Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:REFUND)
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrator instructions

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7 or G11 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases


Draft:Sanomechanics[edit]

I, Bbezverk, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bbezverk (talk) 18:33, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

That draft comes off as fairly promotional to me, and I wonder about WP:FRINGE and WP:MEDRS compliance. It will need a cleanup if restored.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:07, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
~
Please identify what sounds promotional -- will be very happy to fix. The page was meant to explain/inform on mainstream biomechanical research (results came out of a Tufts Medical School study. Here's the journalistic/pop-science write-up: http://www.healio.com/orthotics-prosthetics/prosthetics/news/print/o-and-p-news/%7B8c964a6e-b0ea-4bd3-a21f-a29feae7fa3c%7D/new-research-could-lead-to-healthier-joints-better-gait-for-amputees, and here's a scientific article in Nature: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep08103#author-information Would be really good to know what specifically triggers red flags (medical advice? there's no advice. If there were criticism of research, it would be addressed in the article, but the topic, to the best of my knowledge, isn't controversial) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbezverk (talkcontribs) 16:28, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
The thing that worries me the most is the extremely positive tone of the draft: The benefits of the Sanomechanics exercises are wide-reaching and include those used to alleviate lower back pain, neck pain, shoulder problems, a condition known as tennis elbow, knee pain, and some forms of arthritis. . This makes promises with no sources, rather than documenting the scope. At the same time, benefits of the Sanomechanics exercises can be seen right now is very unspecific and sounds promotional as well.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:47, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
This is very helpful, and can of course be edited. I can work on a more neutral tone -- if the draft page is restored. Which hasn't happened. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbezverk (talkcontribs) 21:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
@Bbezverk: I've restored it now, sorry! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Pramod Attarde1[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Pramod Attarde1 (talk) 18:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

  • There is nothing to do as the page is not deleted. However note that Wikipedia is not the pace to write about yourself. You are welcome to contribute in other ways to enhance Wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia, so we need people to write or add to articles here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:51, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Alphabet Soup (film)[edit]

Believe it or not, I am the person who made that hoax. I have recently discovered Alternate History Wiki and would like to move it there. Thanks. Now I've gotta play them all. (talk) 22:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

@Now I've gotta play them all.: I have emailed you a copy of the text. JohnCD (talk) 15:33, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Oligochaetology[edit]

I, Andycor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Andycor (talk) 14:52, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

@Andycor: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. See WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary - uUnless there is more to say about this than a simple word definition, you might do better to post it at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. JohnCD (talk) 15:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Briana Roy[edit]

I, Theroypublicist, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Theroypublicist (talk) 15:34, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

@Theroypublicist: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

cake 4 gift[edit]

i have no idea why my page cake 4 gift have been deleted please help. -101.59.214.11 (talk) 18:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

@101.59.214.11: You might want to check your talk page user talk:Yash jhambh, which explains that the article was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 because it contained no credible assertion of notability. As such, it isn't eligible for restoration by request on this page. You can ask the deleting admin on User talk:Randykitty about restoring it to user space or draft space for you to improve. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:36, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Bili vegas[edit]

I, 74.88.25.159, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 74.88.25.159 (talk) 22:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Hyperpallium[edit]

I, MultiPoly, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MultiPoly (talk) 01:46, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

@MultiPoly: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:49, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

The Conventioneers[edit]

The article got PROD due to notability and sourcing concerns. The last point is admittedly a valid one, but I feel the subject is notable. The show ran for seven seasons, received some international distribution, and perhaps most importantly, got in trouble with a notable watchdog group. I intend to work on the article. -Damnedfan1234 (talk) 05:53, 18 July 2016 (UTC) Damnedfan1234 (talk) 05:53, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

@Damnedfan1234: Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Ayesha Nazir Jatt[edit]

i want to update it i have lots or refrence links and data about it -Shobi136 (talk) 07:13, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

@Shobi136: X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayesha Nazir Jatt, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Joe Decker (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Sticky Learning (G13: Abandoned Article for creation – to retrieve it, see WP:REFUND/G13)[edit]

