Wikipedia:Peer review/Automated/December 2006

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]

Wikipedia's Peer review process exposes articles to closer scrutiny from a broader group of editors, and is intended for high-quality articles that have already undergone extensive work, often as a way of preparing a featured article candidate. It is not academic peer review by a group of experts in a particular subject, and articles that undergo this process should not be assumed to have greater authority than any other.

For general editing advice, see Wikipedia style guidelines, Wikipedia how-to, "How to write a great article", and "The perfect article". Articles that need extensive basic editing should be directed to Pages needing attention, Requests for expansion or Cleanup, and content or neutrality disputes should be listed at Requests for comment.

The path to a featured article

  1. Start a new article
  2. Research and write a great article
  3. Check against the featured article criteria
  4. Get creative feedback
    1. Automated review
  5. Apply for featured article status
  6. Featured articles

The following peer review suggestions were semi-automatically generated by a javascript code - they may or possibly may not be accurate/applicable for the article in question due to unique differences for each articles. They are provided as a supplement to manual suggestions, and generally focus on stylistic issues that peer reviewers may miss or not be aware of.

Creation procedure
Generally, the suggestions will be generated semi-automatically by User:AZPR, though all users can run the script themselves by following the instructions for installation.

How to respond to a request
Feel free to strike out issues that have already been taken care of or to respond to problems; questions about issues can be left on this page (which hopefully an editor will notice and respond to) or on the articles peer review page.

How to remove a request
Automated reviews for articles that have been closed or archived should be left on this page to keep the links organized.

How to get updated suggestions
A message can be left at here or here requesting an updated automated review, or you can install the script yourself by following instructions at User:AndyZ/peerreviewer#Installation

Notes
Please see User:AndyZ/peerreviewer/guide for additional information about specific suggestions.

Contents

Requests[edit]

J. K. Rowling[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

C. S. Lewis[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (change kms to km and lbs to lb).
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[15]
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • it has been
    • apparently
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: neighbour (B) (American: neighbor), favourite (B) (American: favorite), defence (B) (American: defense), criticize (A) (British: criticise), criticise (B) (American: criticize), ization (A) (British: isation), skeptic (A) (British: sceptic).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Barry Manilow[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Risk (game)[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • is considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

De Lorean Motor Company[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 000 mile, use 000 mile, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 000 mile.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • apparently
    • many considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Chemical series[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Delhi[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 100 km, use 100 km, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 100 km.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • are considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: neighbour (B) (American: neighbor), meter (A) (British: metre), defence (B) (American: defense), organize (A) (British: organise), organise (B) (American: organize), recognize (A) (British: recognise), recognise (B) (American: recognize), ization (A) (British: isation), enrollment (A) (British: enrolment), programme (B) (American: program ).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Martin Mattner[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata}} along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 150 kilometre, use 150 kilometre, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 150 kilometre.[8]
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), please do not link words in headings.
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: seeked (sought).
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Mini Moke[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 33 cm, use 33 cm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 33 cm.[8]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Roman-Spartan War[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.[3]
  • Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Scottish Parliament Building[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, previous [day/week/month/year] might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 36ft, use 36 ft, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 36 ft.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example, miles -> mi, kilometers squared -> km2, and pounds -> lb.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: compatability (compatibility),inital (initial),intial (initial).
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Neal Boortz[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently and yesterday might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata}} along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 12 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Stephen Barrett[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

El Greco[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, last year might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata}} along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18 cm, use 18 cm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18 cm.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.[9] Specifically, an example is 18 cm.
  • When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (change kms to km and lbs to lb).
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: organize (A) (British: organise), criticize (A) (British: criticise), ization (A) (British: isation), analyse (B) (American: analyze), traveled (A) (British: travelled), travelled (B) (American: traveled), mould (B) (American: mold).
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: emmigrated (emigrated).
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Kirby: Right Back at Ya![edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.[3]
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • it has been
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Maple[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and WP:CONTEXT.
  • Avoid including galleries in articles, as per Wikipedia:Galleries. Common solutions to this problem include moving the gallery to a separate page.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 100 cm, use 100 cm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 100 cm.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example, miles -> mi, kilometers squared -> km2, and pounds -> lb.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • is considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Charlotte Bobcats[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

