This article is a bit of a departure for me in that most of it is about a highway that isn't in Michigan. US 8 spans 280 miles (450 km) in the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan. It recently passed its ACR where it was given an image review and source spotcheck. Imzadi 1979→ 04:35, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Support per my support at the aforementioned ACR. I also did the spotcheck. --Rschen7754 08:53, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Support - very strong article (I'm particularly impressed by the lead). The writing is clear and conducive to imparting information, with thorough sourcing and decent illustrations. Clearly the most comprehensive and well-presented account of the highway in existence, so I'm glad to offer my support. – Juliancolton | Talk 23:49, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Support and Image review - I reviewed the prose at GAN and conducted an image review at the ACR and feel that this article is high-quality and meets all the FA criteria. Dough4872 01:21, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Support - I reviewed this at ACR and can happily say that this meets the Featured Article criteria. TCN7JM 01:41, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Support. Comments from a roadgeek (having stumbled here from my FAC)
Can you avoid saying the verb "run" in the first two sentences of the article?
"Other changes on the east end have moved that terminus from the originally planned end location at Powers, to the current location in Norway. " - you can remove the comma here, unless you were going for something else?
"East of Barron, US 8 meets US 53 at a mixed diamond/cloverleaf interchange and turns north into Cameron, then turns east in downtown to leave Cameron." - any way to rewrite so you don't say "Cameron" twice?
"In 2002, US 8 was widened from two lanes to four lanes with a grass median between North Rifle Road and WIS 47" - you should clarify the state here (and good job with the 20th century section, no complaints there)
"$4.5 million (equivalent to $5.7 million in 2011) to $6.0 million (equivalent to $7.6 million in 2011)" - why not equivalent to 2013 dollars?
The inflation template carries a warning that the Consumer Price Index-based inflation numbers are only valid for small quantities like consumer prices. For these larger amounts, it's recommended that we use a measure based on the gross domestic product, and the numbers for that are only calculated for the US through 2011. The article is using a template that will update the year when the calculations are updated though. Imzadi 1979→ 02:45, 4 December 2013 (UTC)