Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here – discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Kenneth Walker III
Kenneth Walker III

Glossary

[edit]
  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

[edit]
  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

[edit]
  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

[edit]

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

[edit]
  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

[edit]
  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

[edit]

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Structure

[edit]

This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. Eight days of current nominations are maintained – older days are archived.

To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.


February 11

[edit]

El Paso

[edit]
Proposed image
Articles: El Paso International Airport (talk · history · tag) and NOTAM (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The airspace around El Paso is closed for unspecified "Special Security Reasons". (Post)
News source(s): NYT
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Such a shutdown seems unprecedented so something strange is going on. Did an alien escape from Area 51 or what? Andrew🐉(talk) 12:24, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Until it is confirmed that it was due to the escape of an alien or something extremely serious. For now, trivial. Airports are usually closed for extraordinary reasons (weather, security, etc.). _-_Alsor (talk) 12:28, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Usually, a sensible explanation is provided. In this case, the reporting says, an El Paso city representive, said that while there was no reason to believe the city is in any “kind of imminent safety threat,” the lack of clarity from the F.A.A. was fueling fear and misinformation. “What’s especially troubling is that there appears to have been no advance notice to local government, airport leadership, or even local Air Traffic Control or local military leadership,” Don't Panic! Andrew🐉(talk) 12:36, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ITN is not for wild speculation. It is very unusual but nowhere at a point we can reliably cover it in an encyclopedic manner. Masem (t) 12:34, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:ITN, ITN started with the WTC attack which was posted on Wikipedia's main page within minutes. It was not clear what was happening initially and it was first supposed to be an air crash but editors pitched in to make sense of the developing news and this was generally thought to be a good thing. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:54, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
There was a clear obvious immediate impact, including who did it, within a few hours on 9/11. Nothing yet outside a eerie warning has happened here. WP is responsive to news, not proactive. Masem (t) 14:04, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It was immediately clear with 9/11 that it was going to have a worldwide impact; this is just the closure of an airport. the entire United States was a TFR on that day. EF5 14:34, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No, it wasn't immediately clear as the initial impression was that it was an accidental crash. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:41, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, lean oppose Feels best to wait for more developments before deciding. For now, I lean oppose on notability based on trivia concerns, per Alsor. CastleFort1 (talk) 12:35, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Change to strong oppose and SNOW close Now that there are further developments, I see no further reason to keep this nomination open. CastleFort1 (talk) 14:35, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Wait. We don't know enough to have anything concrete to post. Best to not close it prematurely in case of unexpected developments, but I'm not counting on it. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 12:36, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose are we being serious here? Are we going to report one very single instance of air travel being disrupted? Scuba 14:02, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose and close--classic case of ITN jumping the gun (to be fair, I think I'm guilty of this too). According to the NYT source cited, El Paso was closed because of anti-drone warfare tests at Fort Bliss. Departure– (talk) 14:24, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
A test is successful if it finds a bug and so it sounds like this one went well! Andrew🐉(talk) 14:38, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2026 Barbadian general election

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: 2026 Barbadian general election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In the Barbadian general election, the Barbados Labour Party wins the most seats, as leader Mia Mottley (pictured) becomes Prime Minister for a third consecutive term. (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

Article needs updating
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: Barbadian election, Westminster system, ITN/R. The results have come in and media around the world is reporting on it, but the article needs to be updated and requires a lot of work. Abcmaxx (talk) 11:30, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Elections in Barbados have been previously opposed on quality in ITN nominations back in 2013 and 2022. The quality of the article needs to step up if editors desire the election should get posted on ITN. Examples include adding a campaign section, results prose, results by constituency, and a reaction section. CastleFort1 (talk) 12:22, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Article needs a lot of work and general update: nothing about the campaign and political proposals, nor about the reactions/aftermath; the results section is empty. _-_Alsor (talk) 12:22, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
hey hey, the general election is taking place today, it is still underway. The blurb is incorrect. Let's wait and see what's going to happen. _-_Alsor (talk) 12:32, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Premature the election hasn't even happened yet, 0 votes are in, wait until the results of the election come in and are reported on. Scuba 14:03, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
not to mention "results have come in".Psephguru (talk) 14:55, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

February 10

[edit]

RD: Jim Robson

[edit]
Article: Jim Robson (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Global News, CTV News
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Just nominating for an RD listing, not a blurb. "Legendary" broadcaster in British Columbia who died at the age of 91. Death announced February 10th. TheSandDoctor Talk 07:01, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet ready Several unsourced claims. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 12:39, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

