Page move-protected

Wikipedia:Help desk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:Help Desk)
Jump to: navigation, search
Wikipedia Help Desk
  • This page is only for questions about how to use or edit Wikipedia. For other types of questions, use the search box or the Reference desk.
  • Do not provide your email address or any other contact information. Answers will be provided on this page only.
  • We are all volunteers, so sometimes replies can take some time. Please be patient. Check back on this page to see if your question has been answered.

  • New users: While this is a good place to ask questions, new users may prefer to ask for help at the Teahouse, an area specifically for new users to get help with editing, article creation, and general Wikipedia use, in a friendly environment.
Are you in the right place?
Search Frequently Asked Questions
Search the help desk archives and other help pages

September 17[edit]

Want to create page for me social contriter friend[edit]

Kindly guide me how to create wiki page fir my friend who is doing wonderful Social works & contributing his maximum time with needy for there progress — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nehagzp (talkcontribs) 05:04, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Most people are not eligible for a Wikipedia entry, however wonderful they are, but if your friend has been written about in WP:Reliable sources (that is, they are notable in the special Wikipedia sense), then you need to collect some of those articles about your friend, and summarise them in your own words. You have a WP:Conflict of interest, so perhaps you are not the best person to write the article, but when you have collected the references, you could request an article at WP:Requested articles, or create a draft in WP:Draft space. Dbfirs 06:36, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Nehagzp. Please understand that, however wonderful your friend's activities are, Wikipedia has essentially no interest in what he says or what his friends or associates say or know about him: it is only interested in what people who have no connection with him have chosen to publish about him in reliable places (such as major newspapers or books from reliable publishers). If such sources exist, then there can be an article based on them - but as Dbfirs says, you may have a conflict of interest which will make it hard for you to create an acceptable article. The purpose of a Wikipedia article is not, ever, to tell the world about something, but to summarise what people have already decided to tell the world about. Anyone who creates a Wikipedia article for the purpose of telling the world about something is likely to have a frustrating experience. --ColinFine (talk) 09:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Ricardo Cortez[edit]

I would like to add a film under Ricardo Cortez. It is called "Bunko" and he was in it in 1950. But I am not sure how to acknowledge/cite<ref></ref> the source since I'm just watching it right now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrsCano05 (talkcontribs) 05:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

It's actually called Bunco Squad, and film credits generally don't need to be sourced. I've fixed it, as well as the movie below it. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:22, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

re-apply to have a page allowed[edit]

I submitted a page to be created. I thought that it would certainly be allowed. To my surprise it wasn't. How can I reapply? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidmagee9 (talkcontribs) 10:36, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Have you read the comments on your talk page? Your article was rejected because a) it was on a topic covered by an existing article, and b) it was deemed to read more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. I can't see the deleted text, but was it an expression of your own opinions and theories, or was it a neutral recounting of facts about OSH already expressed in existing books and articles? Only the latter is acceptable here. Rojomoke (talk) 10:59, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

About the link of :[edit]

Hello Have a wonderful day.

About the link of the top I want to say that Tabligue is an unarmed and non political muslim group distributed worldwide. They do not have any political affair with any country. This is hardly prohibited from the Tabligue leaders not to join with politics of any country by staying on Dawat and Tabligue and do not use the reference of Dawat and Tabligue. So here is the matter of yesterday Sir Donald J trump had been attacked on Pakistan and had been hardly announced that FBI drone attack will destroy all types of Hakkani and Jammat. Here Tablighi Jamaat is not the original group and organization name. The original group and organization name is Dawat and Tabligue. Dawat means invitation to mosque of all muslim and Tab league means Tab=Mouth League means Organization. So its an organization of mouth speak and only for muslim primarily. So may be the link of top had been made by any pakistani: and they had been used the name of Jammat with Tabligue which we are worldwide muslim feeling risk. Kindly change the name to dawat and tabligue on the Link: will be or otherwise please off the link kindly to save pure peace lovers muslim group of Dawat and Tabligue. Dawat and Tabligue is a perfect muslim peace lovers group and unarmed and non political muslim group. Pakistan had bene using it fo9r political reference. We are not liking Tabligue for any political reference on any country. This group main duty is to call the muslim people to mosque for five times pray on a day.