The Velveteen Rabbit[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 2(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • it has been
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Enter the Wu-Tang (36 Chambers)[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • Avoid including galleries in articles, as per Wikipedia:Galleries. Common solutions to this problem include moving the gallery to a separate page.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[15]
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • it has been
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: recieved (received).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Kerr-Tar Regional Council of Governments[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and WP:CONTEXT.
  • This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 2(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.
  • This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.[11]
  • The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Balboa High School (San Francisco)[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Latter Days[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 11 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

James Kim[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata}} along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 5 miles, use 5 miles, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 5&nbsp;miles.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Azumanga Daioh[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.[3]
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • correctly
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: occassion (occasion).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 24 additive terms, a bit too much.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

The Lord of the Rings film trilogy[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently and soon might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 5ft, use 5 ft, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 5&nbsp;ft.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • arguably
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honor (A) (British: honour), armour (B) (American: armor), favourite (B) (American: favorite), organise (B) (American: organize), realize (A) (British: realise), ization (A) (British: isation), program (A) (British: programme).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 44 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

The Lion King[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example, miles -> mi, kilometers squared -> km2, and pounds -> lb.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • allege
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Serenity (film)[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • it has been
    • correctly
    • is considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

GoldenEye[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), avoid using special characters (ex: &+{}[]) in headings.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • it has been
    • allege
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Film[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • is considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

List of UFC events[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Flag of Lithuania[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.[3]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: consitution (constitution).
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Latter Days[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Turok: Dinosaur Hunter[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: aquire (acquire).
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

I Not Stupid[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Han van Meegeren[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.[3]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[13]
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata}} along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 65 kilometer, use 65 kilometer, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 65&nbsp;kilometer.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[15]
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • allege
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Žirmūnai[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 7 km, use 7 km, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 7&nbsp;km.[8]
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[15]
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honour (B) (American: honor), neighbour (B) (American: neighbor), meter (A) (British: metre), metre (B) (American: meter), organize (A) (British: organise), ization (A) (British: isation), program (A) (British: programme), programme (B) (American: program ).
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: eigth (eighth, eight).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

De Lorean Motor Company[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 000 mile, use 000 mile, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 000&nbsp;mile.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • apparently
    • many considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Human rights in Syria[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Leapfrogging (infantry)[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[13]
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 2(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.
  • This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.[11]
  • The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Battle of Ghazni[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Princess Elisabeth of Hesse[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, previous [day/week/month/year] might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata}} along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), avoid capitalizing words unless they are proper nouns or the first word of the heading.
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Robert Garran[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, soon might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

The Public Enemy[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Thameslink Programme[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Martin Brodeur[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata}} along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: suprising (surprising).
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Amber MacArthur[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Amber MacArthur[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Where No Man Has Gone Before (TOS episode)[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Book of Abraham[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • apparently
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Akhtar Hameed Khan[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Gabrielle Giffords[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Falklands War[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.[3]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 1200 feet, use 1200 feet, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 1200&nbsp;feet.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[15]
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • it has been
    • arguably
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honor (A) (British: honour), honour (B) (American: honor), neighbour (B) (American: neighbor), metre (B) (American: meter), defence (B) (American: defense), organise (B) (American: organize), realise (B) (American: realize), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization), analyse (B) (American: analyze), travelled (B) (American: traveled), programme (B) (American: program ).
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: suceed (succeed).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
    • “In the year [of] 1990”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Docklands Light Railway[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.[3]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 80km, use 80 km, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 80&nbsp;km.[8]
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[15]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Reform Act 1832[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Black Isle's Torn[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Holden VE Commodore[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 7 inch, use 7 inch, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 7&nbsp;inch.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.[9] Specifically, an example is 100 km.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • correctly
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Kirby (Nintendo)[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 8 inch, use 8 inch, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 8&nbsp;inch.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • correctly
    • apparently
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: journies (journeys),moreso (more, more so),noticably (noticeably),seperate (separate).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 23 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Robert Garran[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, soon might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata}} along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

List of Formula One fatal accidents[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and WP:CONTEXT.
  • This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 2(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Ohio Wesleyan University[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently and last year might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • Avoid including galleries in articles, as per Wikipedia:Galleries. Common solutions to this problem include moving the gallery to a separate page.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[15]
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: agressive (aggressive).
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Storm (comics)[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: noteable (notable),whic (which).
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