[Ready] 2026 Tumbler Ridge shooting

[edit]
Article: 2026 Tumbler Ridge shooting (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Shootings at a school and a residence in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia, Canada, leaves 10 people dead. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In Canada, a school shooting at a school in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia, leaves 10 dead and 27 injured.
News source(s): Global News
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Death toll could possibly rise. Hsnkn (talk) 03:25, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support. It is the second deadliest shooting in Canada during the 21st century. It is also the deadliest school shooting in the country since the École Polytechnique massacre in 1989 and the first major school shooting since La Loche. Mass shootings are somewhat rare in Canada so this makes the one today highly uncommon. Also, 37 victims total from a shooting is highly notable. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 03:36, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Worst school shooting in Canada in over 30 years, unusual event in Canada. I'd like to note though that "school shooting at a school" is redundant Koiramainen (talk) 06:37, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This is the second worst school shooting in Canadian history at this point. Notable and worth a mention for sure, though I respect the thoughts of Ad Orientem and will concede that this can wait a little if necessary. Just lodging support now in case that point happens while I am otherwise indisposed. I would just couch that perhaps we should say "at least 10 people dead" as, tragically, that figure might change given those in critical condition. --TheSandDoctor Talk 06:51, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The Tumbler Ridge Secondary School article is a stub. Greedycell (talk) 07:04, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This has nothing to do wih it.The bold article is what matters.Psephguru (talk) 11:07, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Absolute tragedy and a historic one at that, being the second deadliest school shooting in Canada and the third deadliest mass shooting overall in Canada. If required, I can acquiesce to waiting, though much information has come out, but I do understand that neither the shooter's identity nor the motives have been released, however, that will most likely take much longer, and that's if the motives are discovered. I think the injuries part in the altblurb should be merged into the main blurb as the main blurb is worded much better, but the injuries part is very much notable. DRWiki1102 (talk) 07:31, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This is international news in a way that that the Artsakh story isn't, with coverage in all the major media. There seems to be some mystery about the shooter; currently described as female, which seems unusual, as about 97% of such massacres are committed by men, it says here. This may make it more than the usual news event. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:43, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
comment there is an IP and another editor saying the shooter was trans to a very likely non-RS. S/he was reverted by multiple editors (including me). I dont want to put a dispute tag as it's current and headed to ITN, but something to watch out for. I've opened discussions in talk.Psephguru (talk) 11:00, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed - I am having great difficulty following the discussion there, but there's a strong flavour of 'not touching you' about the non-IP participant's behaviour on that talk page. I feel that some sort of official intervention may be warranted, but I'm not sure where to begin. GenevieveDEon (talk) 12:06, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I added support for semi protection [1].Psephguru (talk) 12:46, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the "Attack and shooting" needs expansion. Support once fixed. _-_Alsor (talk) 12:23, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
comment added investigation and brief on the pre school shooting and removed the tag.Psephguru (talk) 12:56, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the worst tragedies in Canada in recent years. Obvious significance. Article is fine enough for posting. Bremps... 13:24, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clearly notable and significant because this is the worst school shooting in Canada in over 30 years. Quality of the article is sufficient enough for posting. CastleFort1 (talk) 14:26, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment alt is wrong, corrected original.Psephguru (talk) 15:17, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Philippe Gaulier

[edit]
Article: Philippe Gaulier (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NY Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: French clown. The teacher of a long list of famous performers. Death announced 10 February. Thriley (talk) 19:37, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Jose de Venecia Jr.

[edit]
Article: Jose de Venecia Jr. (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): 1
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Former Speaker of the Philippine House of Representatives and long-time political leader in national government. AdobongPogi 06:09, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for now. The Early Life and Speaker of the House sections are largely unsourced. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 13:02, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Walk for Peace

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Walk for Peace (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A group of Buddhist monks completed their Walk for Peace, a 2,300-mile (3,700 km) pilgrimage on foot from Fort Worth, Texas to Washington, DC promoting peace, compassion, and nonviolence. (Post)
News source(s): [2]
Credits:
 Theodore Kloba () 17:37, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Well sourced article and pretty interesting. JaxsonR (talk) 18:25, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
oppose as mere trivia.Psephguru (talk) 18:40, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose--unclear importance, article is oddly written and sounds a little too promotional for me to be comfortable with an ITN feature. Seems like nothing more than a publicity stunt (which it was literally intended to be), and besides a few million social media followers this seems unimportant and unimpactful overall. Note that the event started last December. Departure– (talk) 18:41, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, not significant.Wi1-ch (talk) 18:48, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose on notability Good faith nom, but I feel like this would qualify more for a 'Did You Know' rather than the 'In the news'. CastleFort1 (talk) 23:22, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
DYK is not "just" for interesting articles. It requires either the article to be brand new or expanded 5x within the last seven days. Natg 19 (talk) 01:17, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose aside from some TikTok videos and news coverage here and there, this event haven't achieve much otherwise. NotKringe (talk) 01:13, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

February 9

[edit]

RD: Fazail Agamali

[edit]
Article: Fazail Agamali (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [9]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Looks passable. Natg 19 (talk) 00:07, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support Article is of sufficient quality for RD. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 01:13, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

February 8

[edit]

(Posted) Super Bowl LX

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Super Bowl LX (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Seattle Seahawks (MVP Kenneth Walker III pictured) defeat the New England Patriots at Super Bowl LX. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The Seattle Seahawks defeat the New England Patriots at Super Bowl LX.
Alternative blurb II: ​ The Seattle Seahawks defeat the New England Patriots at Super Bowl LX, with Kenneth Walker III named MVP.
Alternative blurb III: ​ In American football, the Seattle Seahawks defeat the New England Patriots to win the Super Bowl.
News source(s): NYTimes
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Needs a recap which I assume will come soon enough. Masem (t) 03:21, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You mean the soccer World Cup that is an international event that the US participates in? Whereas this is a national event that only US teams are in? GenevieveDEon (talk) 20:35, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
im just saying,its just like the world cup for other people Pandas planes (talk) 20:37, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
(before ec) Yes, I appreciate that. What I'm telling you is that this is not like the World Cup. It is like the FA Cup, or the Coppa Italia. You can't have a 'the worldwide thing, but America', because the USA is just one nation. America isn't distinct from the world. GenevieveDEon (talk) 20:43, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
excitement and emotional wise,not wold competition wise Pandas planes (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
(after ec) Americans are free to watch and get excited about actual worldwide competitions. (Calling a national event the 'World Series' doesn't count.) GenevieveDEon (talk) 20:43, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
i saidddd,not world wise Pandas planes (talk) 20:44, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
just like it a American thing.people who don't know what football is still watch it,like me Pandas planes (talk) 20:46, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia policy is that we can only use freely-licensed photos, or fair-use. Natg 19 (talk) 05:22, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Fair-use not allowed for ITN (WP:ITNIMAGE). —Bagumba (talk) 08:25, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
support Updated with prose. Psephguru (talk) 08:56, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Not updated; someone has removed the empty 'First Half' and 'Second Half' sections from 'Game Summary', along with their attendant orange tags. But this means that there is no prose narrative for the gameplay at all, which is clearly unacceptable. (I also find it ludicrous that there is more space dedicated to Turning Point USA's 'alternative' half-time show than to the actual half-time show. That seems undue, to put it mildly.) GenevieveDEon (talk) 10:36, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The gameplay never had prose sourced. Tennis, cricket, soccer.
Agree with the TPUSA stuff, but its sourced so can't do anything about it.Psephguru (talk) 11:47, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No. The WP:VNOT policy states:

