Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/March 2019

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Municipalities of Guanajuato[edit]

Nominator(s): Mattximus (talk) 17:07, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

I'm continuing my goal to create an "encyclopedic atlas" by bringing all lists of municipalities in North America up to a consistent, high standard (one quarter of all municipality lists in North America are now featured!). I tried to incorporate changes from previous nominations but I'm sure I've missed some and there can always be improvements. Thanks to everyone who regularly reviews these lists! Mattximus (talk) 17:07, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Support – honestly looks good to me. I removed an extra space since there was no point in telling you to do it. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 18:22, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support - I don't think I can pick you up on anything, nice one! :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support: Excellent work as always. I do not notice anything that requires improvement (echoing the above two comments). You have helped to provide an excellent resource for North American geography with all of these lists. Aoba47 (talk) 21:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Municipalities of Mexico should probably be linked in the lead of these articles so readers can get more context, especially because these are equivalent to counties in the US rather than what we would call municipalities. Otherwise looks good as usual. Reywas92Talk 20:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Changed here and on every other list of municipalities pages for all states in Mexico. Mattximus (talk) 23:55, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Source review passed; very short reviews but that's to be expected at this point for this series! Promoting. --PresN 19:31, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

Lo Nuestro Excellence Award[edit]

Nominator(s): Erick (talk) 03:59, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

After working on the Latin Grammy and Billboard Latin Achievement Awards, I finally to decide to do one for the Lo Nuestro Awards. The prose and table is based on what Jaespinoza has done for other articles related to the Lo Nuestro Awards. I look forward to your comments. Erick (talk) 03:59, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

  • Comments
    • "honoring excellence of an artist's contribution to Latin music" doesn't really make grammatical sense. How about simply "honoring an artist's contribution to Latin music"
    • "The Lo Nuestro Awards was" - were, surely.....?
    • "a tribute is held to the winner of the award where the winner" - think something's got a bit mangled here
    • The lead is really short at around 1200 characters (too short even for DYK), I think it needs an extra paragraph. Maybe you could talk about the different nationalities, highlight that only a couple of groups have received the award, that sort of thing. Also, is anything known about how the winner is chosen?
  • HTH -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:28, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Hey @ChrisTheDude:, thanks for your comments, I believed I've addressed your issues. How does the length of the lead look now? Erick (talk) 12:13, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Much better - now happy to support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:19, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Comments from Aoba47
  • I would revise this sentence (It was first awarded at the 2nd Annual Lo Nuestro Awardsin 1990 and has been presented annually since then.) to ( It was first awarded at the 2nd Annual Lo Nuestro Awardsin 1990 and has since been presented annually.) since it seems a little awkward to me to send a sentence with “then”.

Other than that one small/nitpicky comment, everything looks good. Once it is addressed, I will support it. If you have the time, I would greatly appreciate any help/input with my current FLC. Either way, have a wonderful rest of your weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 03:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

@Aoba47: Done, I'll see what I can do about your list. I haven't been so active in Wikipedia lately due to life. Erick (talk) 16:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
No worries. I completely understand. I support this for promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 16:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support – Looks good to me. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 02:47, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 19:31, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

List of songs recorded by Shawn Mendes[edit]

Nominator(s): NØ 09:35, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I’ve created this list 100% alone from scratch, and I believe it meets the criteria. My previous nomination for List of awards and nominations received by Dua Lipa has been open for way longer than a month with over 4 supports but for reasons that remain unknown to me, the delegates are still yet to promote it. So I’m assuming it’s fine for me to open this one. Regards.—NØ 09:35, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Glad to see another song list! Here's some comments:

  • Songs and albums should not be sorted by A, An, The, etc. (sort by the first actual word)
  • Wouldn't hurt to give the table some color. Maybe to indicate singles and/or covers
  • You can say who the artist is for covers ("Use Somebody" is Kings of Leon and "Under Pressure" is Queen and David Bowie, etc.) And put a break between the song and the word "cover" afterwards so it's under the title
  • Who wrote "Handwritten Demos"?
  • The lead should contain a couple more references
  • Care to expand on his live albums? (meaning what they contained, or did either contain a live song/cover that he hasn't properly recorded in a studio?) – things like that

Everything else looks good for now. Great job on this! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 03:00, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Hey, you can have another look at the list now. “Handwritten Demos” has no credited songwriters since it’s a 9 minute compilation of demos of various different songs. I addressed everything else.—NØ 07:45, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Then put a centered en dash in that empty box for that track and make a note saying what you just said. Just so that it's not empty. Also, say "is featured" in the image captions. Reads weird without it. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 18:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Comments from Aoba47
  • For this sentence (Mendes signed with Republic Records in May 2014.), “Republic Records” should have a wikilink.
  • For this sentence (Mendes has appeared as a featured artist on The Vamps' song "Oh Cecilia (Breaking My Heart)", and has contributed a song called "Believe" to the Descendants soundtrack), I would add the years that both songs were released.
  • For this sentence (He has released two live albums titled Live at Madison Square Garden and MTV Unplugged.), I would add the years of the two releases. It is important to give the reader a sense of a timeline, and as someone completely unfamiliar with Mendes, I was left wondering when did this happen for this sentence and the sentence above.
  • I have a question for this sentence (His self-titled third studio album was released in May 2018, and included the singles "In My Blood", "Lost in Japan", "Youth", "Where Were You in the Morning?" and "Nervous".). In previous sentences about singles, you always included a colon after singles. I would add the colon to the above sentence for consistency.
  • The “Contents” bar at the top of the “Songs” section includes parts not used in the list (i.e. “0-9”). Make sure to remove anything from the bar that is not currently represented in the table. They can be added if/when Mendes records albums that start with a number or that particular letter.
  • The table includes something about a “Revisited” album, which I found out was a reissue from the album article. I would include the fact that he reissued this album with new material to the lead for clarity.
  • I would expand the note for “Handwritten Demos” to clarify that it is “a 9 minute compilation of demos of various different songs” as you say in the FLC. If I looked at the list without looking at the FLC, I would wonder why this song in particular did not have songwriters credited.

Great work with the list. Once my comments are addressed, I will support this. Aoba47 (talk) 20:54, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the valuable comments as always, all done!—NØ 04:29, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. I support this for promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 06:04, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Comments
  • "reissued as Handwritten (Revisited) with live recordings and four new songs in November" - of which year?
  • "included the singles: "Life of the Party"," - there should not be a colon there
  • "Mendes has appeared [...] and has contributed" => "Mendes appeared [...] and contributed"
  • "cover versions of Plain White T's' "Hey There Delilah"" => "cover versions of "Hey There Delilah"" by Plain White T's" (avoids that awkward 's')
  • "released in September 2016, included the singles:" - again, there should not be a colon there
  • "released in May 2018, and included the singles:" - or there ;-)
  • In the table, "Oh Cecilia" is a cover of the Simon and Garfunkel song, surely, and therefore should be marked as such.....?
  • Think that's it from me.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:13, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Done. "Oh Cecilia" definitely isn’t a cover of the Simon & Garfunkel song since all of the members of the Vamps are credited as songwriters. The song article calls it an “adaptation” of the latter so I added a note with similar wording here.—NØ 22:10, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Fair enough. One other point - it's probably worth being more specific about the location of the Oracle Arena in the image caption, as I for one wouldn't even know what country it was in, let alone what town/city....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:15, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Done, ChrisTheDude :D—NØ 04:30, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:52, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Comments from Lirim.Z
  • I would any type of verification for the liner notes; ASIN, EAN etc.
  • Mark songs released as a single like here --Lirim | Talk 04:49, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I added the verification codes. I usually find it a pointless exercise to mark single releases on these lists because they’re already discussed on discography articles. So they just work as decoration and don’t really add much to a reader's understanding. And we’ve already marked the covers here to give colour to the table too.—NØ 06:12, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I wouldn't switch so much between ASIN and EAN; use one or both. This list is a seperate list and not an addition to the discography. Singles are a "special kind" of released songs. I would mark them.--Lirim | Talk 17:22, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Since their isn't a concrete rule for this I can't really say anything against your decision. I would still use either EAN or ASIN or both.--Lirim | Talk 20:02, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I did switch them all to ASIN.—NØ 04:30, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support--Lirim | Talk 08:53, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
  • The alt text for most of the images needs to be rewritten, as it doesn't really provide relevant context. That image of Khalid, for example, isn't just "a picture of a main with black hair". Something as simple as, say, "Head-and-shoulders colour photograph of Khalid in October 2017" would work.