List of mammals of Korea[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.[3]
  • Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and WP:CONTEXT.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[15]
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Angevin Empire[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[13]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[15]
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: behaviour (B) (American: behavior), defence (B) (American: defense), offence (B) (American: offense), organise (B) (American: organize), recognize (A) (British: recognise), recognise (B) (American: recognize), isation (B) (American: ization), diarrhea (A) (British: diarrhoea), travelled (B) (American: traveled), anymore (A) (British: any more), any more (B) (American: anymore).
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: immediatly (immediately),originaly (originally),payed (paid),prefered (preferred),responsability (responsibility),writen (written).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

List of Human Rights Incidents in Egypt[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Indonesia[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • done. removed all linked years and dates except 1945 - ie, the end of WW2 - which was highly relelvant. --Merbabu 13:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 000km, use 000 km, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 000&nbsp;km.[8]
  • done - i think--Merbabu 13:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • does this contradict the comment above about removing links?--Merbabu 13:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • doneMerbabu 13:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
  • i think we are pretty good with this. Possibly there is a bit of info that could go to sub pages. but not much. i think the balance is close to good. Merbabu 13:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honour (B) (American: honor), meter (A) (British: metre), recognize (A) (British: recognise), recognise (B) (American: recognize), colonize (A) (British: colonise), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization), aging (A) (British: ageing), cosy (B) (American: cozy), curb (A) (British: kerb), program (A) (British: programme), programme (B) (American: program ).
  • done - probably needs another editor to check.Merbabu 13:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • done Merbabu 13:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
  • done Merbabu 13:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Raised Fist[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

List of ice hockey teams in Alberta[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Psycho (1960 film)[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (change kms to km and lbs to lb).
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • arguably
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: recognize (A) (British: recognise), criticize (A) (British: criticise), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization), any more (B) (American: anymore).
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: planed (planned).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Ford BA Falcon[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.[3]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 100km, use 100 km, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 100&nbsp;km.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example, miles -> mi, kilometers squared -> km2, and pounds -> lb.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.[9] Specifically, an example is 130 kg.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 9 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
    • Temporal terms like “over the years”, “currently”, “now”, and “from time to time” often are too vague to be useful, but occasionally may be helpful. “I am now using a semi-bot to generate your peer review.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

George Washington[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.[3]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 300 miles, use 300 miles, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 300&nbsp;miles.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), please do not link words in headings.
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[15]
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Annamayya[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Yoshiaki Omura[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Áedán mac Gabráin[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Rise of Nations[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.[11]
  • The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

List of Metal Gear Solid characters[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Mount Willey[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and WP:CONTEXT.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 2(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.
  • This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.[11]
  • The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Leaving Las Vegas[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • This article has no images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[12]
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • it has been
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Red Army[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently and soon might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
  • There are a few sections that are too short and that should be either expanded or merged.
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: armor (A) (British: armour), armour (B) (American: armor), behaviour (B) (American: behavior), neighbor (A) (British: neighbour), defense (A) (British: defence), defence (B) (American: defense), organize (A) (British: organise), organise (B) (American: organize), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization), counterattack (A) (British: counter-attack).
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: phenomenom (phenomenon).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Zoophilia and health[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: behaviour (B) (American: behavior), ization (A) (British: isation), diarrhea (A) (British: diarrhoea), diarrhoea (B) (American: diarrhea).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

The Little Shop of Horrors[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, last week might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.
  • There are a few sections that are too short and that should be either expanded or merged.
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Scottish Borders[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Human rights in Morocco[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Silleuksa[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Dio Brando[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), avoid capitalizing words unless they are proper nouns or the first word of the heading.
  • Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: villian (villain).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 14 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • “In the year [of] 1990”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Abraham Lincoln assassination[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Programmer's Notepad[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and WP:CONTEXT.
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • This article does not have any categories. Please categorize it with relevant [[Category:Categories]].
  • This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 2(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.
  • This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.[11]
  • The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Mandela: The Authorised Biography[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • This article has no images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[12]
  • See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[13]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), avoid capitalizing words unless they are proper nouns or the first word of the heading.
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
  • This article does not have any categories. Please categorize it with relevant [[Category:Categories]].
  • This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 2(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • allege
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Oil phase-out in Sweden[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and WP:CONTEXT.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.[4] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 2(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.
  • This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.[11]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Climate of Minnesota[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Methamphetamine[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.[9] Specifically, an example is 125 mg.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: dependant (dependent).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Michael Ignatieff[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, last week might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata}} along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honor (A) (British: honour), defence (B) (American: defense), organize (A) (British: organise), recognize (A) (British: recognise), recognise (B) (American: recognize), criticize (A) (British: criticise), analyze (A) (British: analyse), travelled (B) (American: traveled), programme (B) (American: program ).
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Hayley Westenra[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Pauline Johnson[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Verbascum thapsus[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 10 feet, use 10 feet, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 10&nbsp;feet.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example, miles -> mi, kilometers squared -> km2, and pounds -> lb.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • it has been
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Christmas[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

