTC)

Original – Poster design advertising Lucy Arbell in the Paris première of Jules Massenet's Thérèse
Reason
It's a wonderful drawing. Admittedly, it's a stage of a poster we don't normally see, but I think that the actual art would probably have been degraded a bit as it went to poster, so this stage may well be the best option. Mainly stamp removal and scratch removal here.
Articles in which this image appears
Lucy Arbell, Thérèse (opera)
FP category for this image
WP:FP/THEATRE
Creator
Unknown, restored by Adam Cuerden



White-throated Kingfisher[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2019 at 05:25:26 (UTC)

Original – White-throated Kingfisher (Halcyon smyrnensis), Singapore Botanic Gardens, Singapore
Reason
High EV
Articles in which this image appears
White-throated kingfisher
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator
JJ Harrison
  • Support as nominatorJJ Harrison (talk) 05:25, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • SupportYann (talk) 10:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support, even though I'm pretty sure this is an overwrite violation on Commons as the previous version is a different image. --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 19:47, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support - Excellent image. Mattximus (talk) 23:08, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 11:28, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support. MER-C 18:22, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Strong Oppose - It's not appropriate to overwrite someone else's picture with your own in order to take its filename. This was likely just a mistake, but needs to be remedied. I will most certainly strike this and switch to support once it's fixed. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:41, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
    • Fixed. I was using a bulk upload tool and didn't receive any overwrite warning! JJ Harrison (talk) 08:21, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
      • Support - per above. Thanks for fixing. @JJ Harrison: which upload tool did you use? I'll investigate that issue. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 12:27, 23 March 2019 (UTC)



Double-banded Plover non-breeding plumage[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2019 at 05:23:12 (UTC)

Original – Double-banded Plover (Charadrius bicinctus) non-breeding plumage, Boat Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
Reason
High EV shot of winter plumage
Articles in which this image appears
Double-banded plover
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator
JJ Harrison
  • Support as nominatorJJ Harrison (talk) 05:23, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • SupportYann (talk) 10:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 19:48, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Even though we have another image, I suppose there is EV due to different plumage. Mattximus (talk) 23:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Excellent, and as stated, one picture cannot cover all the EV for this species. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 11:27, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support. MER-C 18:20, 22 March 2019 (UTC)



Bar-tailed Godwit[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2019 at 05:21:12 (UTC)

Original – Bar-tailed Godwit (Limosa lapponica), Taren Point Shorebird Reserve, New South Wales, Australia
Reason
Lots of EV, high quality.
Articles in which this image appears
Bar-tailed godwit
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator
JJ Harrison
  • Support as nominatorJJ Harrison (talk) 05:21, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Excellent photo, with strong EV. Nick-D (talk) 09:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment Could you offer an alternative with tilt corrected? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 19:48, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support I'm not sure how you judge tilt in this kind of scene.... There's not that many definite clues. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 11:24, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
    • My camera has a built in electronic level and I used it in this case. JJ Harrison (talk) 19:40, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support – your camera probably has a nuclear power plant inside!! not that there is anything wrong with that :-) Bammesk (talk) 03:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
    • Sure there is. If he gets cancer, he won't be able to photograph birds! ;) Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 14:28, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support. MER-C 18:19, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support - well done — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:46, 23 March 2019 (UTC)



Stephen Hawking in zero gravity[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2019 at 01:37:36 (UTC)

OriginalStephen Hawking enjoys zero gravity during a flight aboard a Boeing 727 in 2007.
Reason
Physicist Stephen Hawking enjoying zero gravity with a huge smile on his face. His article describes this event. The photo is not technically as good as it could be, for example file size is small (797KB), but good EV and a rare composition of him. This was in preparation for his space flight aiming to: "increase public interest in spaceflight and to show the potential of people with disabilities". His space flight didn't happen, but this photo did! This is FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears
Stephen Hawking, Reduced-gravity aircraft
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
Creator
NASA, published by Jim Campbell/Aero-News Network
  • Support as nominatorBammesk (talk) 01:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Some artefacting, especially on the woman's trousers, I don't like, but it's a great image, and sometimes, drawing the reader in is enough EV. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 15:05, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • SupportYann (talk) 10:47, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 19:48, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Quite unique. --Janke | Talk 22:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Illustrates the topics it's used for very well, and has strong EV. Nick-D (talk) 10:50, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support. MER-C 18:18, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support - of course. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:45, 23 March 2019 (UTC)