While information must be verifiable for inclusion in an article, not all verifiable information must be included

Otherwise, we'd be stuck with WP:COATRACKs. —Bagumba (talk) 18:14, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Just gonna work on tht first part. How game prose gonna be sourced? To the commentary from the game that is not in online text?
Have a look at last year's. Super_Bowl_LIX#Game_summary. Black Kite (talk) 12:15, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Needs work Strange prose with lots of past future tense such as The game was a defensive battle as the Seahawks would take advantage of a struggling Patriots offensive line by kicking four unanswered field goals throughout the first three quarters. In the fourth, the game would see its only touchdowns.... Andrew🐉(talk) 11:21, 9 February 2026 (UTC) (edit conflict)[reply]
Will work on it.Psephguru (talk) 11:47, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
If you need it, WP:INTOTHEWOULDS has good advice on when it works/doesn't work. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 11:52, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Done. I suppose someone may copyedit but mostly done.Psephguru (talk) 12:18, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - The game summary is fairly rudimentary, but it's there and it's sourced. I removed the bit about the alternative half-time show on the basis of WP:UNDUE; it's highly relevant, and not undue, in the article about the main half-time show, and it appears correctly there. GenevieveDEon (talk) 13:39, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Removing that about the alternate show I think is not appropriate here, it needs to be included, or at least some mention. It's been covered for a long time that this alt show was going to happen, and definitely can be sourced, just that we don't need a lot of details in the game article, a more thorough summary can be at the half time show article and the standalone article covering it tells the rest. Masem (t) 14:08, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Don't have to agree or disagree with what is not notable.Psephguru (talk) 14:11, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a brief summary with source for it. Masem (t) 15:07, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The shorter summary is a definite improvement. I'll let those with more investment in the Owl as a whole decide whether it needs to be in its own subsection or not. GenevieveDEon (talk) 16:47, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support alt1 alt3. The article is mostly good, and has a game summary. However the summary says very little, largely ignores the first half, and has only a single reference - it seems out of place with what is otherwise a comprehensive article. The summary should really be improved, but I don't think it's bad enough to hold up posting. I also don't mind the orange tag on the list of international broadcasters, that's not important information. Modest Genius talk 14:04, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    The game summary has been substantially improved, switching to full support. Alt3 is the blurb to use. Modest Genius talk 20:35, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It wsa an extrmeley defensive game until the 4th (most boring, but i played D in team sports, so loving it ;)). Not much more to add, just it was hard to find a source and it' s a live one, so can use a better one but i doubt it can be found.Psephguru (talk) 14:45, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I know it was defensive, I watched it. That doesn't mean nothing happened, or that there's nothing to say. There should still be more than two sentences describing it. Modest Genius talk 16:55, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
... don't mind the orange tag on the list of international broadcasters, that's not important information: Then instead of the sourcing tag, slap on an orange {{undue}} (or just stop including such sections, if trivial). —Bagumba (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Include score in blurb The blurb should at least have the score. CastleFort1 (talk) 16:54, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
We never include scores in sporting items, for good reasons. Modest Genius talk 16:56, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
If we cannot find a suitable picture of Walker, then we do not normally list the MVP. If we do find one, the MVP will be listed in parentheses (Super Bowl MVP Kenneth Walker III pictured). Natg 19 (talk) 19:17, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Suitable image up. @Stephen Bremps... 18:24, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I'm not sure why there's any discussion of a different half-time show in the article. It wasn't part of any North American broadcasts as far as I know. Was this shown internationally? And it doesn't appear to be from the stadium either - but something that was prerecorded and shown by other broadcasters. Should we discuss what all the other networks were counter-programming the Super Bowl with? Nfitz (talk) 00:38, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I see nothing wrong with a brief mention of it. It was notable counterprogramming by the right-wing and the few sentences that are in the article is appropriate weight. Natg 19 (talk) 00:49, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Brief, perhaps. But it had a section with the same weight as the real halftime show. However that's now been fixed. So Support. Nfitz (talk) 11:01, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Ready) Portuguese presidential election

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2026 Portuguese presidential election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: António José Seguro (pictured) is elected as the president of Portugal. (Post)
Alternative blurb: António José Seguro (pictured) of the Socialist Party wins the 2026 runoff election for president of Portugal.
Alternative blurb II: António José Seguro (pictured) of the Socialist Party wins the 2026 Portuguese presidential election despite a strong challenge from the Chega candidate.
News source(s): PR '26, NYT
Credits:

 Chorchapu (talk | edits) 21:06, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support ITN/R. Scuba 21:09, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
As ITNR votes should focus on quality. Just being ITNR doesn't mean it's automatically postable. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 21:11, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support once updated Per Alsor above, the results prose needs to be updated for the second round and a reaction section is also needed. CastleFort1 (talk) 22:18, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose ITN is election inundated as is. I am already wary of non-ITNR election items and when that extends to "The President of Portugal has a largely ceremonial role, with no executive power, but can veto new laws and dissolve Parliament" the case is even harder to make. Gotitbro (talk) 03:08, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, but this sounds like a WP:IDONTLIKEIT argument, a similar one is made under sports nominations from persons who claim we post too many sports and subjectively claim they are unimportant. The President has some executive power and the function is not purely ceremonial either, but rather than focusing on the technicalities, this was fundamentally an important election in Portuguese politics and covered worldwide, therefore I don't see how this is any less relevant than any other recent election. Abcmaxx (talk) 07:45, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, rationalizing an oppose on the substantive reason of us not posting ceremonial elections is not an "IDONTLIKEIT" argument. The onus is on those advocating for a posting to show "this was fundamentally an important election in Portuguese politics" and I have seen absolutely no rationale to substantiate that for this nom. Gotitbro (talk) 08:26, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Describing this as a ceremonial election is misleading. I disagree that the post is purely ceremonial, but the election is a regular political election by universal suffrage. A ceremonial election would be something like the election of the Archbishop of Canterbury, which serves only to confirm a decision that has already been made by a committee. GenevieveDEon (talk) 08:50, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
"Describing this as a ceremonial election is misleading." I quoted that exactly from what the lede of the article says.
I also opposed the Irish presidential election for the same reason but even then there rationale was provided to show significance of that election beyond suffrage or head of state changes (that election also not being ITNR); I ams still waiting for that here. Gotitbro (talk) 10:29, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Come on; the words 'ceremonial' and 'election' both appear in the lead of the article, but the adjective is not used there to qualify the noun. And I think the article about the presidency is probably a better source for the nature of the presidency than the one about the election. GenevieveDEon (talk) 10:38, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The contention against this stems from the fact that the post is ceremonial in the first place. It can easily be argued ergo that the election is as well, unless of course contentions can be sustained otherwise (still waiting). Gotitbro (talk) 11:48, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support in principle The change in a head of state is sufficiently notable for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 09:28, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support change in head of state; politically significant in a semi-presidential system and makes snap legislative elections more likely in the short term This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 13:15, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose – Not covered by ITN/R, and no other editor has made a compelling case as to why this presidential election was significant this time around. Perhaps if Chega won, I would support a blurb. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 15:14, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
In what way was this "historic"? Natg 19 (talk) 00:22, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
As the article reads: "This was only the second time that a direct Portuguese presidential election went to a second round, after the 1986 election". ArionStar (talk) 03:01, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, explaining significance The incumbent Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa was set to retire after two terms in power, and the election went to a second round for the first time since 1986. The results section of the article describes that António José Seguro captured nearly 67% of the vote in a landslide victory, winning 303 out of 305 municipalities, 3,095 out of 3,239 civil parishes, and all 20 districts of Portugal. Also while the President of Portugal is a mostly ceremonial role, the president acts as a mediator between the three branches, has veto power, and has the power to dissolve parliament. Clearly significant and historic. CastleFort1 (talk) 00:51, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
What you describe are merely procedure hiccups. I am still not seeing WP:ITNSIGNIF here. To repeat, though I opposed the Irish prez elections, even then a rationale for the party/candidate which had won was provided including how it was substantial for the then Irish political scene. Gotitbro (talk) 01:44, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I just browsed the coverage. It's reported by the heavyweight international mainstream sources and the main theme seems to be the challenge of the surging right-wing protest party Chega, which got about a third of the vote in a high turnout and so joins AfD, National Rally, Reform and the like. So, it was not just a formality but was significant as a bellwether. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:27, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose per Gotitbro - this seems to be a mostly ceremonial role with little real power. The Kip (contribs) 01:55, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support article looks good enough to go. Although it is not an ITNR and the Portuguese presidency is ceremonial, these elections have received special coverage and relevance due to the historic support that Chega received. _-_Alsor (talk) 12:51, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2026 Thai general election

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2026 Thai general election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Incumbent prime minister Anutin Charnvirakul (pictured) and his Bhumjaithai Party win the 2026 Thai general election (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In the Thai general election, the Bhumjaithai Party, led by Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul (pictured), wins the most seats.
Alternative blurb II: ​ In the Thai general election, the Bhumjaithai Party, led by Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul (pictured), wins the most seats, along with voters approving a referendum to rewrite the current constitution.
News source(s): [10] [11] [12]
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Thai election is ITN/R. The results have come in and media around the world is reporting on it, but the article needs to be updated. Scuba 17:39, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wait until the PM is officially appointed Even though Anutin is most likely to lead a coalition, he is not holding absolute majority yet (as his party's seat counts is not over 50%), so I think we should wait until he was named official PM just in case the messy situation like the 2023 Thai general election happens again. NotKringe (talk) 21:26, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • The blurbs back then were:
Bagumba (talk) 22:05, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Even if for whatever reason Antuin isn't named the new PM, he is still the leader of Bhumjaithai and should be listed as such. Scuba 21:45, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

RD: David J. Farber

[edit]
Article: David J. Farber (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [15]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Bell Labs researcher, "Grandfather of the Internet" engineering professor and academic computer scientist who taught several Internet technical pioneers throughout the infancy of the Internet. Created SNOBOL language and served on many Internet organizations' boards. Schoen (talk) 16:49, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose article is orange tagged. Scuba 17:02, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2026 Japanese general election

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2026 Japanese general election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Incumbent prime minister Sanae Takaichi (pictured) and her Liberal Democratic Party win a supermajority in the 2026 Japanese general election (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Incumbent Japanese prime minister Sanae Takaichi (pictured) and her Liberal Democratic Party is re-elected with a landslide majority.
News source(s): Al Jazeera, AP, NBC, Reuters (sources which use the term 'supermajority')
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Japanese election is ITN/R Scuba 15:32, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Update: It is now confirmed that the LDP has won an outright supermajority. Basil the Bat Lord (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Second update: It is now also confirmed that the total LDP-JIP coalition won three-fourths of the House of Representatives. CastleFort1 (talk) 17:28, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support when results expanded This nomination will receive my automatic support as soon as the results prose and tables are expanded and clarified upon. CastleFort1 (talk) 15:48, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Change to support The results prose and tables are now there. I now support this nomination. CastleFort1 (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Historic victory for the LDP. Election is being covered in global news. Results tables in article are good to go. MidnightMayhem (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. NHK also reported a 2/3 majority.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 01:50, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Article is in good shape now. Basil the Bat Lord (talk) 02:42, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Should we add that this was a snap election? ← Metallurgist (talk) 05:48, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Removed) Iranian protests (remove from ongoing)

