Wikipedia:Peer review/NBA All-Rookie Team/archive1

NBA All-Rookie Team[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to know how well it is doing and if it is good enough to become a featured list. Chrishomingtang will also help in answering questions.

Thanks, -- K. Annoyomous 24 03:23, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ruhrfisch comments: Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement. If you want more comments, please ask here.

In an FA the lead summarizes the article and does not need citations, but in an FL the lead often serves as an introduction and so needs cites for anything not in the lists. This needs more cites / refs.
"Olajuwon and Knobler. pg. 207" needs more information as a ref
I would add an explanation of the introduction of the second team in 88-89. Why was it added?
Several places need a copyedit - for example Indicates the player who won the Rookie of the Year award ~~in the same year~~ (since these are both rookie awards, is there any way they could be in different years?) or Voting is conducted by the NBA head coaches; ~~the coaches~~ [who] are not allowed to vote for players on their own team.[1] or The All-Defensive Team is generally composed of two five-man lineups, a first and a second team, comprising a total of 10 roster spots. - I think most readers can add 5 +5 = 10 ;-)
I would add a free picture or two - surely some of the players have free imaqes here?
- There is not enough room for images. -- K. Annoyomous 24_{Need to pee...} 00:35, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Would it make sense to say how many players have been named to the team as of the most recent season?

What do you mean? -- K. Annoyomous 24_{Need to pee...} 00:35, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 23:47, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]