Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:PUF)
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrator instructions

Contents

Shortcuts:

This page is for listing and discussing files that are marked as available under a free license or public domain, but have disputed source or licensing information. Files are listed here for 7 days before they are processed. Files that are tagged with a non-free template should not be listed here.

To list texts with copyright issues, please use WP:Copyright problems.

Instructions[edit]

Before listing, remember that files which are already marked unfree and used under fair use should not be listed here.

To list a file on this page:

I
Edit the file page.

Add {{puf|date=6 February 2016}} to the file page.

II
Create its PUF subsection.

Follow this edit link and list the file using {{subst:puf2|image=File_name.ext|reason=reason}} ~~~~ (remember to exclude the File: prefix).

III
Give due notice.

Inform the uploader by adding a message to their talk page using {{subst:fdw-puf|File_name.ext}} ~~~~

If the image is in use, also consider adding {{pufc|File_name.ext|date=6 February 2016}} to the caption(s), or adding a notice to the article talk pages. Consider also notifying relevant WikiProjects of the discussion.

Remember to replace "File_name.ext" with the name of the file

Unlike Wikipedia:Files for discussion, the primary purpose of this page is to ascertain the source and/or copyright status of a file. Therefore it is not specifically a vote to keep or delete but a forum for the exploration of the copyright status/source of a file and contributions should not be added solely in those terms.

Listings should be processed by an administrator after being listed for 7 days. Files that are accepted following this 7-day period should have {{oldpuffull}} added to the file talk page. If no objection to the file's deletion is raised, or no proof that the file is indeed free is provided, the file may be deleted without further notice after the 7-day period.

Note: Files can be unlisted immediately if they are indisputably in the public domain or verifiably licensed under an indisputably free license (GFDL, CC-BY-SA, etc.—see Wikipedia:File copyright tags for more on these).

Speedy deletion[edit]

Blatant copyright violations or files missing source or license information may be "speedied"

If a file is unquestionably copied from another website and no assertion of permission or fair use is made, the file may be speedy deleted under criterion F9 (formerly I9). Such files do not need to be listed here. Please tag the file with {{subst:db-f9|url=source URL}} and warn the user with {{db-imgcopyvio-notice}}.

If a file is missing source, evidence of permission, or license information, place either use:

or

on the description page to put the file in the appropriate category. After being tagged for 7 days, the file will be eligible for speedy deletion per criterion 4 or criterion 11 for images/media.

Please also notify the uploader so they get a chance to fix the problem(s). The templates {{subst:File source|File:file name}} and {{image copyright}} are made for this purpose, but feel free to write a message of your own. It is not necessary to warn the uploader about every individual file if they have uploaded several of such files, but at least one message telling them that files without source/license will be deleted should be given to each user.

If a file is indisputably non-free, and its possible use can comply with our non-free content policy, be bold and retag it as a non-free file using a non-free image tag instead of taking it to this page.

Please note that this page is not for disputing the fair use of already non-free media, but for the disputing if a freely licensed file really is free. Please take queries of this nature to Files for discussion. An archiving system was implemented July 2007. For older discussions, see the history pages. For all discussions from July 3, 2007 forward, see the Archive.

Holding cell[edit]

These files have been listed for at least 7 days. Discussions should be closed following the steps here. Files that have been determined to be acceptable may be removed from this page.

New listings[edit]

January 30[edit]

File:Mohammad Moustafa Haddara.jpg[edit]

File:Mohammad Moustafa Haddara.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Photographer unknown. Sourced to {{somewebsite}} (offline) without evidence that the website's contents was freely licensed. Recherchedienst (talk) 04:08, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
    Seems to me like it comes from http://www.alriyadh.com/191044, which is "All rights reserved" and probably the image there does not come from Wikipedia, also because of the timestamps. The "source" there is just a link to a Google search. So delete would be my recommendation.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:15, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

File:JimmyStewartStatute.jpg[edit]

File:JimmyStewartStatute.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Derivative work, No information on sculptor given. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

File:PunxyStatues.jpg[edit]

File:PunxyStatues.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Derivative work, No information on sculptor(s) of subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:18, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

File:OglebayWinterFestival.jpg[edit]