[edit]
Article: 2025–2026 Iranian protests (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item removal (Post)

Nominator's comments: According to the article the last significant protest was in mid-January, it is misleading to have this article remain in the "ongoing" section - Dumelow (talk) 08:01, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support The protests are effectively over after the crackdown/massacres. What we have now is the aftermath of them and Trump threats to attack Iran not the protests. Gotitbro (talk) 13:07, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – The protests have long been suppressed and over. Keeping it in ongoing is an obvious POV decision. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 13:43, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Iran is still a hotbed with the potential Israel/US attacks that have been abuzz. Even if the protests were the catalysts for these attacks as a way to threaten the current leadership, I would now expect that if the attacks were to happen, that would be a wholly separate article now, and as others have said, whatever protests have happened appeared to have been quelled. Masem (t) 13:46, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
support the hat-trick of events are put down.Psephguru (talk) 13:56, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support protests have been over for weeks, current content is just reactions to them being crushed. Scuba 16:54, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Winter Olympics (temporary Ongoing removal)

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2026 Winter Olympics (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item removal (Post)
Nominator's comments: The Ongoing section is currently extremely crowded, and it doesn't really make sense to have it there at the same time as a blurb for the opening ceremony. We can add it back once the opening blurb rolls off. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 03:49, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It shouldn't been added until the Olympics blurb rolls off. Masem (t) 03:56, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Wait The Olympics blurb will easily be pushed downwards due to election blurbs. There are three national elections on 8 February, which may be posted within the next one or two days. CastleFort1 (talk) 13:41, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
We also have the ITNR Super Bowl today Masem (t) 17:26, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose that makes four incoming blurbs, which will push the Olympics blurb off ITN. CastleFort1 (talk) 17:55, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait and keep imminent posting of election ITN/r blurbs would push opening ceremony blurb anyways.
Omnifalcon (talk) 19:01, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose removal per Omnifalcon. ITN/R and other backlogged blurbs will be pushing the ceremony blurb off soon. If we want to free up space, "Iranian protests" can (finally) be removed from Ongoing. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 19:39, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - seems a bit unnecessary and bureaucratic (though I don't know what policy supports this). Ongoing "blurbs" should be briefer thougy. Support simply changing this to "Olympics" and remove the timeline. Nfitz (talk) 19:49, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose/Keep - It makes sense now to keep it, because the opening blurb is going to fall off quickly with the Japanese & Thai elections and very likely the Super Bowl blurbs. 20:52, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Normally, I would vote to Remove because the Opening Ceremony blurb is still in ITN and precedent has been to only add the Olympics to Ongoing when that blurb rolls off. However, because of the number of elections and Superb Owl blurbs soon to be posted, I will IAR vote Oppose/keep because it makes no sense for us to have to put it back up again in less than a day when the Opening Ceremony blurb rolls off due to the aforementioned imminent turnover. Also keep the chronological summary/timeline link in the Ongoing item. -GhostStalker (Got a present for ya! / Mission Log) 04:42, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I'm personally opposed to the idea of removing an ongoing event from ongoing just because there's many other ongoing events. --SpectralIon 22:04, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - and now everyone is worried about the length of ongoing? Make the "blurbs" shorter then. And get rid of that stale MSP one. Nfitz (talk) 00:41, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

February 7

[edit]

RD: Sander Severino

[edit]
Article: Sander Severino (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.spin.ph/multisport/para-sports/fide-master-bemedalled-para-athlete-sander-severino-dies-at-40-a793-20260208
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Filipino chess player. Article seems to be good. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:22, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good enough article. Bremps... 18:25, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Haitian presidential transition council fails

[edit]

Article: Transitional Presidential Council (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Transitional Presidential Council of Haiti dissolves without a successor. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The Transitional Presidential Council of Haiti dissolves, transferring executive power to prime minister Alix Didier Fils-Aimé.
News source(s): https://www.rfi.fr/en/international/20260207-haiti-s-transitional-council-disbands-with-nothing-to-replace-it

https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20260207-haiti-transitional-council-transfers-power-prime-minister-fils-aim%C3%A9-us-gang-violence
Credits:
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Haiti's been struggling for a while now. The council was intended to facilitate a popular election for a president though that's not in the cards right now. Bremps... 00:33, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Lean support Could count as ITN/R on a technicality. While the actual office of the presidency is vacant, the Transitional Presidential Council acted with the executive powers of Haiti, and then transferred to the Prime Minister. Only a lean support since there are some duplicate citations that need to be resolved first. Quality of the article looks sufficient for posting. CastleFort1 (talk) 00:55, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support in principle – ITN/R and good quality, but the article's body should also be updated, not just the lede. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 15:18, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support, body is updated Kowal2701 (talk) 12:05, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Admins willing to post ITN: Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 16:04, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Jeane Freeman

[edit]
Article: Jeane Freeman (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC Herald Scotland
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Member of the Scottish Parliament who was Minister for Social Security 2016–2018 then Scottish Cabinet Secretary for Health and Sport 2018–2021. Drchriswilliams (talk) 15:46, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've added three Cn tags. The article might be ready soon. _-_Alsor (talk) 16:37, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support good to go. _-_Alsor (talk) 11:37, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Chorchapu: On closer inspection, I agree- The STV and Times obituaries both only list birth month. The source in the article is Companies House which lists a month and year for people registered as directors etc. I've update the birth dates listed accordingly. Drchriswilliams (talk) 22:09, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Brad Arnold

