Wikipedia:Media copyright questions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Media copyright questions

    Welcome to the Media Copyright Questions page, a place for help with image copyrights, tagging, non-free content, and related questions. For all other questions please see Wikipedia:Questions.

    How to add a copyright tag to an existing image
    1. On the description page of the image (the one whose name starts File:), click Edit this page.
    2. From the page Wikipedia:File copyright tags, choose the appropriate tag:
      • For work you created yourself, use one of the ones listed under the heading "For image creators".
      • For a work downloaded from the internet, please understand that the vast majority of images from the internet are not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. Exceptions include images from flickr that have an acceptable license, images that are in the public domain because of their age or because they were created by the United States federal government, or images used under a claim of fair use. If you do not know what you are doing, please post a link to the image here and ask BEFORE uploading it.
      • For an image created by someone else who has licensed their image under an acceptable Creative Commons or other free license, or has released their image into the public domain, this permission must be documented. Please see Requesting copyright permission for more information.
    3. Type the name of the tag (e.g.; {{Cc-by-4.0}}), not forgetting {{ before and }} after, in the edit box on the image's description page.
    4. Remove any existing tag complaining that the image has no tag (for example, {{untagged}})
    5. Hit Publish changes.
    6. If you still have questions, go on to "How to ask a question" below.
    How to ask a question
    1. To ask a new question hit the "Click here to start a new discussion" link below.
    2. Please sign your question by typing ~~~~ at the end.
    3. Check this page for updates, or request to be notified on your talk page.
    4. Don't include your email address, for your own privacy. We will respond here and cannot respond by email.
    Note for those replying to posted questions

    If a question clearly does not belong on this page, reply to it using the template {{mcq-wrong}} and, if possible, leave a note on the poster's talk page. For copyright issues relevant to Commons where questions arising cannot be answered locally, questions may be directed to Commons:Commons:Village pump/Copyright.

    Click here to purge this page
    (For help, see Wikipedia:Purge)

    Originality of the Love & Loss Sculpture[edit]

    While going through Category:Non-free files with orphaned versions I noticed File:Love & Loss by Roy McMakin, Seattle.jpg, which is a photo of a sculpture of a red ampersand (& symbol). It seems to me like that would fail to meet the threshold of originality, and we could mark this image as free. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 12:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    The Quirky Kitty, the amount of creativity necessary to pass TOO is pretty minimal, so I don't think we can definitively say this fails it. That said, I have serious doubts about whether the work is notable to start with, so it may not matter in any case as the article may need to be deleted. Seraphimblade Talk to me 09:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Originality of File:MNRK Music Group.svg[edit]

    I also found File:MNRK Music Group.svg which is probably below the threshold of originality but I figured to ask here for a second opinion first. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 12:57, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Agreed that this does not pass the Best Western test. I've changed the license to {{PD-textlogo}} accordingly. Seraphimblade Talk to me 09:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Thanks. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 09:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Archived newspaper copyright question[edit]

    I've been researching Tracey Emin's 'My Bed', and recently came across a picture I hadn't seen before, on this website

    The picture is a scan from a 1999 'The Gaurdian' article covering the event where two men jumped on the artpeice. The wikipedia page for the bed contains a description of this same event, but it and the rest of the internet are lacking the image.

    I thought it would be a good idea to make an account and add the image, but im currently unsure on what the rules are for images like this, as from what I can find, some sources are saying small parts of larger articles, atleast in the UK, are ok? but maybe not? I am a bit out of my depth and would appreciate some guidance on this, thanks ! 100fish (talk) 06:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    100fish, what use would you plan for the image? While we do allow some use of nonfree content, its use is quite strictly limited. If you could be more specific about what article you might foresee this being used in and why, it would help in evaluating if your proposed use might pass those criteria or not. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:LouisTikas.jpg public domain?[edit]