Darrenasmithmtm (talk) 08:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 08:37, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Now at Draft:Sticky learning (different capitalization). ~Amatulić (talk) 05:10, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

European Business Awards[edit]

We are a business and awards programme which is highly regarded in Europe and aim to encourage business growth in Europe and then click the "Save page" button below -164.39.166.235 (talk) 12:25, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Business Awards, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. -- GB fan 12:34, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
This user couldn't take "no" for an answer, and created a substantially identical article, which is now deleted again. One more time and it will be protected from re-creation. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

2016 Ramadan attacks[edit]

I am not contesting the outcome of the deletion discussion, however I am formulating an Arbitration Enforcement action against a user and some of their misconduct was within this now-deleted article. I would like this article temporarily undeleted (not necessarily in mainspace) for review. -AnotherNewAccount (talk) 15:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

May want to ask the administrators that work in AE to undelete it, in your enforcement request. Unless you need to read it yourself.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:02, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
@AnotherNewAccount: I would be prepared to email you a copy of the text, if you enable email on your account. To do that, click on "Preferences" at the top of the screen, and at the bottom of the "user profile" tab enter your email address (which will not be visible to me or anyone) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users". JohnCD (talk) 18:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
@JohnCD: Thanks, but I'm honestly not really interested in the text, I am interested in the editing history, and possibly that of the talk page too; I need to present diffs involving the conduct of the user in question. Ideally it needs to be viewable by both that user and other participating editors. You can blank the content, "NOINDEX" it, move it all to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/2016 Ramadan attacks - or perhaps the best idea - undelete and redirect to List of terrorist incidents, 2016. I don't mind. AnotherNewAccount (talk) 18:42, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Hmmm. Pinging Sandstein, the deleting admin, for his view. JohnCD (talk) 20:22, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
As I've said on my user talk page: That is in my view not a sufficient reason for restoring content the community wants deleted. If there is actionable misconduct by an editor, chances are that it can also be shown through edits of non-deleted articles; if not, it likely does not warrant action.  Sandstein  20:24, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
This is now addressed, see WP:AE#Result concerning Sepsis II.  Sandstein  15:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Fragapalooza[edit]

Page is relevant and contains data that is not located anywhere else - we were recording our attendance numbers on the site as well as other data relevant to the event. If anything I would like the content if I cannot get the page restored. -Melbosa (talk) 17:14, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Might want to address the issues that SwisterTwister PRODded the page for, though. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:07, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Why Ahmadiyyas are not Muslims[edit]

This article is an encyclopedia article about the book -Chunakkutti (talk) 17:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

@Chunakkutti: X mark.svg Not done. It does not appear that this book meets Wikipedia's notability standard for books, explained at WP:Notability (books). JohnCD (talk) 18:13, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
@JohnCD: If you restore the article i will improve the article Chunakkutti (talk) 18:29, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
@Chunakkutti: Then start a new version. In draft space, preferably: Draft:Why Ahmadiyyas are not Muslims. There is nothing worthwhile restoring in the deleted version, it's just one sentence "Why Ahmadiyyas are not Muslims is an open letter to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the current leader of the Ahmadiyyas. Its Written by Aboobacker Amani" with a bunch of refspam links to the book. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
But you will be wasting your time, because No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. It is quite clear that this book does not meet the requirements of WP:Notability (books). It is not listed in Worldcat or on Amazon or Google Books; the ISBN number returns no results. The only review I have found is on Goodreads, which gives it 5 stars, but as the review is by the book's author that counts for nothing. JohnCD (talk) 20:20, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Sorry this listed in amazon. see here. http://www.amazon.in/Why-Ahmadiyyas-are-not-Muslims/dp/1533514496/ Chunakkutti (talk) 20:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
So it is: I looked at Amazon.com, not Amazon.in. Well, make a draft if you like, but read WP:BKCRIT and WP:BKTS first, and understand that it will not be accepted unless you give references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 20:45, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Greg Moyer[edit]