Please help the rest of the Tableaguei muslim people in this world.

Thanks Cent Jhon Joseph — Preceding unsigned comment added by Centjhonjoseph (talkcontribs) 10:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

wiki bio notable person[edit]

i want to create a wiki notable person page how do I begin to do that: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julialynn424 (talkcontribs) 12:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

@Julialynn424: please read Wikipedia:Your first article. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 12:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Dysfunctional navbox[edit]


I created Template:List of universities in Belarus navbox. When I try to use it somewhere else using the shortcut List of universities in Belarus navbox or List of universities in Belarus between two brackets( {{}}), it looks as follows:


Could you help me to fix the issues?

--Les Yeux Noirs (talk) 13:53, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

The <noinclude> tag near the end is preventing the final curly brackets from being transcluded; you need to either remove it or add a matching </noinclude> tag. Pppery 14:03, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
(which was done by PrimeHunter) Pppery 14:04, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Fixed.[1] See WP:NOINCLUDE. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Infobox broken[edit]

Resolved: Lourdes

Could somebody please fix this infobox here? LBJ (film)

Best regards, --Keimzelle (talk) 15:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Done. Lourdes 15:51, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, @Lourdes:--Keimzelle (talk) 17:39, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Template:Quote, Template:Quotation[edit]

Would it be possible to change the spacing settings within these templates? They namely appear too large to me as can be seen from here or here for instance. Hoping for your support,--Tuchiel (talk) 15:27, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

You can use 'style' parameter to apply custom css styles like I did in Jesus_in_Christianity#Ministry. Ruslik_Zero 19:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: Thanks a lot. Though, wouldn't it be even better to generally change these templates in that manner?--Tuchiel (talk) 21:28, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
PS: The same goes for Template:Blockquote, cf. Christ (title)#Usage for instance!--Tuchiel (talk) 17:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Template issues[edit]

Hi, in Crusades, I tried to apply the option state=expanded for the Template:Campaignbox Crusades included at the very beginning, but for some reason that doesn't work. Besides, why is there a divergent spacing above and below that template?--Tuchiel (talk) 16:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

PS: Concerning the last point (spacings), there is a similar thing with Template:Portal and Template:Commons, e. g. if you have a look at Jiří Třanovský: the spacing after the See also headline's underlining, before the Poetry Portal link box is slightly bigger than the one after the External links underlining, before the Commons link box, isn't it? I must say that I'm not very familiar with template formatting – since otherwise I would try to fix those hiccups myself, of course. Best--Tuchiel (talk) 16:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

@Tuchiel: Templates have different parameters. {{Campaignbox Crusades}} has no state parameter and doesn't claim to have it. Image thumbs may have a little more space below them than some other things. That seems unimportant to me. I think Crusades and Jiří Třanovský look OK. Does 1 or 2 mm more or less space around templates really matter? PrimeHunter (talk) 18:24, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
@PrimeHunter: Thanks a lot for answering! "Does 1 or 2 mm more or less space around templates really matter?" — Well, admittedly, there are certainly more important issues around. However, I thought it would be somewhat in the interest of the project in itself to have a more or less coherent layout / design / typography. And thus, I had the notion that the mentioned issues would be something one could consider to harmonize things... I hope that helps at least a bit to explain my concern. Best--Tuchiel (talk) 18:37, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
PS: Regarding Crusades, I think it would really make sense to have the campaignbox opened by default here. Is there a way to include that option?--Tuchiel (talk) 19:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
I have added the option.[2] PrimeHunter (talk) 19:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Pornographic Material[edit]

My daughter is doing a research paper on the 1960's. She loves the Beatles and somehow came across the page of John Lennon and Yoko Ono's, "Two Virgins" album. You have pornography posted! I realize that the original album cover included John and Yoko naked but for this particular website (that is used like an encyclopedia by children) the photo should be censored. That's not something I want my 13 year old daughter seeing. You have a responsibility. Please fix it or take down the picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 17:11, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

