Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Featured log/August 2011

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
edit2006
April 1 promoted 6 not promoted
October 0 promoted 1 not promoted
November 4 promoted 1 not promoted
December 1 promoted 2 not promoted 1 sup.
2007
January 2 promoted 7 not promoted
February 1 promoted 2 not promoted 0 sup. 1 demoted
March 1 promoted 4 not promoted 0 sup. 1 demoted
April 2 promoted 1 not promoted
May 2 promoted 4 not promoted 2 sup. 1 kept
June 3 promoted 2 not promoted
July 0 promoted 0 not promoted
August 1 promoted 0 not promoted
September 4 promoted 6 not promoted 1 sup.
October 4 promoted 1 not promoted
November 2 promoted 0 not promoted 2 sup.
December 3 promoted 1 not promoted
2008
January 3 promoted 0 not promoted 2 sup. 2 demoted
February 2 promoted 1 not promoted
March 4 promoted 2 not promoted 1 sup.
April 5 promoted 4 not promoted 0 sup. 1 kept
May 5 promoted 1 not promoted 1 sup.
June 2 promoted 0 not promoted 1 sup. 2 demoted
July 3 promoted 4 not promoted 1 sup.
August 7 promoted 5 not promoted 2 sup.
September 10 FT, 7 GT 14 not promoted 3 sup.
October 2 FT, 7 GT 7 not promoted 3 sup. 1 kept
November 2 FT, 5 GT 3 not promoted 4 sup.
December 7 FT, 11 GT 5 not promoted 2 sup.
2009
January 2 FT, 4 GT 5 not promoted 2 sup.
February 7 FT, 6 GT 1 not promoted 2 sup. 1 kept, 1 demoted
March 2 FT, 3 GT 2 not promoted 1 sup. 1 kept
April 3 FT, 1 GT 3 not promoted 0 sup.
May 2 FT, 3 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 1 demoted
June 4 FT, 9 GT 2 not promoted 3 sup. 3 demoted
July 2 FT, 6 GT 5 not promoted 3 sup. 2 demoted
August 2 FT, 6 GT 2 not promoted 1 sup.
September 3 FT, 2 GT 1 not promoted 2 sup. 2 kept
October 3 FT, 4 GT 0 not promoted 1 sup. 2 kept, 6 demoted
November 1 FT, 1 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 1 kept
December 1 FT, 5 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup.
2010
January 1 FT, 3 GT 1 not promoted 2 sup. 2 demoted
February 0 FT, 3 GT 2 not promoted 3 sup. 2 kept, 2 demoted
March 5 FT, 4 GT 3 not promoted 1 sup. 1 kept, 5 demoted
April 1 FT, 8 GT 3 not promoted 4 sup.
May 0 FT, 7 GT 0 not promoted 1 sup.
June 2 FT, 3 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 1 demoted
July 5 FT, 3 GT 2 not promoted 2 sup. 2 demoted
August 1 FT, 6 GT 0 not promoted 1 sup.
September 1 FT, 1 GT 4 not promoted 0 sup.
October 3 FT, 18 GT 4 not promoted 1 sup. 2 kept, 2 demoted
November 0 FT, 2 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 2 kept, 1 demoted
December 2 FT, 7 GT 1 not promoted 1 sup. 1 kept, 1 demoted
2011
January 2 FT, 5 GT 3 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 1 demoted
February 1 FT, 11 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 1 kept, 1 demoted
March 0 FT, 4 GT 2 not promoted 0 sup. 1 kept, 0 demoted
April 1 FT, 9 GT 1 not promoted 1 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
May 1 FT, 4 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 2 demoted
June 1 FT, 2 GT 2 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
July 2 FT, 2 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 2 demoted
August 1 FT, 8 GT 2 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 1 demoted
September 2 FT, 2 GT 2 not promoted 1 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
October 4 FT, 6 GT 0 not promoted 2 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
November 1 FT, 2 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 1 demoted
December 1 FT, 4 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 1 demoted
2012
January 1 FT, 3 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
February 0 FT, 11 GT 0 not promoted 1 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
March 2 FT, 0 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
April 0 FT, 6 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 1 kept, 0 demoted
May 1 FT, 5 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 1 kept, 0 demoted
June 0 FT, 2 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
July 0 FT, 14 GT 1 not promoted 1 sup. 0 kept, 4 demoted
August 2 FT, 0 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
September 1 FT, 6 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 2 kept, 0 demoted
October 1 FT, 3 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
November 2 FT, 4 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
December 1 FT, 6 GT 0 not promoted 1 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
2013
January 0 FT, 3 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
