Wikipedia:Proposed mergers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:Proposed merger)
Jump to: navigation, search

Closing instructions

"WP:PM" redirects here. For requesting to move or rename a page, see Wikipedia:Requested moves. For page history mergers, see Wikipedia:Requests for history merge.
Shortcuts:
The discussion about merging at the village pump is now archived (here). The vast majority of those who expressed an opinion considered the system based on the current templates and this process (Wikipedia:Proposed mergers) to be inadequate.

The implementation of a new automated system is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Merge/Archive 2#Automation of merge proposals. More participation in that discussion is welcome.

This page lists proposed article mergers as a supplement to the merge categories and templates; it is meant for discussing possible mergers and does not replace any of the other steps in the merger process. Please add the appropriate merger tag(s) to the articles before listing them here.

How to propose a merger[edit]

Main page: Help:Merging

There are three types of mergers on Wikipedia:

  1. mergers that are so obviously necessary and appropriate that no one is expected to object;
  2. mergers that would benefit from discussion with the other editors at the affected articles about whether and/or how to perform the merge; and
  3. mergers that are controversial or potentially difficult to carry out, and therefore need assistance from uninvolved editors in determining whether to merge the pages.

If the pages that you would like to merge fall into the first group, then it is not necessary to propose a merger at all. You should boldly do the merger now, without formally proposing it. (In the event that someone unexpectedly objects, then the merger can be undone easily, and you can formally propose the merger for discussion at that time.)

If a formal discussion is wanted, then proposing a merger can be done in three steps:

  1. Create a place for discussion. Go to the Talk Page (also known as the discussion page) of the TARGET ARTICLE (the one you want to merge to) and create a section (eg: "Merger proposal") to discuss the merger. If there's already a discussion on the talk page regarding the merger, you can omit this step. Whether the discussion is new or old, make sure the discussion section names all articles involved and links to them. The section name can be anything that includes the word merge (for example ==Merger proposal==).
  2. Put one of the merger tags at the top of the articles you wish to be merged. The templates {{Merge from}} and {{Merge to}}, or {{merge}} are the most common ones. Remember to make sure that the Discuss link in each tag points to the section you've created in step 1 (this is to prevent having two separate discussions on different talk pages).
  3. If the proposed merge is controversial or potentially difficult to carry out, follow the directions under #Requests for merge assistance and feedback to add it to the list.

Many bold mergers are performed each day. Of the mergers that are formally proposed, about 95% fall into the second category, of wanting discussion or practical assistance from the editors at the articles that are to be merged. The remaining 5% of formally proposed mergers are on contentious topics or are controversial for one reason or another. Only this small fraction is listed at the bottom of this page as instructed in step #3.

Requests for merge assistance and feedback[edit]

If you need outside feedback regarding mergers that are either tricky or of a controversial nature, please do the following:

  • Tag the article as shown above
  • Create a discussion as shown above
  • Notify the talk page of the appropriate Wikiproject to get knowledgeable people to comment on it. (To find out which Wikiproject the page is associated with, check the associated talk page. It should be tagged with a template, such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey.)
  • If there is consensus to merge, but the merge is difficult, contact Wikipedia:WikiProject Merge for assistance.

For other topics:

  • If you need help with renaming or moving, consult Help:Moving a page.
  • Cut-and-paste move fixes: If you have merged an article by this method, then you need to request page histories to be merged; list them at requests for history merge. Please DO NOT perform further moves by cut and paste.

NOTE: Do not Post Here if You are Not Willing to do the Merge Yourself. We will provide you assistance in how to complete the merge if you are unsure how to do it. -Project Merge
NOTE: Please do not re-list old merge proposals that are already tagged and in the "to Merge" queue (including requests made up to two years ago), as these will be handled as we get to them. -Project Merge

New requests[edit]

If you need assistance with proposing a merge, list it below and someone will make sure it's properly listed. Note that this will not get the merge completed, as there is a large merge backlog. Once a merge is listed properly, move it to the "Completed requests" or "Awaiting consensus" sections below as appropriate.

Please list new requests at the bottom of this section. Use the Edit Summary and list at least a link to the article to be redirected. Please legitimize your request by signing each listing or comment by typing four tildes (~~~~):


Oppose. Look again, better yet, withdraw this nomination due to possible error in judgement. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 07:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Support. Strongly disagree with Poeticbent and thank you not to include POV in talk. Subcamps are not historically notable for their names, because they were not given names. See [[1]]. Very simple to observe that subcamps were redirected to the geographical areas where they were located, because the subcamps did not have proper names. Treatment of Malchow concentration camp nonstandard and nonperformant. Stan94301 (talk) 16:09, 25 February 2015 (UTC)


Awaiting consensus[edit]

Once tagged, request should be added here. This section can also be used if an old proposal needs further discussion. We will attempt to get more people to comment on it.

