Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files
Contents
- 1 Instructions
- 2 Speedy deletion
- 3 Holding cell
- 4 New listings
- 4.1 October 15
- 4.1.1 File:Randy Brecker photo with trumbet, taken by wife Ada, April 2014.jpeg
- 4.1.2 File:378px Tim Gemmill.jpg
- 4.1.3 File:Games People Play cover 1964.jpg
- 4.1.4 File:FatzFront.jpg
- 4.1.5 File:Giorgi kadagidze.jpg
- 4.1.6 File:Fence12-10-10.jpg
- 4.1.7 File:Festivalofhope.jpeg
- 4.1.8 File:FIAF building.jpg
- 4.1.9 File:Fisher, Bernice 1960.jpg
- 4.1.10 File:Flores gun boat.jpg
- 4.1.11 File:FrankStanford St. Benedict sCemetery.jpg
- 4.1.12 File:G8brown.JPG
- 4.1.13 File:GarrickDavis2013inWashington.jpg
- 4.1.14 File:Golden conure perched in its cage.jpg
- 4.1.15 File:Gracelee.jpg
- 4.1.16 File:Appayya Swami Aigali.jpg
- 4.1.17 File:Sign for Galeria Kaufhof.jpg
- 4.1.18 File:Street musician.jpg
- 4.1.19 File:Panoram.jpg
- 4.1.20 File:Lake1.jpg
- 4.1.21 File:Iximche1.jpg
- 4.1.22 File:Jonathanjames.jpg
- 4.1.23 File:Karl Peters.jpg
- 4.1.24 File:Piazza Saffi.jpg
- 4.1.25 File:T.S. Eliot, 1923.JPG
- 4.2 October 16
- 4.2.1 File:Mormopterus planiceps.jpg
- 4.2.2 File:Julebrus.jpg
- 4.2.3 File:Pintoint1.jpg
- 4.2.4 File:Bluepinto.jpg
- 4.2.5 File:Pasaje.jpg
- 4.2.6 File:Lennon and Ono in Canada.jpg
- 4.2.7 File:SpennemannDirk.jpg
- 4.2.8 File:Paullusmagnus-logo.JPG
- 4.2.9 File:Preschool2.jpg
- 4.2.10 File:Korean bbq.jpg
- 4.2.11 File:Korean architecture roof detail.jpg
- 4.2.12 File:Korean cuisine mandu fried.jpg
- 4.2.13 File:Bangladeshi passport (pre-1979).jpg
- 4.3 October 17
- 4.3.1 File:Avon Microwave Popcorn Maker.jpg
- 4.3.2 File:Port of Stockton air view.jpg
- 4.3.3 File:West Sacramento.jpg
- 4.3.4 File:Port of Sacramento.jpg
- 4.3.5 File:Procession.jpg
- 4.3.6 File:Portada2.jpg
- 4.3.7 File:John Morrison 2010.jpg
- 4.3.8 File:Jean Burns.jpg
- 4.3.9 File:Pop2.jpg
- 4.3.10 File:HimmlerOberfhr.jpg
- 4.3.11 File:Nyon castle.jpg
- 4.3.12 File:Tolmezzo-Stemma.gif
- 4.4 October 18
- 4.5 October 19
- 4.6 October 20
- 4.7 October 21
- 4.7.1 File:SURABHI PRABHU.jpg
- 4.7.2 File:Mapa-rodovia-faria-lima.jpg
- 4.7.3 File:Seesmic Logo.png
- 4.7.4 File:Srplogo33.png
- 4.7.5 File:Fritts.jpg
- 4.7.6 File:B4x-YpHIYAAFt6n.jpg
- 4.7.7 File:La course presidentielle de 1990 - Stevenson Magloire.jpg
- 4.7.8 File:Tripp Eisen.jpg
- 4.7.9 File:SilverFast PrinTao.jpg
- 4.7.10 File:Pavilion View.JPG
- 4.7.11 File:School1.jpg
- 4.8 October 22
- 4.8.1 File:Rahman Alemi, After Silence(2015).jpg
- 4.8.2 File:Eisenach.jpg
- 4.8.3 File:Southern Comfort Vanilla Spice Eggnog Quart TAKEN ON-2015-Oct-21.jpeg
- 4.8.4 File:Steadmanlogo5.jpg
- 4.8.5 File:Josephine Ochoa, Los Angeles CA, 2015.png
- 4.8.6 File:Josephine Ochoa, Los Angeles Photoshoot, 2015.png
- 4.8.7 File:Manics at the brits.jpg
- 4.1 October 15
- 5 Footer
This page is for listing and discussing files that are marked as available under a free license or public domain, but have disputed source or licensing information. Files are listed here for 7 days before they are processed. Files that are tagged with a non-free template should not be listed here.
To list texts with copyright issues, please use WP:Copyright problems.
Instructions[edit]
| Deletion discussions |
|---|
|
|
| Articles |
| Templates |
| Files |
| Possibly unfree files (PUF) |
| Categories |
| Redirects |
| Miscellany |
| Speedy deletion |
| Proposed deletion |
Before listing, remember that files which are already marked unfree and used under fair use should not be listed here.
To list a file on this page:
| I |
Edit the file page.