This is an encyclopedia, not a children's book. We do not believe in censoring. We believe in sharing knowledge. Your daughter can also empower herself by reading on sexuality, for example. This is what Wikipedia is for.--Keimzelle (talk) 17:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED. MarnetteD|Talk 17:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Right. We generally limit images of nudity to articles where it's relevant but the album cover is relevant to an article about the album. PrimeHunter (talk) 18:09, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
IP 74, you can also read Wikipedia:Offensive material, Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Images#Offensive_images, and Help:Options to hide an image. 2605:A000:FFC0:D8:D8E:D6F3:A7EA:C247 (talk) 18:14, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Please also note that the image is nudity, NOT pornography there is no sexual activity involved just a lack of clothes. Theroadislong (talk) 18:19, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Correct.--Keimzelle (talk) 18:40, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Theroadislong, although the image is appropropriate for the article and you are correct that it is not pornography, you are misunderstanding what constitutes pornography. Sexual activity doesn't necessarily need be involved for something to be pornography. In fact, it doesn't even need to be an image. Pornography can be in the form of photos, videos, writings, sculptures, paintings, video games, and others. And in order for it to be pornography, its purpose needs to be to elicit sexual arousal. 2605:A000:FFC0:D8:D8E:D6F3:A7EA:C247 (talk) 18:46, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Wait, so how is it our fault that Lennon and Oko decided to pose nude for an album cover? Because an article about an album is obviously going to include the album cover. Or is it our fault that your daughter is doing a research paper on the '60s? I'm not seeing how Wikipedia is responsible for this. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:54, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Ian, please calm down. There's no need to attack a concerned parent who's simply misunderstanding this enyclopedia's purpose and rules, and what constitutes pornography. Good faith inquires should receive civil responses and clear explanations. You are administrator, so you of all people should know better. 2605:A000:FFC0:D8:D8E:D6F3:A7EA:C247 (talk) 19:01, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
I can reply with a degree of sarcasm calmly and while assuming good faith. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
The Help Desk doesn't need sarcastic replies, especially from administrators. Read your own words on your user page: "there are rules to make sure that...editors are civil". 2605:A000:FFC0:D8:D8E:D6F3:A7EA:C247 (talk) 19:08, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
You say "in order for it to be pornography, its purpose needs to be to elicit sexual arousal". Clearly that was not the purpose of this album cover, who could possibly be sexually aroused by that! Theroadislong (talk) 09:46, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Two Virgins is from 1968 where pornography was illegal and people weren't so used to images of nudity, and a lot of women and girls had a crush on John Lennon. I suspect many people were aroused. Not so many today. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

September 18[edit]

GAYS against GUNS page[edit]

Hello all! I am a founding member of the gun violence prevention organization GAYS against GUNS and I noticed that someone had made a page for us (thank you to whomever that was!). Sadly, it was taken down. I'm not without ego, but this time I'm really motivated more by a sense of fairness. Our group has endured a near constant onslaught of disruption by, what I assume, are NRA members (and their ilk) and it doesn't seem fair to me if they're responsible for the deletion of the page describing our group.

Would someone please look into this for us? We're easy to contact - you can go to our website at or to our facebook page or twitter (@gagnoguns) or instagram (gaysagainstgunsny).

Thank you SO MUCH! — Preceding unsigned comment added by KevinHertzog (talkcontribs) 04:17, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello KevinHertzog, and welcome to Wikipedia. I am not an administrator, so I cannot look at the deleted content of the page, but it would help if you could remember the exact title (case sensitive) of the deleted page. Also, deletions on Wikipedia are carried out by administrators, a small group of trusted volunteers with a lot of experience, so it is unlikely that the deletion was motivated in any other way then Wikipedia's policies. Finally, it's best that you keep the conversation about the article here, not on other platforms. Thanks. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 04:53, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
@KevinHertzog: I'm an administrator but also unable to find the page. Where have you seen indication that it existed? PrimeHunter (talk) 09:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Interlanguage mess[edit]

What the English call "chicory", the French call "endive". What the English call "endive", the French call "chicorée". That's straightforward enough. But when we check Wikipedia's interlanguage links, we find

There are several problems here, which are certainly not restricted to this genus of plants.