    This file is marked as nonfree. However, as Tikas died on 20 April 1914, and this photo depicts him alive, it must clearly have been taken on or before that date. While its exact source is not known, would anyone see a reason not to mark this as {{PD-old}} due to its obvious age? Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Yes:
    1. It can't be stated that the photographer has been dead for more than 100 years if the photographer is not known.
    2. The photo doesn't look like a selfie.
    3. It fails PD-old-assumed.
    4. The publication history is not known.
    -- Asclepias (talk) 14:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    The question came up at the FAC for George Griffith a few months ago. Both File:H.G. Wells by Beresford.jpg and the cropped version File:H.G. Wells by Beresford (cropped).jpg are tagged as being public domain due to the author George Charles Beresford having died in 1938 and the photograph being published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) prior to 1929. I have been unable to track down the publication history. The cropped version used to appear on the George Griffith article; the FAC issue was resolved by simply removing it from the article. Nevertheless, the uncropped version is used rather heavily across various Wikimedia projects, so we should probably try to get this resolved. TompaDompa (talk) 10:16, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    The image is hosted on Commons, so any resolution will need to be done there. I suggest you raise this issue at c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright. -- Whpq (talk) 19:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    For future reference, I did. See here. TompaDompa (talk) 17:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Congress.gov bio[edit]

    I'm curious on the copyright status of a biography pubished at congress.gov here. There is no copyright statement on the document, and it is unclear as to the author. Should I assume that it is copyrighted, or assume that it is a Federal US document? Bilby (talk) 11:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    What is the page (URL) on the web site where you found this? I suspect it's PD, but it is useful to be able to look at the page where it came from for any additional information. -- Whpq (talk) 19:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Thanks, but sadly I don't have a separate page. I'm asking because I came acorss David Halperin (political advocate), which is a straight copy and paste of the bio on congress.gov. My initial reaction was to be safe and assume copyvio, but given that US Government material is often PD I thought I'd dig further. - Bilby (talk) 02:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    NVDA logo copyright question[edit]

    I'd like to add NVDA's logo to the NonVisual Desktop Access article's infobox, but I'm unsure of the copyright restrictions. The logo can be found on this page.

    I thought I'd ask here first rather than just doing it in case it's not classed as fair use or something. KaraLG84 (talk) 14:56, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    It's borderline, but my take is that it is too simple for copyright and could be tagged {{PD-textlogo}}. -- Whpq (talk) 19:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Thanks. I take it I'd be ok to upload it to Wikimedia Commons? KaraLG84 (talk) 08:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Yes, you can upload it to Commons. If they determine it is actually copyrightble, then you can upload it here as a non-free logo instead. -- Whpq (talk) 17:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Kobe Bryant autobiograpy book cover[edit]

    I have attempted to add the official book cover to the The Mamba Mentality: How I Play article as other book pages have. It was removed by JJMC89 bot claiming "No valid non-free use rationale". Is there a way to properly upload this image? Kbill98(talk) 13:53, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Per WP:NFCC#10c, you need to provide the specific article on which the image is to be used. File:Cover of book Mamba Mentality.webp has a non-free usage rationale that claims it is to be used in the article Kobe Bryant. You need to change that to the book article. -- Whpq (talk) 19:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Kbill98: you also need a better source, your draft page is not where you got the image from. Nthep (talk) 20:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Based on suggestions from @Whpq and @Nthep, I did the following, and I hope gets us out of the Catch-22:
    1. In the non-free rationale template I changed the source to the publisher's page.
    2. I changed the template's article field to the book-specific article instead of the target of the earlier redirect.
    3. I added the image back into the book article's infobox.
    3. I removed the orphan tags from the image's page. -Reagle (talk) 15:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    [edit]

    Birds of the World, an online database published by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, has a logo that is pretty clearly PD-textlogo (it's just the words Birds of the World) [1]. However the logo is seemingly never separated from the Cornell Lab logo, which can only be fair use because of the bird in the logo (File:Cornell_Lab_of_Ornithology_logo.svg). Can the text be separated out to make it public domain and usable in Birds of the World (currently in this draft)? Reconrabbit 17:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    If Cornell does not the use words only in any logo, then you should not separate out the text because that would be a misrepresentation of the logo. -- Whpq (talk) 17:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Book cover photo for Maid by Stephanie Land[edit]

    Hi, I am new, so I am sorry if I do not use correct terminology. I created a new page for Stephanie Land's book Maid. Here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maid_(book) I uploaded the cover of the book following all instructions for using a copyrighted image under Fair Use. I provided the non-free book cover rationale when uploading the image. On Sunday, I received a bot message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cyborgwriter#c-B-bot-20240225184000-Orphaned_non-free_image_File%3AMaid_Cover.webp Does this mean I should try to upload the cover again? Thank you for your help. Cyborgwriter (talk) 23:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    @Cyborgwriter I think the problem was that in this version [2] you didn't add the rationale in way the bot recognized (and it was a little short on detail). But afaict, in this version [3] you did, so everything should be ok now, image-wise. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]