February 0 FT, 3 GT 0 not promoted 1 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
March 2 FT, 2 GT 1 not promoted 1 sup. 0 kept, 1 demoted
April 2 FT, 4 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 2 kept, 0 demoted
May 0 FT, 5 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
June 1 FT, 0 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 1 kept, 1 demoted
July 1 FT, 8 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 3 kept, 2 demoted
August 1 FT, 2 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
September 0 FT, 4 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 1 kept, 0 demoted
October 4 FT, 1 GT 0 not promoted 1 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
November 1 FT, 1 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
December 0 FT, 4 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 1 demoted
2014
January 1 FT, 2 GT 0 not promoted 2 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
February 0 FT, 3 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 1 kept, 0 demoted
March 0 FT, 3 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 1 demoted
April 1 FT, 0 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
May 1 FT, 0 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 1 demoted
June 2 FT, 4 GT 1 not promoted 2 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
July 1 FT, 3 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 1 kept, 0 demoted
August 4 FT, 1 GT 2 not promoted 2 sup. 0 kept, 1 demoted
September 1 FT, 5 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
October 1 FT, 2 GT 1 not promoted 1 sup. 0 kept, 2 demoted
November 1 FT, 1 GT 0 not promoted 1 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
December 1 FT, 0 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 1 demoted
2015
January 0 FT, 2 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 1 demoted
February 0 FT, 1 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 1 demoted
March 1 FT, 1 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
April 0 FT, 2 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 1 demoted
May 2 FT, 3 GT 1 not promoted 2 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
June 0 FT, 0 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
July 1 FT, 3 GT 0 not promoted 1 sup. 1 kept, 1 demoted
August 1 FT, 3 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
September 2 FT, 2 GT 0 not promoted 1 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
October 0 FT, 0 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
November 1 FT, 2 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
December 1 FT, 2 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
2016
January 1 FT, 1 GT 0 not promoted 2 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
February 0 FT, 0 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
March 1 FT, 3 GT 0 not promoted 1 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
April 0 FT, 0 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 1 kept, 0 demoted
May 0 FT, 3 GT 1 not promoted 2 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
June 1 FT, 2 GT 0 not promoted 2 sup. 0 kept, 2 demoted
July 1 FT, 2 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
August 1 FT, 3 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 1 kept, 1 demoted
September 0 FT, 7 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 1 demoted
October 0 FT, 3 GT 0 not promoted 3 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
November 0 FT, 4 GT 0 not promoted 1 sup. 1 kept, 2 demoted
December 0 FT, 1 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 1 demoted
2017
January 2 FT, 3 GT 1 not promoted 1 sup. 0 kept, 1 demoted
February 0 FT, 3 GT 2 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
March 4 FT, 2 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 1 kept, 0 demoted
April 1 FT, 3 GT 0 not promoted 2 sup. 0 kept, 2 demoted
May 1 FT, 6 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
June 0 FT, 2 GT 0 not promoted 1 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
July 0 FT, 4 GT 0 not promoted 1 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
August 0 FT, 1 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
September 0 FT, 1 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
October 0 FT, 1 GT 0 not promoted 1 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted
November 1 FT, 0 GT 1 not promoted 0 sup. 1 kept, 0 demoted
December 1 FT, 2 GT 0 not promoted 0 sup. 0 kept, 0 demoted