  • en:WP does not allow two articles to have interlanguage links to the same foreign article, though fr:WP evidently does.
  • Sometimes an interlanguage link connects a vernacular name (like "endive") to a botanical name (like "Cichorium intybus"), or vice versa, even when a more appropriate target is available.
  • Sometimes an appropriate target isn't available, instead the target article we would like to link to is a redirect, or doesn't exist.

This is the kind of mess that I enjoy working on, even though my French isn't great. What would be the best place to discuss these issues? Maproom (talk) 09:48, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Maproom. This problem has been much discussed on Wikidata: See d:WD:BC. I wouldn't know either chicory or endive if they came up and bit me in the leg, but I remember reading somewhere years and years ago that what the English call 'chicory' the Americans call 'endive', and vice versa. --ColinFine (talk) 10:14, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
(edit conflict) I think it's rare to discuss where specific interlanguage links should go. Editors just make the changes they want. Nearly all interlanguage links are made at the Wikidata item for the page. Click "Wikidata item" under "Tools" to see it (assuming it has one). Wikidata demands a one-to-one correspondance between pages, and a page can only be in one Wikidata item. But a few interlanguage links are made by editing the article itself instead of its Wikidata item. fr:Endive has the code [[en:Chicory#Cultivated]]. Such links are generally at the bottom. See Help:Interlanguage links#Local links. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:17, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
So there's also a American/British language problem contributing to the mess. That hadn't occurred to me. The articles Chicory and Endive seem closer to British usage than American. Thank you, PrimeHunter, for explaining how the non-reciprocal link was created.
I think I'll try cautiously to untangle some of this particular mess, and see how it goes. Maproom (talk) 11:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

The question about the page etc[edit]

Hi Every time go to page i receive alerts "ಈ ಲೇಖನದಲ್ಲಿ ಸರಿಯಾದ ಉಲ್ಲೇಖದ ಅಗತ್ಯವಿದೆ ಸರಿಯಾದ ಉಲ್ಲೇಖಗಳನ್ನು ಸೇರಿಸಿ ಲೇಖನವನ್ನು ಉತ್ತಮಗೊಳಿಸಿ. ಲೇಖನದ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಚರ್ಚೆ ನಡೆಸಲು ಚರ್ಚೆ ಪುಟವನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ."

cool, am glad to know that there are people who can help me on this. But when i go there i do not find option to post my query or discuss about the page i have been working on. could you please someone send or comment with right link, so i that i can discuss about the page. As far as my concern, i have used very good contents but help me once.

regards, Dharanesh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dharanesha.e (talkcontribs)

I can't read Kannada and therefore can't start to think what might be wrong. Imaginably something funny is going on: somebody has just now posted a message to me there. I can't read it, and I don't believe I've ever posted anything there. But this isn't a matter for discussion here. -- Hoary (talk) 13:21, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
@Dharanesha.e: I don't know Kannada but Google tranlates the message as: "This article needs a proper reference. Add the correct references and make the article better. See the talk page to discuss the article". The message is made with the code {{Cn}}. The article doesn't currently have a talk page but you can create it by clicking the red link. I cannot say whether you will get a response. Tagging an article with {{Cn}} is very easy and the user doing it may not actually want to spend time discussing the article. I don't know the reference requirements of the Kannada Wikipedia but you can also consider removing {{Cn}} if the references seem adequate. The page history shows it was added in [3] and moved to the top in [4]. See Help:Talk pages for an English guide about how how to contact editors or use article talk pages.
@Hoary: When you visit a Wikimedia wiki for the first time while logged in, your account is automatically created there. Special:CentralAuth/Hoary shows your Kannada account was created today. Some wikis post welcome messages to new accounts. You got a standard welcome message corresponding to {{Welcome}}. This has confused and annoyed many users who visited languages they don't know and haven't edited in. I have considered proposing a Wikimedia-wide ban on posting welcome messages to accounts which have no edits and were not originally created at that wiki. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, PrimeHunter. I hadn't previously encountered this autowelcome thing -- which is rather a surprise because I fairly often visit other-language pedias while logged in. Perhaps it's very new. It doesn't worry me, but it does rather seem a solution in search of a problem. -- Hoary (talk) 22:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

