Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Love. Angel. Music. Baby./archive2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Love. Angel. Music. Baby.[edit]

7 articles
Featured article Love. Angel. Music. Baby.
GwenStefaniHarajukuGirls2.jpg
Featured article "What You Waiting For?"
Featured article "Rich Girl"
Featured article "Hollaback Girl"
Good article "Cool"
Good article "Luxurious"
Good article "Crash"

Procedural nomination; it used to be a Featured Topic until it was demoted in 2010. I noticed that Cool, the reason why it was demoted, became a Good Article back in November and is now nominating it. GamerPro64 18:52, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Comment, the topic should get its own book. Also, several article are crippled with deadlinks. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:21, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose per Harajuku Lovers Tour 2005 Crystal Clear x3 11:23, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose The Rich Girl article should not be an FA, there are lots of cases of WP:OR in multiple sections and there are mistakes in the references, thus it shouldn't become an FA topic. CalvinNaNaNaC'mon! 17:15, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Weak Oppose I'm concerned with the Original Research in Holla and Rich, particularly in the music and lyrics section where there are analyses of the sheet music itself. FA before was not that strict, unlike today. --Efe (talk) 04:01, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I'm sorry but all these "FA" articles violate GA criteria let alone FA. NFCC issues, OR issues, LEAD issues, MOS issues in abundance. I think a reassessment of each is needed. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 06:11, 17 September 2011 (UTC)