Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/American Broadcasting Company/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 17:31, 25 May 2007.

American Broadcasting Company[edit]

I think this article meets the criteria for a featured article because of the detailed, non biased information that it has. It also has massive amounts of information that is all factual. It also is a good candidate because of the organization being renowned for it's brilliant newscasting throughout many years. This page I believe, deserves to be a featured article. L337p4wn 00:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SNOWBALL Oppose, suggest a peer review after the article is cited; it is completely uncited and has numerous WP:MOS errors. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball oppose per Sandy, almost entirely uncited. -- Phoenix2 ^{(talk, review)} 00:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Can we not vote "snowball oppose", and instead let the FA-admins snowball these themselves. We'll be getting Snowball Supports next. - hahnch e n 16:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, alot of good information and a good start but will need alot of referencing and review as per WP:MOS. cheers, Cas Liber | talk | contribs 01:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, the article has a lot of unreferenced information. -- Underneath-it-All 16:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.