"during the 6th ODI of England's tour " which tour? There's probably an article about it you could link to as well...
"failed in ensuring India's " failed to ensure.
Fifer number 13, did he really get 6 wickets in 3.1 overs while conceding 78 runs??
Fifer number 4, expected economy to be rounded up to 2.01 but perhaps we always round down, I can't remember...
In the past, when sorting by wickets, it has been commonplace to ensure that when wickets are tied, they're then ordered by the fewest runs conceded (when in descending order). That's not the case here by the looks of things.
"He has claimed most of his five-wicket hauls against Australia, seven of them". Seven isn't most of the hauls when there are 28 of them total; it's only 25 percent of the total, and "most" implies a majority.
Try not to start a sentence with a number like in "16 of Harbhajan's international five-wicket hauls...".
Lead photo's caption could use a citation and alt text.
I only count four five-wicket hauls in losses, not five.
Is he commonly known by his first name? If not, he should be referred to by his last name after the full name is first given. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:22, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Comment – while reviewing this for DYK I found a couple of errors in the table (a couple results were given inaccurately), but I've fixed these. I'd advise you to double-check this just to make sure you've not made any more little mistakes. —Cliftonian(talk) 06:00, 6 April 2012 (UTC)