Add |
|---|---|
| II |
Create its PUF subsection.
Follow this edit link and list the file using |
| III |
Give due notice.
Inform the uploader by adding a message to their talk page using If the image is in use, also consider adding
|
Unlike Wikipedia:Files for deletion the primary purpose of this page is to ascertain the source and/or copyright status of a file. Therefore it is not specifically a vote to keep or delete but a forum for the exploration of the copyright status/source of a file and contributions should not be added solely in those terms.
Listings should be processed by an administrator after being listed for 7 days. Files that are accepted following this 7-day period should have {{oldpuffull}} added to the file talk page. If no objection to the file's deletion is raised, or no proof that the file is indeed free is provided, the file may be deleted without further notice after the 7-day period.
Note: Files can be unlisted immediately if they are indisputably in the public domain or verifiably licensed under an indisputably free license (GFDL, CC-BY-SA, etc.—see Wikipedia:File copyright tags for more on these).
Speedy deletion[edit]
Blatant copyright violations or files missing source or license information may be "speedied"
If a file is unquestionably copied from another website and no assertion of permission or fair use is made, the file may be speedy deleted under criterion F9 (formerly I9). Such files do not need to be listed here. Please tag the file with {{subst:db-f9|url=source URL}} and warn the user with {{db-copyvio-notice}}.
If a file is missing source, evidence of permission, or license information, place either use:
or
- {{subst:npd}} for No evidence of permission
on the description page to put the file in the appropriate category. After being tagged for 7 days, the file will be eligible for speedy deletion per criterion 4 or criterion 11 for images/media.
Please also notify the uploader so they get a chance to fix the problem(s). The templates {{subst:File source|File:file name}} and {{image copyright}} are made for this purpose, but feel free to write a message of your own. It is not necessary to warn the uploader about every individual file if they have uploaded several of such files, but at least one message telling them that files without source/license will be deleted should be given to each user.
If a file is indisputably non-free, and its possible use can comply with our non-free content policy, be bold and retag it as a non-free file using a non-free image tag instead of taking it to this page.
Please note that this page is not for disputing the fair use of already non-free media, but for the disputing if a freely licensed file really is free. Please take queries of this nature to Files for deletion or Non-free content review An archiving system was implemented July 2007. For older discussions, see the history pages. For all discussions from July 3, 2007 forward, see the Archive.
Holding cell[edit]
| This page has a backlog that requires the attention of one or more administrators. Please change this notice to {{No admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
- These files have been listed for at least 7 days. Discussions should be closed following the steps here. Files that have been determined to be acceptable may be removed from this page.
New listings[edit]
October 15[edit]
File:Randy Brecker photo with trumbet, taken by wife Ada, April 2014.jpeg[edit]
- File:Randy Brecker photo with trumbet, taken by wife Ada, April 2014.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unless the uploader is his wife there is a conflict with the source statements. Eeekster (talk) 00:52, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
File:378px Tim Gemmill.jpg[edit]
- File:378px Tim Gemmill.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
Eeekster: Please remove your warning tag for File:378px Tim Gemmill.jpg on the Tim Gemmill page. Wikipedia has permission to display this photograph. It is in the public domain and can be found at Music on the Web®. Thank you. Cozgem (talk) 06:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Games People Play cover 1964.jpg[edit]
- Since the book is the clear focus of this photo, I do not think this is a free image. Steel1943 (talk) 04:01, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback. My understanding is that the use of a book's cover in connection with a review, comment, or news reporting is a fair use. Do I need to alter the listing? Wiki-psyc (talk) 13:00, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:09, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- I think I did that when changing the rationale to Fair Use based on looking at the copyright law. Wiki-psyc (talk) 17:27, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
File:FatzFront.jpg[edit]
- File:FatzFront.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Web resolution, no metadata, likely copyvio. Kelly hi! 11:01, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- The strange border suggests that the picture comes from elsewhere, possibly a screenshot of some website. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Giorgi kadagidze.jpg[edit]
- File:Giorgi kadagidze.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It says "Previously published: at www. nbg.gov.ge" meaning that we need evidence of permission. See WP:CONSENT. Stefan2 (talk) 11:02, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Fence12-10-10.jpg[edit]
- File:Fence12-10-10.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Web resolution and lack of camera metadata, along with limited history of contributor, suggest this is a copyvio. Kelly hi! 11:24, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Festivalofhope.jpeg[edit]
- File:Festivalofhope.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:FIAF building.jpg[edit]
- File:FIAF building.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unclear if the uploader is the copyright holder of the photo. Kelly hi! 12:00, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Fisher, Bernice 1960.jpg[edit]
- File:Fisher, Bernice 1960.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Flores gun boat.jpg[edit]
- File:Flores gun boat.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:FrankStanford St. Benedict sCemetery.jpg[edit]
File:G8brown.JPG[edit]
- File:G8brown.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:GarrickDavis2013inWashington.jpg[edit]
File:Golden conure perched in its cage.jpg[edit]
File:Gracelee.jpg[edit]
- File:Gracelee.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Low-resolution image of Grace Lee; I'm skeptical that the uploader is the copyright holder. Kelly hi! 13:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Appayya Swami Aigali.jpg[edit]
- File:Appayya Swami Aigali.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Ticket insufficient. Image of the person may be old enough to be free, but may not. Contradicting claims in the ticket and overall confusion. Nothing subsequent to a clarification request I sent on 2015-10-05. Storkk (talk) 16:05, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Sign for Galeria Kaufhof.jpg[edit]
File:Street musician.jpg[edit]
- File:Street musician.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Sourced to Flickr, but only with a generic link to the Flickrstream. A more direct link is needed in order to check if the file is freely licensed or not. The copyright tag is not a copyright tag offered by Flickr. Stefan2 (talk) 21:53, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Panoram.jpg[edit]
- File:Panoram.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Low resolution, no EXIF. The strange border suggests that it is a screenshot from somewhere. Stefan2 (talk) 21:54, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Lake1.jpg[edit]
- File:Lake1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: two in one.