Anguish[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2019 at 22:24:16 (UTC)

OriginalAnguish, c. 1878
Reason
Another painting that was a second round candidate for POTY 2018. From the National Gallery of Victoria website: In Anguish, Schenck has given the ewe clearly recognisable human characteristics, such as determination and sorrow, so that the viewer immediately identifies with its predicament and emotions. The sinister murder of crows also appear organised and patiently await a moment of weakness. Schenck is here metaphorically examining a broader human condition in the context of an animal painting.
Articles in which this image appears
August Friedrich Schenck, Grief
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator
August Friedrich Schenck
  • Support as nominatorWalk Like an Egyptian (talk) 22:24, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Though I suspect the article on Schenck will need some bulking up before this goes to the main page. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 02:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support. --Gnosis (talk) 05:00, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support JJ Harrison (talk) 08:58, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • SupportYann (talk) 10:48, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support. MER-C 18:17, 22 March 2019 (UTC)



Haliotis laevigata[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2019 at 15:43:51 (UTC)

Original – Haliotis laevigata (Green Lip Abalone), green form; Length 7.5 cm; Originating from South Australia, Australia.
Reason
High fidelity documentation of the shell of this abalone species. Featured on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears
Haliotis laevigata, Haliotis
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Molluscs
Creator
H. Zell
  • Support as nominatorMER-C 15:43, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • SupportBammesk (talk) 19:09, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • SupportYann (talk) 19:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 02:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 22:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment Beautiful, but it needs a scale. There is no way to tell if this is 1cm long or 30 cm long. Can this be added? Mattximus (talk) 00:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Mattximus, the file description [2] says length is 7.5 cm. I think that's the size of the shell. The uploader has a huge portfolio and records the lengths in file descriptions, for example 4.8 cm here. Bammesk (talk) 00:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I've seen some of these with a small white bar on the bottom indicated the size. I think this is important and rather easy to add. Mattximus (talk) 11:25, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Something like this:
    Nototropis falcatus.jpg
  • I see your point. I have advocated for a scale mark on some noms. In cases when the photographer is an active editor, I think it's best that they do any modifications. In this case given the size is on the file page, I am Ok supporting the nom as is, although adding a scale would be an improvement. Bammesk (talk) 02:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)



Set: Cavalliera Rusticana[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2019 at 04:44:23 (UTC)

Reason
Two particularly fine images showing key scenes in the opera. Since both have similar damage to the lower left hand corner, and there's clearly a small logo there, I left that small bit of damage in, to avoid misleading.
Articles in which this image appears
Cavalliera Rusticana
FP category for this image
WP:FP/THEATRE
Creator
Anonymous, attributed to Rauzzini by sources of uncertain validity (see file description pages). Restored by Adam Cuerden
  • Support as nominatorAdam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 04:44, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • SupportYann (talk) 10:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support. MER-C 15:28, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment – file tags say the images may not be in public domain outside US. Do images have to be in public domain in their home country? Bammesk (talk) 19:20, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support – never mind, images are in public domain and in Commons. Bammesk (talk) 19:27, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • It's not a requirement, we have a few that are en-wiki only. I'm just being sufficiently cautious here, as Gallica say it's public domain and anonymous, but there's one other claim on the internet that, if true, would raise questions. For which the answers are almost certainly "still Public domain" - That said, the Commons discussion seems to think they're fine for there. @Bammesk: Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 10:56, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I agree, thanks, Getty can be unreliable. Bammesk (talk) 03:31, 19 March 2019 (UTC) . . BTW the ping didn't come across, ping only works if it's followed by a user signature in the same edit (in one edit).



