This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump.
The New Page Review training program is designed to help new and/or inexperienced users who wish to assist with maintenance tasks to understand the basic principles of reviewing new pages on Wikipedia, and to provide one-on-one help in the use of the New Pages Feed and its curation toolbar.
Reviewing new pages is more than simply tagging them for maintenance or deletion – reviewers are detectives too!
Experienced Wikipedians (or trainers in this instance) can "adopt" newer users, mentoring them along the way as they learn how to review new pages. It is hoped that this program will be able to inform new users about the ins and outs of deletion and notability and steer them away from making errors in the use of the tools and tags. If you are looking to contribute to Wikipedia but do not intend to remain active on New Page Review, then this program is probably not for you.
Users who are less experienced – but who would still like to help maintain the quality of the encyclopedia might like to consider Patrolling Vandalism instead – an essential function that requires less knowledge of Notability Guidelines and Deletion. For training on Counter vandalism, see WP:CVUA.
Find a user who is in your time zone and leave a message on their talk page to request training. If you don't receive a reply within 48 hours, please choose another trainer.
Learning about reviewing new pages is easy and fun. If you'd like an experienced user to show you how, simply choose an active trainer from the list who is in your time zone and leave a message on their talk page.
Your chosen trainer should share your interests so that they can comfortably assist you while you learn under their tutelage. For more information on what you will be expected to learn, first visit the pages at WP:NPP and WP:DELETION.
If you are an experienced user and have time to devote to being a trainer, visit the Trainers' resources section where you will find the minimum requirement for trainers, recommended practice, and teaching suggestions and examples. You may then wish to add yourself to the list of active trainers taking note of the page source comments.
You will be interested to know that occasionally some candidates for training may be university professors taking part in the Wikipedia Education Program
If you're new and/or inexperienced, before embarking on a New Page Review training programme, you should be able to demonstrate that you have already mastered the basic principles of editing the encyclopedia and contributed at least 1,000 edits to MAINSPACE.
When you have shown through training that you have mastered the principles of New Page Review and can apply them with accuracy, and are able to communicate correctly and effectively with new users of all kinds you will be contributing to what is one of the most important maintenance tasks on Wikipedia, while understanding that speed alone is not essential – the target is accuracy. When you have achieved these goals, you can display the User New Page Patrol userbox on your user page.
Not currently available due to time consuming commitments on other Wikipedia projects
Trainers' resources (for trainers only)
This page is about instruction methods in the CVUA. For resources you can use in your CVUA Teachings, see WP:CVUA/R.
While each trainer and each student will have different levels of interest and different lessons based on which tools and techniques will be used, it is important that each graduate understands and can effectively perform each of these essential tasks:
How to identify vandalism (and what is not vandalism)
How to restore the pre-vandalized version of the article
How to appropriately use warning templates (including their substitution)
How to report persistent vandals
Trainers are responsible for:
Building a relationship of trust with your student
Ensuring the student has read and understands the relevant policies
Maintaining checks on reverts of vandalism and good faith edits and only warning users where applicable. Comment on both the student and incorrectly warned user about the incorrect reverts.
Ensuring that up-to-date policies and guidelines are taught.
Requesting tool access
The developer of the STiki counter vandalism tool informed may entertain special requests on Wikipedia talk:STiki for their students to have access to the tool. The developer's decision is final. If the request is approved, instructors need to continually monitor their student's use of the tool and make comments where necessary. Lesson plans, tests, quizzes, and more.
It is recommended to create student's own "academy page", as a subpage of your talk, i.e. User talk:Example/CVUA/Example.
You are free to teach however you like – the goal is that the student will have demonstrated knowledge and use of all the points in the syllabus