Good topic candidates: view - edit - history

Hugo Awards[edit]

16 articles
Good article Hugo Award
40px
Featured list Novel
Featured list Novella
Featured list Novelette
Featured list Short Story
Featured list Related Work
Featured list Dramatic Presentation
Featured list Professional Magazine
Featured list Semiprozine
Featured list Fanzine
Featured list Graphic Story
Featured list Professional Editor
Featured list Professional Artist
Featured list Fan Artist
Featured list Fan Writer
Featured list Discontinued Hugo Awards
Contributor(s): PresN

Hey, it's taken the better part of 15 months, but here's a topic on the Hugo Awards- science fiction's biggest awards. The awards are broken up in several current and historical categories, and they're all featured lists. The lead is only a GA, but when I get some time I plan on tracking down some offline sources to boost it to FA, so that the whole thing will be featured. It's still a Featured Topic nomination right now, though, and everything should be good to go! --PresN 19:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Support Comprehensively covered. —Adabow (talk · contribs) 23:40, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Support. Great work. I think it would be better to sort the articles alphabetically in the topic box. Ucucha 00:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
    • Headbomb thought so as well, but I reverted it because this way, like is with like- written works together, magazines together, etc. Additionally, despite all the many categories Novels, and to a lesser extent the other written stories, are the big players- most people are only vaguely aware that there are even other categories, caring only about the novel of the year- and this layout puts them first in the topic box. --PresN 00:17, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - great job! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Support have watched this steadily clogging up coming through FLC - well done! BencherliteTalk 09:32, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Support. I use these articles all the times to grab references for others! Great job. Glimmer721 talk 01:01, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Supplementary nominations[edit]

  1. Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Hugo Awards/addition1


Virginia Tech Hokies bowl games[edit]

25 articles
Featured list Virginia Tech Hokies bowl games
2006 Clemson at Virginia Tech celebration.jpg
Good article 1947 Sun Bowl
Good article 1966 Liberty Bowl
Good article 1968 Liberty Bowl
Good article 1981 Peach Bowl (January)
Good article 1984 Independence Bowl
Good article 1986 Peach Bowl
Good article 1993 Independence Bowl
Good article 1994 Gator Bowl
Good article 1995 Sugar Bowl (December)
Good article 1996 Orange Bowl (December)
Good article 1998 Gator Bowl
Good article 1998 Music City Bowl
Featured article 2000 Sugar Bowl
Good article 2001 Gator Bowl
Good article 2002 Gator Bowl
Good article 2002 San Francisco Bowl
Featured article 2003 Insight Bowl
Featured article 2005 Sugar Bowl
Featured article 2006 Gator Bowl
Featured article 2006 Chick-fil-A Bowl
Featured article 2008 Orange Bowl
Featured article 2009 Orange Bowl
Good article 2009 Chick-fil-A Bowl
Good article 2011 Orange Bowl
Contributor(s): JKBrooks85

Procedural nom; this topic was originally delisted since the primary article writer left. He has returned and brought the articles up to GA though, so this topic is again complete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:25, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Comment Some dead links are present in the articles. See book report. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 17:32, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Fixed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 20:26, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Still some. Citation 37 in 2008 Orange Bowl e.g. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 06:45, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Support topic is now back up to requirements so can be re-promoted. BencherliteTalk 10:34, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Support, meets requirements again. Rreagan007 (talk) 14:29, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Wow, err, support :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Support Very good work. Gage (talk) 05:29, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment I just inspected the articles with the "Ext Links" tool in the book reports, and several articles contain several dead links. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 07:48, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
    Alas, I've been unable to easily replace the Orange Bowl deadlink noted above, and there wasn't enough in the ref where I can just de-URL it. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:21, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Closed with consensus to promote as good topic. - GamerPro64 00:49, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Fringe (season 2)[edit]

23 articles
Good article Fringe (season 2)
Anna Torv (cropped).png
Good article "A New Day in the Old Town"
Good article "Night of Desirable Objects"
Good article "Fracture"
Good article "Momentum Deferred"
Good article "Dream Logic"
Good article "Earthling"
Good article "Of Human Action"
Good article "August"
Good article "Snakehead"
Good article "Grey Matters"
Good article "Unearthed"
Good article "Johari Window"
Good article "What Lies Below"
Good article "The Bishop Revival"
Good article "Jacksonville"
Good article "Peter"
Good article "Olivia. In the Lab. With the Revolver."
Good article "White Tulip"
Good article "The Man from the Other Side"
Good article "Brown Betty"
Good article "Northwest Passage"
Featured article "Over There"
Contributor(s): Ruby2010