Minnie Maddern Fiske[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2019 at 20:45:46 (UTC)

Original – Minnie Maddern Fiske, American actress (1865-1932)
Alt 1 - Restoration by Adam Cuerden
Alt 2 Levels and saturation tweaked on Alt 1.
Reason
high quality portrait of a famous actress
Articles in which this image appears
Minnie Maddern Fiske, Women photographers
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator
Zaida Ben-Yusuf (1869-1933)
  • In the previous nomination, it was mentioned that more contrast is needed, so I added some. I also removed a few spots. Yann (talk) 20:50, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support as nominatorYann (talk) 20:45, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment I love the image, but completely desaturating it makes it look less formal, and more like a cheap photocopy to me. Can a little bit more of the original slight colouration be added back in? Compare [3], where everthing just seems a little more high quality for reasons that are probably a mix between psychological, and differing saturations emphasising a luminosity gradient. I mean, the hair blends into the background here. It doen't in [4] - and the only real differece is desaturation. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 04:49, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Well, sometimes, one shouldn't complain too much, and just do something. Support Alt 1 or 2 Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 12:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
@Adam Cuerden: I would support either, but could you please wait for a consensus before changing the image in the article? Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, force of habit when I'm doing the nomination. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 13:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Oppose - posterization in both noticeably worse than the original. MER-C 15:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment – I think Alt 1 is definitely an improvement and I am leaning to support. How about laying Alt 1 with 50% opacity on top of the first uploaded version here, would that be an improvement? Bammesk (talk) 02:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
    • Alt 1 is a restoration, there's heavy work to remove scratches, so the damage would then be right back and present. The vertical lines would reappear in the background; her cheeks would be scratched up again, etc. If you're saying you want the levels adjusted, that's pretty easily done. Hold on. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 10:52, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • @MER-C, Bammesk, and Yann: Try Alt 2 Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 11:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Alt 1 – in the face area, the shades have more range (detail) in Alt 1 compared to Alt 2. In two spots: x,y=(777,750) and (860,757), the slightly brighter touchups in this version might be a good idea? but not a big deal. Bammesk (talk) 00:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Slight preference for Alt 2. --Yann (talk) 10:42, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support alt 1 or alt 2. MER-C 18:17, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Alt 2 --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 22:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Alt 2, though I think the ideal is alt 2's saturation with the levels about halfway between alt 1 and 2. Qono (talk) 01:38, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Alt 1 as first choice, Support Alt 2 as second choice. Tend to agree with Bammesk, but both would work. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:35, 23 March 2019 (UTC)



Nominations — to be closed[edit]

Nominations in this category are older than ten days and are to be closed. New votes will no longer be accepted.

Older nominations requiring additional input from users[edit]

These nominations have been moved here because consensus is impossible to determine without additional input from those who participated in the discussion. Usually this is because there was more than one edit of the image available, and no clear preference for one of them was determined. If you voted on these images previously, please update your vote to specify which edit(s) you are supporting.

Closing procedure[edit]

A script is available that automates the majority of these tasks: User:Jujutacular/closeFPC

When NOT promoted, perform the following:

  1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Not promoted| }} --~~~~
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
  2. If the nominator is new to FPC, consider placing {{subst:NotpromotedFPC|Image name}} on their talk page. To avoid overuse, do not use the template when in doubt.

When promoted, perform the following:

  1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Promoted|File:FILENAME.JPG}} --~~~~
    • Replace FILENAME.JPG with the name of the file that was promoted. It should show up as:
    Promoted File:FILENAME.JPG
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
  2. Add the image to:
  3. Add the image to the proper sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on top.
    The caption for a Wikipedian created image should read "Description at Article, by Creator". For a non-Wikipedian, it should be similar, but if the creator does not have an article, use an external link if appropriate. For images with substantial editing by one or more Wikipedians, but created by someone else, use "Description at Article, by Creator (edited by Editor)" (all editors involved should be clear from the nomination). Additionally, the description is optional - if it's essentially the same as the article title, then just use "Article, by Creator". Numerous examples can be found on the various Featured Pictures subpages.
  4. Add the image to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on left and remove the oldest from the right so that there are always three in each section.
  5. Add the Featured Picture tag and star to the image page using {{Featured picture|page_name}} (replace page_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the page_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/page_name). To add this template you most likely will have to click the "create" button on the upper right if the "edit" button is not present, generally if the image originates from Commons.
  6. If an edited or alternative version of the originally nominated image is promoted, make sure that all articles contain the Featured Picture version, as opposed to the original.
  7. Notify the nominator or co-nominators by placing {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:file_name.xxx}} on each nominator's talk page. For example: {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
  8. If the image was created by a Wikipedian, place {{subst:UploadedFP|File:file_name.xxx}} on the creator's talk page. For example: {{subst:UploadedFP|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.

Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:

  1. Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} to the top of the section.
  2. Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the March archive. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} from this page to the bottom of the archive.
  3. If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.

Delist closing procedure[edit]

Note that delisting an image does not equal deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article/s.

If consensus is to KEEP featured picture status, and the image is used in at least one article, perform the following:

  1. Check that the image has been in the article for at least one week. Otherwise, suspend the nomination to give it time to stabilize before continuing.
  2. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Kept|}} --~~~~
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
  3. Optionally leave a note on the picture's talk page.

If consensus is to DELIST, or the image is unused (and consensus is not for a replacement that is used), perform the following:

  1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Delisted|}} --~~~~
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
  2. Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
  3. Remove the image from the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs.

If consensus is to REPLACE (and at least one of the images is used in articles), perform the following:

  1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
    {{FPCresult|Replaced|}} with File:NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG --~~~~
    • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
    • Replace NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG with the name of the replacement file.
  2. Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the delisted image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
  3. Update the replacement picture's tag, adding the tag {{Featured picture|delist/image_name}} (replace image_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the image_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/image_name). Remove any no longer applicable tags from the original, replacement and from any other alternatives. If the alternatives were on Commons and no longer have any tags, be sure to tag the description page with {{missing image}}.
  4. Replace the delisted Featured Picture in all articles with the new replacement Featured Picture version. Do NOT replace the original in non-article space, such as Talk Pages, FPC nominations, archives, etc.
  5. Ensure that the replacement image is included on the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs. Do this by replacing the original image with the new replacement image; do not add the replacement as a new Featured Picture.

Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:

  1. Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the top of the section.
  2. Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the archived delist nominations. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the bottom of the appropriate section of the archive.
  3. If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.

Recently closed nominations[edit]

Nominations in this category have already been closed and are here for the purposes of closure review by FPC contributors. Please do not add any further comments or votes regarding the original nomination. If you wish to discuss any of these closures, please do so at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Nominations will stay here for three full days following closure and subsequently be removed.

Delist and Replace: Lansdowne Herakles[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2019 at 23:19:29 (UTC)

Current FP: Lansdowne Herakles
Proposed Replacement: Lansdowne Herakles
Reason
to be replaced by File:Lansdowne Herakles Getty Museum (retouched).jpg, background noise reduced
Articles this image appears in
Lansdowne Heracles
Previous nomination/s
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Lansdowne Heracles
Nominator
Yann (talk)
  • Delist and replaceYann (talk) 23:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep current — blurring and 'glow' at the statue's edges. I don't particularly see the need to have less noise on the background than on the main subject; I don't object to it, but it isn't worth the cost of even the slightest negative impact on the main subject. TSP (talk) 12:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Delist and replace – It's an improvement. Edge glow is hardly noticeable at full size (it's confined to 2 pixels in head and shoulder area), there is no edge blurring. The noise improvement is very noticeable. Bammesk (talk) 15:57, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Replace. I abstained from supporting the nomination, but seeing that the noise is fixed I should support. MER-C 15:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Kept --Armbrust The Homunculus 23:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)



Anne Dallas Dudley[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2019 at 21:59:24 (UTC)

Original – Anne Dallas Dudley
Reason
high resolution portrait of a prominent activist in the women's suffrage movement
Articles in which this image appears
Anne Dallas Dudley
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator
Bain News Service, photographer unknown / LoC
  • Support as nominatorYann (talk) 21:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Is [5] a better pic? I think one of those two should definitely be promoted, but I'm torn as to which. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 22:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • They are different, it's a subjective call, I would support either (FWIW this one shows more of her). Bammesk (talk) 15:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I'm kind of torn between liking and hating the many early-20th century fads that are all in one image - the fade out, the very pale skin in a white dress, the low-contrast between hair and background. Let's say Support for now. If this one doesn't pass, I'll restore the other. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 11:08, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Promoted File:Anne Dallas Dudley LOC.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 22:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)



Fervaal[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2019 at 10:58:55 (UTC)