File:OglebayWinterFestival.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Possible derivative work (lighting design), No information on creator of subject work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:19, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Monstaa Piranhas.jpg[edit]

File:Monstaa Piranhas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This is clearly an album cover:) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:23, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Sula vineyards sun.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G12 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 00:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Sula vineyards sun.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Similarly named files from same account recently deleted on Commons for copyright issues (c:User talk:Finivino1000). Metadata does list copyright holder. Unclear if uploader had ownership or permission to grant CC0. Murph9000 (talk) 12:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:St Lukes Church Smithfield VA.jpg[edit]

File:St Lukes Church Smithfield VA.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • The summary claims that this image is taken from "US Park Service" materials on its National Register of Historic Places assessment. The image isn't included in the photos attached to the church's NRHP nomination, though, so it's unclear where this image comes from. Since images created while documenting sites for the NRHP are often created by private citizens (despite a common misconception that they're all PD works of the National Park Service), it's not clear that this image was actually created by a government employee. There's no publication date given for the image, so it's unclear whether it would be PD based on that either. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 16:00, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep. If you look at the file history, you'll see the telltale HABS borders in the original upload. This is HABS VA,47-SMIF.V,1--9, so not a copyright problem. Normally I'd say "delete because this image, or a better version of the same original, is already on Commons", but I can't find this one on Commons; it's not in Commons:Category:St. Luke's Church (Smithfield, Virginia) or any other place that I thought to check. Nyttend (talk) 05:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
  • I can't find this on Commons either, so I uploaded the file there and overwrote it with a higher resolution copy from the souce Nyttend found. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

File:MAZUMDAR SHAW MEDICAL FOUNDATION logo.png[edit]

File:MAZUMDAR SHAW MEDICAL FOUNDATION logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Nothing on the linked website suggests that this is in the public domain. Stefan2 (talk) 18:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

File:DigeaNetwork.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by GiantSnowman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 12:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:DigeaNetwork.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • The colour effect probably makes this too complex for the copyright tag used. Stefan2 (talk) 18:14, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MikkelCoffee.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by GiantSnowman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 12:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:MikkelCoffee.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 18:15, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PrometheusGas.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by GiantSnowman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 12:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:PrometheusGas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • The flame looks too complex for the copyright tag used. Stefan2 (talk) 18:15, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MarinopoulosMarket.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by GiantSnowman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 12:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:MarinopoulosMarket.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This is a logo of a Greek supermarket chain. It is unlikely that the logo designer was employed by the United States Government. Stefan2 (talk) 18:16, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
    True, but I think it works fine as {{Non-free logo}}. Thus suggesting to turn into a non-free image.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

January 31[edit]

File:RedArrowYJ.jpg[edit]

File:RedArrowYJ.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This one seems to be a derivative work of an animated series, not something that the uploader could license as GFDL Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Collective Logo Black RGB.jpg[edit]

File:Collective Logo Black RGB.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This is a higher quality version of File:Camden Collective.jpg, which I uploaded as a non-free logo per WP:NFCC. The uploader has tagged the work as CC-BY-SA, stating that they are the copyright holder. However, a similar logo appears on the organization's official website, and there is no evidence that this logo is available under the selected free license, or that the uploader is, in fact, the copyright holder. If this can't be established, I recommend converting the file description to a non-free one. Mz7 (talk) 19:06, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

February 1[edit]

File:Planet 9 Art.jpg[edit]

File:Planet 9 Art.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Fort Rocasoli - middle center.png[edit]

File:Fort Rocasoli - middle center.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This is a painting that was most likely not created by the uploader, and is thus most likely a derivative work. To validate if this file can be released as a free image, the author, date of creation, and country of origin of the painting would have to be known. Steel1943 (talk) 21:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Maltese harbours - artist impression on an antique art.png[edit]

File:Maltese harbours - artist impression on an antique art.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This is a painting that was most likely not created by the uploader, and is thus most likely a derivative work. To validate if this file can be released as a free image, the author, date of creation, and country of origin of the painting would have to be known. Steel1943 (talk) 21:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2[edit]

File:Geoffrey Kiddle of Hinckley Permanent Building Society.jpg[edit]

File:Geoffrey Kiddle of Hinckley Permanent Building Society.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Unclear if the picture is actually in public domain. Leyo 01:51, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Flag Map of County Durham.png[edit]