It's been a lot of work, but I have finally promoted all of the Fringe season 2 articles to either GA or FA status. This will be my first GT, and I'm ready and willing to address any of your comments. Thanks. --Ruby2010 comment! 03:19, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Support Great job! igordebraga 17:45, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - I reviewed a lot of these articles for their GA nominations, and the quality is high across the board. GRAPPLE X 17:49, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Support I have reviewed some Fringe articles for GA, all the ones I read are in shape. And also thanks to Ruby2010 for the hard work of putting them together. -- Matthew RD 21:05, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Support has all the season 2 episodes and the parent season article.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 02:45, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Great quality articles. Glimmer721 talk 00:57, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment there are some deadlinks {{citation needed}} in some of the articles. See the book report. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 17:36, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Support, but I wonder whether Unearthed should be here or in season one. Or, I should ask, was that episode indeed included on the season 2 box set? Furthermore, I'd like if the deadlinks were fixed. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:50, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the support. Unearthed was indeed included on the season 2 DVD, and is generally considered a part of that season due to the broadcast date. Also, what deadlinks are you referring to? None came up during the recent GA reviews. Thanks, Ruby2010 comment! 18:00, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
I see from the book report that Grey Matters has 2 × [citation needed], (which it looks like someone removed the citations stating it was not a RS), but I don't see any deadlink notifications either.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 18:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Had a wee look online, and I couldn't find anything that met WP:RS that made the connections cited. If they're not mentioned on the DVD, maybe in a featurette or commentary, it might be safer removing them until they can be sourced. GRAPPLE X 02:37, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
I removed the content in question and added it to talkpage until suitable references come along. Thanks, Ruby2010 comment! 21:05, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Great, thanks! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:40, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Support Looks good to me. Gage (talk) 23:01, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Support Nice work. Pedro J. the rookie 17:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Comment there's a few dead links in Fringe (season 2), Northwest Passage (Fringe) and Over There (Fringe) . See the book report ("Ext Links" tool) for details. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 07:52, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

All of those links belonged to a certain author at the Vancouver Sun. I couldn't find them or the cited information anywhere else on Google, so I just deleted the URLs and kept them as treelinks. I also addressed a few issues with the Chicago Tribune sources in the season 2 article. Thanks for taking the time to look them over, Ruby2010 comment! 16:03, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Closed with consensus to promote as good topic. - GamerPro64 18:51, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Battleships of Germany[edit]

62 articles
Featured list Battleships of Germany
Hochseeflotte 2.jpg
Good article Brandenburg-class battleship
Good article SMS Brandenburg
Good article SMS Kurfürst Friedrich Wilhelm
Good article SMS Weissenburg
Good article SMS Wörth
Good article Kaiser Friedrich III-class battleship
Good article SMS Kaiser Friedrich III
Good article SMS Kaiser Wilhelm II
Good article SMS Kaiser Wilhelm der Grosse
Good article SMS Kaiser Karl der Grosse
Good article SMS Kaiser Barbarossa
Good article Wittelsbach-class battleship
Good article SMS Wittelsbach
Good article SMS Wettin
Good article SMS Zähringen
Good article SMS Schwaben
Good article SMS Mecklenburg
Good article Braunschweig-class battleship
Good article SMS Braunschweig
Good article SMS Elsass
Good article SMS Hessen
Good article SMS Preussen
Good article SMS Lothringen
Good article Deutschland-class battleship
Good article SMS Deutschland
Good article SMS Hannover
Good article SMS Pommern
Good article SMS Schlesien
Good article SMS Schleswig-Holstein
Featured article Nassau-class battleship
Good article SMS Nassau
Featured article SMS Westfalen
Good article SMS Posen
Featured article SMS Rheinland
Featured article Helgoland-class battleship
Featured article SMS Helgoland
Good article SMS Ostfriesland
Good article SMS Thüringen
Good article SMS Oldenburg
Featured article Kaiser-class battleship
Good article SMS Kaiser
Featured article SMS Friedrich der Grosse
Good article SMS Kaiserin
Good article SMS König Albert
Good article SMS Prinzregent Luitpold
Featured article König-class battleship
Featured article SMS König
Good article SMS Grosser Kurfürst
Featured article SMS Markgraf
Featured article SMS Kronprinz
Featured article Bayern-class battleship
Featured article SMS Bayern
Featured article SMS Baden
Good article L 20 α-class battleship
Good article Scharnhorst-class battleship
Good article Scharnhorst
Good article Gneisenau
Good article Bismarck-class battleship
Good article Bismarck
Good article Tirpitz
Good article H class battleship proposals

