|This page is an essay, containing the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. Essays are not Wikipedia policies or guidelines. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.||
|This page in a nutshell: There are other places for potentially useful or valuable content which is not appropriate for Wikipedia.|
|It has been suggested that Wikipedia:Other projects similar to Wikipedia be merged into this page. (Discuss)|
When content (text, pages, images, etc.) is deleted, various policies and guidelines such as "Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not", notability, verifiability and our prohibition on original research are often cited as reasons the material does not belong here, in an encyclopedia, and rightly so. Unfortunately, this is not particularly helpful or calming to the person(s) who put in time and effort to write the material. They often see it as their hard work being casually tossed away. The phrase "try another wiki" is also sometimes used, for similar intent.
In an effort to foster general spirit of collegiality, this page provides some referrals to alternative outlets which do allow content that Wikipedia does not. Sometimes material is submitted that is perfectly factual and verifiable, but simply outside of the scope of Wikipedia. Just because the content does not belong here does not mean it does not have value, and it is worth preserving valuable free content if we can.
Please consider directing people to these sites (or this page), rather than simply telling them that their contributions are WP:NOT wanted.
For example, Wikipedia contains a significant amount of information about the "Star Wars" media franchise, but for an even more detailed treatment, try Wookieepedia—a wiki dedicated to the "Star Wars universe". Similarly, information on the "Star Trek" franchise can be found at Memory Alpha. JurisPedia focuses on legal topics, and WikiWikiWeb is the oldest wiki. There also are wikis devoted to specific languages or localities that may be more appropriate for a given topic.
There may be legal or ethical restrictions on the copying of content from Wikipedia to other sites. It is up to individual contributors to familiarize themselves with the procedures and policies of other outlets and to examine their licensing arrangements, which may differ from Wikipedia in significant ways.
Free media repository
Wiki software development
Wikimedia project coordination
Free textbooks and manuals
Free knowledge base
Collection of quotations
Directory of species
Free learning materials and activities
Free travel guide
Dictionary and thesaurus
There are Wikipedia articles, lists, and categories which provide information on other wikis:
This page also has links to external sites which provide similar information.
Directory of alternatives
|NOTICE: The presence of a third-party site does not constitute an endorsement by the Wikimedia Foundation or the Wikipedia community. See the general disclaimer for more information.|
The above is more than an arbitrary list of sites. Sister projects in the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) are preferred. Failing that, sites should meet some combination of the following criteria to be listed:
- Policies consistent with the spirit of WMF goals
- Allow content to be moved over verbatim (e.g., CC BY-SA-compatible or GFDL-compatible)
- A wiki, or like a wiki
- Notable in some way (preferably as a link to an existing Wikipedia article)
Content (text, images, etc.) Text submitted to Wikipedia is required to be licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA); Media submitted to Wikipedia is required to be licensed under the terms of the CC BY-SA or a similar free license. Other sites (especially non-WMF sites) may require a different license. Do not copy content from Wikipedia to other sites unless you are sure the licenses are compatible. If they are not, try contacting the copyright holder of the content to obtain permission to re-license the content. Typically the user who submitted the content to Wikipedia in the first place is the copyright holder. Check the page's edit history to help identify the user.
For CC BY-SA content being deleted from Wikipedia, the edit history should also be copied or preserved in some way. For example, if the target site uses talk pages in the style of Wikipedia, copy the edit history there.
For more information, see: Reusing Wikipedia content.
- Wikipedia:Other projects similar to Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not/Outtakes (humor)
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not Google
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion
- Deletion policy
- Deletion debates
- Deletion process
- Deletion review
- Undeletion policy
- Recreation of previously deleted pages
- Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
- Common deletion outcomes
- Deletion guidelines for administrators
- Deletion review guide
- Why was my page deleted?
- Editor's index entries about deletion