OriginalCarlos Schwabe's illustration for Vincent d'Indy's Fervaal.
Reason
A particularly beautiful photomechanical print (Which I presume is something like a photochrom) for a rather obscure opera. The paper had clearly discoloured, so I nudged it back towards original colours a bit. There's a rather art deco looking poster based on it as well, but this has far nicer colour and linework. It shows him climbing a mountain with the corpse of his beloved to disappear into an ideal sunrise as the old gods and they that worshipped them fade out of existence with the dawn of Christianity. It was the sort of stuff that was kind of a thing for a while around 1895 or so. You also get Elgar's "Scenes from The Saga of King Olaf" around then, for instance, before the rise of the Verisimo and modernist movements.
Articles in which this image appears
Fervaal, +2
FP category for this image
WP:FP/THEATRE
Creator
Carlos Schwabe (credited as Carloz Schwabe for reasons best known to himself - it's in the signature as well), restored by Adam Cuerden
  • Support as nominatorAdam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 10:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support per nom. I wonder why there are two images nearly identical in the article though. This one is clearly superior however. Mattximus (talk) 15:52, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
    • The article had no images, so I thought "Eh... the poster is somewhat different.... I'll throw it in." I'd imagine the poster will be first to go in any chop. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 17:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • SupportYann (talk) 18:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support. MER-C 19:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • SupportBammesk (talk) 15:07, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support JJ Harrison (talk) 08:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Nice — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:43, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Promoted File:Carloz Schwabe - Vincent d'Indy's Fervaal.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 11:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)



White-tailed eagle[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2019 at 20:17:23 (UTC)

Original – White-tailed eagle grabbing a fish near Raftsund, Lofoten/Norway
Reason
One of this year's Commons POTY candidates that has clear EV.
Articles in which this image appears
White-tailed eagle, List of semiaquatic tetrapods
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator
Christoph Müller

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 00:31, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust The Homunculus 00:31, 24 March 2019 (UTC)



Soyuz rocket[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2019 at 20:20:49 (UTC)

Original – Exploded plan of Soyuz FG rocket
Reason
One of this year's Commons POTY candidates that has clear EV.
Articles in which this image appears
Soyuz (rocket family), Soyuz (spacecraft), Soyuz MS
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Getting there
Creator
AstroBidules

Promoted File:Soyuz rocket and spaceship V1-1.svg --Armbrust The Homunculus 00:24, 24 March 2019 (UTC)



La Esmeralda, Act III, Scene 2[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2019 at 22:05:09 (UTC)

Original – Set design for Act III, Scene 2 of La Esmeralda, the most ambitious, and sadly last opera by French composer Louise Bertin.
Reason
A fine example of set design, from the première of the work. Charles Cambon tends not to go full colour like Chaperon did, but his chiaroscuro work is pretty excellent.
Articles in which this image appears
La Esmeralda (opera), Charles-Antoine Cambon
FP category for this image
WP:FP/THEATRE
Creator
Charles-Antoine Cambon, lightly restored by Adam Cuerden
  • Support as nominatorAdam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 22:05, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  •  Question: How can we tell if this is not too dark (compared with other images online)? Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:38, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
    • @Charlesjsharp: The Bibliotheque Nationale de France seem to have quite good colour fidelity overall. One could possibly justify lightening it a little - there's clearly white ink used on it for highlights, so the paper is not going to be white - in order to bring out detail, but I'd say that this is very likely the colours for what it currently looks like. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 22:44, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • The Alamy image may be too light I suppose. There's no provenance. Why not lightenit /alter tone/do whatever a little? Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:49, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I guess a little more contrast won't hurt. Five minutes. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 23:38, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Right. I gave it a slight lift. Nothing too extreme, but enough to get an improvement in without overdoing it. It's meamt t be a poorly-lit garret room, after all. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 23:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support. Wonderfully detailed and engaging sketch. Illustrates Cambon's work well. Not opposed to a slight brightening, but will leave it up to Adam to determine the final word on that (it's fine as is for mine). --jjron (talk) 07:35, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Let's hope you're right! Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:17, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support. MER-C 19:59, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support and Comment – there is a round spot at x,y,=(1860,2975), you removed a similar spot at (3390,3825), I am just wondering if it belongs there? Bammesk (talk) 16:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
    • You can argue either way on that type of thing, but, on the whole, it seems like a drip. I think it's probably worth removing. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.4% of all FPs 00:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Promoted File:Charles-Antoine Cambon - La Esmeralda, Act 3, Scene 2 set.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 03:48, 23 March 2019 (UTC)



Suspended nominations[edit]

This section is for Featured Picture (or delisting) candidacies whose closure is postponed for additional editing, rendering, or copyright clarification.