University of Virginia[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 30 km, use 30 km, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 30&nbsp;km.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Philippine Tarsier Foundation[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

*There may be an applicable infoboxfor this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.[4] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) *Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 29 pounds, use 29 pounds, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 29&nbsp;pounds.[8] *Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example, miles -> mi, kilometers squared -> km2, and pounds -> lb. *Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.[9] Specifically, an example is 14 km.

*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.

  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • correctly
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]

*Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: continously (continuously).

  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 17 additive terms, a bit too much.

*As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Calgary Hitmen[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Brooks-Baxter War[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently and yesterday might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • it has been
    • apparently
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 9 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
    • Temporal terms like “over the years”, “currently”, “now”, and “from time to time” often are too vague to be useful, but occasionally may be helpful. “I am now using a semi-bot to generate your peer review.”
  • This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.[11]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Houston, Texas[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Avoid including galleries in articles, as per Wikipedia:Galleries. Common solutions to this problem include moving the gallery to a separate page.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 13 km, use 13 km, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 13&nbsp;km.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[15]
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 35 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Riesling[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • it has been
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Rhodes blood libel[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Satellite Instructional Television Experiment[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: meter (A) (British: metre), categorise (B) (American: categorize), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization), program (A) (British: programme), programme (B) (American: program ).
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: focussed (focused).
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Bandarban District[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 52 km, use 52 km, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 52&nbsp;km.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.[9] Specifically, an example is 4 km.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 20 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
    • Temporal terms like “over the years”, “currently”, “now”, and “from time to time” often are too vague to be useful, but occasionally may be helpful. “I am now using a semi-bot to generate your peer review.”
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Shaw and Crompton[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Parâkramabâhu I[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 15 kilometer, use 15 kilometer, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 15&nbsp;kilometer.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[15]
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • apparently
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: meter (A) (British: metre), organise (B) (American: organize), ization (A) (British: isation), travelled (B) (American: traveled), programme (B) (American: program ).
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: beseiged (besieged),cheif (chief),despatched (dispatched),dissapeared (disappeared),occassion (occasion),percieved (perceived),pursuaded (persuaded),recieving (receiving),refered (referred),resistence (resistance),seige (siege),soliders (soldiers),succeded (succeeded),supress (suppress).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 26 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Kings of Chaos[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, soon and last week might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • arguably
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.[11]
  • The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Chocolate Hills[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article. *Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18 km, use 18 km, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18&nbsp;km.[8]*Per [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Units of measurement|Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers)]], please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.[9] Specifically, an example is 18 km. *Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5] *Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==. *Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==. *Please avoid including instruction manuals, tutorials, etc. or other 'how-to's per WP:NOT.

  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • are considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”

*As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Campbell's Soup Cans[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • Avoid including galleries in articles, as per Wikipedia:Galleries. Common solutions to this problem include moving the gallery to a separate page.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 1 cm, use 1 cm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 1&nbsp;cm.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.[9] Specifically, an example is 52 in..
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • is considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.[11]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

U2[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 2089339 NM, use 2089339 NM, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 2089339&nbsp;NM.[8]
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • arguably
    • apparently
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Katie Melua[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Bianca Ryan[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 22:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Shuffle![edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 12 cm, use 12 cm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 12&nbsp;cm.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.[9] Specifically, an example is 12 cm.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: artifical (artificial),begining (beginning),saught (sought).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 13 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 13:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