How to claim a public school page[edit]

Is there a way for our school district to claim our page and maintain it ourself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Commcca (talkcontribs) 15:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

No. No one is responsible for maintaining any page and no one can claim ownership of a page. Also since you have a Conflict of interest you shouldn't be editing the page. ~ GB fan 15:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

So it's okay to have incorrect information on the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Commcca (talkcontribs) 15:12, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Very clearly, no-one has said. or even inferred, that. If you think corrections need to be made then please request them on the talk page of the relevant article, citing reliable sources where the information can be verified - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 15:16, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
We did not imply that either, so it cannot be inferred. Britmax (talk) 15:24, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  • @Commcca: the posters above may have overreacted, because the way you formulated your query is a major sin for Wikipedia-dwellers (see WP:OWN). You cannot "claim" a page and control its contents; Wikipedia is an encyclopedia governed by a complex set of guidelines and the dual belief that (1) the best article is that which is written with those guidelines in mind and (2) ease to edit will help to enforce those guidelines (in most cases). Giving pages for their "owners" to maintain would run contrary to (2).
You could edit the page yourself, though this is highly discouraged, see WP:COI. In addition, if you are working for the district or the school, please immediately see WP:PAID.
What you should do is to edit the talk page of the article, describe what exactly you want changed, add sources to back up that information and place the magic words {{edit request}} at the top of it.
I will also add that while adding material beyond trivialities would require sources, removing unsourced material should be done on sight even without a source proving it is false. TigraanClick here to contact me 15:46, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Editing Program ?[edit]

What is a good program to use to edit Wikipedia pages ?

FDLeyda (talk) 15:54, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

  • @FDLeyda: it appears from your contributions that you already managed to edit Wikipedia, so I am wondering if you have a specific problem in mind...? Usually a web browser is enough. There are a lot of gadgets to change how you edit Wikipedia pages (notably Visual Editor). There also are programs ("bots") that perform tedious and easy-to-automate tasks, but you should not use one without getting it approved first. TigraanClick here to contact me 16:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Jamie Oliver[edit]

Error on article about Jamie Oliver - chef He has 5 children not 6.

You put in more work by commenting here than by fixing it! :P I've corrected it. If you catch an error, you're always more than welcome to correct it, though providing sources for your edits is strongly recommended. PureRED | talk to me | 19:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

New red link page[edit]

I clicked on a red link and ended up here: The red link page used to have a link that searched Wikipedia for the page title. Why was it removed? (talk) 20:53, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

The landing page is part of Wikipedia:Autoconfirmed article creation trial, announced at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#ACTRIAL beginning today. I think there are several issues and have posted to Wikipedia talk:Autoconfirmed article creation trial#Deletion log not shown. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:42, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
I can see how this would be confusing to a new user who is trying to use the search function, and I've posted a request at Wikipedia talk:New user landing page. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Correction to a name[edit] You have the name listed as Charles Emmerich, in fact it is Bob Emmerich

He was my father so I know it is correct. He wrote and adapted the actual music.— Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Comment Not certain as to reliability, but [5]. Eagleash (talk) 21:07, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

I would say discogs copied Wikipedia. Composed by Bob Emmerich. [6]. I will make the change. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:28, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Probably did! Eagleash (talk) 21:34, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Our Love is the title of many songs. The above discogs link is about a 1959 song. Our Love (song) is about the 1939 song in this discogs link saying Bob Emmerich. By the way, see Stay#Songs for a really common title. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
1959 was the year the Ted Heath album containing the song was released. It was a compilation of songs based on classical originals. The Our Love (song) page refers to the adaptation from Tchaikovsky. However, seems 'Bob' is correct. Eagleash (talk) 22:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