[edit]
Article: Brad Arnold (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): USA Today TMZ Rolling Stone
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Lead singer of the American rock band 3 Doors Down thrashbandicoot01 (talk) 20:13, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Issues fixed. Article is still a bit short, but isn't a stub. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 20:55, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Highly notable musician and article is well referenced and comprehensive. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 09:48, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose article is still orange tagged. Scuba 17:02, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Where..? Bloxzge 025 (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It was removed in this diff. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 03:48, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

February 6

[edit]

(Posted) RD: Terrance Gore

[edit]
Article: Terrance Gore (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [16]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

 – Muboshgu (talk) 17:27, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Three-time world series champion. Article is decently long and has no citation needed tags or issues. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 20:57, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Article is of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 00:04, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Shaea al-Zindani

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Shaea al-Zindani (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Shaea al-Zindani is inaugurated as prime minister of Yemen. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Yemeni prime minister Shaea al-Zindani assumes office with his cabinet.
News source(s): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/2/6/new-yemen-government-formed-with-shaya-mohsin-al-zindani-as-prime-minister
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Yemen is split in twain but he's of the internationally recognized faction; hence no qualifiers. Bremps... 01:24, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Article is kind of short and in need of more refs. Bremps... 01:28, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose on quality for now Article is a stub. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 08:28, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Soft support I wouldn't say his article is a stub, but it is definitely start class. Scuba 15:25, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
How's it look now? Hsnkn (talk) 05:54, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose current blurbs per Andrew, not neutral and misleading Kowal2701 (talk) 16:24, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
ah yes we must maintain our neutrality and pretend the Houthis are a legitimate government. Scuba 18:46, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
We say not that the Houthis are legitimate but that there are other threats/claimants to the internationally recognised government's power and control. Presenting it as the government of Yemen is misleading and omits important nuance. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 22:27, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Because it is a government. JaxsonR (talk) 22:40, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Transnistria, South Ossetia, and Abkhazia are also governments but we don't omit changes in Moldovan or Georgian leadership because of that. Scuba 00:42, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
That would be very different, the Houthis dont claim to be a seperate country. JaxsonR (talk) 00:45, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
so what's your point? the existence of the Rada of the Belarusian Democratic Republic doesn't exclude Lukashenko making an appearances in ITN every time he rigs an election. Scuba 21:08, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Well actually, we did note the... irregularities in the 2025 blurb and the 2020 blurb. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 21:16, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
"legitimate" is a value judgement, we're better off going with the de facto situation than pushing propaganda Kowal2701 (talk) 23:15, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I would also capitalize Prime Minister of Yemen. Hsnkn (talk) 05:54, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Shouldnt this be listed at ITN/R? JaxsonR (talk) 05:56, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe so. WP:ITNELECTIONS states: "Changes, reelections or reappointments in the holder of the office which administer the executive of their respective state/government [...] as listed at List of current heads of state and government." According to that list, its the president of Yemen, not the prime minister, which holds executive power. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 15:41, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Sonny Jurgensen

[edit]
Article: Sonny Jurgensen (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

 Looks good, but would prefer if other refs can be found for the early life section and the college section - they only have 1 ref supporting all those statements. Natg 19 (talk) 21:00, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Trial of former Republic of Artsakh leaders

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Trial of former Republic of Artsakh leaders (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Former members of the military-political leadership of the unrecognized Republic of Artsakh, including three former presidents and one acting president, have been sentenced by an Azerbaijan court, five of them are sentenced to life imprisonment. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ An Azerbaijani court convicts former military and political leaders of the former unrecognized Republic of Artsakh, including four former presidents.
Alternative blurb II: ​ An Azerbaijani court convicts former military and political leaders of the breakaway Republic of Artsakh, including three Artsakhi presidents (Arayik Harutyunyan pictured).
News source(s): [17]
Credits:

 Wi1-ch (talk) 18:29, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support though it should be a little more clear than Artsakh no longer exists. Could be worded like "Leadership of the former Republic of Artsakh were sentenced" Ion.want.uu (talk) 18:48, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't the point that it never existed? 05:36, 7 February 2026 (UTC) Nfitz (talk) 05:36, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
"Former unrecognized Republic of Artsakh" seems to convey the point neutrally enough. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 07:43, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The article was created on February 5th, so the update is the entire article. Should assessment of the "quality of the update" be only for that portion that relates to the current event? WP:ITNUPDATE does not suggest this to me. And from a 20,000 foot/IAR perspective, a current event that triggers a substantial update of non-current information still fits our purpose here (improving the mainspace). GreatCaesarsGhost 15:53, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality per Masem. Neutral on notability; would reassess once article is further updated. FlipandFlopped 00:35, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Closed military trial (court martial) of political leadership of now absorbed state without substantial coverage beyond Azerbaijan. It should also be nited that none of the trialed BLPs have been updated, Arkadi Ghukasyan directly states in the lead "currently facing criminal charges in Azerbaijan". Gotitbro (talk) 05:43, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on notability though I don't believe it needs to be specified that the Republic of Artsakh was "unrecognized". Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 14:15, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, if we don't we could run into problems of making it sound like it was a full, recognised, nation, when in fact it was not. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 14:16, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't see how that would be implied nor would it be relevant. If anything, using "breakaway" (as the article uses) or "separatist" would be more relevant and provide appropriate context to an unfamiliar reader. "Unrecognized" isn't that helpful because this blurb isn't about Artsakh's diplomatic relations / international status.
    Suggesting altblurb2 that doesn't use the word "former" three times. Also note that three presidents were convicted; the fourth was only acting president. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 14:44, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Artsakh and other unrecognized countries aren't ITN material, we never included any of these presidents in ITN when they where elected, so why should we include them now that they've been sentenced? Scuba 15:26, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
WP:ITNATA: "Opposing a specific story merely because one opposes all stories of that type ... do not often generate agreement from the community." I wouldn't agree that "unrecognized countries aren't ITN material" considering that they are posted from time to time, such as Northern Cyprus recently. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 16:40, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Northern Cyprus was a special case because the new president was pro-unification. as said in the discussion. Scuba 18:45, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
support notable decimation of a nations.Psephguru (talk) 13:54, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support, quality is good, everything cited at least, though the Verdict section could be expanded, and possibly an Aftermath/Reactions section created. Prefer ALT 2 Kowal2701 (talk) 21:25, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support article looks excellent. The condemnation of the high-ranking civil and military authorities of a former semi-sovereign nation is, I believe, ITN-worthy, especially when it is for war. In fact, I would even consider it to be a non-independent region. _-_Alsor (talk) 22:46, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2026 Winter Olympics