I, 2604:2000:F80F:B700:8D55:6E0:F780:3BE6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2604:2000:F80F:B700:8D55:6E0:F780:3BE6 (talk) 21:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Greg Moyer. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Greg Moyer[edit]

I, 2604:2000:F80F:B700:8D55:6E0:F780:3BE6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2604:2000:F80F:B700:8D55:6E0:F780:3BE6 (talk) 21:56, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Already answered - see above. You only need to ask once. JohnCD (talk) 21:58, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

2XL TrophyLite Rally[edit]

expired prod -Prisencolin (talk) 04:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Prisencolin: Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Piotrus (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 09:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

File:CWL Logo.png[edit]

non free file apparently deleted after it was vandalized after file was removed from page -Prisencolin (talk) 04:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Prisencolin: that file was deleted on Commons and has never been on en-wp as far as I can see. If you want to use it as fair-use, you'll have to find a source and upload it here. I don't know whether Commons might be willing to undelete and transfer it. JohnCD (talk) 09:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Tony Granger[edit]

This page is accurate and should be updated. 204.10.132.7 (talk) 15:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)Gabrielle

Yes check.svg Done. Since the deletion debate at WP:Articles for deletion/Tony Granger was closed as SOFTDELETE, the page is restored on request. Note that it may be re-nominated: please add any additional references to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 16:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Bill Goodwyn[edit]

I, ShawneeDiscovery, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ShawneeDiscovery (talk) 20:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please do not copy other people's writing into this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Laurette Nicoll[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 172.242.52.243 (talk) 21:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Artem Lobov[edit]

Originally deleted because he was considered not to have sufficient fights in a major organisation, he now does - I will update his fight record with new UFC if/when the page is restored. Thanks for assistance -LeinsterLad (talk) 03:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artem Lobov, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user The Bushranger (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

User:DJ CHAIRMAN[edit]

Good Day, My name is Godfrey Motheogane and my disk jockey name is DJ Chairman. I created a page on wikipedia for DJ CHAIRMAN For promotional use of my music services and to build a brand. This page was deleted on wikipedia because it does not conform to the rules of wikipedia and the reason that wikipedia gave me for deleting my page was Blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a web host. I agree with your reasons and i take responsibility for the deletion of my page. My only request is that can i please have a a copy of the contents that was on that page so that i can find other online blogs where i can host my profile. I am really sorry for this inconvenience and i will respect wikipedia in future. Many Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ CHAIRMAN (talkcontribs) 09:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

@DJ CHAIRMAN: Yes check.svg Done I have emailed a copy to you. No need to apologise: Wikipedia does not make clear to new users what it is not for, so it is not surprising that many people think it is just another social-networking site. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Stephen Lendman[edit]

I added references as asked but the page still was deleted. What do I do to have the page remain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbeason (talkcontribs) 16:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Asking David Gerard about this, but I wonder if the issue was that these references seem to talk about the book rather than the individual.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
  • They appear to be in the manner of personal references, rather than citations to WP:RSes supporting the text (the little blue numbers you see on most articles). Here's the references section from the article:
  • CLARITY PRESS (address: 2625 Piedmont Rd. NE. Atlanta GA) regarding the three books published there!
  • Ellen Brown (web of Debt) book review for the book How Wall Street Fleeces America by S Lendman
  • John McMurtry ( Unequal Freedoms- The Global Market as an Ethical System)
  • Peter Phillips ( President Media Freedom Foundation/ Project Censored) for Stephen's award from that Project Censored!}}
I mean, I just deleted it as an expired PROD, so I have no objection to restoring it if actual references for the text can be found. Though probably a draft would be a better idea, seeing as the text doesn't have the refs as yet. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to do it. - David Gerard (talk) 21:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
    • Please restore it and I will add references that meet Wiki needs. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbeason (talkcontribs) 22:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
      • I've restored it to Draft:Stephen Lendman, with all the history (including previous deleted versions, I wasn't aware it had been PRODed before). Make sure you read over WP:BLP, Wikipedia is very fussy that articles about living people be well referenced. Good luck writing an article that sticks when it's moved to mainspace :-) - David Gerard (talk) 23:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Edin Murga[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Manos H. Scorer (talk) 18:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

The player has played in a fully profesional league. Plus the references are from reliable sources. Thank you.