- File uploaded by Mancho~enwiki (talk · contribs) and TerminalPreppie (talk · contribs): Properly sourced and licensed. Keep this one.
- File uploaded by Ndn (talk · contribs): No source and no licence. Delete this one. Stefan2 (talk) 21:56, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Iximche1.jpg[edit]
- File:Iximche1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It says "Fair Use", so does it mean that the picture is unfree? Stefan2 (talk) 21:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Jonathanjames.jpg[edit]
- File:Jonathanjames.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Apparently a photo by Jonathan James, but without evidence of permission from him. Also note that the person on the photo is unidentified, so the picture isn't very useful for us. Stefan2 (talk) 21:59, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Karl Peters.jpg[edit]
- File:Karl Peters.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears in larger resolution elsewhere, see [1]. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 22:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Piazza Saffi.jpg[edit]
- File:Piazza Saffi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Sourced to itwiki where it was deleted due to lack of legal information. Stefan2 (talk) 23:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
File:T.S. Eliot, 1923.JPG[edit]
- File:T.S. Eliot, 1923.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The copyright tag refers to the source country, but English Wikipedia is hosted in the United States, where the copyright rules are different. It seems that the photographer died after 1925, so the United States copyright term expires 95 years after the photograph was first published. Stefan2 (talk) 23:54, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Please be specific about which element of Wikipedia's guidelines or policies you are referring to. Be very precise and make a clear case. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 02:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- He's saying it's a copyvio. Samsara 09:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Yep. Sorry. I'm not being clear. Stefan says, I think, that this image is still covered by copyright in the US, and gives his reason for thinking that. I'm asking him to point to the relevant Wikipedia advice page, guideline or policy that supports his position.
- To be clear: I know next to nothing about copyright, as I'm sure is the case with many Wikipedians. I saw notification of this listing on User:SlimVirgin's talk page (which I have watchlisted) and came here to see what it is about. I'm assuming there is a clear and simple guideline on Wikipedia that clearly, simply and plainly supports Stefan's position, and am asking him to point to it.
- Perhaps I'm wrong in my assumption, and it's just down to Wikipedians to cite the relevant US and other statutes, like bush lawyers. I'd be surprised and very disappointed, though, if that is the case. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 10:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Nothing to do with Wikipedia - it's the law: Copyright law of the United States. Samsara 11:01, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- Are you saying there are no guidelines on how to determine copyright status on Wikipedia? --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 11:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Thanks for those links. According to Cornell University's "Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States - 1 January 2015", works published outside the US after 1 March 1989 (this image was first published on the UK National Portrait Gallery website after 2003) in a country that is a signatory to the Berne Convention (UK is a signatory), the copyright term is "70 years after the death of author, or if work of corporate authorship, 95 years from publication". The author, Lady Ottoline Morrell, died in 1938, so the US copyright term expired in 2008. --Anthonyhcole (talk · Special:Contributions/Anthonyhcole · email) 12:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- It was in a bunch of photo albums bought by the NPG in 2003. I've done a google book search for "Eliot" + "David Cecil" (Cecil is in the un-cropped photo) and didn't find any photos of the two together. I did a similar search of all Ebook Library's holdings and came up with nothing. Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 12:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- The fact that it appeared in a book in 2003 does not rule out the possibility that the picture appeared in some other book or publication before 2003. It is only the year of the first publication which matters, and most printed publications are not available on the Internet. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:23, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- I suppose anything's possible. There could be monkeys on the moon. At this point, you now need to prove publication earlier than 1 March 1989 if you want us to delete this from Wikipedia. We can't be expected to prove it wasn't published earlier, that can't be done. But you can prove it was published earlier, if it was published earlier. Do that and I'll be the first to support its deletion. Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 12:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- The requirement is to prove that the file is in the public domain. This requirement has not been fulfilled, since it hasn't been proven that the picture wasn't published before 2003. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- OK. My misunderstanding. Sorry. How do I prove something wasn't published? --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 14:17, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- How did the National Portrait Gallery obtain the photo albums? Does it look as if the NPG obtained a collection of family photos? If so, then we have a credible reason to believe that the picture wasn't previously published; family photos are rarely published. On the other hand, if the NPG obtained pictures from a newspaper photographer, then it is much more likely that the picture was previously published.