  • Tagged and awaiting comment; suggest opposite merge direction due to the latter article being a stub. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:10, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Merge Investigative Project on Terrorism into Steven Emerson. There is no such entity as the Investigative Project on Terrorism, and much of the information included in the current article belongs in an article under the actual organization which is The Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation founded in April 2006. There is also a separate entity, The Investigative Project, and the Steven Emerson article where some of the information belongs. Everything is being lump summed under an invalid article. AtsmeConsult 17:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
*Note: Discussion belongs on the article page which survives the merger (the "target page"), not the one which will become a redirect. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:59, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Merge Fantasy literature into Fantasy; Fantasy literature is a pretty small article, and its scope could easily be incorporated into Fantasy with a little expansion work. Both articles tagged and discussion started here. Pariah24 (talk) 08:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Merge MG Cars and MG Motor; There are two articles about the motoring brand MG - MG Cars and MG Motor. This causes confusion about a brand that is not defunct as the article MG Cars states. It is proposed that one article should be created named 'MG' with details about the brand - past and present. If there is too much information for one article, then 'The History Of MG' would be a suitable secondary article. The merger has so far not come up with a natural conclusion. See details here. Aldoturner (talk) 12:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Merge Kollam Airport into Asramam Maidan; The two articles overlap in that they describe the same open space which once used to be a landing ground in the 1930s (not an airport, as claimed). I propose that the "airport article be merged into the history section of Asramam Maidan article in order to provide more accurate coverage of the topic. --Trinidade (talk) 16:11, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Merge Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago into Florida v. Zimmerman. I do not believe the sparse content here merits its own stand-alone article. All the info here can easily be merged with the Florida v. Zimmerman article without any losses. I am adding the merge proposal to this list because it needs attention from a broader audience than it has gotten. -- Veggies (talk) 20:04, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
    This has been discussed at [4]. Nakon 06:05, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Merge Sam Hunter (TV series) into Hunted (TV series). Former article is about a proposed spin-off series that was never produced and is officially cancelled, rendering the article moot but the content should still be rolled into the latter article. 68.146.52.234 (talk) 14:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Answered requests[edit]

After discussion concludes, completed requests should be moved below. Please mark as {{Done}}; {{Not Done}}; {{Working}} when consensus has been reached.

Yes check.svg Done by others. Trim02 (talk) 19:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done A quick search shows they are not the same. If you can provide a source for them being the same, please do so at Talk:Muhallabia and create a new discussion or send a new merge request. Trim02 (talk) 12:21, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done. Sources was provided and a discussion was opened. Result: Merge with common name Trim02 (talk) 12:40, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