X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edin Murga, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Kudpung (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Technically, the article was then reposted and redeleted as G4 by Patar knight, but I am sceptical on restoring this G4 without the prior AfD being overturned.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
My reply here covers this page as well. Despite being updated, the article did not address the concerns in the AfD (i.e. WP:NFOOTY, WP:GNG. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 20:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Dr. Mohammad Tahir Shah[edit]

Dr. Mohammad Tahir Shah is the Vice Chancellor of FATA University, Pakistan which is the first ever university established in the Federal Administratored Area in KPK Pakistan, He has great achievements in the field of Geology and Environmental Sciences. He as been given the Presidential Awards in the field of Sciences by Government of Pakistan. Links have been updated on the Page. And References have been given also. People who are less popular and with less achievements are present on the wikipedia. This information is added so that many students and the people can visit his page and find his research papers and references for there future work and research. So it is requested to kindly not delete this page. -Syed Sajid Shah mashwani (talk) 18:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. "X exists, therefore Y should" is not a valid argument to make. Please read WP:Notability and WP:Notability (people), and note that we do not accept CVs. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Moranaffa[edit]

I would still to like to contribute to Wikipedia -Moranaffa (talk) 18:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

@Moranaffa: Um ... sure (Moranaffa does not exist). However, I'd recommend you to make sure that the biographies you write satisfy the WP:PEOPLE notability policy.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kerry Babbage[edit]

I, 103.29.31.46, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 103.29.31.46 (talk) 01:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


Enter your reasoning here Kerry Babbage is a Public Personality and Community Leader, Speaker and Human Rights Activist and then click the "Save page" button below -AzzekezzA (talk) 01:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

  • While that may be true the page used very promotional language unsuitable for an encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Aayo1978/sandbox/ContractCareers[edit]

I, 120.147.68.29, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 120.147.68.29 (talk) 03:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Seancombs84/Boi Sirius[edit]

I, Seancombs84, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Seancombs84 (talk) 10:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

letoya makhene[edit]

i want to improve the article with good sources. -Mhlabauyangilinga (talk) 13:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Camp Walden[edit]

I, Pattwala, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pattwala (talk) 14:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

I would like to make another attempt at getting this page published, however the Wikipedia draft was unfortunately the only place where the copy exists. I would like to retrieve it so I can take it out of Wikipedia to write the copy, then come back and attempt to publish. Thank you. -Pattwala (talk) 14:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Mick Murphy[edit]

I, Burlington Bert, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Burlington Bert (talk) 15:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

  • What do you intend to do to this? I restored it earlier this year and there were no improvements made. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
  • I intend to make updates and improvements to the article, including new/amended references and the provision of new biographical information Burlington Bert (talk) 11:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Achraf Baznani[edit]

This artist began to make known in magazines in 2014 and its popularity has risen sharply since July 2015. He has exhibited some of his work in several galleries. [1] -Alfabytes (talk) 16:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

That article has been repeatedly deleted because it was written in overly promotional tone. I'd suggest to start a draft at Draft:Achraf Baznani first.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Or not, per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Maromania that draft is protected now.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Edgar_Littlefield[edit]

I, 155.178.180.5, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 155.178.180.5 (talk) 16:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

That's been deleted under G13 and restored already once. DO you plan to work on it soon? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

scheibe's dysplasia[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Musketeers.svu (talk) 07:30, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Musketeers.svu It looks like you requested the page's deletion in the past, which is why it was deleted. There's not really that much to be restored, but I have no true issue with restoring it. Offhand I will warn you that you will need to source the page with in-line citations and you also need to make sure to write it in layman's terms as well. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:12, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

User:DJ CHAIRMAN[edit]

