Wikipedia:GLAM/GibraltarpediA/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/GibraltarpediA-related articles by quality statistics

Welcome to the assessment department of the GibraltarpediA WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about Gibraltar. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject GibraltarpediA}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:GibraltarpediA-related articles by quality and Category:GibraltarpediA-related articles by importance.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below, or add a blank project banner to the article talk page, and it will get spotted.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject GibraltarpediA}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject GibraltarpediA
|class=
|importance=
|infobox=
|photo=
}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed GibraltarpediA-related articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance scale[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject GibraltarpediA}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject GibraltarpediA|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Gibraltar.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to an outside audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Assessment log[edit]

GibraltarpediA articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

September 17, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 25, 2016[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 22, 2016[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 21, 2016[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 6, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 19, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 12, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 11, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 24, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 21, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 29, 2016[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 14, 2016[edit]

Removed[edit]

February 5, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 31, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 29, 2016[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 21, 2016[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

November 20, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 29, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 27, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 26, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 22, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 20, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 19, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 18, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

October 9, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Mark Miles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as High-Class (rev · t).

October 7, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Main Guard (talk) removed. Quality rating was C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).

October 1, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 30, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 19, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 31, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 11, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 27, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • John Leake (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class (rev · t).

March 8, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 4, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 26, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 16, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 13, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 31, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 15, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 23, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 15, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Pícaro (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).

November 15, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Pícaro (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).

November 13, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 1, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 30, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 22, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 8, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 5, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 4, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 6, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 12, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]