[edit]
Article: 2026 Winter Olympics (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The 2026 Winter Olympics in Milano/Cortina starts (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The 2026 Winter Olympics in Milano/Cortina opens
Alternative blurb II: ​ The 2026 Winter Olympics, held in Milan and Cortina d'Ampezzo, Italy, opens
Alternative blurb III: ​ The Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina d'Ampezzo, Italy.
News source(s): [20]
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Several sports are already two days into competition. BabbaQ (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Opening Ceremony article still needs a lot of improvement. Support Winter Olympics to Ongoing for now. Natg 19 (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Could support the current blurbs, which do not bold the opening ceremony. Natg 19 (talk) 23:20, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support the opening ceremony article is now ready. Good work Rushtheeditor! Natg 19 (talk) 05:00, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Tysm! Rushtheeditor (talk) 05:01, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt3 on conciseness. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 08:27, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The 2026 Winter Olympics opening ceremony

(Posted) 2026 Islamabad suicide bombing

[edit]
Article: 2026 Islamabad suicide bombing (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: A suicide attack at a mosque during Friday prayers killed at least 31 people and more than 150 were injured in Islamabad, Pakistan. (Post)
News source(s): Reuters, BBC, CNN, Al Jazeera, France 24, ABC News, CBS News, The Guardian
Credits:

 Ainty Painty (talk) 14:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Probably should not mention injuries though. JaxsonR (talk) 14:39, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Moderate Support; let's wait for more information about preperators and if the BLA was behind it, although the IS and Taliban paper to be behind it. 4-RΔ𝚉🌑R-01𝕏 (talk) 15:47, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Major attack with dozens of fatalities, hundreds of injuries and has been covered internationally. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 17:00, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose tragic, but this kind of attacks are sadly too common in Pakistan. _-_Alsor (talk) 18:42, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Per 2026 in Pakistan, this seems to be second-deadliest attack this year. Most such bombings have fatalities in the single digits. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 01:43, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It was also the deadliest attack targeting a religious place in Pakistan since 2023. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 20:57, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
We posted the 2025 Islamabad suicide bombing that had a smaller death toll. This is the capital of Pakistan, not a small town with no security. JaxsonR (talk) 01:48, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Soft support recentism is a factor, but with a death toll like this it shouldn't be the defining factor. Scuba 00:41, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Major attack in a capital city. Hsnkn (talk) 00:50, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. Note the 2025 precedent. Bremps... 01:42, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

February 5

[edit]

RD: Tamás Vásáry

[edit]
Article: Tamás Vásáry (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Telegraph
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: At his peak, a leading pianist of the works by Chopin and Liszt, later also a conductor, leading the Berlin Philharmonic from the piano in a recording of Mozart Concertos, and his own orchestra in Chopin's two concertos. Superlative reviews. - The article, however was short and mostly unreferenced, and turned out to have been copied from the Hungarian Music Onformation Center. Took some time to fix that, especially on vacation. The best obit - in German - appeared only today. More detail possible - there's a complete list of recordings in Hungarian - but other tasks waiting. As always, help welcome. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:45, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Vladimir Kuroyedov

[edit]
Article: Vladimir Kuroyedov (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://ria.ru/20260205/rossiya-2072556019.html
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Aside from needing to cite the awards section the article seems good enough. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:24, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support article looks good enough. Scuba 17:01, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) New START

[edit]
Article: New START (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The expiry of the New START makes Russia–United States relations without any nuclear arms reduction treaties for the first time since 1972. (Post)
Alternative blurb: New START, the last active nuclear arms reduction treaty between the United States and Russia, expires.
News source(s): CNN, The Associated Press, Reuters
Credits:

Article needs updating

 UCinternational (talk) 13:34, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Added ALT1, which is more direct and relies less on the whole "first time since YYYY" thing that gets significant pushback at ITN (nevermind that the Russian Federation didn't exist in 1972, so all sources declare this to be the first time, period). Departure– (talk) 14:04, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose We are in a new era in which neither Putin nor Trump can be relied on to observe any treaty, and Trump in particular, has been tearing up lots of them lately. Because of their actions, other powers such as Germany are now contemplating getting nuclear weapons. So, this particular expiry seems a small detail compared to the overall assessment of the scientists who set the Doomsday Clock to its most advanced setting recently. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:04, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A treaty expires is not really a news, only what happened afterwards that is noteworthy enough is. NotKringe (talk) 14:54, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a random treaty randomly expiring and plentiful top-tier WP:RS coverage tells something very different. Prototyperspective (talk) 23:53, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose – AlexeyKhrulev did a nice job expanding the article, but it doesn't feel quite quality enough yet. Doing a quick Google News search, it looks like ITNSIGNIF is easily met. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 15:50, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    More specifically, there's four citation-neededs, one clarify, and one 'unreliable source?'. I just changed a whole section to past tense, but that section probably requires some updates based on new information. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 09:15, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Is this the start of new nuclear arms race (Nuclear arms race#Post–Cold War)? Perhaps. But while a treaty expiring is news, it is isn't significant in and of itself. As the significance here entirely relies on WP:CRYSTAL what nows. If the treaty was violated or otherwise terminated out of process, its termination then would be significant news itself but that is not the case here. Gotitbro (talk) 18:58, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I would like to object to opposes based on WP:CRYSTAL. It is policy, but only regarding article contents. If the world media is into some inane feeding frenzy over what proves to be a nothingburger, and we share the FACT up front that they are into silly speculation, there is no WP policy violation. The only embarrassment on our end is that we encouraged clickbait trash. ~2026-81816-3 (talk) 23:27, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support when properly updated, the expiration of a treaty can be just as fitting to be posted on ITN as the signing of the treaty itself. I see no CRYSTAL in saying that the treaty has ceased. --GhostStalker (Got a present for ya! / Mission Log) 23:31, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support – definitely ITN worthy and the article is in good enough shape. Prototyperspective (talk) 23:51, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: this is now featured in German Wikipedia's ITN and made it there very quickly as many editors understood the notability. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:11, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Altblurb for conciseness. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Altblurb - Definitely significant and notable enough to be ITN. Also agree with GhostStalker that there is no WP:CRYSTAL in saying that this treaty has expired. ***Eliza*** (talk) 09:19, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Ongoing: Masalit genocide