A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 00:59, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

All done, A Thousand Doors. Thanks for the valuable feedback.—NØ 06:33, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
I'm afraid that the alt text still needs some work. Unless these images were being used to illustrate an article on, say, celebrities dyeing their name, there's really no need to highlight their hair colour in the alt text for every single photo – it's only going to confuse our visually-impaired readers. I was thinking something more like this. Thanks, A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 13:15, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Source review passed; A Thousand Doors did the alt text themselves; promoting. --PresN 19:31, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

List of songs recorded by Jennifer Love Hewitt[edit]

Nominator(s): Aoba47 (talk) 23:50, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello everyone. The above list is on the songs recorded by Jennifer Love Hewitt. For those of you only familiar with Hewitt's acting career, she has also recorded songs for four studio albums and a compilation album as well as for other projects.

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets all of the requirements for a featured list. It is comprehensive in its content, and I have styled its structure after similar featured lists. I would greatly appreciate feedback and comments on how to improve this and improve lists in general. Thank you in advance! Aoba47 (talk) 23:50, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments from ChrisTheDude[edit]

I'll come back with a proper review later, but one quick point - it is not usual practice to include in these lists songs on which the person in question merely did something minor like backing vocals and wasn't actually credited as either the main or featured artist. I would therefore remove "Toy Soldiers" and "Pleasure".... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:31, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

  • I have removed it from the table and the lead. Aoba47 (talk) 21:42, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: Hello again. I was just curious if you had any updates for this? Aoba47 (talk) 04:32, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Apologies, I completely forgot. I'll try and take a proper look later today..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:24, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Further comments from ChrisTheDude
  • Pedantically, she didn't record any songs for the compilation album if it consisted (as seems to be the case) entirely of already-released material. Might be better to say "American actress and singer Jennifer Love Hewitt has recorded songs for four studio albums as well as a number of soundtracks and other projects."
  • Expand Killeen to "Killeen, Texas", as I doubt many people know where it is
  • "Two years later, Hewitt had recorded " => "Two years later, Hewitt recorded "
  • Might be worth merging the next two sentences together as they are both very short
  • Might be worth mentioning that her first album was credited to simply "Love Hewitt"
  • Don't need to say "(pictured)" in all the image captions, as the relevant people are obviously pictured
  • First image caption is missing a "
  • ....as is the third one
  • @ChrisTheDude: Thank you for the comments. I believe that I have addressed everything. Have a great rest of your week! Aoba47 (talk) 16:21, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • You too - now happy to support this nomination -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:29, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments from BeatlesLedTV[edit]

Love to see yet another song list up for FLC. Here are some comments:

  • I think the alt text should be better than just "a photograph" (especially when it's the case for every single image)
  • I have revised the ALT text. Aoba47 (talk) 22:30, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
  • "In 2013, she did record" → "In 2013, she recorded"
  • Add a top heading to the table (many other FL song lists have this)
  • "(Our Love)..." should be sorted by "Our Love" and be put in the correct alphabetical order in the table
  • Unfortunately, I cannot get the formatting to work correctly, and I would greatly appreciate any help with it. I have tried to use the sort template, but it keeps pushing the title at the end of the list when I sort alphabetically. Aoba47 (talk) 03:51, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
  • @PresN:@The Rambling Man: Apologies for the random ping, but I was wondering if either of you knew a way to address the above issue. When I was working on the list in my sandbox, I have tried to use the sort template as I have seen it in other lists. However, it just pushed the song title to the bottom alphabetically. I was obviously doing something wrong, but I cannot figure out what. I was wondering if either of you knew how to do the formatting correctly. I would imagine that this issue must have come up in at least one previous FLC. Thank you in advance! Aoba47 (talk) 22:34, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
  • @Aoba47: Yep, done. The issue is that you have to include the quote marks in the sort template, because technically all the song names start with a ("), so Our Love needs to start with one too to not get sorted last (since O comes after "). --PresN 17:05, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Thank you for clarifying that for me and correcting it. I am not sure how missed that lol. Aoba47 (talk) 17:10, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

───────────────────────── @PresN: Apologies for pinging you again, but I was wondering if you would have the time or interest to do the source review for this. I am only wondering as you did the source review for the FLC for the list of songs recorded by Alyssa Milano and this is a similar list (i.e. List of songs recorded by...). I completely understand if you would prefer not to. I am in no rush for this. I am trying to better about not rush FLCs and FACs and just let it go its own natural course. Either way, I hope you are having a wonderful week so far. Thank you again for your previous help with this. Aoba47 (talk) 20:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Album(s) → Release(s) (song are non-album singles)
  • I notice Hewitt doesn't have a writing credit for many of these. Maybe color code (in the writer col) the ones she's credited as co-writer?
  • I don't think the artist col is necessary since she's solo'd every song besides two. Maybe just put a break under the song title and put it there? I did that for Daft Punk's list.
  • Revised. Thank you for the suggestion. Aoba47 (talk) 04:05, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Make a note of the acoustic version of "Never a Day Goes By" (doesn't need to be in the table twice) (something like "An acoustic version of "Never a Day Goes By" also appears on Jennifer Love Hewitt")

Everything else looks good. Great job so far! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 23:39, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

  • @BeatlesLedTV: Thank you for the comments. I believe that I have addressed everything. I am uncertain on how to fix the "(Our Love) Don't Throw It All Away" listing. Hope you are having a wonderful start to your weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 04:05, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
  • The sorting issue has been fixed. Aoba47 (talk) 17:10, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Support – All good for me now. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 22:52, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 23:05, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments from Soaper1234[edit]

I can't see any major issues with this list. Overall, I think it would make a great featured list. My only comment is there are six instances of sea of blue ("When possible, avoid placing links next to each other so that they look like a single link"). One example is in the opening paragraph ("the children's television series Kids Incorporated."). Once this is addressed, I will happily support this! Soaper1234 - talk 22:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

  • @Soaper1234: Thank you for the suggestion. I can sometimes get a little too link happy lol. I have removed the wikilinks for the television show and film genres as I am not sure if they are particularly helpful in this list. Aoba47 (talk) 22:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
  • As we all can! This looks better to me, so I'm happy to support this nomination. Soaper1234 - talk 12:45, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments from MaranoFan[edit]

