Comprehensive, accurate, referenced list which appears to meet FL criteria. Similar to the Arsenal and Liverpool lists, which are both featured. WATP(talk) • (contribs) 17:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Needs quite a bit of work, I would have suggested a Peer review first.
On first glance, needs a WP:LEAD section that summarises the list. Needs an image as part of the FL criteria. It needs ndashes for the date ranges per WP:DASH. It needs a link from the Rangers template at the bottom.
Could you expand the acronyms?
Try and make articles for the redlinks. (Not compulsory).Woody (talk) 17:12, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
As I say, a peer review would have caught these. Perhaps you should think about one? Woody (talk) 17:12, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Must have missed the PR for this (or perhaps there wasn't one) but either way, some comments before I can support.
Must use en-dash for year separators, see WP:DASH.
Lead could do with some work, I don't think the bullet pointed list helps with "brilliant prose".
No "correct as of..." - you have a number of current players in the list so an update date is needed.
Any chance of an image?
Why is the whole first sentence of the lead emboldened?
The Rangers template needs fixing so it points (with redirection) to this page).
I'd go along with that. While there's a discussion going on right now at WP:FOOTBALL about "notable players", for the time being it's a good idea to be able to justify players who don't meet the criteria. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Right, dashes fixed, image added, link from template added, bullet points integrated into lead, update date added, emboldening fixed, notes for <100 appearance player added. Regarding the acronyms, there is a key which is linked to from the top of the column. Any further input or suggestions? WATP(talk) • (contribs) 14:02, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
I think the lead needs a bit of work to describe the list. Have a look at some of the other featured list of players for some ideas. Good work so far though. Peanut4 (talk) 14:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Comment - Colin Jackson links to the Welsh sprinter. So I'd advise you check all names are correctly linked to... The Rambling Man (talk) 08:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Done, all bluelinks point directly to the correct articles. WATP(talk) • (contribs) 17:46, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Comment okay, the list is now in a much much better state. Some further comments before I can support its promotion:
"first-class matches " - a term which probably needs explanation. Especially when you go on in the second paragraph to say " competitive first-team matches only"
"Nine In A Row years" - this needs a further explanation (e.g. just add something like "when Rangers won the title for nine consecutive seasons..." or similar).
"A player's name in bold denotes that player is inducted into Hall of Fame." - this is just as well placed at the end of the lead and not in small text.
Eliminate the red linked articles by writing stubs.
Consider adding club record holders and colouring them.
Consider colour coding internationals (unless that's most of them, which I suspect it may be!)
I'm not keen on the key for the positions, I use the full position and wikilink it accordingly.