Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Supermarine Spitfire Mk XVI NR.jpg

A fine picture I found on the French Wikipedia´s Featured Pictures. --Tobyw87 12:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Doesn't seem particularly striking to me, although I suspect the resolution and overall quality is good (apart from the blown highlights that someones bound to bring up). Terri G 14:39, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but really it's out of focus, and is pretty grainy. — Arjun 14:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Compare to this FP warbird. --Bridgecross 16:54, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough (and I took it!!) - Adrian Pingstone 23:44, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose I really like it and was going to support it until I click on the link that Brisgecross made above. It just isn't as clear as it needs to be a Featured Picture. Why1991 00:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment I've looked through the French Wikipedia's FPs, and about have wouldn't make it here. This is just an example. | AndonicO ^{Talk | Sign Here} 02:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Grainy, uninteresting. Other pictures of planes are striking and very visually appealling. This picture lacks that. --Midnight Rider 03:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OpposeIt is boring and grainy. Good for the article though Baseracer 02:25, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Too grainy. Due to there being many stunning plane pictures out there, it has to be very good to get past FPC. NauticaShad e s 20:02, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 05:31, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]