2018 Major League Baseball season[edit]

Thank you for starting the 2018 Major League Baseball season article I thank you for this and I Am glad you started a couple of days ago. Next Year will look forward to the 2019 Major League Baseball Season article. will talk about that next year. 2600:8803:7A00:976A:F5AE:AF3B:D7FE:8881 (talk) 23:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Dudley Marjoribanks, 1st Baron Tweedmouth[edit]

Ref 1 which I have just added - does not clearly have who the publisher is. Please leave in the quote when you fix this up if you can.Srbernadette (talk) 23:36, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Fixed Eagleash (talk) 23:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

September 19[edit]

Odd alert[edit]

I received an Alert that I was mentioned in this edit, but I'm not. What am I missing? Is something up with Alerts? Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 03:01, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

@TransporterMan: This part of the edit... you RULE {{User:Hasteur}} the draftspace ...accidentally transcluded a copy of Hasteur's user page into the noticeboard. This would have triggered a notification to all the editors linked from that page. -- John of Reading (talk) 06:01, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Hmm... It is interesting to know that notifications go through template transclusions. It is logical (after all, {{U|Foo}} and [[User:Foo]] have to deliver the same notification somehow), but not an intuitive behavior. (Or maybe I am just slow-thinking.) TigraanClick here to contact me 12:36, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
[[User:Foo]] is just a link, of course, with no notification, but I assume you meant {{User:Foo}} Dbfirs 15:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Multiple sandboxes?[edit]

Hi, my sandbox is getting too cluttery. How can I make additional sandboxes, one for each subject I'm working on? GreyGoose (talk) 03:12, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi GreyGoose. User:GreyGoose/sandbox example is an example I created for you. You could create more by making similar named pages, for example User:GreyGoose/your_topic_here. Hope this helps. Thanks. Lourdes 03:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the titling info, Lourdes. How would I actually go about newly creating something like that? GreyGoose (talk) 03:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Click on this link and in your browser's web address link box, replace the term "your_topic_here" with any title you prefer. Thanks. Lourdes 03:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Ah, OK thanks. So for any future sandboxes, I go into the last one and change the URL? GreyGoose (talk) 03:34, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Yup!Naraht (talk) 03:53, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi GreyGoose. Please see Wikipedia:How to create a page, where multiple ways to create pages are described, including this one as "Method 4: changing a URL". Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:13, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Coast to Coast Funding Group[edit]

Who is the parent co. of Coast to Coast Funding Group? Is it radio program, Coast to Coast AM? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs)

  • Hello there. This page is only for questions about how to use or edit Wikipedia. For your particular question, you could use the Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities desk. Thanks. Lourdes 10:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

I need to delete my wiki page or delete the info on it[edit]

Hi! I have a wiki page. I don't know how it started but I would like to either have the information on it deleted (as most of it is incorrect) or have it deleted completely how do I go about that. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smartcar2 (talkcontribs)

Smartcar2, it would us give you a relevant answer if you were to tell us which page you are referring to. †dismas†|(talk) 16:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Smartcar2. I'm guessing that you are referring to a Wikipedia article about you. If so, then I have to tell you that it is not your article, and you do not get to say whether we keep it or not. However; we want articles to be accurate as far as possible, according to published sources. So, if there are few published sources about you, then the article will probably get deleted for that reason. If there are published sources independent of you, so that you are Notable in Wikipedia's terms, then the article will be kept. If there are particular items in the article which you want removed, then if they are not sourced to a reliable published source, anybody may remove them. Other than that, you are welcome to suggest changes to the article (on its talk page); or to contact Wikipedia by email if there are matters you don't want to discuss publicly. Please see WP:AUTOPROB for how to proceed. --ColinFine (talk) 16:41, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Smartcar2 seems to be referring to Jason Ybarra. Smartcar2 - you need to read and follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Contact us - Subjects. Shearonink (talk) 19:13, 19 September 2017 (UTC)


How do you correct incorrect info in Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mick Robinson (talkcontribs) 20:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

The question's pretty much answered on your talk page here - you need to be able to source the information, rather than just change it. Chaheel Riens (talk) 20:48, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Consistent citation style with legislation[edit]

Hi there, apologies if this isn't the right place for this question.