I have worked on this project for over four years, and it is finally complete. Parsecboy (talk) 12:39, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Support a 62 article Good Topic with a quarter of them FA class. Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:15, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Support, although I'm not sure if the sub-topic version is preferable. This is visually very impressive, but rather bulky.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:49, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Well, there is precedent for a topic this large - Wikipedia:Featured topics/Governors of Kentucky has 60 articles in it. Parsecboy (talk) 14:15, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Support for the big version, not only because it looks grand and majestic and more visually appealing but also because it is far more illuminating and has a more cohesive and encyclopedic feel to it. Also, it is equally well logically set up as the shortened version. Great work by Parsecboy. - DSachan (talk) 09:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

If we're going with the 62-article version, should we still have the many subtopics for this one? Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:01, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Comment, apparently SMS Ostfriesland has some broken references. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 02:39, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

What do you mean? There's only one online reference and it's working fine. Parsecboy (talk) 12:49, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Support the single-topic version, and merge in all the smaller topics. Ucucha 23:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Support the single topic and merger of smaller topics. Rreagan007 (talk) 15:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Support the single topic. I wasn't a fan of having the different topics in the ultimate form, although I think that worked great for the development of the entire topic. I may have to steal that idea for the hurricane project. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:01, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Support single topic. Gage (talk) 05:31, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Just to note that I will likely do this promotion in two parts. The first will be to cut the 11 merged topics and turn them into former ones, the second will be promotion of the big topic. It may be over the course of a couple days, so don't panic if it looks like I'm just removing a bunch of topics. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:52, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Consensus to promote as single topic, will handle merging issues tonight and officially promote tomorrow night. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:32, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

1987 Atlantic hurricane season[edit]

7 articles
Good article 1987 Atlantic hurricane season
Arlene 22 aug 1987 1737Z.jpg
Good article Gulf Coast storm
Good article Hurricane Arlene
Good article Hurricane Emily
Good article Hurricane Floyd
Good article Tropical Depression Fourteen
Featured list Timeline
Contributor(s): Cyclonebiskit, Hurricanehink, Mitchazenia

All of the articles now are good. I can't see any of the other storms getting articles with how weak and dumpy they are. Thus, I'm happy to nominate this batch of articles for GT. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:34, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Support. All looks good. Ucucha 00:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Support, no complaints here. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 10:41, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Support Good work. Gage (talk) 23:00, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Here I Stand (Usher album)[edit]

7 articles
Good article Here I Stand
Usher Ring cropped.jpg
Good article "Love in This Club"
Good article "Love in This Club Part II"
Good article "Moving Mountains"
Good article "What's Your Name"
Good article "Trading Places"
Good article "Here I Stand"
Contributor(s): Adabow

I have worked on these articles since late last year, and I believe that the articles cover the topic of Usher's fifth studio album comprehensively. The tour was not huge, so it is included in the album article. --Adabow (talk · contribs) 21:55, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Support. Looking good to me in general. However, there should ideally be a navigation template uniting the articles in the topic. I assume the tour is not notable for an article of its own. Ucucha 00:15, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Support Looks fine to me. YE Pacific Hurricane 18:15, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Ferugliotheriidae[edit]

5 articles
Good article Ferugliotheriidae
Good article Argentodites
Good article Ferugliotherium
Good article LACM 149371
Good article Trapalcotherium
Contributor(s): Ucucha

Since the 1980s, weird teeth have been turning up in ancient rocks in South America. We don't quite know what they are—most likely multituberculates—and this series therefore contains a lot of uncertainties. Possibly it covers two quite unrelated groups of animals. All articles are GAs (thanks to the reviewing efforts of Sasata, Casliber, J Milburn, and Visionholder), so this is a GT nomination. --Ucucha 01:48, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Support Although {{Gondwanatheria nav}} has Trapalcotherium third and LACM 149371 last. Is there a reason for the ordering? The topic and navbox should probably be consistent. Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:27, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks. I've changed the navbox, as I don't see a good reason to use anything other than alphabetical ordering. Ucucha 12:13, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment: I think it's worth pointing out that the formatting of the references is inconsistent between the articles. Ferugliotheriidae and Ferugliotherium have the more standard quoted articles, italic journals, while the other three use a different style (which I seem to remember is a style used in a journal you read). If we're bringing these together as one topic, consistency would be nice- I'd go with the former, as it's what the MoS recommends. J Milburn (talk) 15:27, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
    • I changed the citation style I use on articles about halfway through this topic. I don't think there's a requirement for articles in an FT to be consistent with each other as regards references, and WP:CITEHOW says we shouldn't be changing reference styles. Ucucha 15:30, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Would prefer another comment or two on this one. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Slayer discography[edit]