- I'd like to add that you should also consider the definition of 'publication'. Within copyright law, that typically means that you offer copies of a work to the public. If a public archive or the National Portrait Gallery owns a lot of pictures and allows the public to visit the archive or gallery to inspect the pictures and obtain photocopies of the pictures, then the pictures would probably be considered to be published when the archive/gallery begins to offer the public do do this. However, if the National Portrait Gallery didn't obtain the photograph until 2003, then it would not have been published by the National Portrait Gallery prior to this date. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- OK. My misunderstanding. Sorry. How do I prove something wasn't published? --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 14:17, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- The requirement is to prove that the file is in the public domain. This requirement has not been fulfilled, since it hasn't been proven that the picture wasn't published before 2003. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- I suppose anything's possible. There could be monkeys on the moon. At this point, you now need to prove publication earlier than 1 March 1989 if you want us to delete this from Wikipedia. We can't be expected to prove it wasn't published earlier, that can't be done. But you can prove it was published earlier, if it was published earlier. Do that and I'll be the first to support its deletion. Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 12:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- It was in a bunch of photo albums bought by the NPG in 2003. I've done a google book search for "Eliot" + "David Cecil" (Cecil is in the un-cropped photo) and didn't find any photos of the two together. I did a similar search of all Ebook Library's holdings and came up with nothing. Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 12:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
-
-
Yes, it is a collection of family photos belonging to the late Lady Ottoline Morrell acquired by the NPG in 2003. The site just says they "acquired" the albums, but not from whom they acquired them. They're family albums, not press photos. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 23:45, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hm. That description suggests that the collection mostly was unpublished when the National Portrait Gallery acquired them. I can't find the year 2003 anywhere. It says that the pictures were displayed in 2005 and that they had 'recently' been acquired at that time, so it seems fair to assume that the first publication was in 2003 or later (probably in 2005). It's probably fine to add {{PD-US-unpublished}} here. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:03, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
October 16[edit]
File:Mormopterus planiceps.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:09, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- File:Mormopterus planiceps.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be copied from blog at https://strathbogierangesnatureview.wordpress.com/2011/01/25/microbats-in-the-roof/; this is given as attribution, possibly under the impression that it enables reproduction Elmidae (talk) 12:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Julebrus.jpg[edit]
- File:Julebrus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Packaging artwork. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Pintoint1.jpg[edit]
- File:Pintoint1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This image was one of a suite of three (see below) uploaded by User:Nakedicarus. The first of these, File:Us90.jpg, was recently deleted as a blatant copyvio of [2] by User:CactusWriter. Given this, his other images are also suspect, and this one bears a mark - "(F)" - supporting the enormous likelihood that it is a professional photograph for an advertisement or brochure. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Bluepinto.jpg[edit]
- File:Bluepinto.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See listing immediately above for why works by User:Nakedicarus are suspect. While this one is not quite as blatant as the other two, it still has the signs of professional photography, including the off-road photography before a striking background and the small image size suggesting it was scraped off the web. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Pasaje.jpg[edit]
- File:Pasaje.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Seems to be a painting by Ricardo N. Degrossi. Stefan2 (talk) 20:07, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Lennon and Ono in Canada.jpg[edit]
- Source Commons:File:Lennon Ono Trudeau 1969 b.jpg deleted from Commons as copyvio. Kelly hi! 20:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. The copyright on the photographs by Duncan Cameron (1928-1985) belongs to Library and archives Canada and those photographs are not offered under a free license. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
File:SpennemannDirk.jpg[edit]
- File:SpennemannDirk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Web resolution, no metadata, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 20:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Paullusmagnus-logo.JPG[edit]
- File:Paullusmagnus-logo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence of permission. Originally uploaded by User:Orangemonster2k1 under a claim of fair use in 2007, shortly after that he removed the fair use notice and added in a Wikimedia logo copyright notice. And even though he said User:Paullusmagnus would give him permission to use his logo, there is no evidence he gave Wikipedia the permission, let alone license it freely. User:Fbot (inactive bot) then tagged the image with non-free orphaned revisions on December 1, 2011, which got removed a month later. Since this image's copyright permission status is unclear, it's probably best to discuss here. 189.25.244.90 (talk) 22:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Preschool2.jpg[edit]
- File:Preschool2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It says "source-bernicolet" so it is apparently not own work. Stefan2 (talk) 22:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Korean bbq.jpg[edit]
- File:Korean bbq.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- All rights reserved on Flickr. Flickr doesn't use version 2.5 of Creative Commons licences either. Stefan2 (talk) 22:56, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Korean architecture roof detail.jpg[edit]
- All rights reserved on Flickr. Flickr doesn't use version 2.5 of Creative Commons licences. Stefan2 (talk) 22:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Korean cuisine mandu fried.jpg[edit]
- Cc-by-nc-nd on Flickr. Flickr doesn't use version 2.5 of Creative Commons licences. Stefan2 (talk) 22:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Bangladeshi passport (pre-1979).jpg[edit]
- Complicated security features. Unlikely to be below the threshold of originality. Stefan2 (talk) 23:01, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
October 17[edit]
File:Avon Microwave Popcorn Maker.jpg[edit]
- CPSC website says, " Images on this website may have been licensed for use by CPSC from a stock photography service or other copyright holder and the copyright holder may prohibit republication, retransmission, reproduction or other use of the images."[3] No way to know whether this is a federal government work, or just something they've gotten from Avon or elsewhere. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:57, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Port of Stockton air view.jpg[edit]
- I cannot locate this image on a .gov website. Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:09, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
File:West Sacramento.jpg[edit]
- File:West Sacramento.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I cannot locate this image on army.mil or any other federal government website. Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:09, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Port of Sacramento.jpg[edit]
- File:Port of Sacramento.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I cannot locate this image on army.mil or any other federal government website. Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:10, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Procession.jpg[edit]
- File:Procession.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: two in one.