The Boondock Saints[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 13:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Economic impact of immigration to Canada[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.
  • This article has no images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[12]
  • See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[13]
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • allege
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 9 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 13:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Clement of Dunblane[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.[3]
  • Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata}} along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5].
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • it has been {{#if:it has been|**might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: organize (A) (British: organise), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization), sceptic (B) (American: skeptic).
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 13:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Distillation[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 65 centi, use 65 centi, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 65&nbsp;centi.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 23:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Nathu La[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (change kms to km and lbs to lb).
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: meter (A) (British: metre), metre (B) (American: meter), recognise (B) (American: recognize), realise (B) (American: realize), isation (B) (American: ization), program (A) (British: programme).
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 23:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Nature[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 150 lb, use 150 lb, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 150&nbsp;lb.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.[9] Specifically, an example is kg.
  • When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (change kms to km and lbs to lb).
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: behavior (A) (British: behaviour), meter (A) (British: metre), metre (B) (American: meter), organize (A) (British: organise), colonize (A) (British: colonise), categorize (A) (British: categorise), ization (A) (British: isation), cosy (B) (American: cozy), molt (A) (British: moult).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 23:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

United Airlines Flight 232[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.[3]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 300 feet, use 300 feet, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 300&nbsp;feet.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.[9] Specifically, an example is in..
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • is considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 11 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 23:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
    • Corrected. No links to months or days of the week. Madcoverboy 22:55, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
    • One instance corrected. The other mention of recently is valid since it reveals a current trend (women faculty members) that will not suddenly change.Madcoverboy 22:58, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Avoid including galleries in articles, as per Wikipedia:Galleries. Common solutions to this problem include moving the gallery to a separate page.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 2fT, use 2 fT, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 2&nbsp;fT.[8]
  • When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (change kms to km and lbs to lb).
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[15]
    • Unnecessary subsections removed and/or condensed.Madcoverboy 05:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
    • Most sections have appropriate subpages. Madcoverboy 21:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • it has been
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
    • "MIT has been" incorrectly interpreted as "it has been." Madcoverboy 21:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 23:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Rowing (sport)[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 130 lb, use 130 lb, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 130&nbsp;lb.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.[9] Specifically, an example is 59 kg.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[15]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 21 additive terms, a bit too much.
  • This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.[11]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 23:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Ricky Ponting[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.[3]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: wich (which, witch).
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 23:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Slayer[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[14]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • is considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Please check through the article for possible misspellings (see WP:SPELL). Examples of possible misspellings include: cant (cannot, can not, can't),resemblence (resemblance).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 23:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Yanam (India)[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 3 km, use 3 km, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 3&nbsp;km.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.[9] Specifically, an example is 3 km.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: neighbour (B) (American: neighbor), meter (A) (British: metre), defence (B) (American: defense), ization (A) (British: isation).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
    • “In the year [of] 1990”
  • This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.[11]
  • The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 23:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Municipal Administration in French India[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 23:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Coup d'État de Yanaon[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • This article has no images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[12]
  • See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[13]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 50 Yards, use 50 Yards, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 50&nbsp;Yards.[8]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • is considered
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[17]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: meter (A) (British: metre), organise (B) (American: organize), realise (B) (American: realize), ization (A) (British: isation), analyse (B) (American: analyze).
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.[11]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 23:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

They Might Be Giants[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[13]
  • Avoid including galleries in articles, as per Wikipedia:Galleries. Common solutions to this problem include moving the gallery to a separate page.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 23:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Halloween Horror Nights (Orlando)[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, previous [day/week/month/year] might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[7]
  • See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[13]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example, miles -> mi, kilometers squared -> km2, and pounds -> lb.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 23:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Central Coast Mariners FC[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 23:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

