I am nominating this for featured list because I've recently been working on it and have based its layout on a number of other featured medal tables. I believe it may now meet the criteria for inclusion and will be willing to fix any issues. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Replace Olympic.org with International Olympic Committee in the publishers field since that is the official organization's website and leave the work field blank.
Any items in the work field that are not titles of periodicals or related stuff should be removed from the work field and inserted in the publishers field. An example would be Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics (Sochi Organising Committee).
@The Rambling Man: All done apart from "an historic tie"; I took a look at this and was unsure. I've cut "Olympic.ca" and "Olympic.org" out, in line with suggestions above by another user. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 09:42, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Fine by me, I blame my teachers of decades ago... The Rambling Man (talk) 10:36, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The red in the image needs to become something like green. Also, the legend is missing and "eleven" is a joke. Nergaal (talk) 18:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
None of this is actionable, what "legend" do you want? What do you mean by "eleven" is a joke? If you'd like to help then please help, otherwise I suggest you don't continue to add such cryptic and unhelpful commentary. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
It looks fine now, but are there deleted entries in the history of the article after Aug 31? Nergaal (talk) 18:15, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Nvm, I am pretty sure I remember seeing "11" being spelled out in the table, but maybe there was some sort of glitch. Nergaal (talk) 22:05, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Resolved comments from Nergaal (talk) 17:50, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
*"with a historic tie in alpine skiing." is a bit vague. The historic part was that it was the first time a gold was tied or any medal, or that the fight for the medal was a historic one?
"medals over six consecutive games" was this at the same event? what discipline?
"If nations are still tied, equal ranking is given and they are listed alphabetically." does not apply here
why you chose the first podium iamge specifically? why not some of the more notable cases mentioned in the text?
I deemed podium images containing medals quite fitting to go alongside the table of medals. This is a similar format to the 2010 Winter Olympics medal table list.
The secnd is fine, but the first image seems completely random considering there are more notable options like File:Women's downhill, 2014 Winter Olympics, podium.jpg. Nergaal (talk) 22:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Support and feel free to rc my comments. Nergaal (talk) 17:50, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Resolved comments from Ravendrop 17:13, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Comments by Ravendrop
The lead mentions 15 sports, however the main article lists 15 disciplines in 7 sports. Would suggest matching the language used in the main article, i.e. "A total of 2,873 athletes from 88 nations participated in 98 events in 7 sports across 15 disciplines." Or "A total of 2,873 athletes from 88 nations participated in 98 events in 15 winter sport disciplines." The second option is what is used in the 2010 Medal Table and in the 2014 list of medalists.
I changed the Men's super-G from a "second" place tie, to the correct "third" place tie for bronze.
I support the article. Looks Good. Ravendrop 19:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
I've adopted the wording used in the main article. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Closing this nomination as passed. Remember to review other people's nominations, so that future nominations will run faster! --PresN 21:18, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.