Good Day, My name is Godfrey Motheogane and my disk jockey name is DJ Chairman. I created a page on wikipedia for DJ CHAIRMAN For promotional use of my music services and to build a brand. This page was deleted on wikipedia because it does not conform to the rules of wikipedia and the reason that wikipedia gave me for deleting my page was Blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a web host. I agree with your reasons and i take responsibility for the deletion of my page. Can you please send me a copy of the images that was on my Wikipedia page please. I do not have a backup of them. I am really sorry for this inconvenience.i am currently looking for other online blogs where i can host my profile. I am really sorry for this inconvenience and i will respect wikipedia in future. Many Thanks -The Music Producer 08:56, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Offhand here's one piece of advice I can give if you're setting up your website/blogs/etc. Less tends to be more at times and I would recommend that you not use an image if it doesn't closely or exactly represent the materials/equipment you're using in real life. (IE, it can be seen as a bit deceptive if I show an image of professional grade, cutting edge equipment and I'm using a basic microphone or very old equipment. You can do this, but this does tend to look bad when people go to these pages. Part of the charm of amateur music is seeing how people work with little to no professional equipment and seeing how they overcome this.) Putting too many images on a page can make a page look bad and feel clumsy to maneuver around, which can make everything seem more amateurish. When setting up pages it's best to just go for minimalism than anything else.
I'd also recommend that since you're looking to promote yourself, that you use websites like Wix or Weebly. These sites tend to give you a basic template that you can use to set up your page, which can be a huge help when you're just starting out since it'll make things look a little more professional. They're also free, which is an added bonus. Blogs are also good, but be careful since they're set up to be more like a diary than anything else and setting those up to seem professional can be kind of difficult sometimes. I'd recommend setting up the main website on Wix or Weebly and then using a blog to record your creative process in general and to give basic updates. A lot of professionals tend to use this format. Wikis might be good at some point, but keep in mind that those can be slightly difficult to set up since they're expected to be extensive and most can be edited by any user - I'd focus on setting up the website first. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:30, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Vaasthu Vidya Gurukulam[edit]

For rewriting the entire article -Alexandereventual (talk) 10:54, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

@Alexandereventual: the article was deleted as a copyright infringement, so it cannot be restored. Wikipedia cannot host copyright material, even temporarily. I will email you a copy of the text, if you like. JohnCD (talk) 17:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

saurabh kushwaha[edit]

Requesting an Undeletion. Islo123 (talk) 12:03, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

@Islo123: the page has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saurabh kushwaha, and that is where you should comment, but read WP:DISCUSSAFD and WP:Notability (people) first. JohnCD (talk) 17:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Serving the Poorest of the Poor - Work for Poverty Alleviation by Bhai Trilochan Singh Panesar[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Premjit Panesar (talk) 14:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

You did already ask for restoration once, which was granted and then followed by another G13 when nothing happened. Do you plan to work on it soon? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

CoNetrix[edit]

The page "CoNetrix" was deleted by Orangemike on August 19, 2009 for Advertising. Can the page please be restored to a user page so that I can work on it and ensure it follows all rules for posting? -Prlandru (talk) 15:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

File:WOLV Records logo.png + Carnage (DJ)[edit]

This image, which was uploaded in July 2015 was deleted by Explicit back in February under F5. I would like to request this page be restored so I can license them under a free license or in the public domain, because I think that these logos are simple and consists of text. I would like to request these pages be restored so I can license them under a free license or in the public domain, because I think that these logos are simple and consists of text. And also this page named "Carnage (DJ)" was deleted for this reason: 08:04, 19 April 2016 Sandstein (talk | contribs) deleted page Carnage (DJ) (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carnage (DJ) closed as delete), because it has a little depth of coverage in reliable sources and appears to have made no widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record, fails WP:BIO, WP:ANYBIO and WP:MUSBIO. I would like to request these pages be restored and moved into "draft space" so I can improve it. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. XPanettaa (talk) 19:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Restored the logo, for the article I'll request Sandstein to comment.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:13, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
In my view, undeletion requests should show how the article can be made ready for main space in the near future, e.g. through references to new reliable sources.  Sandstein  21:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kavita Kiran[edit]

I, Kavitakiran, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. KavitaKiran 03:00, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)