John Adams[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[2]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.[9] Specifically, an example is in..
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[5]
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), please do not link words in headings.
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[15]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [16]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 23:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Archives[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ The following suggestions are all semi-automatically generated by JavaScript, and there is no guarantee that they are all accurate; in most cases, however, they are correct for the article in question. The suggestions above include stylistic problems (many having to do with WP:MOS and its subpages, others can be found here) and other commonly found on WP:PR, WP:FAC, and WP:FARC. However, it is strongly suggested that besides just tackling the problems listed here, that you ask for human assistance to review your article with a greater depth.
    You can use the script yourself. Add {{subst:js|User:AndyZ/peerreviewer.js}} to your monobook.js, and then bypass your cache. While in editing mode, click on the peer review link that appears next to your logout button.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay This suggestion will always appear if the lead is only one paragraph long. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "lead" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n If the lead is 5 paragraphs or longer, this suggestion will appear. It does not actually look at the content of the lead. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leaddetail" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leaddetail" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leaddetail" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leaddetail" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leaddetail" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leaddetail" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leaddetail" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leaddetail" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leaddetail" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leaddetail" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leaddetail" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leaddetail" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leaddetail" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  4. ^ a b c d e f Many articles will not have applicable infoboxes. If an article already has an infobox/similar template, the javascript code probably did not recognize the infobox; please just strike the comment. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "infobox" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "infobox" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "infobox" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "infobox" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "infobox" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az ba bb bc bd be bf bg bh bi bj bk bl bm bn bo bp bq br bs bt bu bv bw This will trigger if dates located in references or inline citations are not linked Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "linkdate" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  6. ^ Partial dates like months and days of the week usually aren't linked; years alone are sometimes linked – see WP:CONTEXT. User:Bobblewik has an useful JavaScript code to deal with this - add {{subst:js|User:Bobblewik/monobook.js/dates.js}} to your monobook.js
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am In many occasions, these terms are used as relative time terms and have absolutely nothing to do with the recent time concern. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "time" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am Certain phrases, especially “# in ”, will trigger this suggestion; in that case, the in is interpreted as “inches”. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "nbsp" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o This will occasionally be triggered incorrectly due to certain phrases. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "spellnum" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "spellnum" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "spellnum" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "spellnum" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "spellnum" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "spellnum" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "spellnum" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "spellnum" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "spellnum" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "spellnum" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "spellnum" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "spellnum" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "spellnum" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "spellnum" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  10. ^ The categories and interwiki/language links usually are located at the bottom of the article. They are in the format [[Category:THE CATEGORY]] and [[es:Espanol]]. About the alphabetizing of interwiki links, see Wikipedia:Language order poll.
  11. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t See WP:FOOTNOTE for more information. The cite.php system is highly recommended by WP:WIAFA. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "foot" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  12. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Sometimes images in an infobox will be missed. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "noimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  13. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o If the beginning of an article is a comment or a disambiguation link, this might cause the suggestion to be triggered. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leadimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leadimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leadimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leadimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leadimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leadimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leadimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leadimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leadimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leadimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leadimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leadimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leadimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "leadimg" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  14. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad Sometimes, an infobox image’s caption will be missed. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "caption" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  15. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s Depending upon the scope of an article, in certain cases the TOC will have to be larger. There is not set min/max for the TOC. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "toc" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  16. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az ba bb bc bd be bf bg bh bi bj bk bl bm bn bo bp bq br bs bt bu bv bw bx by bz ca cb cc cd ce cf cg ch ci cj ck cl cm cn co cp cq cr cs ct cu cv cw cx cy cz da db dc dd de df dg dh di dj dk dl dm dn do dp dq dr ds dt du dv dw dx dy dz ea eb ec This is a default suggestion; it lghrshjh fjlhnonklhoklnfdsaohfdslmfdsnojgfdsnjlfdsbnjld jdlbnhdeuiuirehjleuenuojhtrewlhoitruojftshjlgfdsngftnoikhn,mgfdsnoifdn h ndalmbnmeajkfeq,mhefe jkebde,mhbmbndejklnjklfdn,.ngfs,.n fklngfdklnfds,. fdskl vlnfs,.vnfsgv dnfkdsanfk.,dsanfkldsanfnsajd,rnlsanfdk;sanfsamn;fmnsanfkl;wanfl;afk;jafkl;hjfnwljwklwmpwwnhwlnwlwejldoerewqerejkltewijkjklgrsgfdsajkl;gfdsgfdshklklgjklftrerrejkltrejkl;frwwill always appear. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "copyedit" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  17. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an Many phrases are not weasel words (ex. They are found in quotes, or in other situations where it is clear that they are not weasel words.). In addition, if an inline citation is provided, it cannot be picked up by the javascript code. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "awt" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  18. ^ Gimmetrow has an useful script to quickly fix this problem. Add {{subst:js|User:Gimmetrow/replace.js}} to your monobook.js (or other file). See here.