  • “Hewitt had recorded her first studio album Love Songs (1992), a collection of love songs” — Link to love songs
  • Added wikilink. Aoba47 (talk) 14:22, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
  • “Prior to the album's release, Hewitt released the stand-alone cover of Blondie's "Heart of Glass" earlier in 1992” — I do not believe the word “stand-alone” is necessary
  • I think it is necessary to avoid confusion and emphasize that the song was not released as part of Love Songs in any capacity. Aoba47 (talk) 14:22, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
  • “Despite finding commercial success with BareNaked, Hewitt has shifted away from music in 2004” — Clearly, the word “has” should be removed from this sentence
  • “During a 2009 interview, Hewitt's then-boyfriend Jamie Kennedy said she was writing a country song; he encouraged her to return to her music career. Despite Kennedy's statement, Hewitt has not recorded a country album” — This whole part shouldn’t be in this article if she didn’t actually record the song.
  • “In 2013, she recorded five songs for the television drama The Client List, in which starred as the lead character” — There’s a missing “she” before the word “starred”
  • “she also collaborated with Sophie B. Hawkins for a song for the comedy film Alpha Males Experiment” — I would replace the first “for” with “on” to avoid repetition
  • You’ll need to provide sources for the singles since liner notes for the parent albums do not cover single releases
  • Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 14:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Good job with this list. I’d be glad to support once these are addressed.—NØ 11:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
  • @MaranoFan: Thank you for the review. I believe that I have addressed everything. Have a great rest of your weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 14:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
  • One final thing, you should add verification codes for the liner notes (ASIN, EAN etc). ASIN codes are found on Amazon, and EAN codes can be found on eandata.com. I recently did it for all of the liner notes on this list if you want an example of how to use them.—NØ 15:12, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
  • @MaranoFan: Added verification codes to everything. I had to use Discogs.com to get some of the codes though as Hewitt's releases are not as recent as Mendes' (given up to 10 to 15 years lol). Let me know if there is anything else. Thank you again for the help. Aoba47 (talk) 16:45, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
  • SupportNØ 17:56, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 19:02, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments from A Thousand Doors[edit]

  • Support One final comment from me: some of the double daggers have spaces in front of them, and some don't. All of the single daggers do, so the double daggers probably should as well. Otherwise, great work! A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 18:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the support. I believe that I have addressed the spacing issue. Aoba47 (talk) 19:26, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 19:31, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

List of Prime Ministers of India[edit]

Nominator(s): Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:43, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Back in the FLC after six month stint. This is my second politics-related list and probably one of the most important one. As always, feel free to leave constructive feedbacks. Thank you. Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:43, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Initial comments:

  • 'Sworn in' doesn't need a hyphen
  • Prime minister does not need to be capitalized per MOS:CAPS#Titles of people. It is a common noun unless part of a name.
  • "youngest premier, and the third" doesn't need a comma
  • "Thus far" is unnecessary (duh, we're not talking as of another time), and the exact number of days may be overly precise for that.
  • The color key is unnecessary - every row in the table has the party right next to the color already!
  • The symbols could go in the footnotes rather than a key (but other thoughts on this may differ); №, if not already a well-known abbreviation or obvious from the context, could be labeled with a tooltip instead.
  • The smaller text size for the date on top of a normal-sized year does not look good, just keep it all the same size.
  • Sorting the Term of Office column sorts the first date alphabetically! (1 June, 10 November, 10 October...)
  • The Number and Lk Sabha columns also sort incorrectly. Reywas92Talk 23:59, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
@Reywas92: All done but I can't figure out the sortings. Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Try Template:Sort and Template:Sortname (the names should sort by surname not first. You didn't have to remove the colors altogether if you think they make sense to have (idk if they've been adopted as widely/uniformly in India as those in other countries); I was just saying the key was unnecessary since it's redundant to the party name column. Reywas92Talk 19:49, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
I will work on sorting soon. Give me some time. - Vivvt (Talk) 12:06, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
@Reywas92: All done now, thanks to Vivvt. Also I don't think the color keys are necessary at all. Thank you for the comments. Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Fixed sorting for Number, Name, Appointed by, and Loksabha. I have also made some minor changes. Let me know if anything else is remaining. All the Best! - Vivvt (Talk) 17:50, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
I'd put the table footnotes in the Notes section, otherwise I Support. Reywas92Talk 02:09, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Done. Thanks. Yashthepunisher (talk) 19:38, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Support – honestly can't find anything wrong. Great job to you! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 17:36, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you BeatlesLedTV Yashthepunisher (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Support: Everything looks good to me. It is a very important list, and as someone is completely ignorant of India's history, I was still able to follow everything clearly and understand it. I was a little confused on why certain numbers above ten are sometimes represented in numerals (i.e. whose 19-month term also ended in death) and in other times, they are represented through words (i.e. India has had fourteen prime ministers, fifteen including), but it is not a major issue in my opinion. Wonderful work with this! Aoba47 (talk) 20:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you Aoba47 Yashthepunisher (talk) 22:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Source review: I'm leery of citing an encyclopedia for the INC (I) name change, but checking WP:TERTIARY I guess it's okay. Promoting. --PresN 19:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