- File uploaded by Akaharry (talk · contribs): Properly sourced and licensed, to be kept.
- File uploaded by Magiko (talk · contribs): No source and no licence. To be deleted. Stefan2 (talk) 10:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Portada2.jpg[edit]
- File:Portada2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:John Morrison 2010.jpg[edit]
- File:John Morrison 2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:Jean Burns.jpg[edit]
- File:Jean Burns.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Historical photo. Uploader unlikely to be the photographer. Stefan2 (talk) 10:47, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Pop2.jpg[edit]
- File:Pop2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: two in one.
- File uploaded by Super8Guy (talk · contribs): Apparently a photo of the uploader's father. It's unclear who the photographer is and what the source country is. If it is a United States photograph, then Pushman v. New York Graphic Society, Inc. probably made the uploader's father the copyright holder, meaning that the uploader may have inherited the copyright. If the source country is some other country, then the copyright has probably never been held by the uploader or the uploader's father.
- File uploaded by Madin10 (talk · contribs): Seems to be a photo of a non-free video game in front of a Japanese keyboard. Stefan2 (talk) 11:06, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
File:HimmlerOberfhr.jpg[edit]
- File:HimmlerOberfhr.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Missing dates/location of creation and publication to verify copyright status. A copy of this file was deleted at Commons for similar reasons following this discussion. Kelly hi! 14:33, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- All the pertinent information has been updated. The photo is out of Himmler's record at the U.S. National Archives and is unrestricted and free to reproduce. -O.R.Comms 14:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- This photo is over 80 years old; Himmler first held that rank of SS-Oberführer back in 1927. Secondly, would it not fall under the Bundesarchiv, Bild (German Federal Archives, image) in which there is no copyright on any Nazi Germany photos. Even if it does not, the copy of this photo is over 80 years old and shown to be from the U.S. National Archives. It should be kept. Kierzek (talk) 16:02, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- The license tag is incorrect, as the photo was not taken prior to 1923. It is most likely
{{PD-URAA}}-- Diannaa (talk) 16:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC)- Thank you for bringing up the other licensing tag. I updated the file accordingly. -O.R.Comms 17:07, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- {{PD-URAA}} can only be used for German photos taken by photographers who died before 1926. This doesn't seem to be the case here. Instead, it's {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. The German copyright status depends on whether the photographer is anonymous and, if not, on when he died. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- However, if it is in the 'Captured German Records Collection', then it may be in the public domain in the United States for the same reason as the one stated in the {{PD-HHOFFMANN}} template. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for bringing up the other licensing tag. I updated the file accordingly. -O.R.Comms 17:07, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Nyon castle.jpg[edit]
- File:Nyon castle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Cc-by-nc-sa-2.0 on Flickr. Note that Flickr never has used version 2.5 of Creative Commons licences, so the copyright tag on Wikipedia is obviously wrong. Stefan2 (talk) 15:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Tolmezzo-Stemma.gif[edit]
- File:Tolmezzo-Stemma.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See c:Commons:Deletion requests/Images from www.araldicacivica.it. Stefan2 (talk) 20:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
October 18[edit]
File:Mpc be.png[edit]
- File:Mpc be.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
No, it's not. See the discussion tab. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Europa76 (talk • contribs) 09:24, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Shaban Polluzha.jpg[edit]
- File:Shaban Polluzha.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Claimed as public domain because "Its everywere". Obviously incorrect reasoning. Taken from [4], there is no photo credit or licensing given for the image. Whpq (talk) 11:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Soles.jpg[edit]
- File:Soles.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "Updated Image" but this is the only revision, so is this a derivative work of some other unidentified image? Stefan2 (talk) 19:41, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Korea.jpg[edit]
- File:Korea.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: two in one.
- File uploaded by Bmoc2012tms (talk · contribs) and Light show (talk · contribs): To be kept.
- File uploaded by Light show (talk · contribs): There is an FUR in the edit summary, so assume that the file is unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 20:47, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Kutaisi Stadium.jpg[edit]
- File:Kutaisi Stadium.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: two in one.
- File uploaded by Kotola001 (talk · contribs) and Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs): Sourced and licensed, but the uploader's edit summary mentions fctorpedo.ge, so maybe the uploader means that the file is a copyright violation from that website.
- File uploaded by NESAI11 (talk · contribs): See c:File:Kutaisi Stadium.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 20:50, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Santo Stefano di Sessanio.jpg[edit]
- Claimed to be from Flickr but without a link it isn't possible to verify the copyright tag. The copyright tag currently used is not one which is available on Flickr. Stefan2 (talk) 21:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Marathon.jpg[edit]
- File:Marathon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: two in one.