- Cheers! bd2412 T 17:18, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done by others. Trim02 (talk) 19:38, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done Trim02 (talk) 02:24, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done -- phoebe / (talk to me) 03:08, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done -- phoebe / (talk to me) 07:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done by someone, though could use double-checking, looks like it was just redirected. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 03:00, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done only comment opposes merge due to lack of quality of the target article. Complete rewrite would be necessary. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:10, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Working; although opposition has been expressed, both articles are non-independantly sourced going on five years, and there has been no attempts at improvement through the corse of this discussion. No reason why proposer or someone familiar with the subject(s) should not proceed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:10, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Merge
Mosaics within Mosaics to Circulatory System Circulatory System (band). Discussion >>>HERE<<< Wgolf (talk) 16:20, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Tagged and awaiting consensus Wgolf (talk) 16:20, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Comment-I put a AFD on it as well for the time being as this is an album with no info that is coming soon. (If someone who knows about the band can come in-great) Wgolf (talk) 16:22, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Note: The AfD debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Note: The AfD debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Yes check.svg Done with other albums equally obscure; Merger of non-notable album into band article should occur; proposer should carry out. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 12:54, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
into List of MacGyver characters. Discussion is >>>HERE<<<. Dwanyewest (talk) 06:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Proceed per discussion, no opposition after five months. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 12:54, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Merge
Lennie Godber
Mr. Mackay
Lukewarm (Porridge)
McClaren (Porridge)
Mr. Barrowclough
Harry Grout
Blanco Webb
Norman Stanley Fletcher
into Porridge (TV series). Discussion is >>>HERE<<<. Dwanyewest (talk) 00:45, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Only comments after four months favor the mass-merges of the request. Someone familiar with the subject should proceed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:40, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Merge Salawat (now redirected to Peace be upon him (Islam)) and Durood. Reason given: The articles seems to indicate that Salawat is Arabic of Durood. Also, sending Peace, Salutations, Blessings , etc on the Muhammad all usually refer to similar things, with some slight but significant difference in the meaning of the words. The difference comes in usage of different phrases. E.g.- one kind of phrase used after mentioning his name and another kind of phrase used in Salah. Rather a sub-topic should be used to mention the difference (Note: Naat is not used for this merger, which removed previous merge request) Verycuriousboy (talk) 12:22, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
  • No opposition voiced. Proposer or someone familiar with the subject should proceed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 11:21, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
  • No opposition; proposer or someone familiar with subject should proceed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 11:21, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Non-notable articles should be merged as requested; no opposition voiced; proposer or someone familiar with subject should proceed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 11:21, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done by Simp Redir (non-sourced). GenQuest "Talk to Me" 09:29, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Working
Currently being discussed at here. Main issue is what is the official name of the system, and which direction should the merge proceed? --Gccwang (talk) 16:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Consensus seems to favor the more developed article as target. Discussion moved; merger should proceed.- GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:59, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Merge:
    • UTRA-TDD LCR (Stub) into TD-SCDMA with proposed redirection — duplication of topic - both articles address the same technology.
    • UTRA-TDD HCR (Stub) into TD-CDMA with proposed redirection — duplication of topic - both articles address the same technology. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 17:27, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  •  Working No opposition expressed; proposer or someone knowledgeable about the subject should proceed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:59, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Merge:
    • UMTS-FDD (Stub) into UMTS (section FDD) with proposed redirection — duplication of topic - both articles address the same technology.
    • UMTS-TDD (Stub) into UMTS (section TDD) with proposed redirection — duplication of topic - both articles address the same technology.
    • W-CDMA (UMTS) into UMTS with proposed redirection — duplication of topic - both articles address the same technology. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 17:27, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  •  Working No opposition expressed; proposer or someone knowledgeable about the subject should proceed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:59, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Tagged and after >14 months nobody responded, see Talk:TNT N.V.#Merger proposal. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 10:42, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
No opposition after more than one year. --Gccwang (talk) 16:58, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Working No opposition to merger; proposer or someone knowledgeable about the subject should proceed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:47, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
This is clearly the same person. I would suggest Iliana Iotova as the merged spelling, as it is used on her European Parliament page. Place Clichy (talk) 12:06, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Working No brainer; proposer or someone knowledgeable about the subject should proceed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:47, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Consensus is to proceed with merger; proposer or someone knowledgeable about the subject should proceed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:47, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Recent archives[edit]

This proposal should be made on a global 50-state basis, not on a single state, to maintain consistency across states. Wbm1058 (talk) 16:28, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
I have tagged. Awaiting consensus or a bold merge by someone more familiar with these subjects. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:36, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Partial consolidation of the articles involved have now taken place (Multani dialectMultani language; ThalochiThalochi dialect). Additional input, however, will be required for finding consensus for the rest. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:12, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
I fixed several broken and reverted Redirects that involved sockpuppetry and blocked editors. It's a mess. NOTE: I crossed out what's already been merged. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:06, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done Closing this as done. The original proposal is 80% complete, and no further movement on the remaining two items seems evident. (They can be re-proposed if needed in the future.) GenQuest "Talk to Me" 03:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Tagged, awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:13, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done Article creator (and merge requester) withdrew the proposal. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:41, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
  • US Railroad classes. I think it's suitable to merge all three articles of the US Railroad Classes to one article. The Class I Railroad page is detailed, but is subjected to cleanup. The Class II railroad and Class III railroad pages are the other articles in this proposal. The list in "Class III" might have to be in a different page. Please consider this merging. Ctempire (talk) 21:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 04:08, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
tagged and awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:31, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Merge now taking place. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 08:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 Working The incomplete merge was made by an IP (95.141.31.4) on March 3, 2013. Since then, the merger was reversed with the discussion continuing here. There will need to be administrative or supervisory input to close this apparently divisive proposal. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 04:03, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done Boldly by an IP. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:22, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
tagged and awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:31, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Note: requested further input from Wikipedia:WikiProject Miami {{WikiProject Miami tasks}} – Wbm1058 (talk) 18:55, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Consensus seems to favor the merge. Someone familiar with the subject should go ahead and do it. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:44, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done – Neighborhoods where notability has not been established were not merged. Wbm1058 (talk) 05:26, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
  • I'm not going to read anything about the procedure I should use, but just ignore all rules and report it here: Geometric Shapes and Geometric Shapes (Unicode block) are duplicates, it would be nice if somebody who read about the way to merge to articles could merge them. Thank you. --Schnark (talk) 09:38, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done I suspect you were looking at the redirect. The original redirect was accomplished nearly a year ago; however, another stub-version of the redirected article reappeared recently. It has since been redirected. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

All articles tagged for merging[edit]

This section is updated by Merge bot.

See also[edit]