I am nominating this for featured list because it has been extensively worked for the past year, using List of One Piece characters as a model. Before I edited this page, it looked a little messy, but thanks to the efforts of editors like User:AngusWOOF, User:Immblueversion and myself, we managed to help improve the list using the aforementioned One Piece character list, as well as the Naruto character list. I think it's suitable enough to cover all of the aspects here on Wikipedia, such as the reception, and chapter references. Therefore, I think it meets the FL standards. I am open to suggestions anyone has to improve this list. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:05, 1 August 2013 (UTC) Note: This nomination remained untranscluded until 21:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC). Goodraise 21:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Going through the sourcing now. Ref 4 is supposed to backup the statement "Mashima based the titular guild on a local bar he was visiting at the time.". However the source states the bar helped him conceive the series, not the guild or characters.
Why is Fairy Tail capitalized in the volume references?
The statement about Todd Haberkorn should be more precise. I was under the impression the author was worried that Todd would not meet up to standards.
I'm concerned about the focus in the conception and reception section. These seem to focus mostly on individual characters; the Naruto character list was more broad and focused on all the characters in general. DragonZero (Talk·Contribs) 07:36, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Oppose and remove immediately nominator is indef-blocked as a result of a self-request. Suggest this is quick-failed unless someone else is prepared to co-nominate, no point in wasting the community's precious time making comments which won't be addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
I can co-nominate, or help address concerns, although I've never done one of those before. ;) -AngusWOOF (talk) 00:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
I could also co-nominate, but there are some sections of the article I think could and should be rewritten first. I will address my concerns with AngusWOOF. User:Immblueversion (talk) 01:59, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Ok well if I see you as nominators above in the nominee section, and I see you addressing issues, I'll reconsider my oppose. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:36, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.