List of national lakeshores and seashores of the United States[edit]

Nominator(s): Reywas92Talk 20:17, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

I started this list about eight years ago in the model of List of national monuments of the United States and List of national parks of the United States and decided to finally finish it up since the only one of them I've actually visited was just taken off this list! Looking forward to your comments. Reywas92Talk 20:17, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Comments from Lirim.Z[edit]

Resolved comments from Lirim.Z
  • Quick first comment, in depth review later today:
  • The lead looks huge imo, WP:Lead As a general rule of thumb, a lead section should contain no more than four well-composed paragraphs and be carefully sourced as appropriate. This has five.
    • Since this is a list (without a corresponding main article) and the lead isn't typical summary-style I don't think it must match that exactly. However I could certainly move the History into a separate section.
  • Is there a reason there isn't a main article?
  • Link United States in the first sentence
  • Use ! scope="row" for the names in the table
  • All the date formats for the refs should be the same
  • It's surname, Given name. Change Ref 5, 8, 10. Use
  • Support--Lirim | Talk 02:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Comments from BeatlesLedTV
    • I agree with Lirim.Z the lead does seem a little long. You could get away with separating the history into its own section
    • Tables need scope cols and rows per MOS:ACCESS (if you need help I can do this for ya).
    • Fixed date formats for ya

    Everything else looks really good. Great job to you! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 18:03, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

      • Thanks you for that, all done! Reywas92Talk 20:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
    • I made this edit for ya (unbolds the names). If you don't like it you can undo it but if you do let me know. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 22:05, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
    • Hmm can't decide if I have a preference, bold may look better on the gray background but it was regular before without a need to change so whatever others like is fine; regular is more consistent with the other articles. Reywas92Talk 22:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
    • Unbold is the right way to do it.--Lirim | Talk 02:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
    • Support – Looks good for me. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 17:37, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

    Comments by Dudley[edit]

    • "Long term planning for all sites must address erosion and visitor access." This is POV and should be attributed to a named author.
    • "but debate over the meaning of this status and how the land would be acquired delayed action". "how the land would be acquired" and comments below seem to imply that national lakeshores and seashores have to be owned by the Park Service. The rules regarding ownership should be spelled out.
    • Seminole Rest and Mosquito Lagoon should be linked.
    • "The museum on the mainland preserves Timucua Indian history, Nathaniel Green and Eli Whitney's works, and War of 1812 battles." "preserves" sounds odd. Maybe "displays".
    • "the most at any NPS site". You should have "National Park Service (NPS)" at first mention of the National Park Service.
    • "Ice caves" should not be capitalised.
    • Article looks good. Dudley Miles (talk) 10:24, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
      • All done, went with "exhibits", and yes, the land is owned by the Park Service. Thanks for your comments, Reywas92Talk 00:21, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
    • Does land have to be owned by the NPS in order to be designated a national lakeshore or seashore? I think you should spell out the general rules, not just the situation in some specific cases. Dudley Miles (talk) 10:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
    • Yes, with very few exceptions all of the units of the NPS are fully owned by the federal government, which is what makes them public lands. Added a couple phrases to clarify. 18:43, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

    Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 19:31, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

    • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

    List of accolades received by Vikram Vedha[edit]

    Nominator(s):  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 07:32, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