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Masalit genocide (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Should be added in parentheses with Sudan war. This article was changed to "genocide" relatively recently, and I believe any ongoing genocide should be on the front page, similar to how the Gaza genocide was. I want the second Darfur genocide page up instead, but it is of lower quality. Also, sorry I wasn't sure what date to put an ongoing event on. Pencilceaser123 (talk) 00:37, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose only two edits this year. Greedycell (talk) 00:49, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for several reasons. The topic is not receiving coverage in the news and the article has no substantial updates in almost 2 months so fails WP:ITNSIGNIF. The "Masalit genocide" also does not have scholarly recognition, and has so far not been added to List of genocides. The article is currently orange tagged although that could be easily fixed. Finally, the Gaza genocide is still ongoing but was removed from ITN, so that comparison doesn't work. EvansHallBear (talk) 00:57, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – The Gaza genocide article wasn't added to ongoing because any ongoing genocide should be on the front page, it was because it was frequently updated. I anticipate a WP:SNOW close. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 01:00, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

February 4

[edit]

(Closed) CIA World Factbook

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: The World Factbook (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The C.I.A. World Factbook is abruptly terminated. (Post)
News source(s): ABC, AP, The Atlantic, CNN, Indian Express, NPR, NYT,
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: I was browsing an RFC about an archive site when I came across this news, which is quite a shock. As encyclopedists, we have a special interest in such sources. I read the other day that paperbacks are vanishing too and so we are entering the world of Fahrenheit 451. "It was a pleasure to burn.Andrew🐉(talk) 09:01, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The word "abruptly" indicates that no notice was given. The reporting states that this has been disruptive for users who have relied on this source. This is not a POV; it's a relevant fact. As for the other issue, the point is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. People who read encyclopedias are likely to be interested in other such reference works too, whether they edit or just read them. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:26, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Lee Hamilton

[edit]
Article: Lee Hamilton (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Washington Post
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: US Representative, Vice-Chair of the 9/11 Commission. Article has orange tag. Goosedukeee (talk) 18:53, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose multiple orange tags. Scuba 17:00, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Mickey Lolich

[edit]
Article: Mickey Lolich (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [21]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

 Greedycell (talk) 18:53, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support besides the sports trivia, the actual biographical information in the article looks good. Scuba 17:01, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Elizabeth Kelly

[edit]
Article: Elizabeth Kelly (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [22]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: English actress Omelettemaker (talk) 16:37, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support Article is of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 11:38, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no citations in the Filmography. Scuba 16:59, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: John Virgo

[edit]
Article: John Virgo (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News The Independent
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: English snooker commentator and professional snooker player. ItsShandog (talk) 09:47, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support absolute hero of mine. Absolutely distraught. Will hopefully get some more work done on it over the next couple of days in addition Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:54, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Ongoing: Olympics

[edit]
Article: Chronological summary of the 2026 Winter Olympics (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Curling starts inside 12 hours, although the official opening is friday for the blurb. Psephguru (talk) 06:09, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose (for now) — Let's post a blurb for the opening ceremony. If that blurb rolls off before the Games end, then I think an ongoing entry would be warranted, but for now I don't see a need. DecafPotato (talk) 06:30, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait The Olympics are typically an ongoing item and it is listed at ITN/R (The Olympics, as the world's leading multi-day multi-sport event, is accepted as an appropriate "ongoing" entry.), but we should wait until after the opening ceremony, as that is the official start of the Games. Additionally the ongoing item should just be 2026 Winter Olympics, not this other article. Natg 19 (talk) 07:45, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's better to have 2026 Winter Olympics as the target article. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 08:34, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Chronology has the updates.Psephguru (talk) 10:50, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@MtPenguinMonster Another way to do it is to link the Olympics main page and then this summary in parentheses Thedevilif (talk) 14:00, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds reasonable. How was it during the paris games? Psephguru (talk) 07:31, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Wait - Lets wait until the opening ceremony blurb rolls off. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:37, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Technically yes, but officially no. The Games begin at the opening ceremony, though for scheduling reasons there are events earlier than that. Natg 19 (talk) 00:24, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
There's already been major events, such as yesterday's Canada-Czechia curling match. I'm not sure why waiting 24 hours for an ongoing makes much difference, unless we think the Olympics may be cancelled or something. It's all over the news right now. It's front pages of major papers here today, and at least one of them yesterday. Nfitz (talk) 19:14, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support propsal of EvansHallBear. The main article looks good enough to be added as ongoing, given that it will plenty of updates as the games go on. V. L. Mastikosa (talk) 02:35, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I think ongoing should be added when games begin, before the Opening Ceremony. I know that is a minority opinion but there are events happening now.
Omnifalcon (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment there is a proposal to withdrawl this ongoing item at the subheader Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates#Winter Olympics (temporary Ongoing removal). Departure– (talk) 04:17, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: