Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/River martin/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

River martin[edit]

3 articles
Good article River martin
Good article African River Martin
Good article White-eyed River Martin

Having succeeded with a genus FT previously, an entire subfamily this time, albeit with just two members. I'm aiming for GT, and the three articles are all at GA. The articles ahave the same layout and a navbox. Inevitably, there's a certain amount of overlap, but I've tried to incorporate some different bits into each article. Thanks, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

I don't know why the top left corner isn't working? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:32, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
What do you mean? rst20xx (talk) 13:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
The bit that should read "edit-topic discussion-book" is just showing redlinked "book" Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
That's how it should be, you can't edit or discuss a topic until it's promoted, but you can create the book for it - rst20xx (talk) 14:45, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Oh, thanks, I didn't notice that last time around Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:35, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Actually the book link wouldn't have been there before, that's a new change. Sorry, I should have said that before - rst20xx (talk) 03:52, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Support: I like the animal genus/subfamily topics, they fit so well in the "tree" structure of a Ftopic or Gtopic. --PresN 15:59, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - looks complete—Chris!c/t 20:43, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - Amazing work by Jimfbleak. Looking forward to Condor FT. - DSachan (talk) 13:39, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - nice topic, I find it interesting the m in Martin is capitalised in the species name but not the subfamily, never noticed that before - rst20xx (talk) 03:52, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Thanks for support. The bird project policy is to fully cap species English names, but not higher taxa, so Tawny Owl, but "owl" for the group as a whole (or an unnamed owl) Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:51, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Great job! Reywas92Talk 20:26, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Support go science! Nergaal (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • thanks for the support from the outer realms of the solar system {: Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:31, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment - can you create a book on this topic? Just click on the link in the top left of the topic box and create a book there, copying the formatting used in other existing books - rst20xx (talk) 20:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Done, could you please check that I've got it right. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:08, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Looks good to me, thanks :) rst20xx (talk) 13:48, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 00:20, 13 December 2009 (UTC)