    This article provides a listing of the notable awards and nominations received by the 2017 Indian Tamil film, Vikram Vedha starring R. Madhavan and Vijay Sethupathi. This film is notable for garnering its cast and crew members several awards and nominations. It is my fourteenth attempt at an accolades FLC. Any constructive comments to improve this list are most welcome.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 07:32, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

    Comments
    • Provide alt text for the images.
    • "is a 2017 Indian Tamil-language neo-noir action thriller" --> is a 2017 Indian Tamil-language neo-noir action thriller film
    • The 'husband and wife duo' bit seems redundant to me. It'll work better without this bit
    Yashthepunisher, I wrote it specifically because they are husband and wife. I feel readers would know it then and there. If you still insist on removing it, then I will do so.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
    • Do we need to mention the banner also?
    Y NOT Studios is a notable Tamil cinema production banner so I feel it needs to be included and also to let our readers know the company that financed the film.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
    • You should mention the editor's name as well
    • Provide a reference that can back the 'received positive reviews' claim. Right now, there are only two reviews
    Yashthepunisher, it is in the India Today reference I've placed before (Reference no 9). The line states "Thanks to Vikram Vedha, which has opened to rave reception from critics and audience alike." Rave here obviously is positive reception.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
    • A tweet cannot be considered a RS, IMO. Try to replace them with better source

    Yashthepunisher (talk) 10:10, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

    (talk page stalker) tweets can be considered RS if they are from verified accounts. --Kailash29792 (talk) 10:38, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
    I second Kailash's comments. Vikn Media Creations is a company and also I found no other better source than this one that covers all the awards.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
    Thank you very much, Yashthepunisher. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 11:13, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
    Support from Aoba47
    • The image caption should have punctuation since it is a complete sentence.
    • I agree with the first two points raised by the above reviewer.
    • For this part (feature in supporting characters), it should be either "feature as supporting characters" or "feature in supporting roles".

    Everything else looks good to me. I will support this when my comments are addressed. Aoba47 (talk) 19:23, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

    Aoba47, can you tell me where I should use punctuation in the caption as I really don't see where any punctuation could be used. The other two comments, I have hopefully resolved them.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
    • To the best of my knowledge, if a caption is a complete sentence/idea, then punctuation is required. Aoba47 (talk) 18:44, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
    I've made a change to it. Can you check it now, Aoba47?  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 07:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
    I have added the punctuation to the caption. I support this for promotion. Wonderful work! Aoba47 (talk) 17:37, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
    You could've just said "Add the full-stop" lol. Anyways, thank you very much, Aoba47. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 09:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
    • Support from Kailash: just add the trans-title value for this source, and if possible, link all the sources within the citations. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
    Thank you very much, Kailash29792. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. I've added the trans-title. As for the source linking, I've only linked their first instance of being mentioned, which is common for most Wikipedia articles as it wouldn't be good with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
    • Support – Looks good to me. Sorry I was waiting for everyone else's comments to be resolved first. Great job! :) BeatlesLedTV (talk) 18:17, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
    Thank you very much, BeatlesLedTV. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 09:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

    Support Comments from Jim[edit]

    • First para is over-long, needs splitting after "respectively"
    • titular characters—"title characters is more usual"
    • ₹110 million (about US$1,661,631 in 2017)... ₹400 million (about US$6,042,296 in 2017) worldwide —"about" seems redundant when you are converting to the nearest dollar. Even if it was exactly ₹110 million and ₹400 million, which I doubt, the conversion is over-precise.
    • in the refs, is [@viknmedia] necessary?
    That's all Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:40, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
    I have hopefully resolved your comments, Jimfbleak. Do have a look and get back to me. Thank you.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:28, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
    I think that you have missed the point of my conversion comment. To quote the US currency to the exact number of dollars, you must have assumed that the rupee figures are accurate to the nearest rupee, which I simply don't believe, they have obviously been rounded off. To me, it should read ₹110 million (about US$1,700,000 in 2017)... ₹400 million (about US$6,000,000 in 2017) worldwide or perhaps better ₹110 million (about US$1.7 million in 2017)... ₹400 million (about US$6.0 million in 2017) worldwide Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:47, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
    Done as asked, Jimfbleak.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:12, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
    Thanks, no other issues, so supporting above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:34, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
    Thank you very much, Jimfbleak. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:30, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

    Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 19:31, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

    • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

    List of accolades received by Padmaavat[edit]

    Nominator(s): Mr. Smart LION 11:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

    This list provides notable awards and nominations received by the 2018 Indian Hindi epic period drama film. The film is notable for Ranveer Singh, who received several awards for his role as Sultan Alauddin Khalji. This is my second attempt after a successful first attempt. If there are any comments regarding the list, will try to resolve it. Mr. Smart LION 11:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

    Comments
    • "Set in 1303 AD medieval India, Padmaavat is the story of honor, valor and obsession" => "Set in medieval India in 1303 AD, Padmaavat is a story of honor, valor and obsession"
    • "It garnered twenty one nominations" => "It garnered twenty-one nominations"
    • "won eight awards, including Song of The Year for Ghoomar" - the song title should have quotation marks, and there's also no need to link it again as it was only linked in the previous sentence
    • No need to link Singh in the last sentence as he has already been linked in the lead
    • "It also received five nominations for Best Film, Best Director, Best Actress for Deepika Padukone and Best Actor for Ranveer Singh and Shahid Kapoor at the Indian Film Festival of Melbourne, winning none." => "It also received five nominations for Best Film, Best Director, Best Actress for Deepika Padukone and Best Actor for Ranveer Singh and Shahid Kapoor at the Indian Film Festival of Melbourne, but did not win any of the awards."
    • In the table's first column, why is "Films of India Online Awards" centred, unlinked and in bold, a completely different format to all the others?
    • Near the top of the table you have e.g. "Kruti Mahesh Midya (for the song "Ghoomar")", but then further down the format changes to simply "Shreya Ghoshal - "Ghoomar"" - be consistent
    • Linking of things that appear multiple times in the table is inconsistent - some items are linked multiple times, others are not
    • Sorting on the "reciepients" column doesn't work - the items starting with a " all appear at the top, and people's names sort by forename when they should sort by surname
    • Think that's it from me...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
    @ChrisTheDude:  Done Mr. Smart LION 09:56, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
      • Sorting on the "recipients" column still doesn't work correctly..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
    @ChrisTheDude: I'm not able to understand that line. Mr. Smart LION 10:40, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
    When you sort the "receipients" column, it should be in alphabetical order, and for people it should be based on the surname, so Ranveer Singh needs to sort under "S". So in Singh's case, rather than simply wikilinking the name, you need to use {{sortname|Ranveer|Singh}}. This will make Singh's name sort under S. You need to do this for the first name listed in each cell. Also, where a value starts with a ", those are currently appearing at the top, because punctuation marks sort before letters. So in those cases you would need to type {{sort|Ghoomar|"[[Ghoomar (song)|Ghoomar]]"}} to make it appear under "G". Does that help? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:46, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
    @ChrisTheDude:  Done Mr. Smart LION 14:31, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
    You still need to fix the five rows where the recipient starts with a " - at the moment these all sort at the top -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:32, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

    ───────────────  Done Mr. Smart LION 13:12, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

    Comments
    • "The film's script and screenplay were penned by Sanjay Leela Bhansali". 'penned' sounds idiomatic.
    • Mention the cinematographer's name in the first para.
    • Rephrase the 'honor, valor' bit and write a more straight forward plot synopsis.

    Yashthepunisher (talk) 22:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

    @Yashthepunisher:  Done Thanks for taking some time to review it. Mr. Smart LION 05:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
    • Support – Looks good to me. Great job on this! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 22:54, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

    Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 19:31, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

    • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.