- File uploaded by Solitude (talk · contribs) and Angusmclellan (talk · contribs): no source, so the United States Government authorship claim can't be verified.
- File uploaded by Bomberteto (talk · contribs): Looks like an unfree album cover. Stefan2 (talk) 21:55, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
October 19[edit]
File:Kipleigh Brown.jpg[edit]
- File:Kipleigh Brown.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Claimed as uploader's own work and copied to Commons. The file is nominated for deletion on Commons as a copyright violation. The image seems to be a publicity photo. See [5] for one example of it around the web. Unlikely to be uploader's work. Whpq (talk) 04:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Kenneth Earl Medrano, That's My Bae Grand Winner during mall show, 2015.jpg[edit]
- File:Kenneth Earl Medrano, That's My Bae Grand Winner during mall show, 2015.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader has a history of copyright violations on here and Commons. This image appears to be taken from someone else's Instragram (for a weblink, it should be available here). However with the own work claims, and the fact that the users could in fact be connected, I thought that a speedy might be declined, so bringing it here. BethNaught (talk) 07:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- They have now added that link under the source heading but the usernames still don't match. Still an untrustworthy upload. BethNaught (talk) 08:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: I just tagged the image with a F11 speedy tag requesting copyright holder permission and notified the uploader requesting proof of permission. Steel1943 (talk) 23:49, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
File:HCMS Turbine BLades.jpg[edit]
- File:HCMS Turbine BLades.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I'm not sure if this picture violates privacy rights or not per Wikipedia:Image use policy#What are public and private places?, considering that there are people in the image. Steel1943 (talk) 14:46, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Pioppi.jpg[edit]
- File:Pioppi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It says that this is "an old pic of American photographer Harold Miller Null" but the uploader is called Alessandro Zangrilli. Stefan2 (talk) 22:13, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
October 20[edit]
File:Allen M. Sides.jpg[edit]
- File:Allen M. Sides.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: two in one.
- File uploaded on 10 August: Seems to come from [6] without evidence of permission.
- I have requested that an administrator delete the first version of the image request ST (talk) 07:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- File uploaded on 8 October: Seems to have been taken by someone other than the uploader (based on the text on the file information page), so OTRS needed. See WP:CONSENT for instructions on how to send permission to OTRS. Stefan2 (talk) 11:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- I have a photograph of written consent. How do I make that available to you? Original photographer (copyright holder provided permission in this form).
http://toonz.ca/bose/wiki/images/9/90/MichelleShiersAllenSidesPhotoRelease.jpg ST (talk) 07:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- That permission is insufficient as it only applies to you and as it doesn't allow other modifications than resizing. It's better to follow the instructions at WP:CONSENT. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:45, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
File:The Broken Line Monument, Tallinn.jpg[edit]
- This was tagged by Kelly (talk · contribs) as a derivative work without copyright information about the included work. This monument is a memorial of the sinking of MS Estonia in 1994, so the monument is obviously recent, but I'm not sure if it meets the threshold of originality. It might be {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}, so I think that the question warrants a discussion. Stefan2 (talk) 16:52, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- As the uploader, I would obviously like to see this image retained here at Wikipedia. I'm far from being an expert on copyright law, but looking at [7], it states that according to Estonian law, "It is permitted to reproduce works of architecture, works of visual art, works of applied art or photographic works which are permanently located in places open to the public, without the authorisation of the author and without payment of remuneration, by any means except for mechanical contact copying, and to communicate such reproductions of works to the public except if the work is the main subject of the reproduction and it is intended to be used for direct commercial purposes." Given that Wikipedia is a non-commercial venture, I'd have thought that we are in perfectly legal territory in using this photograph on the encyclopedia. Any further advice would be welcome, particularly because Kelly (talk · contribs) has also placed similar tags on a number of my other Estonian images, which I would also like to see retained here. Ethan Doyle White (talk) 18:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Ethan Doyle White - I do want to thank you for your lovely photos. I have been copying many to Wikimedia Commons and adding their scheduled monument and listed building information; I also added several last night to List of scheduled monuments in West Somerset. In regards to freedom of panorama in Estonia, more information here. Unfortunately, Wikipedia's copyright rules state that content has to be free to re-use for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. Any exceptions would have to fall under the non-free content criteria, under which it might be possible to keep images of the copyrighted sculptures if they meet the criteria, particularly if they accompany critical commentary of the particular artwork. Kelly hi! 18:51, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Than you for your response Kelly. Is there a way in which I could change the licensing on the photographs that I uploaded to make clear that they could only be used for non-commercial purposes? Ethan Doyle White (talk) 19:11, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Ethan Doyle White - I'm afraid it's not a particularly user-friendly process, but it's explained at Wikipedia:Non-free content. Kelly hi! 19:24, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- I have added a new license that specifies the image as non-free. Many thanks for your advice, Kelly. Ethan Doyle White (talk) 20:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- I understand your desire to use the images Ethan Doyle White and also think they are quite nice, but I think you need to be very careful and not simply convert every "free" image whose copyright status is being questioned to non-free. The non-free content criteria are quite limiting and purposely make images harder to use. A valid separate, specific non-free use rationale is required for each use, so converting to non-free may actually mean that the image can no longer be used in certain articles or on certain pages, such as your userpage. I suggest you take a look at WP:NFC and make sure this is really what you want to do. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- I have added a new license that specifies the image as non-free. Many thanks for your advice, Kelly. Ethan Doyle White (talk) 20:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Ethan Doyle White - I'm afraid it's not a particularly user-friendly process, but it's explained at Wikipedia:Non-free content. Kelly hi! 19:24, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Than you for your response Kelly. Is there a way in which I could change the licensing on the photographs that I uploaded to make clear that they could only be used for non-commercial purposes? Ethan Doyle White (talk) 19:11, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Ethan Doyle White - I do want to thank you for your lovely photos. I have been copying many to Wikimedia Commons and adding their scheduled monument and listed building information; I also added several last night to List of scheduled monuments in West Somerset. In regards to freedom of panorama in Estonia, more information here. Unfortunately, Wikipedia's copyright rules state that content has to be free to re-use for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. Any exceptions would have to fall under the non-free content criteria, under which it might be possible to keep images of the copyrighted sculptures if they meet the criteria, particularly if they accompany critical commentary of the particular artwork. Kelly hi! 18:51, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- As the uploader, I would obviously like to see this image retained here at Wikipedia. I'm far from being an expert on copyright law, but looking at [7], it states that according to Estonian law, "It is permitted to reproduce works of architecture, works of visual art, works of applied art or photographic works which are permanently located in places open to the public, without the authorisation of the author and without payment of remuneration, by any means except for mechanical contact copying, and to communicate such reproductions of works to the public except if the work is the main subject of the reproduction and it is intended to be used for direct commercial purposes." Given that Wikipedia is a non-commercial venture, I'd have thought that we are in perfectly legal territory in using this photograph on the encyclopedia. Any further advice would be welcome, particularly because Kelly (talk · contribs) has also placed similar tags on a number of my other Estonian images, which I would also like to see retained here. Ethan Doyle White (talk) 18:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:13, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Faim Khan.jpg[edit]
- File:Faim Khan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploaded as the author's own-work, but seems doubtful, and uploader has history of other acknowledged copyvios. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 17:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Siquieros Mural.tif[edit]
- File:Siquieros Mural.tif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Is this a derivative work? Steel1943 (talk) 23:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Animation Studio - Santa Monica - exterior.jpg[edit]
- Is this a derivative work? Steel1943 (talk) 23:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Animation Studio - Santa Monica - interior1.jpg[edit]
- Is this a derivative work? Steel1943 (talk) 23:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
October 21[edit]
File:SURABHI PRABHU.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F2 by KrakatoaKatie (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- File:SURABHI PRABHU.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This looks like a professional-produced photo, and I'm not seeing any convincing proof that the uploader took the photo or owns its copyright. Steel1943 (talk) 00:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - Previous upload was deleted as F9 and editor was blocked for copyright violations. Eeekster (talk) 00:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Mapa-rodovia-faria-lima.jpg[edit]
- The Brazilian government does not release its works free of copyright. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Seesmic Logo.png[edit]
- File:Seesmic Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly not free. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
-
- I have changed this to a fair use logo. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Srplogo33.png[edit]
- File:Srplogo33.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo of a political party. The uploader is unlikely the copyright holder. Stefan2 (talk) 20:29, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Fritts.jpg[edit]
- File:Fritts.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It says "Photo by Michael Cornelison, Alabama Living". Who is Michael Cornelison? Stefan2 (talk) 20:31, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
File:B4x-YpHIYAAFt6n.jpg[edit]
- File:B4x-YpHIYAAFt6n.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
File:La course presidentielle de 1990 - Stevenson Magloire.jpg[edit]
- Overwritten file: two in one.
- File uploaded by Alsandro (talk · contribs) and Pennsylvania Penguin (talk · contribs): Appears to be a painting by Stevenson Magloire. There is no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder.
- File uploaded by Pennsylvania Penguin (talk · contribs): Dupe of File:Vincestevensonfootball.jpg. To be speedily deleted per WP:F1. Stefan2 (talk) 21:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- The painting is certainly here without permission. And the dupe has no need for retention. Perhaps a fair use claim could be made for the painting, but there is no specific commentary on the painting used in Stevenson Magloire. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Tripp Eisen.jpg[edit]
- File:Tripp Eisen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: three in one.
- File uploaded by Iamyourpast (talk · contribs): Sourced to an external website. No evidence of permission.
- File uploaded by KoRnDoll (talk · contribs): No source and no licence. Uploaded several years later in a slightly different form under the same name on Commons by a different user who claims that it is own work by the Commons uploader. Unfortunately, we have no evidence that this is the case.
- File uploaded by Aiwy (talk · contribs): No source and no licence. Stefan2 (talk) 21:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
File:SilverFast PrinTao.jpg[edit]
- File:SilverFast PrinTao.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a software screenshot, and so would need an OTRS confirmation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Pavilion View.JPG[edit]
- File:Pavilion View.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Does the text "copyright reserved of ugyen dorji" mean that the picture is unfree? Stefan2 (talk) 23:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- It suggests that the uploader is not the copyright owner. It raises a question as to whether this can be released to the public domain or not by uploader. But this person looks to be inactive here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:30, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
File:School1.jpg[edit]
- File:School1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: three in one.