26 articles
Featured list Slayer discography
Slayerlive2.jpg
Show No Mercy
Haunting the Chapel
Live Undead
Hell Awaits
Featured article Reign in Blood
Featured article "Angel of Death"
"Raining Blood"
Featured article South of Heaven
Seasons in the Abyss
Decade of Aggression
Divine Intervention
Live Intrusion
Undisputed Attitude
Diabolus in Musica
Featured article God Hates Us All
War at the Warfield
Soundtrack to the Apocalypse
Featured article Still Reigning
Eternal Pyre
Featured article Christ Illusion
Featured article "Eyes of the Insane"
Featured article "Jihad"
World Painted Blood
The Vinyl Conflict
The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria

I am nominating this for good topic because after a lot of work, I think that I can say that it meets the criteria. Thank you for any comments, CrowzRSA 22:22, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

  • But this is a discography, and it should include singles and notable songs. CrowzRSA 22:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Personally, I think that it should be a Slayer albums topic (overview), and singles be hosted in albums' subtopics, but I will wait for others' opinions. Adabow (talk · contribs) 00:38, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
  • But the discography article covers the following:
—Studio albums
—Live albums
—Extended plays
—Box sets
—Singles
—Soundtracks
—Music videos
—Videos
  • Since soundtracks really don't have much to do with the band, I didn't include them, but since Singles are covered on the page, and were releases, they should be included in the topic. CrowzRSA 01:30, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Can we get a couple more comments here? Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:15, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Comment: Would it be a good idea to have the studio albums be a subtopic in here? It'd cut this topic almost in half but it would keep the other one intact. I don't have an opinion either way on that. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:17, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Note Someone nominated Live Intrusion for deletion. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 12:04, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Comment There's a few dead links in a couple of articles. See the book report for details. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 12:05, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

  • This is a pretty impressive scoreboard. It seems that all notable items in the discography of this band are GA or FA, so it would make the most sense to me to have a single topic and merge in all the smaller subtopics, as we might be going to do with the German battlecruisers above. That way, all the related stuff is together. Ucucha 00:31, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Support despite preferring subtopics than basically repeating the two FTs by including the songs, an impressive piece of work. igordebraga 15:03, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Closed with consensus to promote as good topics. The studio albums topic, as well as the two other FTs (Christ Illusion and Reign in Blood) will be merged in. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:12, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

West Coast Express[edit]

4 articles
Good article West Coast Express
West Coast Express line.jpg
Good article Markus Näslund
Good article Brendan Morrison
Good article Todd Bertuzzi
Contributor(s): Leech44 - Orlandkurtenbach

Ice hockey lines consist of three forwards (a center, left wing & right wing). Though it is common for line combinations to be changed including in game, productive lines will stay together. If a line is successful or popular enough it is not uncommon for the line to receive a nickname. The West Coast Express was one such line that played for the Vancouver Canucks. I have nominated this for a Good Topic based on the fact that all three member articles of the line are GA as well as the article about the line itself. I feel that this is very similar to the wrestling tag team GTs that already exist. Thanks for your time.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 15:12, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

  • So I'm apparently a complete idiot, could some one move the page from Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/.../archive1 to the appropriate name Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/West Coast Express/archive1? Sorry for the inconvenience, but before I finish the next steps I'm going to wait so that things aren't missed after a change in pages.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 15:21, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
    Think I managed to get it right. ;) -DJSasso (talk) 16:26, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the assistance.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 17:54, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - can't see any issues -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:52, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Support. Makes sense to me. It would be nice to have some sort of navigation template linking the four articles. Ucucha 00:17, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the support. As for the template WP:ice hockey is pretty particular when it comes to templates and if I were to create one for these four articles I know it would be deleted.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 02:58, 22 July 2011 (UTC)