Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.

  • Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
  • Offer a correction if possible.
  • References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
  • Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 18:02 on 23 February 2024) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
  • Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
  • Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems, because this is not a talk page. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
  • No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
  • Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
  • Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed, determined not to be an error, or the item has rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.

Errors in the summary of the featured article[edit]

Please do not remove this invisible timestamp. See WT:ERRORS and WP:SUBSCRIBE. - Dank (push to talk) 01:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Today's FA[edit]

Tomorrow's FA[edit]

Day-after-tomorrow's FA[edit]

Errors with "In the news"[edit]

  • Odysseus appears to be borderline WP:EGG. Per article's lead, IM-1 is a mission name rather than rover itself - the latter should be linked to Intuitive Machines Nova-C. Brandmeistertalk 10:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Agreed, plus we should avoid 'successful', the nationalism and the gendered term. I suggest a substantial rewrite:
    • Modest Genius talk 11:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • I would have been more in favor of the blurb that omitted the company name. Spaceflight goals such as reaching the Moon (even if we have done so before) ought to be considered achievements of humanity rather than achievements of a private company. Few remember that the Apollo lunar lander was a Grumman vehicle. Duly signed, WaltClipper -(talk) 13:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Alt1: The Odysseus robotic lander of the IM-1 mission performs the first commercial soft Moon landing. Schwede66 15:14, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • LGTM. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • That's OK with me, except I would prefer 'soft lunar landing' or 'soft landing on the Moon'. The Moon itself is not soft. Otherwise, this version is fine. Modest Genius talk 16:05, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • I went with this suggestion, except I fixed a redirect and added pictured. No objections to further tweaking, but it seemed like there was broad agreement that something like this is an improvement over the status quo. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
        • This significant of a change to a blurb should have been discussed at ITNC. ERRORS is for small adjustments to blurbs. (Getting rid of the company being American for example is an issue). --Masem (t) 18:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
          • Particularly now that I realized the target article has changed too. (Though its quality is not really at issue). --Masem (t) 18:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Errors in "Did you know ..."[edit]

Current DYK[edit]

  • "... that the horned sungem (example pictured) becomes a nectar robber when food is scarce?"

While the source states that nectar robbing "may serve as an important food supply for H. bilophus in a period of scarcity of floral resources", I don't see where it states that the bird only becomes a nectar robber in those circumstances. Fram (talk) 14:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Next DYK[edit]

Next-but-one DYK[edit]

Errors in "On this day"[edit]

Today's OTD[edit]

Tomorrow's OTD[edit]

Day-after-tomorrow's OTD[edit]

Errors in the summary of the featured list[edit]

Friday's FL[edit]

(February 23, today)

Monday's FL[edit]

(February 26)

Errors in the summary of the featured picture[edit]

Today's POTD[edit]

Tomorrow's POTD[edit]

Any other Main Page errors[edit]

Please report any such problems or suggestions for improvement at the General discussion section of Talk:Main Page.