Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron - Rescue list

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:RSL)
Jump to: navigation, search
  Main page   Rescue list   Content menus   Article Rescue guide   Newsletter   Members   Awards   Talk page  


Project Code of conduct
Rescuesquad - No text.png
  • Please note that WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron is a Wikiproject intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting !votes, nor about vote-stacking.
  • Focus on improving content. For example, when working on an article listed for rescue, try to qualify topic notability by adding reliable-source references with significant coverage of the topic. Edit the content to address specific concerns raised in the AfD discussion.
  • Show the light. If you comment in an AfD discussion, try to describe points in the nomination that have been corrected. Note any remaining deficiencies (e.g. lack of organization, structural problems, lack of balance, etc.). Base comments upon Wikipedia's deletion policy. If an article has been rewritten, you may place a comment in the AfD as a courtesy to assist the closing admin in determining which article version others were referring to.
For more information about article rescue, please refer to ARS Tips to help rescue articles and ARS Rescue guide
For additional article improvement listings, check out this project's archives and listings at WikiProject Cleanup

This is a list and discussion of Wikipedia content for rescue consideration. When posting here, please be sure to:

  • First familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's guidelines for topic notability and identifying reliable sources.
  • Include specific rationale why the article/content should be retained on Wikipedia, and any ideas to improve the content.
  • Sign posts with four tildes ~~~~.
  • Place the {{subst:rescue list|~~~~}} template in Articles for deletion discussions, to notify editors about the listing here. The tag can be placed below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

The following templates can be used for articles listed here:

  • *{{Find sources|Article name}} - Adds source search options
  • *{{lagafd|Article name}} - Adds relevant links
  • *{{lagafd|Article name|Article name (Nth nomination)}} - Likewise but for page nominated N ≥ 4 times


— Please post new entries at the top of the list —

PeopleStrong[edit]

I deprodded this per a cursory source review. The article needs work per the tags atop it. North America1000 10:15, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Note: The article has been nominated for deletion at AfD. North America1000 02:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Junior Software Engineer[edit]

This was prodded as being original research, and for other reasons. Comes across as a topic that could be expanded upon. I added a source, declined the prod, and tagged it with the OR template. For starters, needs work to verify content. North America1000 09:32, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Note: The article has been nominated for deletion at AfD. North America1000 11:05, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Mixpanel[edit]

I deprodded and added some sources to this article. It would benefit from more sources to demonstrate notability. North America1000 09:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Note: The article has been nominated for deletion at AfD. North America1000 02:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Hayden Kays[edit]

I deprodded this article about an artist and added some sources to the article, but the subject may be a bit borderline regarding notability. Perhaps other users can find additional sources. North America1000 08:58, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Note: The article has been nominated for deletion at AfD. North America1000 02:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Invest.com[edit]

After I rewrote the article, concerns were raised that the article still is a violation of WP:PROMO and still doesn't meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Would editors review the article to fix any Wikipedia:Neutral point of view violations and also look for more sources? Cunard (talk) 17:25, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Clickability[edit]

After I rewrote the article, concerns were raised that the article still is a violation of WP:PROMO and still doesn't meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Would editors review the article to fix any Wikipedia:Neutral point of view violations and also look for more sources? Cunard (talk) 17:25, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Result: Article successfully rescued.

Sturgeon River wolf attacks Cigar Lake Mine wolf attack Ben Cochrane wolf attack List of fatal coyote and wolf attacks in Canada[edit]

Hello, these related articles have all been +tagged for deletion. They are the same topic "ie animal attacks" as many many other articles at Wikipedia. Would you please intervene to save these articles from the deletionist members! Thank you IQ125 (talk) 11:25, 7 September 2016 (UTC) They just added another one to the list: List of fatal coyote and wolf attacks in Canada. IQ125 (talk) 21:51, 7 September 2016 (UTC)