File:Flag Map of County Durham.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:NIHMS254842-supplement-data fig8a.png[edit]

File:NIHMS254842-supplement-data fig8a.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

February 3[edit]

File:Maida ND 2013.jpg[edit]

File:Maida ND 2013.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • "Source: Internal project documentation" is insufficient to prove the {{PD-USGov}} license. Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 05:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Additional information: This photo was taken by AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc, a US Govt. contractor, and was delivered to the US Government (DHS and GSA) in its August 21, 2013 Monthly Status Report (MSR). This report, and its contents, are government property and therefore are in the public domain. I have added clarification to the photo details.Wbaron (talk) 04:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Symbol question.svg Question: (Also about the other files listed on this page that have the same "Source: Internal project documentation" origin) - does PD-USGov apply to a contractor? My impression was that it only applies to directly government made works, unless the terms of the contract imply that the works by the contractor may not be copyrighted.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:42, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

That example doesn't really relate because it was a photo of an artistic creation. In this case, the photographer was paid by the government to produce the report which contains the photo of a govermnent building. The government owns the report and has the right to use its contents in other documents it produces, which therefore renders the material in the public domain.Wbaron (talk) 03:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

In that example, the artist who made the artistic creation was a government contractor. Since he was a contractor as opposed to an employee, the artistic creation wasn't covered by PD-USGov, and it was therefore not permitted to use a photo of the artistic creation on stamps without permission from the artist. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:PR Migration 1995-2000.jpg[edit]

File:PR Migration 1995-2000.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Sarles ND border station.jpg[edit]

File:Sarles ND border station.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • "Source: Internal project documentation" is insufficient to prove the {{PD-USGov}} license. Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 05:27, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Additional information: This photo was taken by AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc, a US Govt. contractor, and was delivered to the US Government (DHS and GSA) in its October 16, 2013 Monthly Status Report (MSR). This report, and its contents, are government property and therefore are in the public domain. I have added clarification to the photo details.Wbaron (talk) 04:48, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Neche ND 2013.jpg[edit]

File:Neche ND 2013.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • "Source: Internal project documentation" is insufficient to prove the {{PD-USGov}} license. Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 05:28, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Additional information: This photo was taken by AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc, a US Govt. contractor, and was delivered to the US Government (DHS and GSA) in its June 12, 2013 Monthly Status Report (MSR). This report, and its contents, are government property and therefore are in the public domain.Wbaron (talk) 04:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

File:MOH William G. Harrell.JPG[edit]

File:MOH William G. Harrell.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Dreddup2004.jpg[edit]

File:Dreddup2004.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Low resolution and lack of EXIF make self-work claim doubtful. Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 05:51, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Dreddup2003.jpg[edit]

File:Dreddup2003.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Low-resolution and lack of EXIF make self-work claim doubtful. Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 05:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

File:DreDDup Abnormal Waltz 1998.jpg[edit]

File:DreDDup Abnormal Waltz 1998.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • "Orifginal (sic) artwork I made for dreDDup in 1998." - If the uploader made this artwork for the band as a commercial deal, then the band likely owns the copyright. No evidence that the uploader has the authority to release the image under a free license. Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 05:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

File:DreDDup Mr Borndeads Feast 2005.jpg[edit]

File:DreDDup Mr Borndeads Feast 2005.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • "Artwork for dreDDup album cover I made with the help of 91 Design team." - If the uploader made this artwork for the band as a commercial deal, then the band likely owns the copyright. No evidence that the uploader has the authority to release the image under a free license. Image is orphaned so I can't convert it to fair use as I did with a similar upload. Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 05:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

File:DreDDup One Way 2005.jpg[edit]

File:DreDDup One Way 2005.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • "Artwork created by Aleksandar Krajovan and modified for the publishing by me." - No evidence that uploader has sufficient authority over the copyright of this image to release it under a free license. Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 05:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

File:DreDDup Future Porn Machine 2007.jpg[edit]