Looking at Railways in Melbourne, which uses just about every citation style under the sun, but mostly uses WP:CS1 templates, I was trying to work out how I might go about making the citations consistent. The article cites a number of pieces of Victorian legislation (see for instance numbers 32–36), and I'm not sure how I'd go about making these consistent with CS1. There is a template available, {{Cite Legislation AU}} but I'm not sure if this would be appropriate. I appreciate any help or guidance in finding the right place for this question. Triptothecottage (talk) 23:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

September 20[edit]

EBSCO access[edit]

I currently have access to EBSCO via Wikipedia. I understand that this access expires after one year. Is that correct, and can I apply for access again once my current access has expired? FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 01:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Kindly make my write up an encyclopedia article[edit]

Kindly make my write up an encyclopedia article:

extended content
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal is a columnist in English language on international politics. Abdul Ruff focuses on international relations with focus on foreign policy. He regularly contributes articles to intentional newspapers and journals like 'Foreign Policy News', 'Modern Diplomacy', 'South Asian Journal', 'India Forward', 'Kashmir Watch'. 'Indian Muslim Observer'. Dr. Abdul Ruff teaches English and Russian. He has a Ph. D in literature and has traveled widely in India and abroad. He has been critical of Indian HIndutva politics, Islamophobia, state arrogance and state terror operations against humanity. References[edit]

1. Indian Politics: Implications Of AAP Win In Delhi By-Poll – OpEd: [1] 2. China, Russia support North Korea, urge USA for talks at UN: [2] 3. 70 years of Kashmir under Indian occupation: [3] 4. From Afghanistan to World War III: [4] 5. Self-purification: Purpose of Holy Hajj: [5] 6. Post coup foreign policy of Turkey!: [6] 7. Bangladesh–Malaysia relations - Wikipedia.–Malaysia_relations Bangladesh–Malaysia relations refers to the relations between the two countries. Both enjoy .... Jump up to: Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal (7 May 2008). 8. Corruption, liquor, price rise, unemployment and Hindutva - issues in Tamil Nadu poll 2016!: 9. India expands presence in Indian Ocean Region, offering military help: 10. Politics of Emerging World by Abdul Ruff Colachal: Dictus Publishing: 11. From Afghanistan to World War III - The Middle East Times - International: 12. Nepal reclaims lands from India - Pakistan Defence: 13. US and the new UN chief: 14.Turkey elections: 15. UNSC votes to end Israeli settlements: What next? - Holiday: 16. Islam: The Spiritual Message of Ramadan Fasting: Jump up ^ "Indian Politics: Implications Of AAP Win In Delhi By-Poll – OpEd". 1 September 2017. Jump up ^ "China, Russia support North Korea, urge USA for talks at UN". Jump up ^ Ruff, Dr. Abdul. "70 years of Kashmir under Indian occupation". Jump up ^ "From Afghanistan to World War III - KashmirWatch". 10 September 2017. Jump up ^ "Self-purification: Purpose of Holy Hajj". 1 September 2017. Jump up ^ Colachal, Abdul Ruff (2017-08-03). "Post coup foreign policy of Turkey!". Indian Muslim Observer. Retrieved 2017-09-10. — 

Preceding unsigned comment added by Colachal (talkcontribs) 02:35, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Colachal, it's not clear what you're asking. This page is for asking questions about using Wikipedia, not for posting draft articles. Please read Wikipedia:Your first article for general information. If you have any specific questions, feel free to return here or visit the Teahouse, a forum especially for new users. RivertorchFIREWATER 03:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)