- File uploaded by Hzoi (talk · contribs): Claimed to be a work of the United States Government with a link to a United States Government website. The link doesn't seem to work for me. If it can be verified that the file is a work of the United States Government, then the file can be kept, otherwise delete.
- File uploaded by Yeshy (talk · contribs): No source and no licence. Delete.
- File uploaded twice by Eng2hgroup (talk · contribs): No source and no licence. Delete. Stefan2 (talk) 23:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
October 22[edit]
File:Rahman Alemi, After Silence(2015).jpg[edit]
- This looks like a professionally-taken photo that has been cropped. Steel1943 (talk) 00:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Eisenach.jpg[edit]
- File:Eisenach.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unable to verify image source or license. Kelly hi! 13:48, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- The case is closed. See original discussion here. Please revert your edit. Thank you. Storye book 13:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete In the previous PUF discussion, someone found a page with text in Russian which Google translated as "If you use any materials published on our website, a link is required!" Unfortunately, the quote does not reveal if there also are other restrictions in addition to linking which you have to comply with when using the material. For example, it might only be permitted to use the material in specific situations, or after having been given explicit permission to use the material. Besides, "use" is not sufficiently specific since we don't know whether modifications are permitted or not. What does the word "use" cover? --Stefan2 (talk) 22:01, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- An option would be to convert it to non-free if the original source and copyright holder can be identified per WP:NFCC#10a. Kelly hi! 09:00, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- The image is no longer hosted at the source, so we can only go by the evidence we have. (I would love to have a full translation from an uninvolved party of the information on the source page, but it doesn't look like that is available.) We know that the source site required a link to the originating website, but that is compatible with the "attribution" requirements of Wikipedia. We have no evidence of any other restrictions; Stefan2's speculations are just speculations. The best evidence suggests that the requirements from the source are compatible with Wikipedia's acceptable restrictions. Given that, and barring evidence to the contrary, I think our policy allows us to keep the image. – Quadell (talk) 12:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- A licence can only be used if the licence explicitly states that the material can be used. The page only states one condition which must be satisfied if the material is used, but does not specify whether the material can be used in the first place. The statement on the website is therefore useless. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:21, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ξxplicit 03:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- The problem is that the permission quoted by User:Quadell in the previous discussion only lists a necessary condition: you have to provide attribution through linking. The permission doesn't reveal whether this condition is a sufficient condition. It is also not stated that the image can be modified, so it seems that we have a non-derivative licence. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:54, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- I think you're reading that incorrectly. Modifying an image is a way of using an image. You're imagining that when the copyright holder said "use", he meant "use without modifications", but that's not what he said; he said it can be used (with a link back). And if he wanted to specify some uses that were allowed, while withholding permission for others, he could have done so. He did not. – Quadell (talk) 14:06, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Southern Comfort Vanilla Spice Eggnog Quart TAKEN ON-2015-Oct-21.jpeg[edit]
- File:Southern Comfort Vanilla Spice Eggnog Quart TAKEN ON-2015-Oct-21.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Since the subject of the picture is possible a non-free subject, this may be considered a derivative work of the logo. Steel1943 (talk) 04:42, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- Because the picture contained a registered trademarked logo, I changed the license from the cc-zero license to that of the "Non-free logo|regtrademark=yes" license. I also provided a fair-use rationale, and reduced the image's size by 75% so that it's very low resolution.I am the author of the photograph.YouarelovedSOmuch (talk) 06:41, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Steadmanlogo5.jpg[edit]
- File:Steadmanlogo5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Claimed as public domain, but the logo looks too original for that to my untrained eye. Would appreciate other editors with more experience in this area weighing in though. Note that uploader made about a dozen other uploads around this time and most of them have been deleted for various reasons. Jenks24 (talk) 11:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- Also not specifically tagging it on to this nomination, but any ideas whether File:Steadman band.jpg can really be public domain? Jenks24 (talk) 11:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Josephine Ochoa, Los Angeles CA, 2015.png[edit]
- Professional photo, unclear source. Needs clarification of who the photographer is and OTRS permission if it is not the uploader. January (talk) 16:01, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Josephine Ochoa, Los Angeles Photoshoot, 2015.png[edit]
- Professional photo, unclear source. Needs clarification of who the photographer is and OTRS permission if it is not the uploader. January (talk) 16:02, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- Image found here, and it looks like it's by a commercial fashion photographer, so highly unlikely that it's free license. Mosmof (talk) 18:20, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Manics at the brits.jpg[edit]
- File:Manics at the brits.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Nothing at the source page says the image is public domain John of Reading (talk) 18:02, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
[edit]
Today is October 22 2015. Put new nominations in Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 October 22 -- (new nomination)
If the current date's page has been started without the header, apply {{subst:puf log}} to the top of the day's page.
Please ensure "===October 22===" is at the very top of the new page so that internal page links from the main Possibly unfree files page (the one you're on now) work.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||