File:DreDDup Future Porn Machine 2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • "Artwork I made in 2006 for the 2007's album release for the band dreDDup." - If the uploader made this artwork for the band as a commercial deal, then the band likely owns the copyright. No evidence that the uploader has the authority to release the image under a free license. Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 05:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Har Cheong Gai Burger.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 18:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Har Cheong Gai Burger.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This file looks like it's copied from https://www.burpple.com/f/CLHqbX19 which shows no evidence of being freely licensed. The uploader had a large amount of other uploads deleted because of licensing/copying issues. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete - no evidence of release under the claimed license. -- Whpq (talk) 15:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rojak Bandung.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 18:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Rojak Bandung.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:US container port water depths.jpeg[edit]

File:US container port water depths.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Muhur.jpg[edit]

File:Muhur.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • The red and gold image discussed at Presidential Seal of Turkey seems to be the sole Presidential Seal used [1]. Current fair use argument for this image is therefore invalid. LukeSurl t c 12:30, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:FFD. AnomieBOT 13:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
  • OK. I'm withdrawing this nomination and doing down the {{dfu}} route. --LukeSurl t c 12:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Om Banna Late.jpg[edit]

File:Om Banna Late.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

February 4[edit]

File:Deepthi kapse jwalantham photoshoot.jpg[edit]

File:Deepthi kapse jwalantham photoshoot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Jackichand playing for Salgaocar.png[edit]

File:Jackichand playing for Salgaocar.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Reagan picture.png[edit]

File:Reagan picture.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Seitya For Slagaocar.png[edit]

File:Seitya For Slagaocar.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Seaside City Arena artist rendering.jpg.png[edit]

File:Seaside City Arena artist rendering.jpg.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image is a derivative work of this copyrighted CAD generated image. Peripitus (Talk) 09:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Charlotte-eagles.jpg[edit]

File:Charlotte-eagles.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Now that the logo has been replaced (File:Charlotte_Eagles.svg), there is not a need for Wikipedia to save the old logo and the fair use rational is now invalid. LukeSurl t c 12:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Withdrawing this nomination and going down the {{dfu}} route. --LukeSurl t c 12:55, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:FFD. AnomieBOT 13:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Pranav.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 19:14, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Pranav.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Identical to image on [2]. No indication of free license on that page. LukeSurl t c 15:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
    • You seem to have created a PUF discussion at about the same time as I tagged this with {{db-f9}} citing another URL. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Two files[edit]

File:Bleached By The Sun Performing at You Year.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Bleached By The Sun Performing in 2014.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

One of the copies links to a website and there is no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder to the material on that website. Also, note that the two copies were uploaded by two different users (although one of them has redirected his talk page to the other user). --Stefan2 (talk) 16:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Lavender.png[edit]

File:Lavender.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • It says from free image site, but without knowing which site the uploader is talking about, there is no way to verify that the file is freely licensed (or even that 'free' means 'freely licensed' - it could mean something else).

The file is currently in use on User:Hrjr/sandbox, but that appears to be an error. The user who created the sandbox probably meant to include a different file with the same name on Commons. Stefan2 (talk) 16:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

File:MOH George D. Keathley.JPG[edit]

File:MOH George D. Keathley.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:MOH Eli L. Whiteley.JPG[edit]

File:MOH Eli L. Whiteley.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:MOH Lloyd H. Hughes.JPG[edit]

File:MOH Lloyd H. Hughes.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:MOH Thomas W. Fowler.JPG[edit]

File:MOH Thomas W. Fowler.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:MOH Turney W. Leonard.JPG[edit]

File:MOH Turney W. Leonard.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Allegiance tv series logo.png[edit]

File:Allegiance tv series logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • The castle/palace in the logo is non-free. Stefan2 (talk) 17:48, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

File:VanierCupMcMaster2012.jpg[edit]

File:VanierCupMcMaster2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

February 5[edit]

File:ELLIOT JAMES MULHERN.png[edit]

File:ELLIOT JAMES MULHERN.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • By the uploader's own description it's a PR image. Image was likely taken by a professional photographer. Prior publication includes here. Self-work claim doubtful. Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 00:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Sbtransitcentersketch.png[edit]

File:Sbtransitcentersketch.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Uploaded as a PD federal government work; but there is no indication of this at the source. Appears to be the work of a consultancy, possibly contracted by a local bus service. Regards, James(talk/contribs) 01:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Boy Scouts Association in India.png[edit]

File:Boy Scouts Association in India.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • There's no evidence that the copyright has expired as there is no evidence that the logo is sufficiently old. The PD claim seems to originate from Special:Diff/379344859 by Kintetsubuffalo. There are some guesses about the age of the logo in Special:Diff/703359587 by Marchjuly, but nothing definite. For the record, the logo needs to have been published before 1941 in order to be in the public domain in the United States, and before 1956 in order to be in the public domain in India. Stefan2 (talk) 02:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
    • The source given for the file in the non-free use rationales is File:Indtrim.jpg, but that is a link to a previously deleted file. Perhaps an administrator can check the source file to see if any more specific source information has been provided which might possibly help date the image. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:51, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Scott at Grammies.png[edit]

File:Scott at Grammies.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This image was "taken by Aimee Berger who shot it for me". It needs evidence of the license given, especially when it follows up as "it is a non-free image". Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Work13.jpg[edit]

File:Work13.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • It says "Copyrighted, Fair Use for Wikipedia.org" at the same time as PD-self. Not clear whether it's a fair use or a PD image. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Tim Hecker image.jpg[edit]

File:Tim Hecker image.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • No indication of copyright release. Karst (talk) 12:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:NRA Marksmanship Qualification Badges.png[edit]

File:NRA Marksmanship Qualification Badges.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Claimed as own work and licensed as public domain, this appears to be a derivative work from this document. This was identified in the original upload summary. The claim is that the booklet is public domain, but there is no indication that is public domain. The images are clear derivatives. See page 32 of the booklet. This "digital painting" appears to be the image run through photoshop filters and some cut and paste movement to straighten out the individual badges. See also Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2016 January 28#File:Painting of Gen2 Honda Ridgeline.png for another example where a similar technique was used by this uploader. Whpq (talk) 15:33, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:NRA Law Enforcement Explorer Badges.png[edit]

File:NRA Law Enforcement Explorer Badges.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Claimed as own work and licensed as public domain, this appears to be a derivative work from http://materials.nrahq.org/le-explorer-pins.html. The images are clear derivatives. This "digital painting" appears to be the image run through photoshop filters and some cut and paste movement to reduce space between badges. See also [Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2016 January 28#File:Painting of Gen2 Honda Ridgeline.png] for another example where a similar technique was used by this uploader. Whpq (talk) 15:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:CHIP Computer logo.png[edit]

File:CHIP Computer logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • I am rather dubious that the figure on the left is not original enough to be copyrightable. If it is, this can probably be kept as {{Non-free logo}} though. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Don Vaughn Daily Bruin.jpg[edit]

File:Don Vaughn Daily Bruin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Rupert for Lajong.png[edit]

File:Rupert for Lajong.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Vishal kaith in Shillong Lajong.jpg[edit]

File:Vishal kaith in Shillong Lajong.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Appears to be a professional image of a sportsperson. Uploader's date of creation provided (2016-01-22) doesn't match the EXIF (08:56, 23 January 2015). Self-work claim suspect given the other uploads being more obvious copyvios. Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 17:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Souvik in action.jpg[edit]

File:Souvik in action.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Given other uploads, lack of EXIF, and resolution, this appears to be a screenshot from a video. Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 18:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Geneva School of Diplomacy logo.png[edit]

File:Geneva School of Diplomacy logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This is the logo of this group, and it's unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder. And it is complex and original enough to be copyrightable. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

February 6[edit]

File:Wvu downtown library.jpg[edit]

File:Wvu downtown library.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • A lower resolution version of the same file is previously hosted elsewhere, for instance here. Given the uploader's history there's an indication that the copyright for these works may be held by WVU as a work for hire, rather than the uploader herself. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 01:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Wvu evansdale library.jpg[edit]

File:Wvu evansdale library.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • In light of Melissarogue's other contributions having problematic copyright issues (see this PUF and this ANI for discussion), even thought I haven't found this uploaded elsewhere, we should exercise precaution and delete this file as having questionable provenance. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 01:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Footer[edit]

Today is February 6 2016. Put new nominations in Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2016 February 6 -- (new nomination)

If the current date's page has been started without the header, apply {{subst:puf log}} to the top of the day's page.

Please ensure "===February 6===" is at the very top of the new page so that internal page links from the main Possibly unfree files page (the one you're on now) work.